Script: /stevehall1979/blog/cat/general
Owner:
Subdir: stevehall1979

    SteveHall1979
    Lifetime Points: 11


    Location:
    About Me: I'm an avid NBA fan with a lot of love for college basketball, college football, and the NFL. When putting together a team, all I think really matters is results on the actual field of play during real games, not in tryouts, practices, simulations, and i
    Marital Status Married
    School University of Texas
    Prospect


    Location:
    About Me: I'm an avid NBA fan with a lot of love for college basketball, college football, and the NFL. When putting together a team, all I think really matters is results on the actual field of play during real games, not in tryouts, practices, simulations, and i
    Marital Status Married
    School University of Texas

    Easiest NBA Draft Picks of All Time

    Saturday, August 1, 2009, 12:05 AM EST [General]

    Certain NBA GMs have proven very deft at using the draft to better their team even in inauspicious draft spots, with later selections like Tim Hardaway, Karl Malone, Gilbert Arenas, and Tony Parker.  These steals are often the difference in making a team advance to the next level or keeping you on top.

    But what about the picks that are so obvious even the dumbest team could make them? And in some cases, should have made them?  Here's a brief selection of those:

    2009 Blake Griffin, #1 to the LA Clippers: Just look at the number 2 pick, Shawn Bradley 2.0, and you know all you need to about this draft.  Hmmm...the double-double machine with awesome athleticism  or #2 or the teen point guard from Spain, etc.? 

    2007 Kevin Durant, #2 to the Seattle Sonics: You may recall the debate over whether Durant or Oden was better (this debate is settled now, no?).  Since the Blazers took Oden, the Sonics made this pick asleep.  While the Sonics/Thunder deserve no credit for this pick, the Blazers certainly deserve scorn for passing up one of the most breathtaking college players of all time who crushed all competition in every single national POY award.  How untouchable would Portland be with Durant?  Scary to think about, so I'm glad I don't have to.

    2006 Brandon Roy, #6 to the Blazers (via trade): The Italian Nowitzki-lite?  The 'Stache?  The Landlord?  These teams should have gone with the leader who could do everything well and deliver in crunch time.  I believe it was me who said in October 2006 about the Bobcats: "They drafted the 'Stache, but when Brandon Roy hoists the Rookie of the Year trophy this year and is knocking down clutch shots in the playoffs in a few years, the Bobcats will conclude they made the wrong choice."  Picks 9 and 10 in that draft are so horrible, the entire personell department should have been immediately gutted.  Not fired, actually gutted.

    2005 Chris Paul, #4 to the Hornets: After the Bucks amused us with the selection of the Australio-Croat, the Hawks picked UNC's sixth man, and Deron Williams went to the Jazz, who else could they have picked?  The next six are an astounding collection of chuckers.

    2003 Lebron James, #1 to the Cavs: We were all witnesses to the Kings awesomeness.  As fantastic as picks 3-5 were, LBJ was the obvious choice.  Not so obvious: why the supremely overrated Joe Dumars picked the Count Chocula soundalike who couldn't even crack the rotation on his second-rate Serbian team.

    1997 Tim Duncan, #1 to the Spurs: 1997's draft looks a lot like this year's.  Duncan was the unanimous player of the year and Boston not getting him set the Celtics back for years.  He looked like an all-timer from beginning, and the next pick was Keith Van Horrible.  Billups has made a nice career for himself (at #3) and McGrady was briefly a superstar-caliber player, but the rest of the lottery picks are a litany of busts and overrated role-players. 

    2.3 (1 Ratings)

    Shouldn't a Basketball Player Be Able to Shoot?

    Thursday, June 18, 2009, 10:38 PM EST [General]

    One thing that drives me nuts is when a basketball player can't shoot, particularly free throws.  In all the draft previews, Jay Bilas and Chad Ford will mention player after player who needs to work on his jump shot.  My question is why haven't they nailed that anyway?  Isn't shooting the ball a huge percentage of the job? 

