Matt Leinart is the media friendly, Heisman Trophy winning, two-time national championship quarterback from the University of Southern California. When you think of Leinart, the first thing that comes to mind is winner. That is what he's done in 37 of his 38 games as a starting QB for the Trojans. The lone loss coming in triple OT to Aaron Rodgers and California in Berkeley during his sophomore season. His track record at the collegiate level speaks for itself. For all the success he has had, none of these things heavily influence what NFL scouts really fell about a prospect. And from what I have heard from one or two guys that are connected in NFL circles, there are questions on how Leinart projects in the National Football League. Leinart really does not have ideal arm strength for a top prospect. If you do not think this is an important trait, let Leinart play in Soldier Field or the Meadowlands with 30+mph winds in winter (which could happen). Leinart also lacks ideal mobility for the position in the 21st century. Look, you do not have to be Michael Vick, but having some escapability, especially in your early years, is a plus. With all this said, I think Leinart could be a very good player in certain systems. I'm just not quite sure he possesses the physical gifts that a team should want out of a Top 5 pick. He's not a no brainer like a Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, Michael Vick, or Carson Palmer, who each had physical gifts or pedigrees that screamed top pick. There are senior prospects like Vanderbilt's Jay Cutler that have better physical tools and there are the possible early entries of Notre Dame's Brady Quinn and Texas' Vince Young, who could muddle the QB picture up considerably come draft day. I am not saying Leinart will be a bust, but I do not know if his physical gifts are worth $50 million of cap space over the next 5-6 years to some struggling NFL franchise.