Script: /imstillmatic/blog/page/3
Owner:
Subdir: imstillmatic

    imstillmatic



    Location:
    About Me: i am an avid steelers, timberwolves, and tarheels fan, as well as KG, Griffey, Tiger, and Hines Ward fanatic. i am a recent college grad who has entered the real world, but who has not completely forgotten my dream of being an owner, superagent, or sport
    Prospect

    nfl week 1 picks

    Thursday, September 7, 2006, 07:30 AM EST [General]

    my picks for week 1 nfl action.  the home team's name is in CAPS, and the level of confidence (LOC) is listed after each pick.  the higher the LOC (out of 10) the more certain i am that the pick is accurate.  there are three "LOC picks of the week," and for week 1, they are: san diego, chicago, and philly.  also, my eliminator pick for week 1 is arizona. 

    Miami (+1

    0 (0 Ratings)

    2006 nfl preview/predictions

    Thursday, July 27, 2006, 01:04 PM EST [NFL]

    its the end of july, and that means nfl teams report to training camps, thus rekindling the dreams of football fans around the country.  unless you reside in or around detroit (where the only sure bet is the over/under on when the firing of matt millen talk will resurface, which, for my money, is before october 15th), you have the hope of your team hoisting the lombardi trophy in miami early in 2007.  as a steelers fan, i am familiar with this feeling, and thoroughly satisfied that each time the steelers have and will be mentioned from last february to the coming one, they are referred to as the "world champion pittsburgh steelers."  for those of you too young to have ever witnessed your team win it or those of you in a city with a team run by an inept gm, let me tell you, it is truly special.  i admit to crying with my father in the middle of a damon's restaurant when hines was announced as mvp, and i am 100% comfortable that it happened.  however, my duty as a blogger is to seperate my emotion from writing, stressing objectivity over subjectivity.  

    that said, i know how much emotion we as nfl fans put into "next season."  so much speculation and predictions based on the draft, off-field incidents, signings, etc. fly around the sports stations and internet, most of which are far from reality a mere two months later.  the point is this: no one knows what's going to happen.  holdouts happen.  injuries happen.  firings happen.  underacheivement and overacheivement happen.  right now, all we know is that we don't know.  but we sure do love to make (hopefully educated) guesses.  so, with no clue of anything, here is a prediction of the 2006 nfl season.

    afc east       

    1) miami dolphins (11-5):  the dolphins have all the pieces necessary for a playoff run.  culpepper and harrington were both big additions, and with chambers and booker, a solid te in mcmichaels, and emerging rb ronnie brown, they should have a potent offense.  their defense showed improvement in the 2nd half of last season, and with taylor and zach thomas anchoring the unit, it should see continued success.  the glaring hole is the secondary, but with the offense improved, pass attempts against the d should be frequent, and the dbs can make plays on the ball in obvious passing downs.  this team has the chance to not only win the division, but make a deep run in the playoffs.

    2) new england patriots (9-7): the pats didn't get worse.  they drafted well, still have the best leader in football at qb, have weapons on offense (te ben watson, rb corey dillon, and recently drafted lawrence maroney and chad jackson) and a solid defense.  however, they lost mcginest and vinatieri to free agency, have a potential wr holdout in deion branch, and a more question marks than in years past.  they should be good and make the playoffs, but they won't win their division.

    3) new york jets (6-10): the jets have no set starter at qb, an aging rb, and behind laverneous coles, no explosive wrs.  however, both first round fraft picks were solid and new coach eric mangini has instilled the mindset and installed the system he picked up from bill belicheck in new england.  this team is in a transition/rebuilding phase, but are beginning to amass the pieces necessary to be successful in the future.

    4) buffalo bills (5-11): the loss of takeo spikes last year hurt the defense, which will be improved this year with his return, as well as the addition of several dbs through the draft.  there is no proven starting qb on the roster.  rb willis mcgahee will be a star in years to come, but without the threat of a passing attack (losman to evans won't frighten too many d coordinators), teams can stack the box and prevent his breakout year. 

    afc north

    1) baltimore ravens (10-6): this team could be the best example of a "paper tiger" in the league.  they have a former mvp at qb (mcnair), a former 2,000 rusher in the backfield (lewis), a complete te (heap), capable and talented wrs (mason and clayton), a super-bowl winning coach (billick), and a defense loaded with talent (reed, lewis, suggs).  this is a critical year for this team and for coach brian billick.  if he fails to lead the team to the playoffs (as was predicted last year as well), he can no longer blame injuries or kyle boller's ineptitude. 

    2) pittsburgh steelers (9-7): the super bowl champs (oooh sounds great) haven't changed all that much since last season.  they replaced each free agent lost (hope with clark/smith, randle el with reid/holmes, von oelhoffen with keisel) and have duce staley and cedric humes to play the role of the bus.  everyone is aware of their talent on both sides of the ball, given their publicity during super bowl week.  however, a dropoff after a season like last year's is a real possibility, especially in this tough division.  they will finish with an-above .500 record, but barely miss the playoffs.

    3) cincinnati bengals (9-7): with carson palmer back to full strength by the start of the season, there is no reason to think the bengals won't be successful again in 2006.  they have explosive wrs in johnson and t.j., a bruising rb in r. johnson, and palmer is obviously a tremendous talent.  however, off the field issues and a suspect defense have contributed to skepticism about their chances this season.  it doesn't matter if you score 35 points a game if teams can score 42 against you.  in this cutthroat division, they will miss the playoffs.

