Script: /edclinch/blog/cat/general/page/4
Owner:
Subdir: edclinch

    edclinch
    Lifetime Points: 12875



    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    About Me: I have lived in different areas and am faithful to their passions, give or take. Born and raised in Bloomington, Indiana (1970-1989). Knight was a central figure. I then lived in Chile, where soccer became impressed upon me more than before. Returned to South America in 2005 with my then small family of wife and two girls. I love American football, b-ball, baseball, and more sports... How long does this profile go? It's all good. Except: where in the cyberuniverse are all the comments from the last four years???!!!!
    Marital Status Married
    School NVCC~NoVa
    Veteran


    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    About Me: I have lived in different areas and am faithful to their passions, give or take. Born and raised in Bloomington, Indiana (1970-1989). Knight was a central figure. I then lived in Chile, where soccer became impressed upon me more than before. Returned to South America in 2005 with my then small family of wife and two girls. I love American football, b-ball, baseball, and more sports... How long does this profile go? It's all good. Except: where in the cyberuniverse are all the comments from the last four years???!!!!
    Marital Status Married
    School NVCC~NoVa

    2009 to 1909--What was the Baseball Scene 100 Years Ago?

    Sunday, April 26, 2009, 12:10 PM EST [General]

    2009 to 1909--What was the Baseball Scene 100 Years Ago?

    (I accidently erased my first iteration of this blog...Here goes the second attempt)

    My grandpa whom I have never met, was born around 1890. He lived in the greater Boston area. Did he follow baseball? Did he care about sports? Did they have radios then?

    One hundred years from now, will my grandchildren know me?

    I would like my future posterity to have access to this someday.

    Thanks Foxsports.

     


     

    A hundred years ago there were only 16 major league teams, all in the eastern, mostly northeastern United States. The farthest western team was St Louis on the west banks of the Mississipppi. Not quite half way across the continent.

    Now there are six up and down the Pacific Coast, plus two in Texas, and others in Minnesota, Kansas, Colorado and Arizona. There are many more teams now (30 total) and the institution of baseball is fully entrenched not just in our land but in more than 20 other countries across the world, including expansion into China.

    The NL had 8 teams. From top winners (104 victories) to worst (45) that season, here are those teams:

    Pittsburgh Pirates

    Chicago Cubs

    New York Giants

    Cinncinnati Reds

    Philadelphia Phillies

    Brooklyn Superbas

    St Louis Cardinals

    Boston Doves

    From that list, maybe only five remain as they were a century later.

    They are  the Cards, Cubs, Pirates, Phils and Reds. The other three moved on...

    In the AL, there were these eight teams:

    Detroit Tigers

    Philadelphia Athletics

    Boston Red Sox

    Chicago White Sox

    New York Highlanders

    Cleveland Naps

    St Louis Browns

    Washington Senators

    Five of the American League teams still exist.

    Washington lost its team twice over the century, but then the expansion Montreal Expos morphed into the current day Nationals.

    St. Louis, Boston and Philly lost their two team status, while Chicago and New York kept two when creating the Mets in the 1960s, even though the Giants left for San Francisco and the Dodgers (formerly Superbas) left for Los Angeles.

    Also, sadly, the Ne*gro Leagues were running until well after World War II, so a large part of the American population was not a part of the Major Leagues in that respect, most likely reflecting lack of ML presence in the American south.

    Today there are teams in Baltimore, Atlanta, Miami and Tampa Bay, and of course there are minor league teams across the entire nation except Hawaii and Alaska.

    That year the Pirates proved to be the best team in the land, the National Leage representative proving superior to the Tigers winning four to three games, all boiling down to a game seven.

    These two cities are historically steel and automotive centers, places where our nation outpaced much of the rest of the world.

    Back then, many baseball players worked in the offseasons to make ends meet.

    The world had not yet known the first Word War, a sign of terrible devastation and fear that would guide the rest of our 20th century in many ways.

    A more innocent time? The US had completed the Spanish-American War a decade prior, most western American Indian campaigns were ended three decades before (almost like our distance from the Vietnam War now), and a good two generations had left behind the awful experience of the vivid aftermath of the the Civil War. 50 year olds and older grandparents could remember that era in 1909, as well as the Lincoln assassination, much like the Kennedy generation of today remembers those times.

