Script: /ricko/blog/cat/general/page/3
Owner:
Subdir: ricko

    ricko
    Lifetime Points: 35



    Location:
    About Me: Spent half my life in North Dakota. The other half, so far, in the Valley of the Sun. As a kid, I was always playing, watching, reading, or writing about sports. I lost most of the "playing" along the way, but the rest remains the same. I pledge to refrai
    Prospect


    Location:
    About Me: Spent half my life in North Dakota. The other half, so far, in the Valley of the Sun. As a kid, I was always playing, watching, reading, or writing about sports. I lost most of the "playing" along the way, but the rest remains the same. I pledge to refrai

    Frank Irizarry Presents: The All-Star Bloggers Radio Show!

    Monday, June 11, 2007, 11:18 PM EST [General]

    My apologies for not getting this out sooner, but after my appearance on the show, I have been flooded with phone calls, emails, text messages, telegrams, cards and letters, and smoke signals. But then, I always said I wanted to be like Elvis. (Note to self: Be careful what you wish for.) Between a crash course on the Morse code and answering all of the requests for my appearance on future "round table" discussions, not to mention delusions of grandeur that keep invading my dreams and altering my normal sleep hours, I simply haven't had the time or the energy to sit down and pound on the keyboard. But now that my kids are out of school and can help me plow through both of the requests But now that I've hired an agent to help me wade through it all, I have finally found the time. I even remember to turn the ringers off on my home and cell phones, so as not to be disturbed.

     

    First off, let me say that I did catch enough of week two of the http://www.blogtalkradio.com/All_Star_Bloggers_Show to know that Frank handles the show like a pro. Unless he's got me completely fooled, (which isn't all that difficult), it seems like he prepares very well and handles being at the mike like someone who's done it many times.

     

    I was anxious, excited, and admittedly a bit nervous as I called in to take my seat on the show. Going in, I had jotted down a few things I wanted to say right off the bat, i.e. mentioning demon's blogsite, which I would then let him expound on, Southern Cindi's situation and how we are all pulling for her, my appreciation to Fox Sports for giving us a forum in the first place, and how professional I thought Frank had been on the show, among other things. Naturally, I forgot all of those once the "On The Air" light lit up.

     

    But I had been looking forward to inter-acting with Hoffman and demonicume. I have had many discussions with both of them via the blogsite. And while we didn't agree all the time, the discussions were still healthy. I only hoped that, in previous blog discussions, I had imparted as much insight on both of them as they had imparted on me. And frankly, I was afraid I hadn't, which added to my nervousness. Which would explain why, after the show, I thought of many things I wish I had said or things that I wish had come out differently. Perhaps I wasn't alone among my fellow guests in feeling that way.

     

    As the show progressed, I realized a couple things. And I think this is the definition of a paradox, but while I didn't know if I was as well-spoken as either of them, nor was I sure that I had their ability to answer questions on the spur of the moment, I also realized that I could at least somewhat hold my own. Whether I did or not is up to the listeners, but I definitely did loosen up the longer the show went on. Yet there were still those moments when I thought of something to comment on or expound on based on what demon or Hoffman said, and just as quickly forgot it.

     

    I appreciated greatly the callers to the show, as they definitely added something. And while my initial reaction would be to pine for a two hour show, I'm sure Frank has heard that request many times. I'm also sure that Frank has a life beyond this show, and that he's already considered the two hour suggestion. As we all know, it's not just strictly his call. So I think we should be thankful for what we've got. And be thankful to Frank for taking the time and the initiative in opening up the forum, as we should be to demonicume for his efforts on http://realsportsbloggers.com/, which have been arduous, to say the least.

     

    I would love to do the show again, and maybe someday I'll get the opportunity. Now that I'm a pro at it, (cough) perhaps there will come a day in the near future when the Fox Sports Bloggers who are interested in doing the show have all gotten their chance. I would not feel right stepping in again before that happens. But best of all, I learned a lot while doing the show. At least that's what my kids agent tells me.

    Don't forget to tune in this Wednesday at 10:00 P.M. eastern. And speaking of shows, The Dan has a pretty good one, too. His can be heard at http://www.chevradioam.com/ every weekday from 9 A.M to noon eastern.

     

    Thanks for taking the time to read. And thanks to all who listened to the All Star Bloggers Show. Thanks again, Frank. 

