It would appear now that with Eldrick 'Tiger' Woods having won his 12th major golfing title many within the public domain are repared to anoint him as the greatest player ever to play the game. I've heard these accolades being bandied about by many of the pundits on sports talk radio as well as my own friends. And those friends in particular would never have been interested in the sport , let alone watched it had it not been for the fact that Woods was a minority. Inexplicably the curiosity factor had set in.
The terms that were being used to describe Woods after his latest triumph seemed absurd. 'He's the greatest athlete that this country has ever produced ' said one. ' He's the most dynamic and the most brilliant....' said another. These were meant to be rational comments coming from paid commentators on the radio and yet we had many of the public calling in to concur with the arguments being put forward by this host and his co anchor. Perhaps it's me but I seem to remember a gentleman by the name of Jack Nicklaus who before Woods came along could lay claim to being the greatest golfer the world has ever seen. Nicklaus was no slouch either , as he had the same aggressive style as possessed by Woods and was accustomed to defeating his opponents although at times in a less dramatic fashion. There had also been times where had demoralized his opponents much as in the same fashion to which Tiger now despatches his. What cannot be denied however is that we've witnessed greatness but we're now seeing someone starting on the journey towards achieving that lofty goal of being called the greatest.
The comparative ease with which Tiger has won each of his majors gives the impression that he was never under any great deal of pressure. And that would be true in many of the cases as he's had not to face the sought of stiff competition that his mentor Jack had to face. Down the years and throughout his career Jack had to face the likes of Palmer, Player, Trevino, Miller and Watson. Neither of these foes ever intended to yield to Jack as it was not within their makeup or style of play. They knew if Jack was on the prowl they'd have to raise their level of play . However with Tiger it always seemed that if a challenge was mounted by either the likes Di Marco, Garcia, Ogilvy, Singh, Els , Goosen or Mickelson. They somehow would crumble before inevitably reaching the final hole.
The players of today when compared to their predecessors would seem to lack the mental toughness and aptitude for facing adversity and defeating it. This no doubt is where Tiger has benefitted from Jack as he's clearly modelled his game after Nicklaus adding to it his own power and finesse.
So how are to measure Tiger's greatness as he clearly at this moment in time belongs in the pantheon of golf alongside some of the greats. I don't believe that he can be considered to be the greatest as of yet . But over time and no doubt with the further accolades that he'll achieve , we'll have to take a look at his legacy and acomplishments to make a decision as to where he belongs. It's clear that Tiger sees Jack's 18 majors as the yardstick by which he'll be measured and in surpassing that mark he could then be considered to be the greatest to have set foot on the links.
Tophatal