    Would you go to a dentist who was great with teeth, but not so much with gums?  Would you want a construction company that made superior roofs and foundations, but made horrible walls?

    After playing for 5 years where his time could be exclusively dedicated to basketball, Dwight Howard has no low post moves?  That's his job!  Shaq has become a worse free throw shooter over his career.  Chris Paul can't hire a shooting coach and develop a jumper?  He's a basketball player, dammit.

    Are Kobe Bryant, Michael Jordan, Robert Horry, and Jerry West known for their clutch leaping?  Basketballers everywhere: learn to shoot - it's your job.

    3.2 (1 Ratings)

    Ricky Rubio: Passing Dynamo or Passing Fad?

    Thursday, June 18, 2009, 10:28 PM EST [General]

    A lackluster NBA draft like 2009's is sure to be only magnifies the difference between the well-run teams and the ones doomed to Clipperdom.  Myriad factors play into a draftee's success: background, demeanor, makeup of the drafting team, coaching, and plain ol' luck.  From management's perspective, the utmost care must be taken in assembling your team of millionaires who will 82+ times a year prove your competence or lack thereof.  Thus teams with lottery picks must be especially careful in their selections, not just for the sake of building the team, but for the perception of paying customers of how they're building the team. 

    That's why Ricky Rubio presents such a challenge.  Scouting of European teams has become vastly more sophisticated in the past decade, but the huge differences in style of play and team composition make it difficult to extrapolate how well a foreign player will do in the NBA.  European leagues have a long history of producing excellent NBA swingmen and even a handful of quality bigs.  However, here's the list of All-Star point guards from across the Atlantic: Tony Parker.  Carlos Arroyo and Jose Calderon have been contributors and the jury's still out on Sergio Rodriguez, but the list of busts is lengthy, including such luminaries as Marko Jaric and Sarunas Jasikevicius.  Success in Europe, like success in the American college game, doesn't always translate (e.g. Adam Morrison and JJ Redick were both in these NBA finals, fetching drinks for Kobe and Dwight), especially from point guard production.

    Some might make the argument that Rubio performed well in international competition, even against the mighty Redeem Team.  There are several flaws with this thinking.  First, FIBA is not the NBA, with different game play and even a different court.  Second, a couple of games against Team USA is a pathetic sample size to know how someone fares against the NBA style, and it doesn't say anything about how he would play in an NBA style.  Third, certain players make a big splash in international play and it doesn't carry over into league play.  Sarunas Jasikevicius had a long history of sensational play in international tournaments, particularly torching Team USA (2000 Gold medal game?)  Then he signed with the Pacers and was dealt to the Warriors and couldn't crack the rotation in either place and went back to Europe with his tail between his legs.

    Lastly, when you watch Ricky Rubio highlights, none of them include him hitting a jump shot.  With a low, flat shot and poor lateral movement, he is guaranteed to be torched on both ends by guards with any quickness.

    There is a lot to like about Ricky Rubio - his passing, his court awareness, his leadership potential - but before we anoint him, let's take a long, hard look at his entire skill set and the history of European point guards in the NBA. 

     

    3.7 (1 Ratings)

    Empathy for the Suns Fans

    Friday, January 30, 2009, 10:52 PM EST [General]

    I was watching the latest Spurs-Suns clash on TNT and found myself actually feeling a little sorry for the Suns and especially their fans.  I don't mean to come across as a condescending Spurs supporter (okay, maybe a little) but it's easy to see why it would be so frustrating to be a Suns fan.  They have been the victims of unfortunate injuries, overreative NBA rules, and some bad luck.  But longtime San Antonio followers can certainly recall our own team that tormented us for so long: the Utah Jazz.

