Script: /mooresports/blog/cat/general/page/21
Owner:
Subdir: mooresports
    Starter

    Ego Tripping at the Gates of South Beach

    Monday, December 12, 2005, 11:17 AM EST [General]

    I used to love Pat Riley.  Back when he was the coach of the Showtime Lakers in the 1980's, I thought Riles pushed all the right buttons.  His slicked back hair and his designer suits were a perfect fit for the L.A. Hollywood scene.  But then he jumped ship to the New York Knicks.  And then for the Miami Heat.  Then retired in 2003. 

    Today, he resumed the duties of coaching the Miami Heat. 

    I just Riley would call this what it is: his ego out of control with the greedy possibility of winning another NBA Title, instead of putting on the show and doing the dance for the media that he's been "forced" to do something or takeover for his "friend" Stan Van Gundy

    This shouldn't be about Riley returning to coaching to guide the Heat to the Promised Land of the NBA Finals, but about his ego and how it drove a good coach like Stan Van Gundy out of Miami

    Part of me has lost a lot of respect for Stan Van Gundy, though.  Today at the press conference announcing his forced "resignation", Van Gundy played the part Riley asked him to by leaving because he "made this decision for one reason and one reason only", that being he misses his family. 

    Does anyone believe that?  A basketball coach who worked his tail off for years, spending eight years as Riley's lackey from 1995-2003 and coached for years at the college level for schools like Vermont, Castleton State, Canisius, Fordham, UMass-Lowell and Wisconsin,  doesn't leave an NBA Dream Job because he misses his family all the sudden, just  twenty games into his third NBA season, with the best team (on paper) he's ever had

    No, no.  I smell ego.  And rest assured, wherever there's ego, there's Pat Riley. 

    Van Gundy had spoken many times about this being his dream job and how grateful he was to Riley for giving it to him.  Well, today, Riley gave it to him, alright. 

    Riley said at the press conference: "For six weeks I tried to convince him to stay on," his eyes welling with tears.  Remember something: he spent time in L.A.--the tears are fake, he's acting.  Did he name anything he did to make Van Gundy stay on?  Offer to pack his bags, while asking him to stay?  Book Van Gundy a flight while telling him it's a shame he has to go, but there's a one o'clock plane to Houston?

    See, Pat Riley's an ego-maniacal force that can't be stopped.  And if you think this little orchestrated "family" leave for Van Gundy is anything but Riley pushing Stan down the back stairs while no one's looking, then you're sadly mistaken. 

    The rumors started last summer that Riles wanted to return to coaching.  Oh, sure, Riley denied it by stating Van Gundy was "currently" the Heat coach--but deep down he wanted back in.  The Heat in the Summer of 2005, with Shaq, Dywayne Wade, Jason Williams, Antoine Walker and Gary Payton were nothing like the rag-tag team he left behind in 2003. 

    Pat Riley only sees one thing: opportunity--but only for himself.  He stayed on as Heat President in 2003 to help Van Gundy assemble a competitive team, with no idea Shaq would become available in a trade in 2004, or that Wade would become as good as he has. 

    Riley bailed on the Heat originally because he was getting older and they were going nowhere.  Now it's a glamour job, just like L.A. and New York were before.  There's the opportunity for a title in it for him.  He's got a great plan, you can guarantee it.  See, he's done things like this before, just never this harsh to such a close "friend". 

    Riley learned from one of the master's of ego, Adolph Rupp, during his playing days at Kentucky as one of the famous "Rupp's Runts".  He took over the coaching reign for the Lakers in 1981, the year in between championship for the franchise.  After guiding the Showtime Lakers to championships in 1982, 1985, 1987 and 1988, he left after the '89-'90 season to return to broadcasting.  Could this have been because the Lakers looked finished with an aging Magic/Worthy combo and a retired Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?

    It wasn't long (one season) before he took over a talent-loaded Knicks roster in New York, promising to wield his magic there.  He was run out of town in 1995, a year after losing the NBA Finals to the Rockets.  The next season was his first with the Heat, another team loaded with talent over the years with Alonzo Mourning, Tim Hardaway and Jamal Mashburn.   

    The point is to not be "fooled" by Riley's misguided notions and beliefs of what he sees the truth to be in any given situation.  Look at it for what it really is: An ego-extremist with a passion for himself, finding the edge he needs to get back in the game.

    He has an intense, yet quiet rivalry with Phil Jackson.  He can't stand Jackson since the days of Bulls-Knicks in the early 1990's.  Plus, he hates that Jackson took over his spot as Lakers legendary coach.  It eats away at Riley.  And maybe this drives him back to the sidelines, too: the chance to do something that Phil couldn't do with the Lakers in 2004.  Think about it.  The Lakers had Shaq, Payton, Kobe, Karl and all that talent.  All those ego's to mesh, including his own, and Phil Jackson couldn't win the championship.  He quit because of it. 