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Sunset

    Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 12:09 AM EST [General]

    Well, isn't THIS a kick in the teeth. This blog, that is. The one I didn't think I'd be writing. But unfortunately, I have to. This was the year I was certain that the Phoenix Suns would rise to the top. Claim the NBA title that has avoided them like the plague for so long. And if not for a few untimely and unfortunate circumstances, we aren't having this conversation. Even though the Suns have been one of the league's most successful, and well-run, franchises, the ultimate goal has eluded them. Until this year, I thought. Which is why this one hurts more than ever. I haven't been as pumped up for a game of any sort as I was for game six Friday night.

    Sure, we could play the "what if" game all day long. What if Steve Nash hadn't butted heads with Tony Parker late in the first game. What if Bruce Bowen had been suspended for his knee to Nash's groin in game three. Does Robert Horry plant a hard foul on Nash if Bowen's already out? Probably not. What if the league decides to fine Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw, but not suspend them? Or suspend Tim Duncan and Bruce Bowen as well for venturing onto the court during play early in the same game? Or what if Suns head coach Mike D'Antoni had played his bench more during the season so he could rely on them when needed? Therein lies the biggest what if of them all.

     Phoenix, Arizona has three all-sports radio stations. With virtually every sport imaginable existing in this town, (okay, there aren't a lot of skiing or dogsled races going on), all three have no problem filling their airwaves with pertinent talk by the hosts and callers, year round. But make no mistake, the Suns own this town. Other than the occasional "breakout" season by ASU's Sun Devil football team, and the Diamondbacks World Series run in 2001, the Suns are the king of the Phoenix sports scene. Especially since Frank Kush was unceremoniously dumped as ASU's coach in 1979. Granted, Arizona State has a ton of things going for it right now-baseball, softball, women's basketball, both men's and women's golf, (golf? Did someone say 'golf'? I'm in!) Where was I now? Oh yeah. Back to the Suns.

     The rhetoric over the suspensions following game four has been tossed about to the Nth degree already, so I won't revisit that again, other than to say that for every "a rule is a rule" statement I heard from the league, I can produce multiple examples where a rule is not a rule. But moron that later. (Speaking of morons, anyone heard from David Stern lately? Okay, that was a cheap shot. At least I didn't check him into the scorer's table. Oops, another cheap shot. Horry. Uh, I mean sorry. Uncalled for. Unless you're Horry, of course. Who said that Nash flopped. Sure he did. Which makes about as much sense as thinking it was smart to "foul" the best free-throw shooter on the court with 18 seconds left.)

     This series slipped away from the Suns late in game four. In the fourth quarter, the Suns trailed the big bad Spurs by 11 points, yet somehow found a way to toughen up on D, hit some big shots, and win in San Antonio's building. That should have been the turning point of the series. It was not, unfortunately. Instead, what we heard for the next two days was talk of the impending decision from the league. Lost was the fact that the Suns did something no one expected them to do. Think about it. Late in that game, many thought the series was over, with San Antonio about to go up three games to one. But it wasn't. However, the momentum lost between a great Suns win and the game five tipoff was crucial. Not due to the suspensions, mind you, but due to the simple fact that the Suns played Spurs-type basketball in the Spurs' building at a crucial time, and it was overlooked. The Suns momentum was lost in the non-stop discussions regarding suspensions. The Suns never recovered.

     Which brings us to game five. A game that the Suns should have won. If there's one thing that D'Antoni should have learned in his three-plus seasons running the Suns, it's that depth is a great thing. Two years ago, Joe Johnson broke his face against the Mavericks. Last year, with no Stoudemire, Kurt Thomas, and a hobbling Raja Bell, the Suns lost again in the conference finals. If these events don't point out the value of a good bench, nothing will. Yes coach, you had the horses to win it all this year. Everybody knows that. But apparently your preparation is a little faulty. I'll give you kudos for even getting to the conference finals last year when no one thought you had a snowball's chance in hell. And how you didn't see at that point in time the value of a solid bench is beyond me. I'll take your top eight against anyone else's top eight any day of the week. Problem is, you're allowed twelve. And so are they. Marcus Banks, signed to back up Nash? Seven minutes in the playoffs. Jalen Rose? Nine. Jumaine Jones? Zero. I'm sensing a pattern here. Hopefully you are, too. These three were all off-season acquisitions. And you drafted nobody last year, other than Nate Robinson, who was only done so with the purpose of trading him.

     Personally, I think Marcus Banks could've slowed down Parker a little bit in certain situations. Rose could've provided some experience as game five (and game one, for that matter, with Nash bleeding) wound down. Pat Burke? Now there were some fouls to use on Tim Duncan, who, as we all know, is not a very good free throw shooter. But that would have meant that you would have had to play all of them during the regular season to get something resembling consistency out of them. Something you failed to do, coach.