    Like the Suns of the last half decade, the pre-Duncan Spurs seemed to be better than they actually were.  Whereas the Suns had the coaching style of D'Antoni to inflate the opinion of the team because of gaudy stats, the gaudy stats of David Robinson and some of his teammates belied the fact that they were a very soft team.  Gritty, tough basketball is what wins in the playoffs, so while the Nash Suns and Robinson Spurs were very talented and fairly well-coached, they couldn't get it done in the end.  Seemingly every year we were exposed as frauds by the Utah Jazz.  Jerry Sloan's mental toughness had permeated that team (with the exception of Karl Malone, which is why they couldn't seal the deal) and executed ruthlessly.  Like today's Spurs, you knew what they were going to do and you couldn't stop it anyway.  I prayed for injuries to befall John Stockton and Jeff Hornacek, who threw dagger after dagger into my heart.  I raged when Karl Malone would get away with superstar calls (he kneed Robinson in the chest and Robinson got called for blocking).  I developed a distate for people I knew at school and church who were from Utah. 

    In retrospect, I realize I hated the Jazz so much for not just beating up my team in a way that sometimes bordered on the shady, but for exposing my heroes and soft and not being clutch.  An honest Suns fan will take a hard look at the last few years and realize that they weren't quite as close to winning it all as it might seem - they didn't have the grit, toughness, and winning mentality to be a champion.  With that said, it doesn't mean you can't appreciate a team for what it is: your team, the team you love, with its warts and all.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Thanks for the Laughs, Isaiah: My Take on Every NBA Team's Offseason Moves

    Monday, October 30, 2006, 05:38 PM EST [General]

         On a human level, I was pleased to see that the NBA draft went fairly sensibly.  On a more depraved level, I felt a longing for comically bad draft picks (Desegana Diop, anybody?) that compelled me to hi-five my invisible friends.  Thank goodness for free agency which more than satiates my desire to clown GMs with more dollars than sense.  I shall also take a few moments to give credit to where credit is due, throw in some random predictions, and express my fondest wishes for all 29 NBA teams (don't act like the Bobcats are an NBA team).

     

    Atlanta

     

         When Billy Knight is your GM, either controversy or hilarity is guaranteed in any personnel move.  Drafting Shelden Williams falls more on the controversial side, but I'm actually going to defend Knight in this selection.  Everybody was screaming for them to draft a point guard, an obvious need, but this neglects two important issues: the Hawks' pathetic interior defense/defensive rebounding and that they needed experience/leadership.  Which sounds better: Scenario A - you draft an intelligent, hardworking leader who blocks shots and is a monster on the glass, compelling you to bring in an experienced point guard via free agency/trade OR Scenario B - you draft a laptop-stealing/out-of-shape point guard, compelling you to look for an interior presence in a grossly-overpriced and thin market of big men?  Knight actually made the right call given his circumstances.  Drafting a swingman would have been beyond idiotic given their current glut of such players.  They drafted a player who will contribute immediately in areas of profound need in addition to being a leader and someone the fans will appreciate.  Memo to Shelden: thanks for making me look bad with your preseason play. 

         Getting rid of Al Harrington is fantastic.  His absence frees up playing time for potential future stars (we know what Al is going to give us) and gives cap flexibility instead of the NBA's second-most-overrated player (a category in which Steve Nash really is #1).  Signing Speedy Claxton, a vital cog in the Spurs' 2003 playoff run, as an experienced point instead of picking an unproven rookie with character issues was the right move on such a young team.  I still can't believe I just said Knight did a good job.  The Hawks are that much closer to snatching that coveted 10th spot in the East.  (I will take that last statement back if Marvin Williams plays in-season like he has in the summer leagues.)

         Actually, sucking is the best possible route for the Hawks in ridiculously deep draft.  With that in mind, we should congratulate them for their off-season.

     

    Boston

     

         You have to congratulate Danny Ainge - his team will win all of the Rucker League tournaments.  But who will play defense in the NBA?  Potential-wise Telfair may be Earvin Johnson, but achievement-wise he's more Ervin Johnson.  Leon Powe might actually be a nice pickup; hopefully he plays well enough to convince the Celtics to not give the overrated Jefferson Eddy Curry money for Eddy Curry play.  Ainge did manage to shave a year off of bloated big man pay in swapping LaFrentz for Ratliff, also acquiring guaranteed shot-blocking and leg injuries in Theo.  Rondo isn't a distributor, but he is an upgrade.  Let's hope for the Celtics that he isn't just the second coming of Flip Murray.

