Script: /grapes17/blog/cat/general/page/20
Owner:
Subdir: grapes17

    Rivalries are born in the playoffs

    Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 07:36 PM EST [General]

    Regardless of the level of competition, every sport features intense rivalries.

    Traditionally, no sport has had more intense rivalries than hockey.

    Sure, baseball has an intense rivalry with the Yankees and Red Sox, while the Lakers and Celtics have a long-time NBA rivlary, but hockey can come up with a dozen similar rivlaries.

    Toronto-Montreal. Toronto-Ottawa. Boston-Montreal. New York-Philadelphia. New Jersey-Philadelphia. Colorado-Detroit. Detroit-Chicago. Edmonton-Calgary. Vancouver-Calgary. Anaheim-Los Angeles. New York-New York. Buffalo-Toronto.

    You get the idea. When it comes to rivalries, no sport can claim more rivalries than hockey.

    So at first glance, it seemed a bit odd when the NHL revamped this year's schedule to create more rivalries. Teams face divisional opponents eight times and conference opponents in other divisions four times. To make up the difference, teams play just 10 games against the combined 15 teams in the opposing conference.

    The idea of eight Calgary-Edmonton or Toronto-Ottawa games appeals to just about everyone, but there are many negative issues that were not considered.

    The eight meetings between Florida and Carolina have failed to create significant excitement. The same applies for Columbus-St. Louis, Minnesota-Edmonton, and various other attempted rivalries.

    To make things even worse, fans only see teams from the opposing conference once every three years. When Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby visit Southern California and Phoenix every third year, it is hard to market the game in non-traditional environments. The long-time fans in places like Edmonton, Calgary, and St. Louis also deserve to see these young superstars more than once every 1,100 days.

    The problem is clearly defined. The NHL's current system, designed to create new rivalries, has too many flaws to be successful. At the same time, many fans say the rivalries are not as intense as they were in the old days, even as recent as the 1980s.

    The solution? A change to the playoff format.

    Through the 1980s, divisions had five teams, or in the case of the Patrick Division, six teams. In each division, four of those teams made the playoffs. As a result, there were two rounds of playoffs comprising entirely of divisional matchups, meaning Edmonton-Calgary, Montreal-Quebec, or Boston-Montreal were likely to be first or second round matchups every couple of years.

    With the conference-based playoff format, there is no such guarantee. Now, there is a pool of 15 teams, of which eight make the playoffs. The odds of teams facing each other in consecutive years is much more unlikely than in the 1980s.

    In reality, the playoffs are where rivalries are built. Without repeated playoff matchups, it is hard for teams to build a rivalry. Even two of the best new rivalries in the NHL got their start in the playoffs.

    In the spring of 1996, the Colorado Avalanche had just relocated from Quebec, and they faced the powerhouse Red Wings in the conference finals. Colorado defeated Detroit in a contentious series and a rivalry was born. The two teams met several times in the playoffs the next few years, and the rivalry remains to this day.

    The Toronto-Ottawa rivalry is natural because of geography, but even in that case, things became heated when the teams met in the playoffs a couple of times.

    If the NHL wants to create rivalries, a divisional playoff system is the answer. Ideally, the NHL would add two teams to create four divisions of eight teams. Six teams would make the playoffs in each division, with the first and second place teams receiving a first round bye.

    To compensate for the longer playoffs, a slightly shorter season could be played. Teams would face divisional opponents four times each, for a total of 28 games. Three games would be played against each team in their conference's other division, for a total of 24 games. Teams would face clubs in the opposing conference twice each, for a total of 32 games.

    This scenario would create a 74-game season, which would cut about two weeks from the regular season. Those two weeks would be used to play the additional playoff round, as the playoffs would become five rounds instead of four.


    Fans would be able to see each opposing team at least once per season, and all 28 divisional games would have the potential for a rivalry-style atmosphere. Right now, fans see divisional opponents a combined 16 times in their home arena, while under this format, they would have 14 home divisional games -- not a significant difference.

    The addition of two teams and a change in the format might be a few years away, but the NHL would be well-advised to consider the possibility. Rivalries are born in the playoffs, and with a little help, the NHL can increase the odds of that happening.
    0 (0 Ratings)

    The boys of summer?

    Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 06:55 PM EST [General]

    Things have a funny way of coming full circle, and it is no different with hockey.

    Twenty years ago, hockey fans complained about the format of the Olympic hockey tournament. With Soviet-bloc countries sending professional teams disguised as amateurs, often under the guise of military pay, fans said those countries had an unfair advantage.

    Eventually, things changed, and by 1998, all countries were able to send professional -- including NHL -- players.

    Not everyone believes the positives outweigh the benefits of the modern format, however. The NHL shuts down for more than two weeks for the Olympics, causing teams to lose momentum. Top players are placed at a greater risk of injury during the incredibly compressed Olympic schedule. And teams have little time to prepare for the tournament, often arriving in the host nation a day before the games begin.

    The solution? It seems obvious -- play hockey in the Summer Olympics.