     To be fair, the last quarter of game four showed me that your team can, in fact, play tough defense when needed. The 20 point rout of the Spurs in game two proved to me that your style can and will succeed in the post-season. Whether it succeeds under you or some subsequent coach remains to be seen. The only knock on you that has not been resolved is your short rotation. If I needed proof when I mentioned it before, I don't think I do anymore. If you had a bench you could count on, whether it's the fact that they haven't played enough or are not capable, either one falls on you. You called the shots. And regardless of which it is, you failed miserably.

     Many names will be bandied about in the off-season scuttlebutt while trades are mentioned, especially since the Suns already have the 24th and 29th picks in the first round, not to mention possibly picking up the Hawks first round pick if it's not a top three-something that will be decided tomorrow, during the lottery drawing. And while the temptation will no doubt be great to move a vital player or two, I think that would be a mistake. Nash and Stoudemire are what I would consider untouchable, as is Shawn Marion. Marion's name will be brought up like it has been the last two years, but dealing him just doesn't work on so many fronts. Add in Leandro Barbosa and Raja Bell, and you have a strong core with which to move forward. Barbosa had a poor series against San Antonio, but it would be ludicrous to move him at this point. Like Stoudemire, he is only 24 with a tremendous upside. But the fact of the matter is that, after factoring in even a couple signed draft picks, the Suns will be 10 to 12 million over the salary cap, if no other moves are made. And since the NBA regulations state that for every dollar over the cap, a dollar-for-dollar luxury tax must be paid to the league. (To improve the quality of officiating, I can only speculate. But, hey, a rule's a rule, right?). Suns owner Robert Sarver has stated that he would not be opposed to paying it if the team is title-worthy. Unfortunately, for the third straight year, a case could be made that we still don't know if they are or not. But the bottom line is that a significant move or two could be made, and such moves should not come as much of a surprise.

     Speaking of Stoudemire, I am aware that he has gotten a lot of flak for leaving the bench area and therefore inviting the decision by the league to suspend him. I understand that. He also played in all 82 games this season after recovering from surgeries on both knees, one a microfracture, and being named All-NBA first team. Like most fans, I don't know a lot about the microfracture procedure, other than it entails drilling holes in the leg bones near the knee and running ligaments through them, while encouraging them to grow and adhere. At any rate, Stoudemire showed a passion for the game this season. He changed his number from 32 to 1, to remind him of his quest to be the best. He got a new contract shortly before last season, and shortly before it was learned that he would need the major surgery. It's hard to say that microfracture surgery could ever be a good thing, but he made it as good as can be expected. While he was in the early recovery stages, and not yet able to do a lot of running and conditioning, he worked on his mid-range jumper and his free throws. And it showed. I don't think anyone could accuse him of playing simply to pick up a paycheck. Yes, he needs to show a little more maturity on the court. But I'll still take him. He's what is referred to as a keeper. Thirty-eight points in the game six loss. Tell me his absence didn't make a difference in game five.

     Looking at the contract situation of various Suns, it appears the following will not be back: Sean Marks. Unrestricted free agent. Played in three games. 'Nuff said. Jumaine Jones. Unrestricted free agent. Played in 18 games. Which matches the number of games he was inactive to close out the season. Probably could have helped more, had he not had an injury in the pre-season and/or been given more of a chance. Jalen Rose. Though many fans wanted to see more of him, (including yours truly), his lack of athleticism and the fact that he is a defensive liability probably sealed his fate.

     On the other hand, it would be easy to say that Kurt Thomas was the Suns' most consistent player in the Spurs series. Granted, he didn't exactly shut down Tim Duncan, but he did allow his teammates to play the other Spurs straight up and stay at home. Until they were instructed by D'Antoni to do otherwise, apparently. And seeing Duncan play several games in a row makes one realize just how great he is in the low post, on both ends of the floor. Even through Thomas' tough defense, Duncan hit on a vast array of shots. (Like I mentioned before kids-using the glass is a wonderful thing). Yet the Suns consistently let the Spurs perimeter shooters beat them.

    Rumor has it, Boris Diaw has been given a Bunsen burner by the team as a lovely off-season parting gift, and has been instructed to sit on it. Hopefully it will be enough to light a fire under his ass.

