Script: /ngsjudges/blog/page/10
Owner:
Subdir: ngsjudges

    Highlight your favorite blogs here

    Saturday, December 24, 2005, 06:02 PM EST [CBK]

    OK, as promised, here's an opportunity for you to highlight some of your favorite fellow bloggers out there.

    Just use the comments section below to call out your favorites, or, as some of you already have, just create a post on your own blog talking about your favorites and then use the comments section below to highlight that post (also not the worst idea to get others to check out what else is on your blog).

    Thanks again.

    -Tom

    0 (0 Ratings)

    More from the NGS judges

    Thursday, December 22, 2005, 11:35 AM EST [CFB]

    Hi again.

    Just wanted to check in with another post to answer some of the more frequent questions that have come up recently.

    Tech issues:

    I've noticed a number of you have had problems with categorizing your posts. Unfortunately, I don't really have the tech expertise to really dial down and get at the root of any perceived problems. But my understanding is that there is a bit of a lag between posting and having it show up in the categories, and given how much participation is going on, that can leave a small window of time for your posts to appear as one of the most recent eight posts on the main blogs navigation page.

    But on that main page if you click on the sport name ("NFL" or "MLB" for example) that will take you to the listing of all the NFL or MLB posts and you're much more likely to find yours in that overall list.

    But if you have individual tech questions, there are more direct means to try and get your problems addressed:

    Email:

    fsblogs_support@intermix.com

    Fox blog:

    http://blogs.foxsports.com/FOXBlog

    How to get noticed:

    A few people have asked how they can stand out from the crowd of thousands that have entered. The first, and easiest way, is to write consistent, standout posts (but you knew that already). Another way that isn't required, but will be looked upon favorably by some of the judges (especially me) is by participating in the "community" of the blogs. What does that mean? It means using the tools available to you by linking up some of your other favorite bloggers in the right-side navigation of your blog; commenting on other writers' posts; and, something that I especially like to see, calling out bloggers that you think are doing a good job.

    Why is this? Well, I personally appreciate a person who can compliment others who are doing a good job without feeling like that makes their own work seem second-rate. It's not only a way to discover great work being done, but also a good way to get good ideas of how you can do things differently and perhaps more effectively. I know in my own job, I constantly check out what our competitors are doing, because there's a lot of great work going on out there on other sites and it's great way to see how other people attack problems similar to the ones you're facing yourself.

    And in a day or so, I'm going to create a new post on this judges blog where people can respond with blogs that they're reading and enjoying themselves as another means to call out all the good work going on out there.

    Now all that said, not doing any of the things mentioned above will not be considered a negative and you can certainly become a finalist based strictly on the strength of your posts. But I guess you could consider doing the things mentioned above as a type of "extra credit."

    What happens next?

    Some people have asked what happens to their blog after the 16 finalists are named. If you are one of the finalists, you will get special mention on the main NGS page and get assignments from me every week as we narrow the field and head toward a winner. But even if you're not a finalist, your blog will continue to live on and you can continue to build it into the home for your voice on FOXSports.com and the internet as a whole.

    One of the most exciting things about this for us is that it's really only the beginning for blogs on the site. Even after the battle ends, we're working on new, exciting ways to incorporate your voices into the site and make the blogging tools even bigger and better.

     

    That's it for now. And I hope everyone is having a grand holiday season as we head into the final week of the opening phase of the competition.

     -Tom

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Introductions ...

    Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 04:26 PM EST [NFL]

    Hi, I'm Tom Seeley and I'm the managing editor of FOXSports.com. I'll be joining Fox Sports Net's Chris Rose and FOXSports.com contributor Peter Schrager as judges of the Next Great Sportswriter.

    Together we'll be selecting the 16 bloggers who will move on to the final round of the contest, when the Next Great Sportswriter will be selected.

    I'll try to spare you a lot of the legalese and small print that is contained on the official rules page (something you should all check out), and instead try to answer some of the more specific questions.

    What will we be looking for?

    Each of the judges will bring a different perspective to their evaluations (in that "Simon, Paula, Randy" kind of way ... but please don't try to figure out which one of us is which), but in general terms we will be looking for contributors that have unique voices, interesting insights and a passion for what they're writing about.

    As managing editor, one of the ways I'll be evaluating the entrants is by asking, "Is this someone that I could see writing for FOXSports.com?" And I'll be the one assigning stories to the finalists and also eventually working with the winner on the stories that he or she will be writing for the site when this is over. 

    What should I write about on my blog?

    You can write about whatever you want that is somehow related to the world of sports. You can write about something very specific, such as a particular team. Or you can jump from topic to topic. You can even do some more of the lifestyle-type stuff that you might recognize from the writing of one of our judges, Peter Schrager, or someone like ESPN.com's Bill Simmons.

    It was designed so that the final rounds take place during the NFL playoffs and run-up to the Super Bowl. So the final rounds will likely have a football aspect to them, but not exclusively, and not writing about football or the NFL will not affect your chances of becoming a finalist.

    How important are grammar and spelling?

    Simply put, they're important. We have copy editors whose job is to correct this in writers' work, but the editors won't be part of this until after a winner is selected and that person becomes a contributor to FOXSports.com. So in the meantime, all spelling and grammar are the responsibility of the writers.

    Does this mean that a typo or a misspelled word on one of your posts will hurt your chances? No. But a writer whose posts are riddled with them will certainly not find favor with the judges.

    When will my blog be judged?

    With thousands of entrants already, we have quite a job ahead of us. But it's one we're looking forward to. Each blog will be viewed at least once by one of the judges during the course of the entry period.

    We look at the blog postings everyday, so the more postings you have on your blog the more likely it is to be viewed multiple times. But we will not be re-evaluating your blog with every new posting. One thing we'll be looking at before we announce the finalists is the overall "body of work" on your blog, but that doesn't mean a blog with 25 so-so postings will curry more favor than one with five good ones. 

     

    I'll leave it at that for now and hope that at least answers some questions you have.

    If you have additional questions, please comment here and we'll try to answer them as best we can. We won't be able to answer everyone's specific questions, but we'll do our best.

    And thanks to everyone for participating. We're very excited about introducing blogs to FOXSports.com and the community that it's creating, and none of that would be possible without the people who are contributing.

    -Tom

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 8 9 10 Next Last