About Me:
My name is Teddy Mitrosilis. I am a sophomore in college and a journalism major. I am currently a staff writer for Around The Majors at www.mvn.com/aroundthemajors. Before beginning this blog, I authored an all-baseball blog at www.teddysportblog.blogspot
About Me:
My name is Teddy Mitrosilis. I am a sophomore in college and a journalism major. I am currently a staff writer for Around The Majors at www.mvn.com/aroundthemajors. Before beginning this blog, I authored an all-baseball blog at www.teddysportblog.blogspot
About Me:
My name is Teddy Mitrosilis. I am a sophomore in college and a journalism major. I am currently a staff writer for Around The Majors at www.mvn.com/aroundthemajors. Before beginning this blog, I authored an all-baseball blog at www.teddysportblog.blogspot
Lets just talk for a moment,
sports aside. Lets say that you were caught running a deep-rooted drug cartel
out of your lovely little two bedroom apartment and were promptly evicted from
your place.
What once was a comforting
roof amid a family-friendly neighborhood is now nothing more than a lost
memory, a remnant of your old ways.
With no house and a tattered
record, an aunt, cousin, or good buddy goes out of their way to welcome you
into their home and try to help you get back on your feet. They don't owe you
anything, especially given what you did to get put on the streets, but they
offer you a hand out of love.
They give you a room, a warm
bed to sleep in, food to eat, and don't make you pay rent. You get to save some
money while you find a new place that will extend a lease to a wayward soul
with a criminal record.
How grateful would you be
for that friend or relative? Pretty thankful, right?
During your free stay at
their home, you would probably run some errands, make the trips to the grocery
store, take care of the dishes after dinner, maybe even throw in a load of
laundry or two while you are playing with the dog.
You would do many things to
pull your weight and give thanks for probably the biggest favor you will ever
receive. We agree on that, don't we?
Which brings me to my point
about all the hoopla surrounding Manny Ramirez's Minor League Comedy Tour, one
that began Tuesday evening in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
The biggest story - or
disturbance, depending on your opinion - regarding Ramirez's "rehab" assignment
is the fact that he is even being allowed to play ten games in the minor
leagues prior to the culmination of his 50-game suspension.
Is it right? Is it fair? Why
does he get to play in a Los Angeles Dodger sponsored affiliate before he can
play for the Dodgers? If he is suspended by Major League Baseball, why is he
allowed to play for a team that sends a cut of its revenues to MLB before his
suspension is over? Why should he be given the luxury of getting into game
shape before he sits out his 50 games? On, and on, and on ...
Personally, I really don't
care. The only guys that really matter to me are the men who are currently
wearing the uniform of a Major League club. And, of course, the clean prospects
who are working their way up to the big leagues.
But the other guys? The
users? I'm not really that interested in what they do while they are suspended.
Go rock climb in Rome. Doesn't matter to me.
Is there something fundamentally
askew with the MLB rule that allows Manny to play in these minor league games?
Yes, there absolutely is. It's like putting a six-year-old on a thirty-minute
time out, but letting him play after twenty minutes of solitude because he
didn't kick and scream in the corner.
It's a ridiculous rule. It's
so asinine that I'm not going to work myself up thinking about it.
But what I do have a problem
with, is how Ramirez spent his Tuesday evening with the Albuquerque Isotopes.
Ramirez didn't play a game with the Isotopes or spend an evening with the fans.
No, Manny played four
innings, got his two at-bats in, and then was gone quicker than he came. After
playing his four innings, Ramirez was out the back door, signing a couple
autographs before hopping in a car and bolting from the media before the end of
the game.
I don't care if Manny
Ramirez says one word to the
media while in Albuquerque. Hell, I wouldn't.
But what Manny certainly
ought to be doing, is sticking around for the duration of the ball game, and
then some.
He should have played his
four innings, and then hung out with the other minor leaguers for the last
five. He should have spent those five innings talking with the hitters, giving
them two hours of total access to ask any question a kid would want to ask
about hitting to one of the greatest hitters to ever play the game.
He should have spent the
other five innings coaching. He should have paid attention to the other minor
leaguers' at-bats, and then talked to them about pitch sequence and approach
when they came back in the dug out.
He should have had steaks
and beers delivered to the clubhouse after the game - on his dime - and sat
around with the rest of the guys telling them what life is like in the big
leagues.