    Reportedly, Eric Piatkowski has been told that he will be back next season. Good thing, too. His 2.5 point average in 11 regular season games would be hard to replace. He played a grand total of three minutes in the playoffs. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against 37 year old three point shooters having a place on the team, as long as they can forecheck. But I just don't see Piatkowski filling the bill. Unless the coach decides to let him off the bench once in awhile.

     That would leave three roster spots open, provided the Suns make no other moves, which is certainly not a given. Phoenix already has the 24th and 29th picks in the first round of the draft. Based on how the lottery chips fall, they may also have Atlanta's first round pick, thanks to the Joe Johnson/Boris Diaw deal. (Dang, should have gotten the Bunsen burner then). Stay tuned tomorrow for the final word on that. (Much more speculation regarding off-season moves to come, but that's fodder for a later time. In the meantime, can you say "Mike Conley, Jr"?).

     Visiting the "what if" question one final time would bring us to the realization that the Suns very well could have, and perhaps should have, won it all this year. Jerry Colangelo, who put this town on the sports map, saw his tenure with the team come to an end with its loss in game six. The fact that he never realized a championship with the team he helped mold from day one, and later purchased and sold, is a crying shame. And what seemed like such an immediately bright future just a couple seasons ago has now given way to the harsh reality that windows of opportunity seldom stay open very long in this business. Unless you have a Michael Jordan, Larry Bird, or Magic Johnson on your team. And the Suns have gone from the next big thing to just another also-ran. A season which I thought would mirror the 2006 Indianapolis Colts turned into, once again, more like the Buffalo Bills of the early '90s. Except the Bills at least got there. Nash is now 33 years old. Bell is 30. Yes, Stoudemire is still young, as are Barbosa and Diaw. But even Marion just turned 29 a couple weeks ago. Funny how times flies when you're having fun.

     Sunset? Perhaps. And unlike every other one in Arizona, this one may not be pretty.

    Thanks for taking the time to read.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    A Blog In Two Parts. My Take On The Suns And Spurs.

    Friday, May 18, 2007, 12:04 AM EST [General]

    There have been more twists in this series than some teams see in a year. Steve Nash gets his nose split wide open late in game one, and I'm sure everyone immediately thought that he may miss significant time in the next game, which of course he did not. Then came the Bruce Bowen leg flail in game two, after which Amare Stoudemire referred to the Spurs as a "dirty team." Stoudemire later said he was specifically referring to Bowen and Manu Ginobili. (Earlier this season, Ginobili gave Bell a forearm shiver that cost Bell a game due to injury, a play I'm sure all the Suns remember.)  If you haven't heard, Robert Horry committed a flagrant foul on Steve Nash late in game 4. Perhaps out of frustration, perhaps with intent. Following the subsequent suspensions of Horry, Stoudemire, and Diaw, Commissioner David Stern and NBA Punishment-Hander-Outer Stu Jackson were fried by every media outlet in the country. (Isn't it just a little ironic that the player who called the Spurs dirty sits out a game as a result of a dirty play by Horry?) The phrases "a rule is a rule," "immediate vicinity," and "gray area" were thrown around more often than Bowen shows up on youtube. A couple of my favorites were, "It's not a matter of fairness, it's a matter of correctness." Huh? Actually Stu, it turned out to be neither. In fact, it wasn't in the "immediate vicinity" of either. Better luck next time.  And "The rule is the rule . . . We intend to apply it consistently." Strike two. (Look for a breaking ball low and away, Stu Mendoza.)  

     

    A dangerous precedent was set with the Jackson/Stern decision. What is there to stop a team from sending out it's 12th man to bodycheck with the intent of inciting a reaction from the other team, which would result in a suspension of one or more players? For this, I bring in Alex Trebec. "The answer is:  nothing." I'm sure the league will change the rule after the season. But for now, I'll take "Gray Areas for $500, Alex."

    And what does "immediate vicinity" mean, anyway? Stu Jackson-Mendoza, still trying to raise his average above .150, said in a local radio interview that Stoudemire and Diaw were 20 to 25 feet away from their seats. So, had their seats been nearer to the "altercation," would they have been, say, only 10 to 15 feet away? Would that still be in the "immediate vicinity?" Ah, the metric system is a beautiful thing, isn't it Mr. Mendoza? Perhaps we should apply it to your batting average. It may help. Or to your gray area, if you had one. Which we know you don't. You told us over and over. But repeating an ambiguous rule makes neither your decision nor the rule right.

