uhhh,Berrian has been hurt and is just now getting back into the line-up,,I thought you paid attention to the Vikes,,or do you just throw out rants without checking stats? and it looked like Knox dropped that ball before he crossed the goal line,,,showboatin

Oct 4, 2009 -- 9:16PM, Scorpious wrote:

So far he's looked good, true. I'll admit, I was wrong about him getting on the field before week 10

Works for me.

So far he's looked good, true. But so did Grossman. I'll admit, I was wrong about him getting on the field before week 10, but I figured someone else in Minnesota knew how to play offense (well, besides AP). Berrian hasn't been worth a hoot, I don't even know who the other starting receiver is for the Vikes, and the hero of last week's game was a guy they signed off the waiver wire after releasing their former #2 receiver. Their receiving corps is about as bad as Chicago's is (according to critics, anyway). So Harvin kinda has to put up Pro-Bowl numbers this season... they don't have anyone else who will.

Oct 3, 2009 -- 9:49PM, Scorpious wrote:

Oct 3, 2009 -- 4:11PM, MidniteCowboy wrote:

Sep 30, 2009 -- 10:48PM, MP10820 wrote:

He may be a tremendous athlete, but he's still not as good as you think he is.

That's much better. I never proclaimed he'd be a superstar, just an additional weapon that is a playmaker, and would probably be a slot receiver. I just took exception to you totally blowing him off and dismissing him before he ever put on a uniform.

Oct 3, 2009 -- 9:49PM, Scorpious wrote:

Oct 3, 2009 -- 4:11PM, MidniteCowboy wrote:

Sep 30, 2009 -- 10:48PM, MP10820 wrote:

well...i guess we were wrong about Harvin. I was more hoping against hope that hed follow the trend with other Florida recievers and Tedd Ginn but you cant argue with production.

Yeah that's true. I hoped the same about Manningham of the Giants. I was wrong. Damned if he didn't step up and start playing like he did at Michigan.

And scorpious, stop picking which parts of Harvins stats are convenient to look at. You can't cherry pick stats. You were wrong about Harvin. Is it that hard to accept? Everyone in the country knew who he was, and that he was an explosive playmaker. Oh, except you. You openly admitted that you knew nothing (at all) about him, and that the first time you ever heard his name was at the NFL draft. That's just hating purple for the sake of hating purple, with zero insight.

Since when am I cherry-picking stats?

Probably where you stated "Oh, if you drop off Harvin's 101 yard return, his kick return average drops to 28.5."

IF??? You can't cherry pick.  You don't get to only count the return yards that favor your argument.

Go here for the truth my friend.