For all of Ramirez's faults,
he has a reputation of being a tireless worker. He should have sat around with
the boys, enjoying a rib eye, explaining to them exactly what it takes to not
only get to the big leagues, but also stick there.
He should have talked to
them about all the fun you have in The Show, but also the professionalism and
dedication it takes to taking care of your body and being ready to perform.
You don't think those minor
league players would have been hanging on every story and every line? That
would have been like Bring Your Dad To School Day in the second grade. Those
words would have actually made a difference.
You could argue that Manny
should have gotten to the ballpark early, and stayed late to sign autographs
for all of the fans that want them. That would have been a nice gesture, but
I'm not going to say that he has to
do that. Hey, if he wants to say thanks to the people who pay his salary and
support him, that's up to him.
But it's not up to him to
give his time to his current teammates. He owes that to them. He's walking into
their yard, taking the at-bats and outfield reps from a young kid who could use
them to develop and chase a dream, all while he is suspended for testing
positive.
In my opinion, the biggest
travesty with steroid users is not that they cheated the game.
What doesn't sit well with
me is that there are hundreds of minor league players who are working like hell
to get to the major leagues and would give anything to have a job in the big leagues, but don't get it
because there are cheaters who are keeping their job through artificial
enhancements. That's the biggest disgrace of it all.
Steroid users don't cheat
baseball; they cheat minor leaguers out of an opportunity.
Manny owes time and humility
to these kids who are blindfolded and are trying to find their way to the top.
Manny could have a profound impact on the future of some of these players, and
it is now his duty to contribute to their success by offering his knowledge and
experience.
Shoulda, coulda, woulda ...
What are some of those old
sayings about being thankful, making an impact, and giving back?
Yeah, well lets see it.
There's still time.
Teddy Mitrosilis is a staff writer for Around The Majors. He also writes for Bleacher Report. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.
I thought time only flies
when you are having fun, but apparently that beauty of an adage isn't entirely
true.
As it turns out, time also flies when you don't care. Seriously.
The Los Angeles Times
reports that Manny Ramirez is tentatively scheduled to join the Dodgers' Triple
A affiliate in Albuquerque, New Mexico, next Tuesday for the beginning of a
four-game series. According to the report, Ramirez will then play a three-game
series with Los Angeles' Single A Inland Empire club before being set to rejoin
the Dodgers July 3 in San Diego.
Over the last two years, I
have developed a conveniently dark, comfy place for baseball's steroid users in
my heart, one that is more suited for REM than RBI.
True, I have to confront
sleep apnea in my personal defense cocoon, but at least I don't have to pay any
attention to reports (Mitchell), lists (the infamous 102 remaining names), and
prescriptions (pick one).
So, naturally, I dealt with
this week's New York Times report claiming Sammy Sosa tested positive in 2003
for performance-enhancers - wow, a shocker - the same way I have handled
Manny's absence from Los Angeles.
"Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ... "
And let me tell you
something. If you haven't tried this tactic, you are missing out. It's great!
Sure, it is going to be fun
to see Ramirez back in the lineup and his dreds frolicking through the
leftfield air as he skips and turns and twists and hopscotch's his way to a fly
ball, but only because he is an entertaining baseball player, not because he is
coming back from a suspension.
Heck, I may even make my way
down to San Diego to watch it all happen. You never know.
Manny has been relegated to
this type of minimal importance in my baseball life, and I'm better for it.
Why? Because I actually got to open my eyes to the rest of the Dodgers roster
in his absence, and follow some guys that are truly entertaining to watch,
without being pricked with a dirty needle.
Since Manny got bounced by
Commissioner Selig's drug testing policy in early May, the Dodgers have the
best record in the National League (23-15) and have increased their lead in the
National League West from 6.5 games to 9 games over the second-place San
Francisco Giants.
How has it happen?
Lets just call it a
collective effort.
And for the record, all
stats from here on out are from May
7th to the present, or what I like to refer as Great Lent for the
Dodgers - i.e. their official fast from Lord Manny. Okay, here we go ...
Orlando Hudson still looks
like the best signing the Dodgers made last off-season, gobbling up any ground
ball hit to second base and strolling the dugout like he's continuously
connected to a special Red Bull IV drip. He's hitting .284, and continues to
find himself on base and in the middle of seemingly every late-inning rally.
He has grown on me thicker
than Jonathan Broxton's sideburns, and has become my favorite Dodgers player to
watch.