     

    ___________________________________________

    Phoenix. Pronunciation: 'fe-niks   Function: noun

     : a legendary bird which according to one account lived 500 years, burned itself to ashes on a pyre, and rose alive from the ashes to live another period; also : a person or thing likened to the phoenix

    Through five games of one of the better series in recent memory, the San Antonio Spurs lead the Phoenix Suns 3-2.  And the better team almost always wins in a seven game series. Which is why I like the Suns chances of winning two straight.  Through the five games, the Suns have outscored the Spurs 497-486. One could be so bold as to say that, save for a Nash-Gash and an unfortunate suspension, this series may be over. But I'm getting a little ahead of myself.

     

    In the '05 playoffs, Joe Johnson took a vicious fall against the Mavericks. He basically broke his face, yet the Suns still prevailed without him, only to fall the Spurs in five games. (Happy in Atlanta, Joe? At least you're the main guy now, aren't you?) Heading into the following season, Amare Stoudemire was thought to be lost for the season after micro-fracture surgery on one knee and a more common surgery to his other knee. Most NBA scribes labeled the Suns a .500 team at best. Mike D'Antoni though, said that his team would still win 50 games and be a force in the playoffs. After winning 54 and losing 28, and Kurt Thomas and Raja Bell to injury, the Suns made it to the western conference finals. (Granted, the seeding was a bit out of whack, which has since been fixed. But you can only play who they tell you to play.) Stoudemire wound up playing in three mid-season games before it was decided that he would be put on the shelf, as his knees were not recovered enough for the rigors of the NBA. And with his removal from the lineup came more predictions of a lost season. Yet the Suns rose again. And I believe they will in this series.  

     

    There is one glaring reason why the Suns lost game five to the Spurs last night. Mike D'Antoni has answered the usual questions about his coaching ability.

     

    His style can't win a title. Yes, it can. And even the biggest nay-sayers know it, I believe. They may not admit, but they can see it happening.

     

    His team doesn't play any defense. Yes, it does. No, they're not the Detroit Pistons, and never will be. But I doubt even the Pistons could have played the defense the Suns did in the fourth quarter of game four. Or in game five, save for the last two minutes when the Suns ran out of gas.  

     

    Which brings me to the one criticism that D'Antoni has failed to quell:

     

    His bench is too shallow. Yup, it is. No argument there. It would be easy to say that he should have played Pat Burke, Marcus Banks, or, especially, Jalen Rose in game five. And he should've played all three to give his starters more rest, with Stoudemire and Diaw sidelined. But it's hard to play your bench when you don't have confidence in them. And this is where I fault D'Antoni. Yes, he should have played his bench more last night. But I don't know how much it would have helped. The real problem is that he didn't play them on a consistent basis during the season.  And therefore didn't feel comfortable doing it last night.  And that falls squarely on the D'Antoni's shoulders, since he made the personnel decisions in the off-season, as far as anyone can tell, and the playing time decisions during the season.

     

    The worst thing about the game four incident is that the enormity of Suns effort in seizing the game from the Spurs was lost, due to all the Horry/Nash rhetoric and ramifications. The Suns shut down the Spurs defensively in the closing minutes and won a game no one thought they would win. Including Robert Horry, apparently.  To think that the Suns can't do it again in San Antonio in game six is a more than a little presumptuous.  And when it goes to a game seven, I'll take the Suns. And since my nerves will be shot, I can guarantee you I'll be leaving the "immediate vicinity" of my couch. Who knows, I'll probably get so excited that I may wind up 20 feet away. Hopefully I won't have to miss game one of the western conference finals because of it. That would give Shooter an advantage.

     

     

     

     

    Thanks for taking the time to read.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Nash Tries To Bite Horry

    Tuesday, May 15, 2007, 12:39 AM EST [General]

    Hey David Stern, it's not my fault that you still haven't figured out how to schedule your playoff games. It's now 6:45 and the "6:30" Suns/Spurs game still isn't on. If this Nets/Cavs game goes to overtime, I'll be forced to go change my oil, which I've been successful putting off up to this point. Then I'll REALLY be pissed!

     

    Okay, 6:55 now and still no Suns/Spurs. Where's my funnel and that oil filter I bought last month?

     

    7:00 now, the Cavs/Nets game just ended and, after a couple commercials, I see that I missed three and a half minutes of the Suns/Spurs game. Sorry, your "fashionably late" b.s. isn't working for me. You should take a page from the NFL, the most successful sports league around. They start their games on time. Yes, even the playoff games. (Well, except for the concert and concurrent 45 minute halftime show during the Super Bowl. Okay, forget what I said).