    4) cleveland browns (5-11): in a weaker division, the browns could go 8-8.  they have solid skill players on offense in droughns, edwards, and even winslow and frye.  romeo crennel has also brought in many free agents (including ex-pat mcginest) to bolster his o line and defense.  he is a great motivator and is building a team his way, which will speak volumes in the future.  they will continue to see improvement, but will be relegated to last place in the afc north.

    afc west

    1) denver broncos (11-5): with possibly the best draft-day moves in the nfl, the broncos secured a top-level qb in jay cutler and dealt for former packer javon walker to augment the receiving corps.  even is lelie chooses to leave, the broncos have jake plummer (an mvp candidate into the late weeks of 2005) throwing to walker and smith and handing off to bell and dayne behind one of the best o lines in football.  their defense, led by hard-hitting john lynch and lockdown corner champ bailey, has been solid for many years.  this is another tough division, but the broncos have the personnel and coach to win it again.

    2) kansas city chiefs (10-6): despite their lack of a game-changing wr, like the ravens, the chiefs look great on paper.  trent green is arguably the most underrated qb in football.  tony gonzalez is among the 3 best tes in the game.  larry johnson is being discussed as the best rb in the league.  the defense added hali in the draft and ty law via free agency, along with many free agents before last season.  the d unit has the talent, their problem was a failure to execute.  new coach herm edwards will bring the right attitude and lead this team to the playoffs.

    3) san diego chargers (8-8): the chargers have the best all-around rb and te in football, in lt and antonio gates.  they also have some talented players on defense, including merriman and donnie edwards.  however, their problem areas are serious.  behing aging wr keenan mccardell, they have no solid, proven wideouts.  quentin jammer is a disappointment at db, and antonio cromartie is not an immediate answer for a lackluster pass defense.  although he learned behind drew brees for two seasons, first year starting qb philip rivers will have a steep learning curve in adjusting to the nfl game.  even if he becomes solid during the middle of the season, the chargers will be too far behind in a tough division to make up ground.  expect marty to be fired at the end of the year.

    4) oakland raiders (5-11): the raiders have an exceptionally dynamic wr corps in moss, porter, and curry.  they are all unique and game-changing in their own right.  lamont jordan is a potentially great rb as well.  with the right qb, this team's offense could click very well.  however, aaron brooks is not that qb.  he is a better fit than collins, but you won't see this team overpower anyone offensively.  their defense is porous as well.  the addition of michael huff should help, but with the offensive powers in their division, not enough personnel was brought in to prevent this team from finishing last.

    afc south   

    1) indianapolis colts (12-4): the success of this team hinges on rb joseph addai, and whether he can fill the role of the departed james.  it is a foregone conclusion that addai will be the starter over domanic rhoades, and should see success in the wide open indy offense.  nothing much else has changed.  the wrs are still great, the qb is still the best in football, and the defense is still going to be menacing.  there is no reason to think this team, while not going 16-0, will not be the #1 seed in the afc.

    2) jacksonville jaguars (8-8): the jags are a team that has terrific potential, but also glaring holes.  the loss of jimmy smith will be greater than most anticipate, but will be minimized by the emergence of matt jones and ernest wilford.  leftwich is a gamer, but will never be the quintessential finesse qb.  there is a major question mark in the backfield, as no jacksonville rusher was successful last season.  drafting rb maurice drew and te mercedes lewis will help, but a team challenging the colts can't rely on rookies to make the difference.  the defense, with stroud and henderson anchoring the d line, will be successful against the run and should help in disrputing the passing game as well.  the afc is a tougher conference by far, and this team will experience mediocrity this season and miss the playoffs.

    3) houston texans (6-10): the texans will once again finish with double digit losses, but will be much improved this season.  new coach gary kubiak brings both offensive knowledge and te jeb putzier with him from denver.  along with the new te, david carr has wrs andre johnson and eric moulds as weapons, and a solid rb in domanic davis behind him.  obviously carr and the offense have shown promise to coaches and the gm, being that they did not select either leinart, young, or bush #1 overall.  instead, they took mario williams, a freak of a pass-rusher who should see immediate success.  this team does not have the o or d lines to be a contender, but they are on the rise.

    4) tenessee titans (5-11): don't be surprised to hear the calls for lendale white and vince young early into the 2006 campaign.  these high-profile players should compete for starting jobs, and win them if the team is reeling.  besides david givens, the titans did little to upgrade their offense.  with a new starting qb and problems at rb, the offense will look stymied for parts of the season.  their dbs, like pacman jones, are young and talented, but the defense and its philosophy isn't good enough to stay afloat against the offenses in this division.

    nfc east 

    1) dallas cowboys (12-4): in easily the nfl's toughest division, the cowboys will show they are in a class above the rest.  with the addition of t.o., their offense becomes instantly explosive and opens up options for drew bledsoe.  terry glenn is a soid #2 receiver, jason witten is underrated, and julius jones and marion barber are a formidable duo in the backfield.  drew bledsoe isn't the most mobile of qbs, but he is a good game manager, and will have one of his best seasons statistically.  the defense is filled with talent as well, with demarcus ware and roy williams, in addition to rookie bobby carpenter.  this is the make or break year for parcells and jones, and expect them to see great success.