I thought Dodgers GM Ned
Colletti over-valued Casey Blake at last year's trade deadline, giving up a
potential star in catcher Carlos Santana as part of the package sent to the
Cleveland Indians, but I have it to give it to Colletti for pulling the trigger
at the deadline and for Blake pulling the trigger at the plate.
Blake is hitting .364 with 5
homers and 1.020 OPS, and the Dodgers aren't nearly the same club without him.
If you haven't noticed him,
don't feel bad. The only thing that really stands out about him is his beard.
But that's a good thing. For once, Hollywood is putting substance above style.
James Loney? He's hitting
.285 and playing a solid first base, although his .384 SLG is disappointing.
The Dodgers have expected more power than that from him, but hitting coach Don
Mattingly still believes it is going to come for Loney, so that's good enough for
me.
Matt Kemp is teasing all of
L.A. with his .338 batting average and .391 OBP while roaming centerfield. Kemp
is the Dodgers' version of Adam Jones, but he just hasn't broken out yet with
such flair.
See all the fun we are
having sans Manny? And that's just the hitters.
(I didn't forget Andre
Ethier or Rafael Furcal; it's just that their bats have been tanning in Malibu
during Manny's absence.)
Chad Billingsley and Randy
Wolf have been the stucco of the Dodgers pitching staff that leads the National
League in ERA (3.57). Hiroki Kuroda is working himself back into the mix after
missing more than a month with a left oblique strain.
Clayton Kershaw continues to
take steps forward in his development, while Ramon Troncoso and Ronald
Belisario do the heavy lifting in the bullpen leading up to Broxton in the
ninth inning.
Earlier in the season, I
openly wondered whether the pitching staff could hold up, or would the mirrors
eventually shatter into a million pieces. Still early it is, but the pitching
staff has exceeded my expectations.
And that's the beautiful
thing about finding the necessity to move on from fallen stars and fake heroes.
Your world is opened up to good players who can entertain in their own right,
and the emotional burden is nil.
That doesn't mean not caring
as a fan whether your team wins or loses. It means being able to eat dinner and
sleep comfortably after your team is cold-cocked by the PED. You wake up fresh
the next morning, ready for another ballgame.
My dad mentioned to me the
other night that Manny may come back and just go on a tear because the Dodgers
have taken the pressure off him by winning in his absence. Manny is not coming
back to a house full of smoke and looking to be the extinguisher.
I hope he comes back and goes
on a tear, simply because he has cheated the fans out of 50 games of fun and
his teammates out of 50 games of production.
"But, really," I said to my
dad, "Manny could come back and hit 40 homers, and I wouldn't really care, or
he could come back and stink, and I wouldn't really care. It's the same to me."
And that's only because the
fan in me has moved on to bigger and better things.
I want Manny to come back,
shut up, and hit. I'm not interested in fake press conferences and vague
answers. Answer with the bat.
That way he will fit in with
the rest of his teammates, who have been winners in the wake of his
destruction.
But, either way, I won't be
coherent during the circus that accompanies his arrival. The Dodgers, and the
game, can do without it.
Just wake me up when Manny
starts putting balls in the gaps.
Teddy Mitrosilis is a staff writer for Around The Majors. He also writes for Bleacher Report. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.
The Los Angeles Angels have
spent the first two and half months of the season living life in a washing
machine, carelessly tossed and turned, flipped and churned, before wading
through the suds to find what's left.
How the Angels avoided what
seemed to be an inevitable drowning is beyond me, but they've done it and here
they are as we welcome the afternoon of June.
If there has been a team in
the big leagues that has dealt with more than the Angels in such a short period
of time, please, show me.
More than 60 games into the
season, and the shocking tragedy of Nick Adenhart's passing is still fresh in
many minds, his jersey hanging in the dugout during each game, his patch still
front and center on the uniform, and his photo still gracing the outfield wall
at Angel Stadium.
That nightmare will never
take a redeye to oblivion, but at least there seems to be some closure within
the Angels clubhouse.
There is no nuclear bomb
that could have hit the ball club with greater force than that grave news, but
it seems as if time has naturally downsized the baggage from a crowded U-Haul
to a simple carry-on. That's the view from the outside, anyway.
And now it's back to
baseball, where the bob and weave of any given season has produced a plethora
of difficulties for manager Mike Scioscia, from the starting rotation to the
bullpen to the lineup.