     

     

    Coming into this game, some observations I've noticed:

    -Kurt Thomas has indeed played Tim Duncan pretty tough. Duncan has hit a lot of very tough shots, which is what makes him Tim Duncan. (Memo to young players-the backboard can be your friend. Learn to use it). I'd like to see the Suns continue to play Duncan straight up with Thomas instead of doubling him.

     

    -Contrary to popular belief, the Suns defense has played pretty well. The Spurs have shot just 43% through three games.

    -The Suns free throw percentage has been a little off. One of the best FT shooting teams in the regular season(80.8), and in last year's playoffs as well (83.1), they are shooting just 76.8% in this series. That's enough to make a difference.

    -As for all the back-and-forth bickering about the officiating, I look at it this way: I think the officials call a lot of stuff based on a team or player's reputation, whether they intend to or not. The Spurs have the reputation of a tough defensive team, and therefore are going to get more calls in a physical game. The Suns have never had that reputation, and therefore are not going to get a lot of calls when they are physical, simply because it seems out of the ordinary for them. Much like a big man carrying the ball vs. a point guard doing it. Almost all point guards do it at one time or another, and it's almost never called. When a center does it, it looks so out of the ordinary that a red flag goes up and the officials will call it almost every time.
    The fact of the matter, though, is that the team that feels like it's not getting the calls has a much better chance of getting some in the future if they play through it. We could go back and forth about which team whines more, but the fact of the matter is that both teams are doing it too much.

    -I still haven't figured out why D'Antoni hasn't used his bench more, something I've been saying all season. Jalen Rose, for example, has the veteran post-season experience that would no doubt help the Suns. With James Jones having been replaced in the starting line-up by Thomas after game one, Rose would seem to me a natural for grabbing Jones' minutes. I'm not giving up on Jones yet, but this is about the here and now, and Rose should be playing. Don't laugh, but the Suns also have a sharp shooter, Eric Piatkowski, sitting on their bench. Like Brent Barry and Robert Horry for the Spurs, Piatkowski offers little more than a long-range presence, which may be effective at times. Unfortunately, he hasn't been used much at all this season, so who knows how accurate his shot would be. But I would have tried him against Barry or Horry early in the series to get a feel. Okay, enough about that. Let's get on with it.

     

    At 3:08 of the first, (which is one of the first plays I saw in the game-thanks, Mr. Stern, you turd), Ginobili hits an open three. Stay on your man, Suns. Shortly after, Marion goes into the crowd trying to retrieve a loose ball, and has to jump over the cameramen. He landed at the feet of Suns' owner Robert Sarver. The incident reminded me of the Dennis Rodman incident many years ago, when he fell into the cameramen and kicked one of them on the way back to the court. And Rodman was either fined or suspended for it-maybe both, I don't remember. Far be it for me to ever defend Rodman's actions, but I remember getting into it with a lot of my friends at the time, because I felt that cameramen had no business being that close to the field of play. What would happen if a player falls or trips over one of them and tears up a knee or breaks a leg?

    Anyway, Michael Finley, who was drafted by the Suns, hits a long jumper. Hey Suns, stay on your man! With 7:27 to go in the second, Duncan is called for a foul on Nash, which was not a good call. Perhaps it was a makeup call for Duncan shuffling both his pivot feet immediately prior to scoring on the other end. Just a thought.

    With Duncan out at 2:17, Barry hits a three. Again, why are you leaving three point shooters open? Who are you doubling, Oberto? Wake the hell up.

     

    Spurs lead 45-40 at halftime. One thing I've noticed-Nash is playing well for the most part, but he is committing too many turnovers. It's costing the Suns to this point. Great intensity through the first half, though. I wish all NBA games were like this. Though after listening to the last few minutes of the first half on radio, I wonder why the TV broadcast doesn't produce the same crowd volume. Also, it would be easy to say that the score indicates a Spurs scoring pace, but the first three games disproved that theory, so it means little at this point. And as I suspected, the officiating hasn't been an issue so far in the game. As much as we all complain about it, it seldom seems to last more than one game at a time. (Which is no excuse, Stern. It still needs to be fixed. Kind of like your scheduling).

    Stoudemire converts a three point play late in the third. That's crucial. Suns need to get some momentum. And with five seconds left in the quarter, Barbosa dribbles right into traffic and doesn't get a shot off. Come on, Leandro. Use your head. Third quarter ends with an 80-72 Spurs lead, which I believe was the same score after three quarters in game three.