    2) washington redskins (9-7): the redskins once again won the free agency sweepstakes, acquiring solid talent in many major positions.  the addition of wrs lloyd and randle el makes three receiver sets a possibility on every down, which will open up the field for clinton portis and chris cooley.  expect portis to have his best statistical year of his career.  like bledsoe, brunell isn't very mobile and is injury-prone, but is also accurate and savvy.  if he can stay upright, expect him to have a great year.  despite the loss of arrington, the defense is still solid and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future.  this team will finish in the positives and sneak into the playoffs.

    3) new york giants (8-8): eli manning showed early last year that he has the ability to be an excellent qb.  it looked like he and burress and shockey were poised to be the next set of wr/te/qb tandems.  this all fell apart, and despite a great year from tiki barber, the giants offense fizzled and put up a donut in the first round of the playoffs.  the talent is there on offense, and with the addition of sinorice moss, eli has even more weapons at his disposal.  the defense should be improved as well, with the overhaul of the secondary and the addition of lavar arrington to a unit already anchored by strahan and osi.  this team should be great, but they will finish below .500 and miss the playoffs.

    4) philadelphia eagles (5-11): the eagles have a solid enough front office and coaching staff to rebound from a disastrous 2005, but in this division, the rebuilding phase will be postponed significantly.  their aversion to the running game is well-documented, despite having brian westbrook on the payroll.  they have no clear-cut #1 receiver, although reggie brown is an intriguing talent.  their qb has the talent to continue his excellent career, but many wonder if the emotional rollercoaster over the last year and a half will get to him.  the defense is still a realiable unit with several proven veterans like bdawk and kearse, but will be hard-pressed to keep up with the skill players possessed by the three division foes.

    nfc north   

    1) minnesota vikings (10-6): the vikings almost took the division from the bears late last year, and showed promise for the 2006 campaign.  qb brad johnson showed he is a poised and efficient leader.johnson's statistics are not eye-popping, but he will control the tempo of the game.  the addition of rb chester taylor should not be underestimated either, as he showed considerable skills in his role as a raven.  the wr corps is a good squad as well, highlighted by the speedy troy williamson.  the defense is an improving unit as well.  the vikes have loaded up with young talent with plenty of potential based on their speed and abilities.  a deep run in the playoffs is out of the question, but they should win the division and make the postseason.

    2) chicago bears (9-7): the defensive unit is much-heralded and, based on their 2005 numbers, were considered one of the best defenses in the history of the nfl last season.  led by brian urlacher, this side of the ball has no glaring weaknesses, and should once again hold opponents to low scores.  however, in order for that to matter, the offense has to score points.  there are too many questions for this offense to be reliable.  will rex grossman fulfill his potential?  will benson or jones be the starting rb?  will muhsin muhammad regain the magic he had in carolina?  do the bears even have a te?  although they have a truly excellent d, their offense will hinder their chance at a playoff berth and they will miss the postseason.

    3)  detroit lions (6-10): the lions might have made the biggest blunder of the draft in not taking matt leinart with their first round selection.  the qb battle betwen kitna and mccown will not provide a solid starter for the season.  despite the questions under center, the lions do have a rising star in kevin jones and three standout college wrs in rogers and the williams boys.  with mike martz designing the plays, expect a dynamic offensive unit, yet somewhat hindered by the ineffectiveness of their qbs.  on defense, they have no outstanding talents, but do have speedy lbs and should be a more aggresive unit with new coaching.  their secondary is a concern, and this team is still far from contention in the division. 

    4) green bay packers (4-12):  in what should be his final season, brett favre cannot lead this team devoid of reliable skill players.  the injury-prone rb duo of green and davenport, aging te franks, and wr corps of no-names (besides driver) cannot provide enough weapons for a competent offense.  expect favre to throw many more picks, and pressure from fans to start aaron rodgers.  the defense added speed and youth in charles woodson and a.j. hawk, which should improve a lackluster unit.  the problem with the packers is that they will be unable to score (expect between 10-14 points a game), and would find themselves in the nfc north basement, if not for detroit.

    nfc west

    1) seattle seahawks (11-5):  the super bowl losers hope to not meet the same fate as their predecessors, oakland and philadelphia, falling off the deep end following a 2nd place finish.  despite the loss of og hutchinson, the team is mostly still in tact, and has gained in many areas.  shaun alexander is still a scoring machine.  matt hasselbeck is a solid qb and emerging as one of the league's 5 best.  the addition of koren robinson and a healthy darell jackson are key to the passing attack.  and, despite a subpar super bowl, te jerramy stevens is a solid pass-catcher.  the defense should be improved as well, with rising star lofa tatupu gaining more independence as the 'hawks signed julian peterson.  although the team's secondary is still suspect, all the other pieces remain in place and the team should coast to a division title and playoff berth.

    2) arizona cardinals (7-9): the cardinals are the sexy pick this year, as they were in 2005.  the addition of edgerrin james and deuce lutui gives them an instant running attack, and should take pressure off of kurt warner and the outstanding wr set of fitzgerald and boldin.  rookie te leonard pope should emerge as a solid starter as well.  this potent offense should put up plenty of points and attack with many different weapons.  the cards have focused on defense in the past several drafts, acquiring young players whom coach denny green likes a lot.  the team was ranked in the top 10 in defense last season, and their ability to stop opponents will determine their success this season.