    But hockey is not a summer sport, you say? Neither is basketball in most nations, yet the game is played in summer. Soccer seasons tend to run during the winter months in most countries, and again, it is a Summer Olympic sport.

    The reason for soccer being a summer sport seems obvious to anyone who watches the Winter Olympics take place in snowbound cities. However, there is another reason for the timing, and that is to prevent interference with most of the world's soccer leagues.

    The second reason is even more obvious in basketball. Although NBA players have only competed in the Olympics since 1992, most Olympic basketball teams have traditionally been made up of athletes playing in various leagues around the world. With basketball being played in summer, there is time for a team to train before the games begin, the risk of injuries carrying over to the season is reduced greatly, and there is no interruption of the normal season required.

    Hockey's World Cup, formerly known as the Canada Cup, has always been held in summer. The tournament, first held in 1976, grew from Canada's temporary withdrawal from international competition in the late 1960s and 1970s. Canada argued international competition was not fair since the Soviet Union and other nations were essentially using professionals, while Canadian professionals were ruled ineligible.

    The result of the tournament has been some of the greatest international hockey ever played. Hockey fans remember Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux teaming up for the winning goal in 1987, the excitement of the inaugural tournament in 1976, and the surprising United States team of 1996 as some of the most memorable moments in international hockey history.

    The fact that the tournament is played in summer has not hampered the event's success. In fact, the ability to play the games at a time when they are not a distraction to the NHL season has been key, as it has enjoyed near-total support from the hockey world.

    The World Cup would still continue if hockey became a Summer Olympic sport, as it could be held in the Winter Olympic years. Major international competition would still remain two years apart and there would be no concerns about changing the scope of the NHL season.

    Hockey would be the only Summer Olympic sport requiring ice,but in modern arenas with modern refrigeration systems, this would not be an issue. Hockey is regularly played in hot, muggy weather during the playoffs, and in the newer arenas, ice is almost never an issue. Considering almost every Olympics in recent memory has featured new arenas, ice quality should not be an issue.

    The answer to the Olympic debate is obvious -- play hockey in the Summer Olympics. It works for the World Cup, and it would work for the Olympics as well.
    0 (0 Ratings)

    Life in the Frozen Pond

    Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 06:54 PM EST [General]

    From March 14, 2006

    As record low temperatures invaded Southern California Sunday, baseball fans bundled up and braved the elements at Angel Stadium for the second round of the World Baseball Classic.

    With daytime temperatures in the 40s, gusty winds, and intermittent rain, fans dressed in the most unlikely of California clothing -- parkas, scarves, gloves, and even touques.

    They were the lucky ones.

    Across the 57 freeway, Anaheim Ducks fans entered their frozen arena for the 34th time in the regular season. And for the 34th time, the temperature was uncomfortable.

    The Arrowhead Pond is known for poor ice, and in a largely futile attempt to improve the ice, Pond management turns the temperature down a bit further every season. With the lockout last year, the Pond seems to have made up for it by adding two seasons of cold this year.

    The temperature is rumored to be set at 53 degrees Fahrenheit, roughly 12 degrees Celsius. However, with humidity and drafts, it feels significantly colder. In reality, the setting seems significantly colder than 53.

    Conditions hit a new low -- literally -- on Sunday. After walking indoors from 40-something temperatures, fans were greeted by a concourse that felt colder than the outdoors. Still, the worst was yet to come.

    When fans walked through the curtains in the tunnels leading from the concourse to the seating area, they felt like they entered a walk-in freezer. A sudden blast of arctic air, reminiscent of a winter afternoon in Saskatoon or Yellowknife, greets fans along with a frozen-looking usher.

    There is no need for such extremes, and it certainly hurts the Ducks' attendance. The ice is bad in the Pond, but the issue is not temperature, but rather, humidity. Soft drinks and beer condense shortly after purchase, a sure sign the dew point is well above freezing.

    The ice in most NHL arenas is kept in the low to mid 20s Fahrenheit, and to maintain good ice, the dew point must be below that temperature. When the dew point, the measure of absolute humidity in the air, is above ice temperature, condensation will form on the ice.

    As anyone who has lived in cold climates knows, when condensation forms on ice, the ice gets softer. When the ice gets soft, it will chip easily, leading to the Pond's bad ice.

    Seems simple, doesn't it?

    Apparently not. Instead of working to decrease the humidity levels, Pond management just continues to make the arena colder and colder, driving fans to somewhere -- anywhere -- warmer.

    The ice actually improves somewhat during the Santa Anas, a Southern California phenomenon that sees hot, dry air move in from the east. During these times, the outdoor dew point typically drops to the 20s, and the resulting effect inside is better ice.

    Contrary to popular belief, when the Santa Anas are not blowing, Southern California is not dry. True, the area escapes the 70 and 80 degree summer dew points found in much of the United States, but the dew point is still in the 50s most days year-round.

