I used to
love Pat Riley. Back when he was the coach of the Showtime Lakers
in the 1980's, I thought Riles pushed all the right buttons. His slicked
back hair and his designer suits were a perfect fit for the L.A. Hollywood
scene. But then he jumped ship to the New York Knicks. And
then for the Miami
Heat. Then retired in 2003.
Today, he resumed the duties of coaching the Miami Heat.
I just Riley would call this what it is: his ego out of control with the greedy
possibility of winning another NBA Title, instead of putting on the show and
doing the dance for the media that he's been "forced" to do something
or takeover for his "friend" Stan Van Gundy.
This shouldn't be about Riley returning to coaching to guide the Heat to the Promised
Land of the NBA Finals, but about his ego and how it drove a good coach like
Stan Van Gundy out of Miami.
Part of me has lost a lot of respect for Stan Van Gundy, though. Today at
the press conference announcing his forced "resignation", Van Gundy
played the part Riley asked him to by leaving because he "made this
decision for one reason and one reason only", that being he misses his
family.
Does anyone believe that? A basketball coach who worked his tail off for
years, spending eight years as Riley's lackey from 1995-2003 and coached for
years at the college level for schools like Vermont, Castleton State, Canisius,
Fordham, UMass-Lowell and Wisconsin, doesn't leave an NBA Dream Job
because he misses his family all the sudden, just twenty games into his third
NBA season, with the best team (on paper) he's ever had
No, no. I smell ego. And rest assured, wherever there's ego,
there's Pat Riley.
Van Gundy had spoken many times about this being his dream job and how grateful
he was to Riley for giving it to him. Well, today, Riley gave it to him,
alright.
Riley said at the press conference: "For six weeks I tried to convince him
to stay on," his eyes welling with tears. Remember something: he
spent time in L.A.--the
tears are fake, he's acting. Did he name anything he did to make Van
Gundy stay on? Offer to pack his bags, while asking him to stay?
Book Van Gundy a flight while telling him it's a shame he has to go, but
there's a one o'clock plane to Houston?
See, Pat Riley's an ego-maniacal force that can't be stopped. And if you
think this little orchestrated "family" leave for Van Gundy is anything
but Riley pushing Stan down the back stairs while no one's looking, then you're
sadly mistaken.
The rumors started last summer that Riles wanted to return to coaching.
Oh, sure, Riley denied it by stating Van Gundy was "currently" the
Heat coach--but deep down he wanted back in. The Heat in the Summer of
2005, with Shaq, Dywayne Wade, Jason Williams, Antoine Walker and Gary Payton
were nothing like the rag-tag team he left behind in 2003.
Pat Riley only sees one thing: opportunity--but only for himself. He
stayed on as Heat President in 2003 to help Van Gundy assemble a competitive
team, with no idea Shaq would become available in a trade in 2004, or that Wade
would become as good as he has.
Riley bailed on the Heat originally because he was getting older and they were
going nowhere. Now it's a glamour job, just like L.A.
and New York
were before. There's the opportunity for a title in it for him.
He's got a great plan, you can guarantee it. See, he's done things like
this before, just never this harsh to such a close "friend".
Riley learned from one of the master's of ego, Adolph Rupp, during his playing
days at Kentucky
as one of the famous "Rupp's Runts". He took over the coaching
reign for the Lakers in 1981, the year in between championship for the
franchise. After guiding the Showtime Lakers to championships in 1982,
1985, 1987 and 1988, he left after the '89-'90 season to return to
broadcasting. Could this have been because the Lakers looked finished
with an aging Magic/Worthy combo and a retired Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?
It wasn't long (one season) before he took over a talent-loaded Knicks roster
in New York,
promising to wield his magic there. He was run out of town in 1995, a year after
losing the NBA Finals to the Rockets. The next season was his first with
the Heat, another team loaded with talent over the years with Alonzo Mourning,
Tim Hardaway and Jamal Mashburn.
The point is to not be "fooled" by Riley's misguided notions and
beliefs of what he sees the truth to be in any given situation. Look at
it for what it really is: An ego-extremist with a passion for himself, finding
the edge he needs to get back in the game.
He has an intense, yet quiet rivalry with Phil Jackson. He can't stand Jackson since the days of
Bulls-Knicks in the early 1990's. Plus, he hates that Jackson took over his spot as Lakers
legendary coach. It eats away at Riley. And maybe this drives him
back to the sidelines, too: the chance to do something that Phil couldn't do
with the Lakers in 2004. Think about it. The Lakers had Shaq,
Payton, Kobe,
Karl and all that talent. All those ego's to mesh, including his own, and
Phil Jackson couldn't win the championship. He quit because of it.
Now Riley looks at the Heat, sees Shaq, Payton, Wade, Williams and Walker and thinks, "it's '04 L.A." He wants to do what Phil
couldn't, to rub his nose in it and laugh. To get another NBA
title. It's not for anyone but Riley. He's Ego-Tripping at the
Gates of SouthBeach.