    3) st. louis rams (6-10): the rams are a team entrenched in mediocrity.  qb marc bulger is a solid gamer, and wr torry holt remains one of the most consistent threats in football.  rb steven jackson should have his breakout year, with more opportunities coming with the departed mike martz.  kevin curtis is also an intruiging player who showed flashes of brilliance last season.  the offense is aging, but can still be productive and score when it needs to.  the defense should be better with the addition of d coordinator jim haslett.  although they lost adam archuleta, the philosophy under haslett will be tougher.  even so, they simply do not have the all-around talent to compete this season,

    4) san francisco 49ers (4-12): this could be the make or break year for alex smith.  he was given the chance throughout his first season, and failed to show the ability to complete even simple passes.  the loss of brandon lloyd should be made up for by the acquisition of antonio bryant and the drafting of dynamic te vernon davis.  frank gore should beat out barlow for the starting rb position and have some success this season.  however, with no team scared of the passing attack, the box will be stacked and gore will have a tough time finding room to manuever.  the defense is full of holes and question marks, and lost their best player in julian peterson to division champ seattle.  this team is too young and lacks the talent to be effective this year.  expect another year at the bottom for san fran. 

     nfc south

    1) carolina panthers (11-5): the panthers enter 2006 with one one concern - that of the rb position.  deshaun foster proved to be an asset on offense last season, but many believe he is not capable of turning in a 1400 yard/10 td year.  the panthers recognized this, and drafted deangelo williams to back him up.  the passing attack should be solid as well, with delhomme adding keyshawn johnson to steve smith as a target.  johnson is a possession receiver and should complement the superstar smith nicely.  the panthers' defense is solid as well, with dan morgan anchoring the lbs, while key free agent signings make the d line one of the best in football.  pass rusher julius peppers provides speed off the edge, and should have a great year.  both sides of this team are great, and should win this tough division and go deep in the playoffs.

    2) atlanta falcons (10-6): this is a critical year for michael vick.  he is an extraordinary talent; a dual threat that provides a myriad of problems for defenses.  he has the duo of dunn and duckett behind him, and a great te in crumpler and the emerging roddy white as targets.  before every season, it seems like vick will add a consistently accurate arm to his fleet legs to make an unstoppable force, but each year he does not make the expected step forward.  this could be the make or break year, given the lack of excuses if it doens't work out.  the signing of john abraham bolsters the defensive unit, which is already steady and contains several studs.  they are quick and able to get pressure to the qb, but can get into trouble if their offense fails to give them a sizable lead.  expect the falcons to earn a wildcard berth this year and sneak into the playoffs.

    3) tampa bay buccaneers (9-7): gruden has apparently settled on qb chris sims as his starter, and with cadillac williams, this could be a formidable qb/rb combo for years to come.  the wrs clayton and galloway and te alex smith are all consistent pass-catchers, and should provide simms the options he needs to be successful.  the health of williams and the progression of simms are paramount, and a setback in either could spell disaster for the bucs.  on defense, the same stars (barber, brooks, and kiffin) lead the way for a unit that has ranked in the top 10 in almost every category year after year.  the only concern on defense will be age catching up with the starters.  if they can play beyond their age, they should be great once again. 

    4) new orleans saints (6-10): much is made about the drafting of reggie bush.  he will be an excellent running back and kick returner in the nfl, but not on this team and in this year.  he will split carries with deuce mcallister and run behind a shoddy o line, decreasing his breakaway chances and negating his elusiveness.  qb drew brees is an accurate thrower, and if he has fully recovered from shoulder surgery, should be successful with wrs joe horn and donte stallworth.  the offense has a good group of skill players (even considering the recoveries of mcallister, horn, and brees), but the o line will limit its ability to let plays develop.  the defensive line has the ability to rush the quarterback, but the loss of dwight smith will hurt their pass coverage.  with three threatening offenses in their division, expect the new orleans defense to struggle and fail to hold opponents.  in this division, the saints are relegated to the bottom for this season and the foreseeable future.  

     

    playoff picture

    afc:

    seeds: 1) colts  2) broncos  3) dolphins  4) ravens  5) patriots  6) chiefs

    wild card weekend: dolphins over chiefs, patriots over ravens

    divisional playoffs: dolphins over broncos, colts over patriots

    championship game: colts over dolphins 

    nfc:

    seeds: 1) cowboys  2) panthers  3) seahawks  4) vikings  5) falcons  6) redskins

    wild card weekend: seahawks over redskins, falcons over vikings

    divisional playoffs: panthers over seahawks, cowboys over falcons

    championship game: panthers over cowboys

    super bowl xli: panthers over colts     super bowl mvp: jake delhomme

     

    awards

    offensive rookie of the year: joseph addai, rb, colts (honary mention: deangelo williams, rb, panthers; chad jackson, wr, patriots; mercedes lewis, te, jaguars)

    defensive rookie of the year: bobby carpenter, lb, cowboys (honorary mention: a.j. hawk, lb, packers; broderick bunkley, de, eagles; tamba hali, de, chiefs)

    coach of the year: nick saban, dolphins (honorary mention: bill parcells, cowboys; tony dungy, colts; john fox, panthers)

    defensive player of the year: lofa tatupu, lb, seahawks (honorary mention: dan morgan, lb, panthers; ty law, cb, chiefs; troy polamalu, s, steelers)

    league mvp: terell owens, wr, cowboys (honorary mention: steve smith, wr, panthers; peyton manning, qb, colts; clinton portis, rb, redskins)