    Most of those areas with high dew points in summer also have cooler temperatures in winter. By nature, the dew point can not be higher than the outdoor temperature. In other words, if the outdoor temperature is 20, the dew point is still only 20 when the relative humidity is 100%.

    In California, however, most winter days are in the 50s and 60s with dew points in the 40s and 50s. As a result, the dew point is significantly higher than the ice temperature inside an arena.

    The solution? More dehumidification is needed, plain and simple. A 70 degree Pond with a dew point of 20 will provide better ice than a 53 degree Pond with a dew point of 40.

    For the sake of all Ducks fans, let's hope someone in charge figures that out -- soon.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Ducks lose the battle but look to win the war

    Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 06:52 PM EST [General]

    From March 30, 2006

    For a game that featured few shots, fewer scoring chances, and one team playing the trap, Wednesday's Anaheim at Dallas game was strangely intriguing.

    En route to a 2-1 win, the Stars outshot the Ducks 29-16 and spent much of the night playing a trapping style designed to stymie the potent Anaheim forecheck. Scoring chances were as rare as a Tim Horton's in Texas, yet the stat that tells the story comes a few columns later.

    Hits.

    Anaheim 49, Dallas 41.

    The hits came early and often, and some of them were massive. Ducks' defenseman Vitaly Vishnevski threw 7 hits, while Dallas blueliner Philippe Boucher was credited with 10 hits.

    The most significant hit in the game, however, came at the 15:39 mark of the second period when Boucher leveled Anaheim star Teemu Selanne at the blueline with a hard hit. With no enforcers on the ice, diminutive Chris Kunitz came to Selanne's defense, going after Boucher. Dallas tough guy Jeremy Stevenson stepped in, but Kunitz was undeterred, going into the face of both much larger players.

    A scrum ensued, and referees Don Koharski and Dan Marouelli gave the extra minor to Kunitz. A questionable call? Perhaps. A bad penalty for Kunitz to take? Definitely not.

    Kunitz sent a message to the Stars and the rest of the NHL heading into the playoffs -- touch Selanne, and you will pay. Even if there is no enforcer on the ice, the Ducks once again proved they will protect Selanne.

    On the way to the bench after the scrum, Dallas defenseman Willie Mitchell had some words for Selanne from the safety of the Stars' bench. Mitchell was not nearly as talkative on the next shift when he was challenged by Ducks' heavyweight Todd Fedoruk. Mitchell and Fedoruk were given coincidental minors, and the specter of a more intense rematch remains with two more games between the clubs in the next week.

    Although the Stars scored the winning goal on the power play following the penalty to Kunitz, the much bigger message was sent, and it needed to be sent. The Ducks will not be pushed around, and they will protect Selanne at any cost.


    Nine days earlier, the Ducks proved that theory, once again in Dallas. When Joe DiPenta felt Steve Ott's hit on Selanne was borderline, DiPenta dropped the gloves with Ott. Although it was DiPenta's first fight of the year and Ott is a noted heavyweight, DiPenta fought Ott to a draw.

    From that point on, the Ducks dominated the game, scoring two third period goals to win 2-1. There was another difference in that game, however, and that was the forecheck.

    Anaheim was relentless on the forecheck all night, and it was the primary reason for the win. Samuel Pahlsson's forecheck caused Janne Niinimaa to cough up the puck with just over three minutes remaining in that game, and Pahlsson turned that miscue into the game winner.

    Dallas made two adjustments this time around. First of all, Niinimaa was a healthy scratch, as he has been every game since the turnover. Secondly, the Stars played a trapping style, standing up the Ducks at the blueline and largely negating the Ducks' forecheck.

    As a result, the game was devoid of the end-to-end action and scoring chances of Anaheim's game the night before in Colorado. Dallas' style of play Wednesday may have been boring to watch, but it was certainly effective.

    When the two teams meet again Friday night at the Pond, it will be the Ducks' turn to make adjustments. Selanne got a measure of revenge on Mitchell as time ran down, giving Mitchell a thunderous hit to the left of Dallas goaltender Marty Turco. Another scrum ensued, and another message was sent.

    Anaheim coach Randy Carlyle will almost certainly move Fedoruk back to the top line with Selanne and Andy McDonald. Fedoruk has seen limited action on that line since the Olympic break, and the trio has looked impressive. More importantly, Fedoruk acts as a protector for Selanne, much the same way Dave Semenko and Marty McSorley did for Wayne Gretzky.

    If Fedoruk moves to the top line, look for Chris Kunitz to join fellow rookies Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry on the Kid Line. In limited action, that line has also been very impressive as a unit.

    Regardless of any adjustments, two things are certain. One, the "Star"-Spangled Banner will not be played at the Pond, as the Ducks prefer to play America the Beautiful or God Bless America when the "Stars" are in town. The second certainty is another hard-fought, physical, battle in the trenches between these two teams.

    The end-to-end rushes might not be there, but there is plenty of bad blood between the two teams. And when it comes down to it, either style of play creates excitement for the fans.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 18 19 20 Next Last