Jim Leyland is doing quite a
job in Detroit considering his circumstances, but nobody has done the job that
Scioscia has. Scioscia should be a lock for A.L. Manager of the Year.
The Angels were a favorite
to run away with the American League West prior to the opening of the season,
assuming they were at full health.
But extended absences from
John Lackey and Ervin Santana, the nonexistence of Kelvim Escobar, and a
bullpen that has quickly fallen from among the best to living with the worst in
baseball, has opened up the division to the free-swinging Texas Rangers and
surprising Seattle Mariners.
If we have learned anything
from the Angels' recent string of playoff runs, it is that they can always rely
on their depth of starting pitching and dynamic bullpen.
But that was the old Angels;
this year's team is reinventing itself every week.
The bullpen was still
supposed to be a major strength with Scot Shields, Jose Arredondo, and newly
signed closer Brian Fuentes.
As we talk today, Scot
Shields is done for the season, taking his 6.62 ERA to the disabled list and
undergoing knee surgery to correct an injury that was initially reported as
patella tendinitis.
Jose Arredondo, the heir
apparent to Fuentes for the closer's job, appeared in 25 games, posted a 5.55
ERA, and is back in the minor leagues learning the importance of fastball
command.
And, of course, Fuentes was
supposed to be solid. And he has been. But solid isn't good enough when you are taking over for cult
hero Frankie Rodriguez, who set the single-season saves record and then took
his high-wire act to Citi Field after signing a three-year deal with the New
York Mets last winter.
Fuentes has 17 saves - and a
4.64 ERA - but he lacks the presence that great closers always have. K-Rod was
billed as an uncertainty during his time with the Angels, but at least a heavy
dose of confidence came with the unknown.
Fuentes isn't any more of a
sure thing than Rodriguez was, and he stands on the mound like he is in the
middle of an arboretum. "Sweet ... a bunch of plants. So, what's for lunch?"
I don't think the Angels
accounted for the swagger and attitude that Frankie not only brought to the
ninth inning, but also brought to the entire bullpen.
As a middle reliever, I
imagine you feel a little more sense of urgency to do your job when you know
you have a closer, the leader of the bullpen, who carries extremely high
standards and brings a certain level of respect and intimidation to the mound.
The attacking attitude is
infectious, and it begins to rub off on even your lefty specialist. You can
picture K-Rod lighting up the clubhouse if the bullpen wasn't getting it done.
He wouldn't stand for that.
Fuentes? He's a good
pitcher, an All-Star caliber reliever, but I don't know. The Angels bullpen
used to be a dominant one, an intimidating foe in the later innings. Currently,
it's just an apathetic bunch.
Pair that with a lineup that
ranks 8th in the American League in runs scored, and has seen Howie
Kendrick - a guy that some scouts were predicting would contend for the batting
title in the spring - hit .231 before being demoted to the minor leagues to
work it out, and I still haven't figure out how or why the Angels are here.
But, I guess we don't need
to know, we just need to recognize their presence in the race, and the fact
that there indeed are some glimmers of hope beaming through what has been a
profuse thunderstorm thus far.
Lackey has a 6.10 ERA, but
he pitched seven strong innings Monday night in San Francisco, striking out 10,
and will only continue to pitch better as he settles into the season after
missing the first month with arm issues. Don't forget, Lackey is in a walk year
- he will be a free agent this winter - and that usually bodes well for
performance.
Jered Weaver (7-2, 2.08 ERA)
and Joe Saunders (7-4, 3.66 ERA) have been outstanding at the front of the
rotation, one that has been overhauled with unknown names and faces, until now.
Ervin Santana is back from
an elbow strain, although he missed his last start on Tuesday evening, and
should be a contributor in the coming months as long as he is healthy, which we
presume he is or else the Angels wouldn't be taking any chances with him.
Escobar made one start,
realized that his arm couldn't take the workload of 100+ pitches, and now is
headed to the bullpen. He hasn't made an appearance, but he has big stuff and
moxie that will be gladly welcomed at the back end of the pen.
And we must not forget Torii
Hunter, who has held the entire lineup together in the absence of Kendrick and
Guerrero, hitting .319 with 16 home runs and is begging for another
run-producer to join him. Juan Rivera is heating up, so maybe he will be that
guy.