     

    10 breakout players (players who will exceed expectations for 2006)

    andre johnson (wr, texans)

    chris chambers (wr, dolphins)

    chester taylor (rb, vikings)

    derrick mason (wr, ravens)

    jason witten (te, cowboys)

    duce staley (rb, steelers)

    reggie brown (wr, eagles)

    jake delhomme (qb, carolina)

    nate burleson (wr, sea)

    tom brady (qb, patriots)

     

    i would love to hear any feedback on my predictions.  keep in mind that this is a preview being written even before the start of most nfl training camps, and well before any scrimmages or preseason games.  as i said in my introduction, this is all subject to (much) change with one injury, disgruntled star, or any other shakeup.  there is no way to tell what will happen or what factors will affect the teams this season, but all fans seem to know exactly what will happen anyway.  that's what makes this so darn fun.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Top 10 NBAers On Your Side in a Fight

    Friday, July 21, 2006, 09:57 AM EST [lists, nba, nba players, fight]

    as my entry from earlier this week outlined, my friends and i debate quite a bit.  one method through which we choose to debate is list-making.  several online articles on sites such as espn.com, foxsports.com, etc. use this as a basis for discussion, as do many shows on sports channels, such as "top five reasons you can't blame ____" and the recent series of espn shows outlining the top 20 players, teams, events, etc. in a particular category.  my plan is to occassionally share the lists we debate through this blog with the hope that they will be interesting enough to read and possibly even comment upon.  they tend to focus mainly on the present (being that i am 23, and could not make a solid case for or against wilt beating kareem or dr. j in one-on-one or whether bob gibson or sandy koufax would take the mound for my team in a game 7) and will also sometimes focus on strange material. 

    for instance, today's topic is "top 10 nba players you would want on your side in a fight."  i don't know why, but this has come up several times over the past few weeks, so i figured i would compile my list, give my reasoning, and hope for feedback.  the rules are fairly simple: you are walking in a dark alleyway (somehow the arena of choice for any fracas).  you have one of these players with you to fight off any attacker(s) of any size, number, and demeanor.  there are no weapons, and you and your partner must at least knock out the opponent(s) to survive.  i have broken down each player through three categories: level of jackedness (how big and cut they are), level of craziness (volatility of mood, behavior, and appearance), and meaness/toughness (fighting prowess and basically how scared i am of them).  anyway, here's the list....

    10) Craig Smith - Forward, Minnesota Timberwolves (6-7, 250) 

    jacked level: 8     craziness level: 6     meaness/toughness level: 8

    i am fully aware that craig smith is only a rookie and has yet to play an nba game.  however, being a tarheel fan, i have seen him in several regular season acc games over the past few years, and he is an absolute tank.  he is only 6'7", but he routinely backs down power forwards and centers 5 inches taller and 30 lbs. heavier.  he is one of those players who always wears a mouthguard (akin to number 4 on this list) and for good reason.  he's an absolute bruiser and has a pension for mixing it up as well.

    9) Chris Kaman - Forward, Los Angeles Clippers (7-0, 265)

    jacked level: 4     craziness level: 9     meaness/toughness level: 6

    chris kaman is a big fella, but is by no means muscular.  he hasn't gotten into it with the nba's best big men and generally is not an imposing presence on the court.  he is on this list purely for the fact that he combines the looks of dahmer, kaczynski, and rader into one.  its like he asks for the "don't ever let your kids near me again" treatment at the salon/spa.  tell me you would be completely confident meeting this dude (dressed in an al borland shirt and ripped jeans) in a dark alley.  nope.

    8) Danny Fortson - Forward, Seattle(for now) Supersonics (6-8, 260)

    jacked level: 6     craziness level: 7     meaness/toughness: 7

    players from the bob huggins era at cincinnati are seemingly bred to be high-energy and high-contact.  what they may lack in discipline or fundamental skill, they more than make up for with a fighter's mentality.  fortson (along with number 4 on this list) embodies that character, and has become one of the nba's most physical rebounders.  although he isn't as cut as some others on the list, his unique "tracy morgan meets the predator" look represents a force to be reckoned with.

    7) Dwight Howard - Forward/Center, Orlando Magic (6-11, 240)

    jacked level: 8     craziness level: 5     meaness/toughness level: 7

    howard is still fighting the image that he is too thin and lanky to be considered a top nba player.  when he was drafted out of high school, the magic told him that he would need to gain muscle quickly in order to obtain and secure the spot as their #1 center for the future.  he has done that and more, adding almost 20 lbs. of solid muscle in the last two years.  he finished in the top 5 in both rebounding and blocks this past season, showing his tenacity and toughness in the lane.  he is quick and strong, and would be an asset in any scuffle.

    6) Rasheed Wallace - Forward, Detroit Pistons (6-11, 230)

    jacked level: 6     craziness level: 8     meaness/toughness: 7

    big mouth with missing teeth? check.  unkept beard? check.  ambiguously "deep" tattoos? check.  propensity for yelling, fighting, and general debauchery? check.  lead the league in technical fouls for multiple years? check.  rasheed lacks the work ethic, frame, and quickness to be a prizefighter, but he certainly has the intangibles.  go back and check out any one of sheed's rants during his time in portland or detroit, and you can tell that he would use any energy his body can muster to come to your defense.  he would also be more than willing to bite if necessary.    