     

    Charlotte

     

         They drafted the 'Stache, but when Brandon Roy hoists the Rookie of the Year trophy this year and is knocking down clutch shots in the playoffs in a few years, the Bobcats will conclude they made the wrong choice.  And I like Morrison.  I might be inclined to crack on them for not doing more in free agency, but there's a principle I learned about the NBA: free agents only help you win championships if you already have a good team.    True franchise players are drafted and never leave via free agency (though they are traded).  The glaring exception to this is when Shaq joined the Lakers.  And for the most part, good free agents don't want to go to bad teams for a reasonable price, especially not in NBA-nobody towns like Charlotte.  With guys like Oden and Durant in the draft next year, the Bobcats are much better off in the long run sucking for now than tying up big money in players who won't help them win big. 

     

    Chicago

     

         John Paxson will get the award, but Isaiah Thomas deserves to win Executive of the Year for the way he guaranteed the Bulls will be strong playoff contenders for the next decade thanks to the supremely idiotic Eddy Curry deal.  Dealing overpaid and underachieving Chandler for cap space (formerly known as P.J.) was good both for Da Bulls and Tyson.  Swapping whining for leadership is always the right call.  Sure, Ben Wallace is overpaid - they gave Tim Duncan money to a guy with half of Duncan's game- but it will probably prove to be a worthy gamble leading them to win a weak East where the only opponent of consequence is Miami. 

    Cleveland

         The Cavs are Exhibit A in how much it means for your team when you replace an idiot GM with a competent one.  After moronic picks like Dajuan Wagner and Desegana Diop in the lottery, this year they selected guys who make sense at the positions they were drafted.  Shannon Brown finally adds a guy alongside James who can create his own shot and score like crazy. Daniel Gibson probably becomes Damon Jones 2.0: good shooting but in this version, with excellent rebounding and some athleticism, minus the Diddy-wannabe wardrobe.

         Let's all welcome Drew Gooden back to Earth with his signing of an appropriate extension.  After whining about not getting Nene money, Gooden and his agent Calvin Andrews are now acting like it was the best contract ever.  Credit Danny Ferry for putting together a contract that gives his team flexibility while rewarding his player and not succumbing to the whims of a delusional above-average power forward.  At least some teams are learning that you only have to offer a little bit more than the other teams in the market can pay for in order to keep your guys.  Allan Houston and Zack Randolph certainly profited by their teams not abiding by this simple principle. 

     

    Dallas

         So they trade Marquis Daniels and draft his younger, cheaper clone; good call.  Letting Keith Van Horn go is the right call being that Austin Croshere is the younger, cheaper Keith Van Horn.  Croshere is a nice pickup for them, adding even more shooting and rebounding to a team not lacking therein.  Not resigning KVH and the trade bring the Mavs a little closer to cap sanity.  Resigning Terry was a must, and they did it right at his market value, which I didn't even know Mark Cuban knew how to do.  Not getting Mike James is a minor setback, but as long as Devin Harris progresses as he should, there's no question we'll see Dallas right back on top.

    Denver

         Have Gilbert Arenas and Manu Ginobili taught us nothing?  Hanging on to your second-round draft picks is a no-risk, high-reward opportunity.  Having lost their first-rounder in the future-killing Kenyon Martin trade, they gave away their second-round pick.  On a team with depth issues, why not take a guy and let him develop in Europe or the NBDL if he doesn't make the squad? 

         Extending Carmelo was obvious, but signing Nene to that huge money?  What incentive does he have to earn that now?  This deal screams bust.  The Warriors think this signing is too expensive.  Why would Denver pay Steve Nash money for Steve Blake production?  This is one of the keys to perpetual mediocrity: All-Star money for back-up players.  