    With 8:57 left in the fourth, there's a TV timeout, which occurs at the first whistle under nine, six, and three minutes of each quarter. Don't ask me why. Just think advertising. And the Suns have the "deer in the headlights" look. Not looking good for the Suns, as they trail by nine. But coming out of the TV timeout, Marion hits a three. This is a key point, no, a HUGE point in the game-perhaps even a watershed moment, as Steve Kerr suggested-for the Suns.

     

    At 6:54 of the fourth, Ginobili goes down like he's been shot. But then he did run into Stoudemire, who had position. I can honestly say I've just seen the first really bad call of the game. Not to worry, though. Our eyes are on the prize.

     

    At 5:10, Finley hits an open jumper. STAY ON YOUR F*****G MAN!! And Nash is still turning it over too much. It's costly. As I hear the stats on three pointers made, I can't help but think that the Suns haven't had as many open looks as the Spurs. Probably because they are not staying at home defensively.

     

    Shawn Marion is having a huge fourth quarter, both defensively and on the boards. (Okay, we all know the Suns don't play any defense. You got me there). And as Sebastian said in "The Little Mermaid", my nerves are shot! But the Suns are not quite dead yet . . .

     

    Marion gets another huge rebound, and the Suns are doubling Duncan just enough on the other end. It's working out nicely. Could it be?

    Holy cow. With 32 seconds left, the Suns have a three point lead. NOW HEAR THIS: STAY AT HOME ON DEFENSE!! Which they did. And even with Nash missing two of four free throws in the last minute, the Suns win. (I'd trade Nash for a high-quality folding chair, since he can't hit his free throws). Suns win in a way that no one saw coming. Well, almost no one. 

     

    Oh, did I mention that Steve Nash went a little overboard with Robert Horry late in the game? Yup, trust me. I saw it. Horry was just minding his own business, running over to defend Nash, and BAM! Nash suddenly tried to bite him in the elbow. Totally uncalled for. Oh sure, Nash flopped into the scorer's table like a Ginobili out of water, but he didn't fool me. No sir. I wasn't born yesterday.

     

    As for the possible repercussions mentioned for Stoudemire and Diaw for coming off the bench, I would offer this: Earlier this season, after a game vs. Toronto, Raja Bell was suspended for one game because, in the league's opinion, he "intended" to knee an opposing player, though no contact was actually made. However, in game three, Bowen actually DID make contact with Nash's groin area, and was not suspended. I guess the league decided that Bowen did not actually "intend" for his knee to come in contact with Nash. Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this picture? And when did raising one's knee in the direction of your opponents groin become a "natural basketball move"?

     

    Okay, I'll move on. If Horry's move tonight results in a suspension for any Suns player, does that mean the age of the enforcer is back? You know, like back in the '70s when a player would get a little overly physical with an opponents star in hopes of getting the star, or other teammates, out of the game, or a subsequent game? I guess we'll see.

    Before I go, let me leave you with this. Lyrikell, SoAmazin, and Mr. Popovich, with your "hard-nosed defense," you're all done. Bbing, jaysisko and all you other Suns nay-sayers; done too. You all have exactly four days to get your shots in. Because after Friday's game six, you'll have to wait 'til next year. Like I've been saying all along, the teams would split the first two in Phoenix and the second two in San Antonio, and the Suns would win in six. Ciao. You see, it's all about mental toughness.

    And thanks for taking the time to read.

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Thomas and Duncan Go Head-To-Head In Suns Win

    Thursday, May 10, 2007, 12:40 AM EST [General]

    After the Phoenix Suns were eliminated by the San Antonio Spurs in five games in the Western Conference finals in '05, it was apparent to the Suns management that a little more inside toughness was needed. Not necessarily a big scoring presence, but a presence nonetheless. During the subsequent off-season, Kurt Thomas was acquired in a trade with the New York Knicks for guard Quentin Richardson. (There were others involved, but these were the main players). And ever since, countless Suns fans have been waiting for Mike D'Antoni to show us Thomas' worth to the team. Oh we knew what it was; we were just waiting to see it firsthand.

     

    (Oh, I almost forgot to mention this. One of the first things I learned in journalism class way back when I was an aspiring sportswriter was that timeliness was one of the most important ingredients of a successful article. Unfortunately, that was never my strong suit. I attempted to download edhardiman's avatar-you know, the one where it looks like he's scrambling around the newsroom trying to make the deadline with his sports article? At least, that's the mental picture I've always had. I thought that would help somehow. But alas, after several tries, I decided that I wouldn't do ed justice, so I abandoned the idea. Thus, you're stuck with this. If you've read all you care to read about game 2 of the Suns/Spurs matchup, with it now being a day old, you may find this a bit redundant. My apologies. By the way, did y'all have a good Easter?)