    5) Shaquille O'Neal - Center, Miami Heat (7-1, 325)

    jacked level: 7     craziness level: 6     meaness/toughness: 7

    truth be told, shaq was not on my original list.  i thought he was too old, slow, heavy, and docile to be an asset in a brawl.  then i was reminded of how he looked in this year's playoffs: he was thinner and quicker, still just as physical, and showed his fighting mentality when he attempted to get up and piledrive stackhouse following the flagrant foul in the finals.  i liken him to mike tyson in the middle of his career.  not the best mechanics or size, but once he lands one, your day (and life) is over.

    4) Kenyon Martin - Forward, Denver Nuggets (6-9, 240)

    jacked level: 7     craziness level: 7     meaness/toughness level: 8 

    like fortson, kmart fits the cincinnati mold of bruising ballplayers.  like craig smith, kmart rocks the mouthguard at all times.  however, he is more physical and has a worse attitude than both.  oftentimes, a player's ability (and urge) to fight is accompanied with problems with the coach and management of the team for which he plays.  several players on this list fit the description, and with the current rift between kmart and george karl, he has moved into this group as well.  in addition to his bad attitude and imposing physical stature, he also has a nervous tick.  it may be tourette's, but i believe it is simply a reaction to not punching anyone in the throat in the past 10 minutes.

    3) Alonzo Mourning - Center, Miami Heat (6-10, 261)

    jacked level: 9     craziness level: 5     meaness/toughness level: 8

    don't let the well-manicured facial hair, reserved attitude, and elder statesman gig fool you...zo can still mix it up with the best of them.  after 14 seasons in the nba and one kidney transplant, you would be "reserved" too.  the fighter's mentality which once manifested itself in outright, on-court fights now is channeled into emotion-charged speeches and leadership by action for his team.  he still has the undying drive to compete and win at any cost, and has maintained the skill and build to do so successfully.  even with his health problems, i would take him on my side in a brawl anytime.

    2) Ben Wallace - Center, Chicago Bulls (6-9, 240)

      jacked level: 8     craziness level: 7     meaness/toughness: 8

    just as ex-teammate sheed's unkept hair and unruly attitude aids in his consideration as a fighter, ben wallace is positively affected by the same factors.  both his 'fro (home games) and braids (away games) look menacing and represent his two styles of play.  he is as wild, ferocious, and untamed as one of his foul shots, yet is able to lock down opponents on the defensive end (his multiple "defensive player of the year" awards attest to the these characteristics).  add his size, work ethic, and hard-nosed attitude to the mix, and he becomes one bad mutha. 

    1) Ron Artest - Guard/Forward, Sacramento Kings (6-7, 260)

    jacked level: 7     craziness level: 10     meaness/toughness: 8

    ronnie is nuts.  he is absolutely crazy.  from the way he plays, to his behavior in the infamous "malice at the palace," to the way he looks away from the camera and interviewer during interviews, to his soft, muttered, stumbling speach patterns, he isn't right.  now i am not saying he isn't a tremendous basketball player - in fact, if i were to make a list of my top starting five in the nba (hint for future entry), he would be one of my players - but i am saying that, like t.o., mike tyson, and darren daulton, his documented negative attitude is just scratching the surface of a deeply disturbed individual.  its as if he continutally asks himself "what is the most inappropriate and offensive thing i can say at this very moment?" and he internally answers and verbally communicates it at the same time.  i honestly think that i would rather have no nba player on my side in a fight for the pure reason that he would use any tactic available to him for as long as it took to squash any opponent.  i also think that he is probably some kind of alien-vampire hybrid, and thus requires a special and secret method to kill him, so we have that going for us too.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Why We Debate

    Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 10:05 AM EST [debates]

    the boys and i have the uncanny ability to initiate and perpetuate a sports debate in any venue and at any time, completely disregarding the level of appropriateness, rationality, or logic for a given environment.  having all of us sitting around watching any athletic contest (from world series of darts to the softball world cup) is like having a "real world" season with paige, mariotti, wilbon, kornkeiser, bayless, ryan, and adande living under the same roof, and all channels but the espns blocked on the t.v.  points and counterpoints are made, voice inflection and anger levels increase, tensions grow and boil over, and then some third party person or event occurs to remind us all that this debate: 1) was started by a seemingly harmless comment, 2) cannot ever be resolved, and 3) is very unimportant in the grand scheme of things.  this process occurs several times daily, and although we recognize its futility, we engage in it time and time again. 

    and we are not unlike other groups of males, who see this process as part of their daily routine, and almost rite of passage into manhood.  just as women gather to discuss fashion, celebrity gossip, and whether or not meredith should make one last push for mcdreamy, men gather to discuss sports, constructing or destructing things, the maxim top 100, and how our group of friends relates to the cast of entourage.  however, the differences in social norms between males and females is bound to decrease my female readership and is the topic for another installment, so i digress.  the point is that almost all groups of males come together on sports.  from the casual fan ("how 'bout them _____ ?"), to the informed fan ("barry bonds probably took steroids.  just look at that dude's dome."), to the obsessed/schwab fan ("how do they pitch to him there?! don't they realize he has a .450 average against lefties on tuesdays in april during the first quarter of a lunar cycle?!"), anyone can engage in sports debates.  of course, it is customary and most efficient if one finds someone on his level with whom to debate.  imagine what the casual or informed fan would say in response to the obsessed fan after stating the example given.  the response would probably involve (in no particular order) raising of eyebrows, slowly nodding of head, and backing away cautiously. 