    Detroit

         Note to the Sonics: do like Detroit and take your Senegalese project big men late in the second round instead of flushing away your lottery pick.  Losing Ben Wallace is a big blow, but what they're not spending on him may be their salvation.  Take into consideration that they were slipping even with him on the squad and that now they can play five-on-five on offense now, it's not as big of a blow as what we might first think.  Mohammed will fill in admirably; fans and his team will appreciate his hard work and smart play but lament that he isn't Big Ben.  In Flip Murray, the Pistons finally have somebody who can create his own shot.  He's a little playground in his style, but Flip Saunders will find a way to incorporate that.  And one question: why give away Maurice Evans, a proven solid player with nice potential when your perimeter rotation is still so weak?

    Golden State

         The way Warriors fans know they're team is doomed is that the Earth is rotating.  On a struggling team with shaky post play, the best solution is to draft a center that can't hold his position (if he finds it) and needs lots of work on his post moves.  O'Bryant was a fantastic pick!  Here's all you need to know: Chad Ford loves his upside.  ESPN's "Insider" Chad Ford loves anybody with "great length" and "freakish athleticism."  The only way Chad Ford could love this pick more is if the player was named "O'Bryantovic" and played four minutes a game for a fifth-rate Macedonian team that plays on a milking bucket attached to a barn.  Nobody talks about achievement with O'Bryant; it's always "potential."  When "potential" isn't accompanied by actual winning or at least obscene stats (e.g. high school numbers of McGrady), "potential" is nearly a lock for "bust."  Ask the Pistons about a certain Serb with loads of "potential."

         Trading Derek Fisher for spare parts from Utah is bad basketball-wise, but smart financially.  Fisher is a solid contributor on the court who affects teammates positively, but is wildly overpaid.  But wildly overpaid is Golden State's way: they're committed to more than $150,000,000 over the next three years to their starting five that can't make the playoffs.  Even Mark Cuban thinks they overpay. 

         The only laudable move for the Warriors was the purging of Coach Montgomery followed by the upgrade to Don Nelson.  Nelson's crazy schemes will make them more watchable, but 35 wins is the zenith.  Any hopes beyond that are delusional; Nelson still has a point guard who is a lousy shooter but loves to hoist it anyway, a small forward whose best asset is his ability to get paid (and that's probably his agent's best asset) and a gaggle of big men who fear their own shadow.  These guys are still doomed and will be until they fire the owner.

    Houston

         After Vince Carter's picture by "underachievement" in the dictionary, you have the Houston Rockets.  How can a team with a dominant center and a potential Hall of Fame wing player not be elite or at least good?  We won't be able to tell how well they did this summer for some time until we see how good Rudy Gay becomes in Memphis.  Shane Battier brings five things the Rockets desperately needed: shooting, tough perimeter defense, intelligent play, leadership, and a reasonable contract.  You could make the argument that they should have drafted a point guard (i.e. Marcus Williams) and create a very strong case (hopefully one not including a laptop), but since McGrady does so much of the ball-handling and new point guards are not usually reliable, it may not have been a bad decision.

         Getting rid of Swift was an obvious move.  Any big man who doesn't rebound and can't score in the post other than on dunks is a problem.  Steve Novak will have to work to be Steve Kerr or risk becoming Mike Penberthy.  As for snagging Bonzi Wells, some nights it will seem brilliant, others you'll remember why he's played for half of the league.  You have to wonder if the Rockets' conservative approach to this year's draft night will prevent them from becoming a great team rather than just a good, solid squad.   

    Indiana

         What is the source of desperation for Al Harrington?  Why does his "unparalleled" athleticism translate to blocked shot numbers like Steve Nash's? (Nash: .15, Harrington .18)  Do the Pacers really need an average rebounding, sub-par shooting, foul-prone, no-defense forward?  Why lock themselves into perpetual slightly-above-averageness with a bloated contract on a team when they're looking to get rid of such contracts?  Why take minutes away from a promising Danny Granger?  A move for Harrington is an unofficial declaration that the Pacers are not trying to win a championship.  Jermaine O'Neal deserves better.  While many applaud the acquisition of the trade exception for Peja, it just enables them to bring in the cap-killer from Atlanta.  To the Pacer's credit, they did not bring Harrington in for quite the stupid money he wanted nor did they give Atlanta the $3 mil that they wanted.  Credit Bird and Walsh for that stand.

