|
3 months ago ::
Sep 17, 2009 - 1:21AM
#1
|
|
|
Hmmm...multiple posts of the same dribble punky? Did you get tired of having to come up with new stuff? Probably something in the Wisconsin air. After Oct 5, the GB coaching staff is going to have the same problem. LOLOLOL!! Keep 'em coming punky G-boy!
|
|
3 months ago ::
Sep 16, 2009 - 8:38PM
#2
|
|
|
For just a moment I'll give up on trashing you ignorant Vike fans, (though it's so much fun doing so, particularly ripping on one who flashes her fake booty to one and all and those preverts on the muscatel maintenance program who lap it up)....and so to that one and all, I'll get back to foo'ball and actually make some picks (but w/o a point spread since it's so early in the season to get any feel yet (and that reference isn't for you Silly) OK then...First one listed is the winner:
Philadelphia/ New Orleans but a tough call with McNabb down and no dogs allowed on the field .....Jacksonville/Az but Az needs to bounce back....Tennessee/Houston
New England/NY Jets.....Oakland/ K.C.
Green Bay/ Cincinnati ...Pleeze- come to the tundra and freeze your purp
Washington/St. Louis
Minnesota Cheap Shots/Detroit since the Motor City is unemployed on the field too
Seattle/San Francisco just won, but I take Seattle
Tampa Bay/Buffalo close..closer than the All Loser Bowl in Detroit
Atlanta/Carolina at
..since they have the hot new qb the da Purp would have been more happy with ...beyond one year
Pittsburgh/ Chicago ..but don’t make fools of yourselves making fun of a the pain of a dislocated wrist since the only one you got was in bed at age 14 with your barbies
San Diego/ Baltimore at
(Ladanian rocks ...and he blocks too. Amazing !! Can All dimensions do that ?-
Denver/Cleveland since we’ve seen the awesome strength of Cleveland
NY Giants/Dallas ...tough call..two prima donna qbs..
Monday:
I always like Indy vs Miami...they are always disciplined. Never in the mold of cheap shot Allen who goes down this year...
Now that’s real football talk. Can you dig it ?
|
|
3 months ago ::
Sep 04, 2009 - 11:55AM
#3
|
|
|
man fraid you guys are gonna hafta struggle an get used to winnin if ya's dont chill out an let the other teams have a chance.
|
|
3 months ago ::
Sep 03, 2009 - 9:27PM
#4
|
|
|
gee,,and i thought it was a preaseason game and meant nothing,,didn't we win that game anyway?? 
|
|
3 months ago ::
Sep 03, 2009 - 7:09PM
#5
|
|
|
Favre looked damn good against the Heathen Texans as did Chucky Cheese, but the play that put them up early and lasting was A.P.'s run, more of a fluke of a run, more of the D wasn't at all ready off tackle play than anything else. If The Purple Twurps want to win consistently they need more than that....
punkpaulos
|
|
4 months ago ::
Aug 23, 2009 - 12:40AM
#6
|
|
|
My point is he came down with the ball in hands. I believe the rule states that if the defensive player is the cause of the the offensive player being knocked out of bounds then it is a catch. The rule for interference is if the ball is not catchable and catchable means both feet inbounds then there is no interference. Therefore if the ref felt that the guy could not come down with the ball in bounds it is a non catchable ball therefore interference should not have been called.
|
|
4 months ago ::
Aug 22, 2009 - 6:03PM
#7
|
|
|
he hit him before the ball got there,thats why it was pass interference. it looked to me to be a catch able ball but would have been a difficult one to get both feet down.I think it was a good call. Or maybe it was a little favor for missing the obvious pass interference call against the vikings.
|
|
4 months ago ::
Aug 22, 2009 - 11:37AM
#8
|
|
|
The last interference call in the chiefs game should not have been called. Here is why. Either it should have been ruled a touchdown or no catch. The chief player actually came down with the ball. So either it should have been ruled a touchdown because the player that hit him also pushed him out of bounds. So either the refs should have ruled it non catchable because the ball was to high and he would have never come down in bounds or the viking player caused the chief player to go out of bounds therefore it should have been a touchdown.
|