Ok edhardiman.

With the NFC East, the Skins I don't disagree with.

The problem with the Cowboys isn't only the playoffs. Romo is Mr. November. When it hits December, he sucks. All three seasons has the Cowboys collapsed in December.

The Giants could be the only true threat with the improved defense. 2 concerns are if with Spagunolo gone, will that hurt the Giants D, and can the offense get anything going without Plaxio Burress.

If by QB controversy, you mean the fans, yes. It's already known they never liked McNabb since his draft day. Nothing new. QB controversy happens all the time with him there. The team. No way. It will never happen with the Eagles Organization. If Vick ever becomes a starter, it would be elsewhere.

And you called him a raping criminal. Yes I know about the stands but unless he shoved his dick in them, I can't see the word rape making sense here. Maybe that's just me.

At least you make some sense here with your view and I'm glad unlike others on this site.

EQ!,

You said it, why purposely create a QB controversy? If you needed more talent at QB, sign one after the roster cuts...well the Steelers looked good last night...lol

dehbashi,

Let me answer your latter comments first, there most certainly will be a Iggles QB controversy this season, you can bank on it. As long as Snyder owns the Redskins, they're doomed. The bloom seems to have fallen off Jerry Jones genius, but Dallas has enough of the pieces to compete and make the playoffs, it remains to be seen if Romo has mad playoff skills. The Giants are also a formidable opponent. The NFC East is never easy...finally let me address your first comment:

"...First, who did he rape? This is something new to me. Unless you're pulling **** out of your ass that is.

So sorry, nothing will happen..."

Michael Vick had several dog raping stands set up on his property, I refer you to the search warrants and subsequent testimony in his trial. In the future, I suggest you check a fact first before you level such a butt-headed charge...OK I admit it, I only answered that to use the word butt-head...as for nothing happening, that will be the impact on Vick amongst the swirling controversy he creates...

Advocate,

Where to begin?

"...If Micheal Vick had flashed a watermelon smile and catered to white America, it would have never gotten this far!!!..."

What would possess you to make such an essentially useless, non-germane racist observation? What difference does Michael Vick's race make?

"...It's amazing that people are so upset about some dogs but allow children to die everyday from various conditions caused by poverty and indifference..."

I'm assuming you're making a moral equivalency argument here...let's take it at face value, is a child starving to death more or less important than an adult starving to death? How did Michael Vick's conviction raise or lower the indifference or poverty level?

"...this situation has allowed me to see where people priorities really lies..."

So you do understand that people can have many interests and opinions and then organize them in importance, well said, the question remains, what aspect of Vick's behavior do you find commendable so much so that you find fault with the obvious conclusion the rest of us have reached?

"...Keep your head up Mike Vick!!!Just know that you are still supported and loved by us here in Atlanta..."

We can only hope you speak for the ugliest part of Atlanta, the kind of place left off tourists maps and not referred to in polite society...

Gryam,

Well said...