         As far as their draft-day acquisitions, both seem to be great athletes, but Williams and White don't really seem to be great basketball players.  It doesn't make much sense to bring in raw players who won't produce for some time when you're trying to win now.

     

         Speaking of not trying to win, they dealt their only productive point guard who can play more than 60 games for Old Man Armstrong and garnish.  This was purely a short-sighted move to open up a little bit of money to bring in Harrington.  Basketball-wise, they can't possibly think it prudent to trade a productive point guard, the rarest of creatures, for a professional athlete who has membership with the AARP.  That being said, the Croshere-for-Daniels swap was win-win for both teams.  Croshere was useless to Indiana and Marquis is a major upgrade over the departed Fred Jones.  Now they are guaranteed to have an athletic guard on the court even if Stephen Jackson decides to brawl with an entire stadium.

    L.A. Clippers

         Elgin Baylor is dead and has been replaced by a clone.  After deft moves like acquiring coach Dunleavy, Brand, Magette, and Cassell all at the right price, he made moves this summer that looked like a good team smartly tweaking the roster to win bigger. One of the biggest mysteries of draft night was how would the Clippers do with their choice not in the single digits.  They scored: they drafted solid, talented guys at positions of team need (center and shooting guard) that may or may not be brought in right away.  They resign team leader Sam Cassell to an appropriate contract.  Then the Clippers let Count Chocula and his one-dimensional game go to the Clippers only to bring in multi-faceted and newly reenergized Tim Thomas for less money.  And you still don't think that Elgin Baylor is dead or at least possessed by an alien entity?

    L.A. Lakers

         In case you're under any illusions, the Lakers are a bad team made above-average by the brilliance of Kobe Bryant and Phil Jackson.  In the Jackson-less season, had Kobe broken his leg in training camp, this team would have aspired to be the Bobcats.  This team embodies the idea of lacking depth; other than Bryant and Odom, there isn't a player on last year's roster that would be so much as the 7th man on any Western playoff roster on the other teams.  In that context we analyze the Lakers' off-season moves.

         More than anything they needed a point guard and got one.  Jordan Farmar was the best available and he's got to be better than a dude who chooses to be called "Smush."  Kudos on the Maurice Evans acquisition, an athlete who knows how to play basketball.  Being a cap-strapped team, the Lakers weren't looking to be major players in free agency, so they threw their mid-level at Vladimir "Count Chocula" Radmanovic.  The Count brings excellent long-range shooting where the Lakers ranked 19th last year.  Despite his Euro defense (which is sighted along with the Easter Bunny and unicorns) and guard-like rebounding, he's a basketball asset for the sum they acquired him.  But this signing is a double-edged sword: for all of his basketball merits, his signing prevents the Lakers from being major players in free agency after next season when the hideous contract of Brian Grant is over as well as those of Mihm, McKie, and Walton.  But if you really think he's better than the whole free agent crop of 2007, then this is your signing.

         I do have to apologize for a comment I made in a previous blog indicating that the Lakers' bench would be a middle-of-the-pack WNBA squad.  I apologize to the WNBA, their players, coaches, and fans: your brand of basketball should not be degraded by saying that the Lakers' bench could make it in your league.  I am very sorry.

