Week one is behind us, and it was a pretty good opening round of CFB. The big story, of course, was Appy State's take-down of Michigan in the Big House, totally eliminating the Wolverines from our poll. Zero votes, lol. Texas needed a succesful on-sides kick to be overturned by the ref's to preserve their shaky 21 -13 win. The poll is out a little late this wee, due to the Monday night game and the fact that i have to earn a living.
Bloggers Poll, Week One
- USC (8) 239
- LSU (3) 226
- WVU 207
- Wisconsin 189
- Oklahoma 179
- Florida (1) 171
- Texas 163
- Cal (1) 150
- Louisville 149
- Va Tech 122
- Georgia 110
- Penn State 106
- Ohio State 105
- UCLA 92
- Nebraska 80
- Auburn 60
- Rutgers 48
- Ga Tech 44
- Arkansas 39
- BC 26
- So Carolina 25
- Hawaii 23
- Miami 20
- TCU 19
- Tennessee 17
Also recieving votes: Oregon, Alabama, Texas A&M, UNLV, Wyoming, Missouri, Iowa, Colorado, Clemson, Oregon State, Washington State, Connecticut, Pitt, navy, Miami Ohio
SOME THOUGHTS ON WEEK ONE
Several of the big boys made quick work of the directional schools they had lined up for fodder. There were some teams that looked good against legitimate competition, including Georgia's whooping of Oklahoma State, the" Greatest Offense in Stillwater", and Georgia Tech's dismantling of Notre Dame. Wisconsin also looked sharp against WSU, and Cal made an SEC team look slow. (Can you say that?) For the most part, everyone else did as expected.
We had 13 voters this week, about half the number we started with. I'll continue to do this as long as there's interest, but fewer voters means the results can be skewered more easily by a single ballot. So I had to make a slight change in the rules. To keep a team from appearing because a single voter rated them very high, one that no one else even acknowledged, teams must appear on at least two ballots to be included in the top 25.
Here's links to voters who blogged their picks. If you blog your selections, be sure to let me know and I'll link it.
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/jgrace_12/2007/09/04/My_New_Top
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/Nostradomus/2007/09/04/College_Football_Top
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/Kellett69/2007/09/04/Kelletts_Top_25_WEEK
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/Norcalfella/2007/09/04/Norcalfellas_Top_25_College_Football
BALLOT OF THE WEEK
Demonicume's ballot was markedly different from everyone elses, and the main reason I had to change the rules. Demon is using a formula based on the RPI used by college basketball. It rewards teams for wins, strength of schedule, and opponents SOS. As would be expected, early season this will look somewhat disheveled. I'll be interested to see how this shakes out as the season goes along. So here's a big Hog Call to Demonicume, our voter of the week.
DEMONICUME'S BALLOT
i know this will look kinda odd. But remember 3 things as you read these rankings:
1)this is based off the NCAA's basketball RPI.
- Its winning percentage (as a decimal) times .25
- Its opponents' winning percentage times .50
- Its opponents' opponents' winning percentage times .25.
so i'm not grading people according to how well i think they may be, I'm grading them according to how well they've performed within their schedule. I don't care if ou have 55 blue chippers - until you beat someone, it don't matter. We've had plenty of examples of teams getting blasted despite how highly we regarded them (OSU last year against Florida, Michigan against App State.)
2) this ranking system is much more dynamic than the current one. this system allows unranked teams to compete for the national championship. as teams start winning and losing, they'll rise and fall by a dozen spaces of more. this means that if a Big East team goes into November with 3 ranked teams - even though they prolly only played 1 ranked opponent in that 9 weeks - they wont be in the top ten. or the top 20. They may even sit below teams with 2 and 3 losses. in my book, losses to LSU, Auburn and Florida mean more than blowout wins against rice, Maryland and Purdue. No one will sit in my top 25 simply because they have a big name.
3) I don't think we should be doing a poll until Week 4, anyways. All the so-called POWERHOUSES front-load their schedules with weaklings... *cough* Michigan.
this system rewards tams for winning big games and punishes teams for losing games they should win. Many people saw Michigan lose to App State and still felt they belonged in the top 25. That's ridiculous. Had S. Carolina lost to App State, no one would be touting our 'bad day'. Why is that? It's because we've decided in our minds that Michigan is a powerhouse and even when they lose, we give them a pardon. We should be pissed they even scheduled App State, SC fans would have paid $500k to see Michigan. And we would have won. They could have put out the collection plate in the stadium. The truth is that Vanderbilt had Michigan down the same way last season until their QB melted down. Michigan is not good and their schedule is designed to protect them. We've decided that the Trojans are good, even when they sucked against 4 straight opponents last season. We grade our favorate teams on a popularity curve and we stay in denial for years. in 3 years, Bobby Bowden will be gone and we'll all be quietly shocked that FSU is no longer any good. Everyone will wonder how it happened. i'll tell you how it happened: FSU has been in decline for nearly 5 years; but we always float them credit. like Notre Dame. FSU is the new Notre Dame... they'll be on TV even when they go 5-8. This ranking system puts these losers in their places. thanks to John Wobus for doing all the math...
1 California
2 Georgia Tech
3 Virginia Tech
4 Miami Florida
5 Connecticut
6 Pittsburgh
7 Penn St
8 Navy
9 Miami OH
10 UNLV
11 West Virginia
12 TCU
13 Nebraska
14 Wyoming
15 Southern Cal
16 UCLA
17 Missouri
18 Iowa
19 Oregon
20 Colorado