    What would you have been doing 100 years ago?

    Would work have been your main concern, not having time for the leisure of sports? Would the newspaper have been a big part of your day? The box scores of the teams you liked?

    Would you have been living in Texas, California, Oregon or Washington?

    What would you do at the end of the day? Eat and go to bed? How about the weekends? Go on a picnic? To the beach? To a concert? To a church dance? To a game?

    This weekend I played a couple games of basketball for the first time in a long time. I watched a good share of first round playoff basketball in the NBA on television. I also followed a bit of the NFL draft. And I saw some MLB baseball scores, both on TV and the Internet.

    Will baseball still be played in 2109? Will we still have painful wars?

    Time will tell. By my take on history, things will continue for the good and bad.

    Baseball, despite the cheating at times, is still a good thing.

    And maybe Shanghai or Chungking will be in the World Series in 2109. Maybe my grandkids will speak Mandarin by then.

    But that is my conjecture, much more pronounced on the future than upon the unknowns of the past. But both are substantially mysterious, no?

    Enjoy your Sunday.

    PapaClinch

    PS: Did I get any errors? Past balls? Please let me know. Thanks.

    1.9 (1 Ratings)

    Which Ball Parks Still Exist? The Winner Gets a Prize!

    Sunday, April 19, 2009, 12:56 PM EST [General]

    Which Ball Parks Still Exist? The Winner Gets a Prize!

    The following stadiums and parks are ones that I attended in the respective years. Tell me which ones are still extant in 2009 and what they were known as then and what their names are called now:

    1978 Riverfront Stadium, Cinncinnati

    1985 Busch Stadium, St. Louis

    1986 Indian Field, Indianapolis

    1987 Wrigley Field, Chicago

    1988 Same as the 70s

    1989 Estade Olympique, Montreal

    1997 Tiger Stadium, Detroit

    1998 Yankee Stadium

    1999 Indianapolis Field

    2000 Dodger Stadium

    2001 Anaheim Stadium

    2003 Inland Empire 66ers

    2004 High Desert Stadium

    2008 San Jose Giant Stadium

    Most are MLB locales, but a few are Triple A and two are One A.

    Good luck and thanks for playing.

    Enjoy your weekend.

    PapaClinch

     

    1.9 (1 Ratings)

    NBA is a bit like Boxing--Only Better

    Saturday, April 18, 2009, 03:39 PM EST [General]

    NBA is a bit like Boxing--Only Better

    How so?

    The parties involved grow over time---practically none of them become a one season sensation and burst into the top echelon.

    It takes years of growing and building their cache.

    The 2007 Boston Celtics were a bit of an exception, when Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen were instantly added.

    That was the intent of the 2004 Lakers as well, adding Hall of Famers Karl Malone and Gary Payton to their already super power mix.

    I also recall the Houston Rockets adding huge names like Barkely, Pippen and Drexler in order to become a heavy weight champ via instant strength formula.

    Boxers start humble enough, and after a few gold medals and impressive bouts and records, they are ready to contend for a title in their class.

    NBA teams are similar in how they grow respect and confidence over time.

    Does anyone think that anybody except the Lakers, Spurs, Celtics or Cavaliers can make it to the finals this June?

    Obviously, in the case of the Celts and the Spurs, the injured super stars hurt their chances greatly. Without Manu and KG, maybe these teams are really only middle weights with heavy weight experience. Maybe the Pistons qualify in that regard as well.

    Boxing is interesting to watch as the individuals develop over time and by experience. The NBA game is even better, in my opinion emulating chess in an inner game of cohesion and complexity of tactics and roles, self-knowldge and collective wisdom.

    And unlike what I have previously intimated, I do think an outlier could possibly break through and make the finals this playoff.

    Could the Jazz possibly beat the Lakers?

    Could a young gun sink the heavy weight champ?

    Perhaps enough discipined tactics and strategic moves could indeed prove lethal to the reigning Western Conference champs.

    And I know you hate to hear that, Muhammed Ali fans. Sugar Ray Leonard fans. Oscar de la Hoya fans.

    There just might be a new champ at the end.