But that's the thing about
this club; they are totally different than any model we could have expected.
I mean Sean O'Sullivan, Matt
Palmer, and Shane Loux are three coveted arms in the mix. Who are they? My
point exactly.
Regardless, this collective
group has done a job to be proud of and they are lurking right at the top of
the division, ready to claim once again what has been habitually theirs for the
better part of this decade.
If nothing else, it just
proves that good things do happen to good people who persevere.
Mike Scioscia and his club,
bearing the splintered cross of tragedy, are a testament to that.
Teddy Mitrosilis is a staff writer for Around The Majors. He also writes for Bleacher Report. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.
I understand the bar room
appeal of the All-Time Great debate, the competitive banter between
equally-enthusiastic fans who believe that their guy - who, to them, is THE guy
-- is the best we've ever seen.
I get it. It's fun. It's
intoxicating. It's the sporting world's version of a romantic, late night
heart-to-heart. I swear to you, I am not above these kinds of things.
And so when the Los Angeles
Lakers completed their knock out punch of the Orlando Magic Sunday evening,
winning the franchises' 15th NBA title in five games, we became even
more vulnerable to two of the NBA's best "who's better" debates, one involving
Phil Jackson, the other Kobe Bryant.
Celtics fans will go to
their grave inhaling from Red Auerbach's cigar, proclaiming he of the famous
tobacco fetish is superior to any other NBA coach in history. Auerbach, with
nine titles to his name, now sits one championship behind Jackson, who
celebrated his 10th Sunday by donning a custom made yellow championship hat
with the roman numeral X on the front and his initials on the back.
You could argue that one is
"better" than the other, but that argument is silly. How do you compare eras
that are decades apart? The league has changed, players have changed, and
different factors come into play.
Subjective debates have no
finish line, but that is what everyone continually searches for. Sorry, it's
not there.
Which brings us to Bryant,
who finally has a ring for his pinkie after winning his fourth title in Los
Angeles. With Bryant at four championships, the Bryant vs. Jordan debate has
more fuel than ever before, and that one, friends, will never go away. Ever.
I'm convinced.
Michael Jordan is regarded
as the best basketball player ever to walk the planet, and he has six
championships, five MVP awards, ten All-NBA First Team selections, nine
All-Defensive First Team honors, ten scoring titles, and six NBA Finals MVP
awards to prove it.
Okay, that speaks for
itself.
Many people will say that
Bryant will never be Jordan, even if he wins two more titles, and that's fine
because different people have different memories and perceptions of players and
how they dominated the league during their time. That bias comes with being a
fan.
Kobe Bryant will never be
Michael Jordan, in your eyes. So ... who cares?
And that's my point.
Why do we insist on having
these debates? Why do we have to force a player to be somebody he is or isn't,
regardless of what is true? Why are we mesmerized by the molds of legends who
have been here and done it, to the point that we want to inject their DNA into
one of today's stars?
Most importantly, why can't
we be satisfied with great players simply being their great selves?
I have never really
understood the logic between comparing players, not because I think it is
foolish, but because of my tastes and preferences of being a sports fan. I like
to take it all in and appreciate great players equally. I usually don't take
the time to pit one player against another, but rather allow myself to become
mesmerized in the moment. I find that more enjoyable.
When I think of Jordan, I
don't think of his farewell tour through Washington, where he was barely better
than average on any given night. I don't want to think of His Airness and
remember tired legs and mild explosiveness.
When I think of Jordan, I
still envision that one swift flick of the wrist at the top of the key in Utah.
That will forever be his crowning moment, in my opinion, the perfect splash to
an unprecedented career.
For me, Bryant's career has
been completely different for two major reasons. First, I believe he has had
more help thus far in his career than Jordan ever had. Sure, Pippen is an
all-time great, but is that more helpful to a scorer like Jordan than having
the most dominant big man in the game, like Shaq? I don't think so.
I don't think a wing
complements a scorer quite like a dominant center does. A great wing paired
with a great scorer is like hot chocolate chip cookies washed down with a perspiring
glass of ice water. Definitely good, certainly refreshing.
But a great scorer paired
with a great center is like those same cookies but with a frosty glass of milk.
It just fits a little bit better, if not cradling up to perfection.
Second, Kobe has dealt with
pressures and expectations that I don't think Jordan ever did, at least not to
the same extent. Since the day Kobe stepped foot in Los Angeles, he was billed
as the "Next Michael Jordan," the heaviest of burdens to carry.