     

    Before I go any further, my prediction for this series had the Suns winning in six games. I figure they'll split in San Antonio, followed by the Suns winning two straight. The Pistons of the '80s had a hard time getting past the Celtics, but they finally did. The Bulls getting past the Pistons followed the same scenario. And so it goes. So often it occurs that a team has to get to the doorstep and lose before they figure out how to get there and win. That is how I feel about this Suns team. As I mentioned in my post when the Suns were eliminated last year, it's not only the players who gained valuable playoff experience-the coaches did as well.

     

    Okay, back to game 2. The main story that followed game 1, Nash's nose, quickly became a non-story in game 2. He had his full arsenal going early, and set the tone for the game. And yes, Duncan did get 29 in game 2, but he had to work very hard for almost all of them. He got 29 because, well, he's Tim Duncan. Kurt Thomas playing Duncan straight up was an excellent decision. I don't know why it didn't happen sooner, but at the same time, I can understand. Even if I didn't like it. The Suns have been effective with the same starting lineup for a long time. But replacing James Jones with Thomas was the right move at the right time. And forget the talk about Thomas slowing the Suns down. Last I checked, you must play defense and rebound in order to run your offense. I think it's called Basketball 101.

    I loved Kenny Smith's analysis at halftime of the game. In short, he said that the Suns had adjusted and had the momentum going their way. They had done the necessary things to win this game, and he thought they would. And did you hear Magic Johnson? He compared Nash to Nowitzki, saying that the former had stepped up both verbally and physically to lead his team, something the latter has been unable to do. Ouch. Don't get me wrong. I love Dirk's game. If you are looking for a seven footer to play on the perimeter, that is. But you'd better have another one down low to clean up. Or at least that's what Magic said. And I concur. Which I'm sure will make Magic very satisfied.

     

    I must take this opportunity to say that Amare had a leg up on Manu Ginobili. Or should I say a leg down. Oh what the heck, let's just tell it like it is. Ginobili held onto Stoudemire's leg during a pick and roll play. The foul was called on Amare, and I'll give him credit for not making an issue of it. The refs blew it. Move on. Which is what he did.

     

    Kudos to Shawn Marion, who was told to play tough "D" on Tony Parker and not worry about scoring, which he did as well. Marion finished with only five points. In a twenty point victory. I'll take that, and I think the Matrix will, too.

     

    Let's check in with Craig Sager. On second thought, let's not. I know Craig, it's not your fault. I doubt it was your decision to be annoying. You have a job to do. (Probably WAS you decision to wear loud suits, though. I haven't seen you wear purple yet. Are you saving that for game 5?)

     

    I did find it funny how Steve Kerr brought up Duncan's patented look of shock after a foul call. Unlike Doug Collins, Kerr doesn't crap himself when forced to choose between saying the refs blew a call and tying his own shoes. And Collins is probably vomiting just reading this. The pressure is just too much.

     

    The beauty of Kurt Thomas playing Duncan one-on-one, even if Duncan does score 29 hard-earned points, like he did last night, has a domino effect. It allows Stoudemire to play (fill in the blank here with another Spurs low-post scorer, if you can find one), man to man. It also allows Marion to play Parker, which allows Raja Bell to play Michael Finley or Ginobili. Which in turn allows Nash to play Bruce Bowen, who is not going to do a lot of damage with his outside shot, and seldom drives to the basket. Again, kudos to Thomas and Marion for their defensive efforts. Oh what am I saying, we all know the Suns don't play any defense, right?

     

    The decision to have Marion concentrate on defense was especially crucial, I thought. The Suns have ample scoring sources. Marion is usually one of them, but in this series, he may prove to be more effective on the other end. Granted, Parker got 30-plus in game 1, but Marion only played him two of the four quarters. Marion had a purpose in game 2, and he is to be commended. Perhaps he didn't score like he is used to, but he'll be fine come June while being fitted for a ring. And perhaps he didn't care for the fact that he finished fourth in the Defensive Player of the Year balloting, yet failed to make either the first nor second team all-defensive squads. Perhaps that built a little chip on his shoulder. And perhaps he has a max contract with the Suns. And perhaps he is indispensable. And perhaps you can offer me a player that I'd trade you in a heartbeat for him. But don't hold your breath.

     

    Thanks for taking the time to read. Game 3 is Saturday night. We'll see who goes head to head in that one.

    0 (0 Ratings)