    Then again, Bynum and Gasol and Odom and Ariza might just win the title belt.

    And of course, that unmentioned one who already won 3.

    And what of the King James Bible Revival?

    Watch out: Joe Smith is contributing to their front line. They already got Big Z, Sideshow Bob and Big Ben.

    This might be a heavyweight contender people at Lake Erie have been praying for for years.

    Their back court? Will hurt you.

    This will be a fun show.

    Round one!

    Ding! Ding!

    PapaClinch

    1.9 (1 Ratings)

    What College Football Teams Have the Largest Followings?

    Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 09:15 PM EST [General]

    What College Football Teams Have the Largest Followings?

    1. Based on the repeated gigantic NBC television contracts with Notre Dame, I would guess that the Irish program has the largest D-1 following in all the land.

    And obviously it's not just a Catholic thing, even though Catholic means "universal".

    Even if only Catholics cared about the Fight'n Irish of South Bend, the Blessed Lucky Golden Domers, 66 million American members would be pretty good.

    But of course not all Catholics follow football (American college), or do they all pray for Hail Maries of this team.

    I am sure that Boston College counts a few million devoted, at least, when it comes to primary allegiance.

    I know a lot of people in Indiana, and many who live in the southern part of the state simply like ND because they can be considered a state school, and religion plays little part in that loyalty, but rather pure gridiron tradition.

    I assume it is so for much of the rest of the country. Some of the biggest names and best memories come from South Bend, Indiana.

    2. This is hard. USC, Texas or Florida?

    Southern California has a lot of people, and a lot of fans and success. Tradition, loyalty, dominance. I got family down there that love SC. 20 million people are packed down there, and yes, a few million are UCLA fans and there are even some SDSU fans, but I would wager that there are approximately 10 million Trojans in the greater LA area, including all six surrounding counties. And then there are those expat California folk floating around the rest of the nation...

    3. Texas.  By sheer size? But there are a fair share of Texans who go for A & M, and Tech, and even Rice, TCU, SMU, Baylor...

    4. Florida. I know a lot of Indiana people who like Florida (curse those Gators). I think this is a southern Indiana thing, because up north Purdue and Ball State and ND get more home loyalty, which is right.

    5-7.Who's next? Penn State, or Michigan, or maybe Ohio State.

    Who rounds out the top  10? Tennessee? Alabama?

    Keep this in mind...

    State PopulationDescending Change 2000 to 2007 Percent Change  

    California 36,553,215 2,549,164 7.5% Details

    Texas 23,904,380 2,955,537 14.1% Details

    New York 19,297,729 301,158 1.6% Details

    Florida 18,251,243 2,201,927 13.7% Details

    Illinois 12,852,548 413,329 3.3% Details

    Pennsylvania 12,432,792 147,228 1.2% Details

    Ohio 11,466,917 102,774 0.9% Details

    Michigan 10,071,822 116,405 1.2% Details

    Georgia 9,544,750 1,313,831 16.0% Details

    North Carolina 9,061,032 981,255 12.1% Details

    New Jersey 8,685,920 253,969 3.0% Details

    Virginia 7,712,091 607,099 8.5% Details

    Washington 6,468,424 556,772 9.4% Details

    Massachusetts 6,449,755 86,565 1.4% Details

    Indiana 6,345,289 253,554 4.2% Details

    Arizona 6,338,755 1,171,495 22.7% Details

    Tennessee 6,156,719 453,304 7.9% Details

    Missouri 5,878,415 272,275 4.9% Details

    Maryland 5,618,344 307,428 5.8% Details

    Wisconsin 5,601,640 227,241 4.2% Details

    Minnesota 5,197,621 263,436 5.3% Details

    Colorado 4,861,515 533,263 12.3% Details

    Alabama 4,627,851 175,964 4.0% Details

    South Carolina 4,407,709 384,081 9.5% Details

    Louisiana 4,293,204 - 175,840 -3.9% Details

    Kentucky 4,241,474 192,425 4.8% Details

    Oregon 3,747,455 316,359 9.2% Details

    Oklahoma 3,617,316 163,258 4.7% Details

    Connecticut 3,502,309 90,319 2.6% Details

    Iowa 2,988,046 59,800 2.0% Details

    Mississippi 2,918,785 70,361 2.5% Details

    Arkansas 2,834,797 156,400 5.8% Details

    Kansas 2,775,997 83,107 3.1% Details

    Utah 2,645,330 400,899 17.9% Details

    Nevada 2,565,382 546,888 27.1% Details

    New Mexico 1,969,915 149,054 8.2% Details

    West Virginia 1,812,035 4,985 0.3% Details

    Nebraska 1,774,571 61,249 3.6% Details

    If you are a state not on this list I doubt you have the big following...