    Now Riley looks at the Heat, sees Shaq, Payton, Wade, Williams and Walker and thinks, "it's '04 L.A."  He wants to do what Phil couldn't, to rub his nose in it and laugh.  To get another NBA title.  It's not for anyone but Riley.  He's Ego-Tripping at the Gates of South Beach

    That's actually o.k. with me.  The ego is what it is--all star players and coaches have it--all of them.  To want to outdo Phil Jackson, to stick it to the Lakers and Knicks, to win a championship and call himself the man who pulled them all together, that's fine.  It's just he went about it all wrong.  As Tom Cruise said in Cocktail to his bar-tending, womanizing buddy, "Where I come from, you don't do that to friends."

    0 (0 Ratings)

    NFL Sound Gate: Do You Hear What I Hear?

    Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 08:28 AM EST [General]

    If you're living in Indianapolis and plan on attending any of the Colts playoff games, then you should probably bring some ear plugs.  What? What's that you say?  You can't hear me?  Didn't you hear? The Colts are pumping sound into the RCA Dome for home games, as are the Seattle Seahawks, apparently.  This is an obvious disadvantage for visiting teams and is probably the cause of most all the visiting teams losses. 

    In the Seahawks case, the cause of the Giants loss at Seattle couldn't
    possibly have been Giants kicker Jay Feely missing three field goals last week.  Actually, the noise in Qwest Field last week probably helped Feely avoid hearing his teammates going crazy because of his inability to hit at least two very makeable field goals.

    Or maybe the Giants just can't win on the road.  They're 2-4.  Ever think about that?

    And artifical crowd noise
    must be the reason the Colts scored on the first play from scrimmage against the Pittsburgh Steelers last week on "Monday Night Football".

    That sound you hear in my voice is sarcasm--and lots of it.

    The real point to "Sound-Gate" is not if the Colts and Seahawks are pumping artifical crowd noises through the speakers at home games.  No, the point is this: the most enticing story the media can come up with about the 12-0 Indianapolis Colts as they chase history, and the normally mediocre Seahawks, is that somehow both teams are winning with fake crowd noise.

    This could be the most preposterous thing I've ever heard this season--and we've had a lot to digest this year. 

    Should I have my wife and son put earplugs in while we watch the games at home on TV?  Seriously, I think the NFL should look into the hazards of this "fake noise" so that the health of my family and I are not at risk while watching a game...on TV...at home. 

    Some reports from last week's "
    Monday Night Football" game from the media speculated that the Colts had sound equipment in places were normally there wasn't sound equipment before.  Couldn't this have been, I don't know, ABC production equipment for the game?

    If the crowd
    was louder than usual, might this have been the Colts' fans being extra loud for a Monday Night game?  It wasn't so long ago the Colts weren't even on "Monday Night Football " for years at a time.  The fans in Indy might just be relishing every moment of a fantastic team and an amazing season.

    The same thing could be said for Seattle.  The Seahawks have lost something like 10 heartbreaking games
    since 2000. They choked bad against the Packers two years ago in the playoffs.  They've given up 17 point leads in the 4th quarter of meaningful regular season games (in 2003 and 2004).  In the 2000 AFC Wild Card Game, they had a 17-13 lead late in the game against the Dolphins and Dan Marino beat them with the last great drive of his career.  So to get an edge, the Seahawks have decided to pump in fake crowd noise through the speakers this year.

    Or maybe,
    just maybe, Seahawks' fans are enjoying a team that puts teams away, or actually wins the close thrilling games like the one played against the Giants last week and therefore screaming at the top of their lungs with joy. 

    Look, I've got friends and family who go to Colts games--and they can't talk for two days after the game because they want to be heard.  The Colts stunk in Indy for just about the first 20 years they were in town--is it so crazy to think they finally believe, like Red Sox fans in 2004 and White Sox fans in 2005, that this could be their year?

    The prevailing thought is that if these "Sound-Gate" allegations are true, then the home team has a distinct advantage.  Of course, crowd noise gives the home team a distinct advantage--it's called a home game for a reason.  And the argument that Dome teams like the Colts have an even bigger one because the sound is magnified from the roof of the dome is nearly as ridiculous, and here's why: No one seems to complain about the Colts or the Rams having to play outside in December--it's looked at as part of the rules for Dome teams, a price to pay for playing home games in 65 degree temperatures when it's cold outside.

    If the "caged noise" of domes is a problem, then the NFL certainly needs to think about teams like Miami and San Diego having to travel to cold-weather places like Chicago, New England and Green Bay. 

    Maybe this is just a way for certain teams--and their apologists--to justify losing games they used to win over teams clearly better than them.  In reality, all those off-sides penalities the Steelers suffered a couple weeks ago in Indy might have been their own fault--if not the NFL's, since it should be noted that sometime during the "
    Monday Night Football" telecast it was announced the Steelers had only played something like one game indoors in three or four years.

    For nearly four years it has been said the Colts 'better get home-field advantage for the playoffs, 'cause they can't win in Pittsburgh and New England with the January weather'.  Well, now the Colts have it and now it's unfair to the non-dome teams.

    What's next? The Panthers complaining about playing in Chicago this year because there isn't strong wind in Carolina?  San Diego upset because, while it snows in Denver, it never does in Southern California? 

    "Sound-Gate" can live on, the apologists can cry foul over the noise, but I won't be able to hear them.  It'll be too loud.
    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 19 20 21 Next Last