That's actually o.k. with me. The ego is what it is--all star players and
coaches have it--all of them. To want to outdo Phil Jackson, to
stick it to the Lakers and Knicks, to win a championship and call himself the
man who pulled them all together, that's fine. It's just he went about it
all wrong. As Tom Cruise said in Cocktail to his bar-tending,
womanizing buddy, "Where I come from, you don't do that to friends."
If
you're living in Indianapolis and plan on attending any of the Colts
playoff games, then you should probably bring some ear plugs. What?
What's that you say? You can't hear me? Didn't youhear?
The Colts are pumping sound into the RCA Dome for home games, as are
the Seattle Seahawks, apparently. This is an obvious disadvantage for
visiting teams and is probably the cause of most all the visiting teams
losses.
In the Seahawks case, the cause of the Giants loss at Seattle couldn't possibly have
been Giants kicker Jay Feely missing three field goals last week.
Actually, the noise in Qwest Field last week probably helped Feely
avoid hearing his teammates going crazy because of his inability to hit
at least two very makeable field goals.
Or maybe the Giants just can't win on the road. They're 2-4. Ever think about that?
And artifical crowd noise must be the reason the Colts scored on the first play from scrimmage against the Pittsburgh Steelers last week on "Monday Night Football".
That sound you hear in my voice is sarcasm--and lots of it.
The
real point to "Sound-Gate" is not if the Colts and Seahawks are pumping
artifical crowd noises through the speakers at home games. No, the
point is this: the most enticing story the media can come up with about
the 12-0 Indianapolis Colts as they chase history, and the normally
mediocre Seahawks, is that somehow both teams are winning with fake
crowd noise.
This could be the most preposterous thing I've ever heard this season--and we've had a lot to digest this year.
Should
I have my wife and son put earplugs in while we watch the games at home
on TV? Seriously, I think the NFL should look into the hazards of this
"fake noise" so that the health of my family and I are not at risk
while watching a game...on TV...at home.
Some reports from last week's "Monday Night Football"
game from the media speculated that the Colts had sound equipment in
places were normally there wasn't sound equipment before. Couldn't
this have been, I don't know, ABC production equipment for the game?
If the crowd was
louder than usual, might this have been the Colts' fans being extra
loud for a Monday Night game? It wasn't so long ago the Colts weren't
even on "Monday Night Football " for years at a time. The fans in Indy might just be relishing every moment of a fantastic team and an amazing season.
The same thing could be said for Seattle. The Seahawks have lost something like 10 heartbreaking games since 2000.
They choked bad against the Packers two years ago in the playoffs.
They've given up 17 point leads in the 4th quarter of meaningful
regular season games (in 2003 and 2004). In the 2000 AFC Wild Card
Game, they had a 17-13 lead late in the game against the Dolphins and
Dan Marino beat them with the last great drive of his career. So to
get an edge, the Seahawks have decided to pump in fake crowd noise
through the speakers this year.
Or maybe, just maybe,
Seahawks' fans are enjoying a team that puts teams away, or actually
wins the close thrilling games like the one played against the Giants
last week and therefore screaming at the top of their lungs with joy.
Look,
I've got friends and family who go to Colts games--and they can't talk
for two days after the game because they want to be heard. The Colts
stunk in Indy for just about the first 20 years they were in town--is
it so crazy to think they finally believe, like Red Sox fans in 2004
and White Sox fans in 2005, that this could be their year?
The
prevailing thought is that if these "Sound-Gate" allegations are true,
then the home team has a distinct advantage. Of course, crowd noise
gives the home team a distinct advantage--it's called a home game for a
reason. And the argument that Dome teams like the Colts have an even
bigger one because the sound is magnified from the roof of the dome is
nearly as ridiculous, and here's why: No one seems to complain about
the Colts or the Rams having to play outside in December--it's looked
at as part of the rules for Dome teams, a price to pay for playing home
games in 65 degree temperatures when it's cold outside.
If the
"caged noise" of domes is a problem, then the NFL certainly needs to
think about teams like Miami and San Diego having to travel to
cold-weather places like Chicago, New England and Green Bay.
Maybe
this is just a way for certain teams--and their apologists--to justify
losing games they used to win over teams clearly better than them. In
reality, all those off-sides penalities the Steelers suffered a couple
weeks ago in Indy might have been their own fault--if not the NFL's,
since it should be noted that sometime during the "Monday Night Football" telecast it was announced the Steelers had only played something like one game indoors in three or four years.
For
nearly four years it has been said the Colts 'better get home-field
advantage for the playoffs, 'cause they can't win in Pittsburgh and New
England with the January weather'. Well, now the Colts have it and now
it's unfair to the non-dome teams.
What's next? The Panthers
complaining about playing in Chicago this year because there isn't
strong wind in Carolina? San Diego upset because, while it snows in
Denver, it never does in Southern California?
"Sound-Gate" can live on, the apologists can cry foul over the noise, but I won't be able to hear them. It'll be too loud.