Since the day Jordan landed
in Chicago, he was billed to be the next ... what? Anything? I think Jordan was
the first of his kind, a physical guard who didn't play basketball by the
fundamental book (yet could execute anything on the court) and brought a sense
of showmanship to his position, highlight reel plays that were more common from
acrobatic forwards.
Dr. J, Oscar Robertson, and
many greats came before Jordan, but he wasn't forced into a preconceived mold
like Kobe was. Jordan was allowed to make his own mark without living up to the
standard of a legend. In that sense, Jordan was able to freely construct his own
legend.
We want to peg LeBron James
as the next Jordan only because he is an absurdly talented guy and has
accomplished a career's worth before even reaching his mid-20s.
But LeBron is nothing like
Jordan, or Kobe, or anyone else. For better or worse, LeBron can only be
LeBron. We have never seen a player as physical, graceful, and powerful as
LeBron. Bodies that big aren't supposed to move with that much force and speed.
And while we are here,
Dwight Howard isn't the next Bill Russell, either. Calm down, and let him be
Dwight Howard, which could be greater than anything we previously imagined.
Ultimately, we are doing a
player a disservice by putting these labels and comparisons on them. Young
players, as great as they may be, don't deserve to be compared to past legends,
nor should they have to deal with those expectations.
Furthermore, every player
deserves the opportunity to make their own name and leave their own imprint. A
player should be allowed to leave a legacy on his terms, not on his
predecessor's.
And what we do in the
process is cheat ourselves as fans out of potential greatness. Why even put
limits on talents like Kobe, Howard, and LeBron?
Are we afraid that they may
one day become so good and accomplish so much that their careers trump those of
our childhood heroes?
Are we afraid of new faces
rewriting history with disregard to former champions?
I don't know, but what I do
know is that by comparing Player A vs. Player B, we place artificial barriers
on our sports.
In essence, we are saying
that we have already seen the best that will ever grace the court. That may be
true, but do we really want to believe that, and stand by that?
Not me, I want to hang on to
that 0.1% chance that we may one day watch a player who is so unimaginably
amazing that he makes us forget of the past icons that we adore. I want to hang
onto that small mysterious slice of the unknown.
The only way to be sure that
we don't miss anything special is to appreciate every player we have for who he
is, and forget who we may want him to be.
Just don't be the one too
hung over on comparisons to see the light.
Teddy Mitrosilis writes for Bleacher Report. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.
Remember all of the
pre-draft cries about lack of experience, a potentially unstable left knee, the
he's-just-not-quite-ready-for-prime-time label that's carelessly used when
talent evaluators and execs have no better way to prove that a college player
shouldn't make the jump to the professional game?
Well, my gosh, here's $1,000
and an O.J. that says Mark Sanchez couldn't be happier with his decision to go
against the grain, and the advice of his nationally-acclaimed coach, and leave
USC after his junior season to enter the NFL Draft.
We don't need to mention the
university's seemingly abundant moral shortcomings to see how well this move
worked out for Sanchez, but they certainly put the frosting on his green and
white J-E-T-S cake.
Florham Park, New Jersey,
the site of Jets minicamp, is more than a few Hail Mary's from Los Angeles and
the campus of Southern California, and who would have thought Sanchez, who was
a favorite among Hollywood hot shots during his time in L.A., would find heaven
and liberation wrapped all in one when he stepped out of his comfortable place
amidst campus frenzy ?
Sanchez isn't taking any
backseat to the media attention as he prepares to compete with Kellen Clemens
for the Jets starting quarterback job when camp opens in August, as New York
provides its own stratosphere of flash bulbs and microphones.
But when we all thought his
biggest media hurdles were ahead of him, its now clear that they would have
been much worse staying in Los Angeles.
We won't know this for sure,
of course, until Sanchez takes the field in the Meadowlands and begins hurling
spirals in his new regalia. It all depends on the success of the Jets given the
criticism-cauldron nature of Manhattan.
There were never questions
regarding Sanchez's character - that remains impeccable, by all accounts - and
that was a large reason why Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum decided to go
forth with his draft day audible and trade up to the fifth spot in the draft
and select Sanchez.
On Wednesday, Sanchez
drowned any possible notions of prima donnaitis by signing a five-year deal
worth approximately $50 million, $28 million guaranteed, and could potentially
be worth up to $60 million if Sanchez reaches all incentives.