    Memphis

         If you forgot that Jerry West is a genius, let this off-season be your reminder.  West knows how to gamble: he turned a chain-smoking Serb into a cocky high-schooler who became perennial MVP candidate Kobe Bryant.  So this year he rolls the dice and again trades proven commodity Shane Battier for potential superstar Rudy Gay.  Memo to mediocre teams in a rut: this is the type of move you need to make The Leap.  Grizzlies had poor athleticism, so he drafts Gay and reacquires Stromile Swift who can both fly.  West helps remedy toughness in the frontcourt issues by snatching Alexander Johnson in the second round.  At the one, he lets china doll Bobby Jackson go and kills two birds (scoring and the 1 position) with one stone by grabbing Kyle Lowry.  In addition to having a young team with a bright future, they'll have a ton of money after the season once Eddie Jones' obscene contract comes off the books even with the absurd Brian Cardinal contract.  In just two years, we could be talking about the freaking Grizzlies as perennial championship contenders, assuming that can be done with a point guard who once tried to conceal marijuana at an airport metal detector by wrapping it in foil.

    Miami

         They had no draft picks and even less cap space, so their changes were to scrape up some undrafted guys that I've never heard of.  Being the returning champs is a very nice thing, but to depend on increasingly creaky players like O'Neal, Mourning and Payton while assuming Posey, Walker, and Williams will stay under control/motivated is a fairly substantial gamble with very little upside. 

    Milwaukee

         Most people say that Milwaukee fleeced the Raptors in giving them a beat up Ford for Villanueva.  I disagree.  What team doesn't need a guy who can't shoot above 40%, is pushed around on the defensive end, and is a major injury liability?  Why would you want a big man who played well out of position at small forward, improved on an already solid shot, and has star potential?  Yes, yes, the Bucks really bit it this time.  (Note: sarcasm may be present in the previous paragraph and probably the following.)

         Mad props go to the Bucks for trading a big chunk of potential cap space for three average players with overly-long contracts; ALWAYS trade potential big cap space for perpetual mediocrity.  With no first round picks thanks to the brilliant trade to get Magloire in the first place (sarcasm now ending), the Bucks snatched the kind of guys the second round was made for.  Chad Ford reports that David Noel tested as the best athlete in the Orlando pre-draft camp which I guess is a good thing, but at least he comes from a winning program with great coaching.  Regarding Damir Markota the Euro big man, obtained from San Antonio via trade, may I echo Charles Barkley from draft coverage a few years ago and say the Spurs picked him - I guess he can't be that bad.

    Minnesota

         They got Foye but should have kept Roy.  Given the way Foye tore apart the summer competition, he looks like he'll give the Wolves just the scoring option they need to keep Garnett a top fantasy choice...I mean to win.  Minnesota also reminded us they're not that smart and fell for the classic "I've never done anything before this year, but on this bad team I was a ball hog and scored in bunches" routine perpetrated by Mike James.  Why is Stephen Jackson coming to mind?  Mike James is proof that given enough shots, virtually any NBA player can be a 20 point scorer.  Remember that Dominique Wilkins as an old man was the leading scorer on the Spurs in the David Robinson-less '96-'97 season.  Don't forget that not long ago Jerry Stackhouse was the #2 scorer in the league on a terrible Pistons squad.  But since the Wolves don't care about winning, the point is moot.

    New Jersey

         See, karma is real.  Banishing the evil spirit Kenyon Martin compelled the basketball gods to reward them with Marcus Williams, a lottery talent who through idiocy of his own and that of NBA GMs freefell into the lap of Rod Thorn.  Williams will be an excellent heir apparent to the still-awesome Jason Kidd and an obvious upgrade over the Bosnian dude and the ancient Vaughn.  Here's a free tip to all NBA personnel employees: there are exactly two foreign point guards who are successful in the NBA, namely Steve Nash and Tony Parker.  And when you think about it, Canadians don't really play all that differently from us and Parker's dad is American.  When it comes to point guards, buy American.  Go Euro on your swingmen.

         We've been hearing for three years about Josh Boone is going to blow up, but where are the results?  Ditto for Hassan Adams, but at least the Nets drafted him in round two.  I'm actually a big fan of the Mikki Moore trade. He's a good energy guy in the post and he'll give the fans someone to cheer for while Vince Carter is moping on the sideline being consoled by his mother.