    to some, sports is paramount of importance, and their lives are centered around being a fan, debator, writer, speaker of or about sports.  and while others' priorities may be politics or financial matters, as males in our low-20s, we don't have as many other realms of influence on which we need to focus.  we don't have enough patience to watch msnbc for the latest middle east developments.  we don't have enough money to worry about finances.  and we certainly don't have other responsibilities (kids, wife, work-intensive career, house maintenance, etc.) to impede upon our time to read about, watch, and debate sports.  we like it, we have the time, we have the resolve, and so we do it.    

    of course, we always tend to gravitate towards "defending" our own.  one friend swears up and down that tom brady is the best and most clutch quarterback in football history (ignoring montana, favre, bradshaw, starr, and a host of others).  another claims that brian dawkins is the best safety in football (despite the recent breakouts of roy williams, troy polamalu, and ed reed).  and i am notorious for defending the claim that "hines ward is the best all-around receiver in football," despite his only barely above average numbers on a run-first team.  the point is, similar to sticking up for a family member or friend in a fight, we identify with, and thus we must defend, our teams and players of choice.  we feel as if we know these athletes on teams we support better than everyone else, or that they fail to remember certain events (i.e. "don't these people realize that hines cried on national t.v. after losing the 2004 afc championship because of another player?")  we embody the spirit of these teams and treat them as if they are an extension of family or a circle of friends.  we have a vested interest in their well-being and success, we get angry with them if they fail or are irresponsible, and we cheer and jeer them accordingly.  we will be the first to point out their shortcomings, but we are also the first to defend their actions.  no one can say that the aformentioned claims about brady, bdawk, and hines aren't accurate, but it is certainly up for debate. 

    there are also characteristics of each debator which manifest themselves during the arguments.  for example, the friend who defends brady is ruthless, passionate, and unrelenting.  he will hit detractors with stats, stories, and (occassionally outlandish) predictions, and will not let up or concede certain points to make his case stronger.  in addition to his original stubborness, he will continue the debate far beyond the confines of the room in which it began.  for example, two days after a debate over brady's place in qb lore began and ended (unresolved), he will hit a fadeaway three to end a pick-up game and follow it with "that's for tom" or something of the sort.  you know that if he doesn't completely agree with an original claim, you have unknowingly signed up for a week of displeasure. 

    the friend who argues for bdawk is much different.  he is internally completely governed by logic and rationality, and attempts to persuade via these avenues.  during the first portion of an argument, he will respond as anyone would, citing what stats and other information he knows to defend his claim.  however, you can tell that he is listening intently to each thing being said, and along with his current response, he also stores a bit of information that can be used at a later time.  unbeknownst to his opponents, he is also recalling every statement you made since you two met (including ones uttered while intoxicated), searching for inconsistencies between something you said in 2002 and something else 45 seconds ago.  at some point in the argument (usually when little or no progress is being made and a stalemate has been reached) he unleashes all of these saved up tidbits, and completely sinks your argument from a logical standpoint.  for example, while discussing barry bonds' admittance into the hall of fame: "wait a minute.  when barry broke the all-time record for hrs in a season, you said you admired him, his work ethic, and how he overcame pressures to reach this point.  then about a year ago, you said that if mcgwire was even accused of using by a reliable source, he should be banned from baseball.  and now you are saying that even with circumstancial evidence piled sky high against barry, he hasn't officially failed a drug test, so he's allowed in the hall?"  now, this isn't to say that your point of view isn't valid, but he disproves the way in which it was argued.  usually, this deflates his opponent and he "wins" by default (through either frustration, anger, or amazement), since the other argument dies down after his major counterpoint.

    i tend to be the most conceding one.  i never want the argument to affect any other aspect of a relationship, even in the short term, and sometimes the escalation of these debates brings them fairly close.  i mentioned before that my one friend was passionate.  that is not to say that the other friend and i are not, but we are passionate to a point past rational but before dangerous.  i am proud of how much i know about sports, i enjoy learning more about them, and, for now, they are my main hobby and source of enjoyment.  however, i tend to avoid direct conflict, which requires me to give a concession almost every time i make a new point.  for example, i would respond to the brady argument with "i mean brady is very clutch and accurate, especially in the playoffs.  he truly embodies what it means to be a leader and they wouldn't have three rings without him.  but i mean joe montana had better numbers, more comebacks, and his stats went up proportionately higher than brady's in the postseason.  plus, he did it for longer, and brady might not have as impressive of a career."  this way, i figure, my opponent will understand that i have knowledge of his point and that i recognize how he can feel how he does, but i think differently.  i always believe that superior knowledge and information retainment will prevail, so if conceding little bits of the argument allows me to hold his attention for another effective round of point-counterpoint, then it is worth it.  