    Wyoming, Hawaii, Rhode Island...

    So, which teams do you disagree with?

    How many people track this kind of number?

    Is it easier to track the budget and the attendance and paraphernalia sold?

    1.9 (1 Ratings)

    Final Four Monday: The Die is Cast past the Ides of March

    Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 12:21 AM EST [General]

    Final Four Monday: The Die is Cast past the Ides of March

    Headlining the evening are four programs completing the final eight of the NIT.

    Kentucky holds on to beat Creighton.

    Do the Wilcats care? Of course they do.

    It's called basketball. If you are from Kentucky and have a pulse, of course you care; NIT or not.

    And that said, if you are a basketball fan at all, you should care. Meeks and Patterson, at least, are future pros.

    We will see Kentucky Big Dancin' next year. Even though both those dudes would be drafted this spring if they entered the draft...

    Sorry Nebraska/Missouri Valley fans...Next year should be better for you, too, yes? I really don't know.

    And bigger on the news and future pros front: St. Mary's versus Davidson.

    Quite a road trip to Moraga, California, East Bay region of San Francisco.

    Patty Mills gets the win, at home. He only shot 1 of 10 on threes but 9/22 overall and the whole team was solid.

    Curry's finish is a far cry from last year Sweet 16 surprisers.

    So the Elite 8 are set in the NIT. See one of my last blogs below for the others...

    The crowd must have been rabid.


    The CBI is down to four!

    Watch out for the Stanford Cardinal; the PAC 10 is no slouch as evidenced by Arizona in the NCAA sweet 16. USC was impressive and while the others all folded (except for OSU in the CIT, later in this post), the Pacific 10 deserves respect as Lisa Horne pointed out about President Obama's disrespectful picks. Although, like me, he did better in the second round.

    Big Dance-wise, I went 23-9 first round to 13-3 in the second. But Wake Forest has done me in for further down the line (I picked them for Madness Final Four! Talk about madness...)

    My other three? Oklahoma, Villanova and Purdue. Yes, I dislike the top seeds. Especially UNC, Duke and U Conn.

    Back to the CBI: Stanford handled Wichita State soundly.

    UTEP did in Northeastern. I have always like UTEP since the days of Tim Hardaway. I respected Don Haskins before that.

    Richmond overcame Charleston by two points.

    Fear the Spider! Always.

    I learned that from sad experience as an Indiana Hoosier fan.

    And finally, Oregon State Beavers top Vermont by one in OT. They won in Corvallis 4-3 in the first overtime.

    Gotta love it!

    Barack's bro-in-law. Right?

    Do I hear lobbyists in this?

    Oh, and OSU is now 15-17. If they sweep from here out they can go 18-17. But they can still win the CBI at 18-18.

    Fantastic!

    College basketball!

    March!

    Madness!

    College basketball Invitational!!!


    And finally, the newly inaugurated CIT: College.Insider Postseason Tournament.

    Old Dominion beats Belmont.

    That is A Virginia school over a Tennessee school. I think.

    Bradley by one over Oakland. Illinois college over Michigan one.

    James Madison lays it on thick over Liberty. Civil War in Virginia again, one from the Colonial and the loser from the Big South.

    Sorry, Jerry Falwell. And my alumni brother David.

    JMU is jamming! Where is  VA Commonwelath is that again? I should know, I live right up the road.

    And lastly, we have Pacific over Idaho by ten points. The Spuds are out.

    California is in again.

    I used to know what city that was in...Richmond? Bay Area?

    Anyway, that was tonight in college basketball.

    You should care.

    Whatever the case, give me a comment.

    PapaClinch

    1.9 (1 Ratings)

Blog Categories