    New York

         Were I to give the Knicks a grade for the off-season moves, I'd give them an H, because not only is it lower than F, it stands for "hilarious."  Clearly the worst move was hiring Isaiah Thomas as coach.  This guarantees that any of their young players will learn absolutely nothing about how to win or play basketball correctly.  They'll play like the Phoenix Suns alright, but after the Suns had all participated in a shot-drinking contest after they intentionally sprained their ankles. 

         Watching the NBA draft was awesome.  You remember that feeling when Michael Jordan was alone on a breakaway something awesome was going to happen?  Same as when the Knicks were on the clock.  Lottery talent Marcus Williams was still squirming in the green room.  All sorts of athletic wingmen around plus a few solid big man prospects were waiting to be picked.  Then they snag Renaldo Balkman, whoever the hell he is.  It was so gratifying.  Just before the pick ESPN was interviewing some of those "knowledgeable" New York fans who were spouting wisdom such as "yo, uh, uh, Isaiah gonna turn things around this year.  We gonna get Marcus Williams and come back, baby!"  After the pick was announced and the boos exploded, I laughed my ass off.  Spike Lee's eyes nearly popped out of his head, followed by his "we are screwed!" laughter and clapping.  I feel incredibly sorry for Balkman.  He might be the first 20th pick in the draft to be scrutinized as much as the 1st.  The one element that makes this pick truly horrific is how the hell do you pass up Williams and then draft another point guard later?

     

         The Knicks follow up this brilliance by drafting their 10th guard Mardy Collins.  Then they lose promising young big man Jackie Butler to the Spurs because they suddenly cheap out when it's a position of need.  Following this they plunked down a wad of cash to Jared Jeffries who brings wonderful things to the table such as abysmal shooting (32% 3PT, 59% FT) and a high foul ratio, both already glaring Knicks issues.  The only thing this team is missing is Darius Miles.  Please pull the trigger on Richardson-for-Miles, Isaiah.  Maybe some of those "knowledgeable" New York fans could lend Dolan and Thomas a hand in running their team.

    Oklahoma City

       You can easily make the argument that the Hornets got better, but how much better remains to be seen.  Personally, I think they've bitten off more than they can chew.  Individually, I like all of their moves to a degree, but it probably would have been smarter to try to change a little bit more gradually.  The first glaring issue is that they dramatically overpaid to get Peja.  His health and numbers have declined over the past few years.  If he can stay healthy, the counterargument from Byron Scott is that playing with Chris Paul and in an open offense will reverse the trend of playing with constantly injured and declining teammates in his latter days in Sacramento and in Indiana.  It's a huge gamble on a guy with a record of disappearing in crunch time and who couldn't stop Montgomery Burns from going to the hole.

         Apparently there is a premium on athletic big men who can't score, explaining the acquisition of three of them (Tyson Chandler, Hilton Armstrong, and Cedric Simmons.)  However, this may prove to be a worthy gamble in the middle for two reasons: all of these guys are young and can learn plus blocked shots and rebounds are what ignite fast breaks, and Byron Scott's teams know what to do in the open court.

    Orlando

         I have no idea how to evaluate Orlando's draft.  I really want to like the Redick pick.  Redick is such an excellent player and his candor and character are impressive, but the question is how his game will translate to the pros.  Will he be Reggie Miller-lite?  Will he become Steve Kerr?  Or bust?  Dick Vitale was hilarious with his honesty during the draft, hitting up J.J. for free tickets after all the "free publicity."  Way to make you and ESPN seem unbiased, Dick.

          Having just looked at the list of salaries for the Magic, I was surprised to note that with the exception of Grant Hill, this is the most cost-effective team in the NBA.  Bogans, Ariza, and Outlaw are all nice contributors being paid what rather minor role players should be paid.  Orlando is going to have a lot of money come the next summer; if Darko does anything and Dwight Howard continues in his path, don't act like your team's free agents aren't going to want to play with them.

     

    Philadelphia

         Allen Iverson's Lonely Hearts Club Band just got a little more miserable.  Drafting Iguodala's prot

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 1 2 Next Last