    as one can imagine, these styles interact very differently with each other.  for instance, an argument between friend #1 and i is very one-sided, because with each point i concede, he pounces and assumes i am agreeing with him, failing to listen to my point made after the concession.  an argument with friend #2 and i ends fairly amicably, but with less resolve.  he successfully shoots down my means to argument, but nonetheless, i present enough facts to make a solid case.  i believe i impress him enough with information to negate my flaws in argument and it ends without much fanfare.  arguments between friends #1 and 2 are the most volatile, and thus more entertaining.  during friend #1's rants, friend #2 stores enough ammunition to bring down the argument in short order.  when he attempts this (earlier than with most other opponents), friend #1 becomes more vehement in his pursuit of victory, thus making more mistakes for friend #2 to remember.  this vicious cycle continues until one leaves, some third party breaks up the discussion, or a more satisfying activitiy (such as drinking, playing a sport, or causing mayhem) is suggested.  of course, friend #1 will not forget this debate for at least a week, while friend #2 forgets it the moment it ends, making for an interesting next couple of days. 

    the purpose of this article was twofold.  first, it was meant to give my insight on why it is (any by what means) people, especially males, continually debate sports.  and second, it explained a dynamic between three friends, all fans of different sports, teams, and players, and all with different (and occassionally conflicting) personalities.  readers may identify aspects about themselves and their friends that they relate to or disapprove of, but they will hopefully gain a better understanding of why we debate as often, as intently, and as passionately as we do.                

    0 (0 Ratings)

    ESPYs Partial Recap

    Monday, July 17, 2006, 02:19 PM EST [Awards]

     

    the espy's were last night (beginning at 9:45 p.m., thus effectively eliminating any hope of my dad waiting up with me to watch our beloved steelers accept the "best team" award close to midnight), and i was overall very entertained and satisfied with the show.  i couldn't believe lance armstrong's opening monlogue, given the fact that he has "changed gears" from cycling to political figure seemlessly.  it was hilarious, and maybe his jokes about male anatomy, homosexual relations, and calling the french @ssholes were meant to show a comical, everyman character similar to dubya (they're both from texas and apparently good friends).  however, i could also see some of those quotes coming back to haunt him with regards to his political aspirations.

    i was also pretty pleased with the winners of the awards.  of course, any disdain which i hold against the awards cannot be attributed to the athletes who won nor espn, but rather to the american public, whose votes were the only factor in deciding said winners.  on to (some of) the awards...

    best male athlete: lance armstrong - this was no surprise, and i agree with the decision.  even though i'm not a cycling fan and i'm excrutiatingly tired of lance winning this award year after year (this was his fourth in a row) for competing for 3 weeks in a foreign country, this is a good choice.  he had to deal with ongoing doping allegations, health problems, criticism from the brash french public and media, pressure of "the streak," and the maintenance of his image and priorities.  i am happy to see that he has more time to pursue cancer research and spend time with his kids instead of training for another run in le tour.  oh, and he hosted the show. 

    best team: pittsburgh steelers - anyone who thinks the white sox, lady terrapins, miami heat, carolina hurricanes, texas longhorns or whoever else was nominated had any chance is a lunatic.  yes, the white sox had to wait 80 years.  yes, the lady terrapins were young and inexperienced.  yes, the longhorns beat a juggernaunt after playing 2nd fiddle all year.  yes, the hurricanes were slipping in the stanley cup finals before making a final push for the title.  and yes, dwade proved he is in the league of nba superstars.  all those stories are nice, feel good tales and they were all great to watch.  think about this: one of the most storied franchises in all of professional sports comes back from a 7-5 record to win 4 straight, clinch a wildcard berth, roll over 3 straight opponents on the road (unprecedented, by the way) to end up in the hometown of its most beloved player and win the biggest sports contest of the year, thus coming home with the elusive "one for the thumb" after 26 years.  it probably also doesn't hurt that they have one of the most dedicated fan bases in all of sports, as this may be the biggest example of stuffing the ballot for an espy in the award's history.     

    best moment: jason mcelwain - i would like to see the voting %s for this one.  i absolutely agree with this selection and its an incredilble story, but is this the biggest landslide in espy history?  if i was an oddsmaker, i think the over/under would be 85%, and that includes the fact that there were 3 other candidates.  first of all, this story (i believe narrated by chris connelly or tom rinaldi, that's how many times i saw it) was on sportscenter no fewer than 8 times.  and i mean 8 different versions of sportscenter, not like each one from 6 a.m. - 1 p.m.  second, the anchors, pti and ath personalities, and even local sportscasters congratulated him for weeks.  third, espn followed his team's progress in the state tournament for several games, even though jason went back to being team manager.  he got free tickets to several nba games, and even met billups among others.  fourth, he got props from gp, zo, dwade, and i think reggie bush on his way up to the podium.  and finally, in big ben's first public appearance since the accident, he came out in ceremonial fashion, just to say "jmac, you inspire us all" before he thanked god, his team, fans, etc.  i mean, the kid even has his own recognizable "first initial followed by first syllable of his last name" nickname, akin to dwade, a-rod, etc.  did dakoda have any shot?  when the nominee video was being played, i remember thinking "jmac had his time in the sun, i bet dakoda will get it."  then i remembered the last time i had those futile thoughts, it was everytime the jazz, suns, or sonics made the nba finals and i thought "jordan and the bulls have had their success, now its time that someone (malone/stockton, kevin johnson/barkley, gp/shawn kemp) took them out."  anyway, similar results, we just can't get enough of a good thing...watch for the jmac movie coming this spring.

    note: part II of this article was supposed to be posted later in the week.  however, then i realized that my time is much better spent writing something new, rather than judging the fairness of the "best angler" or "best wnba player" awards. 

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 2 3 Next Last