There will be no ridiculous
holdouts or pompous public feuds between player and team. All there to do now
is play football, exactly how Sanchez wants it.
And that's where we will
truly see the answered prayer of Sanchez, who didn't leave USC with the most
distinguished college career, by any means. He had a solid junior season and a
great Rose Bowl performance to hang his chinstrap on.
For USC, though, it's about
everything but playing ball.
One of the most prestigious
American universities now operates in a cesspool of fraud and dishonesty.
One of the most opulent
athletic departments is now the perfect illustration of irrepressible avarice
and moral indifference.
And one of the most
tradition-rich collegiate sports programs now confirms The Next Big Thing on
the gridiron or hardwood is far more important than protecting the virtuous
standards of academia.
Heritage Hall has been
turned into Hinky Hall.
What a grand plan to attract
the attention of mothers and fathers who would have to write approximately
$200,000 in checks if their child is to obtain four years of a USC education.
Would any of these previous
sentences look great in big bold cardinal and gold print on the front of a
campus brochure? Didn't think so. Guess reality isn't always as sparkling as a
BCS National Championship trophy.
These stories of risky
business and cutting corners are present in the underbelly of thousands of
schools in the United States, not just USC. But if you want all the glamour and
fame during the good times, you are going to have to wear the pink tutu that
comes with the embarrassment of the bad times.
This isn't just an athletic
department thing, a coach thing, a player thing, an agent thing. This is a university
thing.
Nobody stops the lies because
the lies lead to millions of dollars and great television contracts.
The lies lead to endless
publicity and promotion.
The lies lead to bloated
bank accounts and softer pillows for administration.
But, please, lets leave it
to Master P, Young Buck, DJ Quik, et al., to preach, "If it don't it make
dollars, it don't make sense."
We often forget that
athletic programs lick the university's table clean, not the other way around.
Sure, in this era of big
business that is major collegiate sports, we would be ignorant to argue that a
university would be the same without its sports teams. Taking away athletic
programs would be taking away irreplaceable streams of revenue while
substantially damaging campus life. That much is undeniably true.
BUT ... lets remember
something in the aftermath of these scandals.
Without basketball and
football, there would still be a University of Southern California (albeit,
admittedly, a severely shrunken and less prosperous version, but a standing
institution nonetheless).
Without USC, there is no
beautiful Galen Center, iconic L.A. Coliseum, Heisman Trophy winning Trojan
running back named Bush, or any of these figures making news for the wrong
reasons.
So, yes, Tim Floyd is at
fault for running a squeaky basketball program before bolting to his
Mississippi cottage due to the idea of having to face allegations regarding the
supposed $1,000 or so that made its way from his fingertips to the palms of
O.J. Mayo's coddlers.
Pete Carroll is at fault for
not being more aware of Reggie Bush's family allegedly accepting free rent and
other gifts from certain conniving prospective agents.
Mayo and Bush are at fault
because, after all, it is their careers and they must learn to take
responsibility for their name.
USC Athletic Director Mike
Garrett is at fault for blindfolding himself and kissing the feet of Carroll
and Floyd in return for high-profile bowl games and March Madness appearances.
And university President
Steven B. Sample is at fault for merely sitting at the top of this mess and
allowing his university to be defamed by the actions of his employees.
Fair or unfair, this is a
tsunami that drenches from the very top of the university all the way down.
This is the most daunting full-court press USC can face, and it is up to the
university as a whole, not just the athletic department, to repair its image.
It won't be easy. This isn't
fourth down territory for USC. This is fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth down
territory for the Trojans because all future athletes will be unfairly marked with the negative connotations
that suddenly accompany being a Trojan.
An 18-year-old will have to prove that he or she didn't except any free money or
benefits, rather than be given the benefit of the doubt and the privacy that an
amateur athlete should be entitled to. How disgusting is that?
And many thought that Mark
Sanchez would be better off returning for his senior season, leading the
Trojans to victory at Ohio State, and winning a National Championship before
heading to the draft with a legitimate case to be the first quarterback chosen
instead of Sam Bradford or Colt McCoy.
Ha!
The bright lights of
Manhattan never seemed so comfortable from afar.
Teddy Mitrosilis writes for Bleacher Report. You can reach him at tm4000@yahoo.com.