Script: /divineswine/blog/cat/general/page/4
Owner:
Subdir: divineswine

    Congratulations to Bill Belichick

    Thursday, January 3, 2008, 11:41 PM EST [General]

    The Coach of the Year Award went to the correct person. Did other coaches have great seasons? Yes, Dick Jauron comes to mind, and Tony Dungy probably had his best coaching year ever.

    Although it's nice to give credit to coaches who have dealt with a lot of adversity this past season, the obvious choice shouldn't be overlooked. No one expected Dick Jauron's team to do anything, yet they found ways to win. Dungy's Colts also had to deal with injuries to key players, especially Marvin Harrison.

    But as teams which have come tantalizingly close to a perfect 16-0 season know, the pressure of trying to go undefeated is an entirely different animal. And now there's even more pressure from everyone who says that anything less than a 19-0 season from the Patriots is failure.

    That's pressure, and Bill Belichick has dealt well with it. If we're going to give awards to people who exceed moderate expectations, then we definitely need to reward coaches who meet lofty expectations.

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Gumbel, Collinsworth & America's Most Watched Show: Pats-Giants

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 01:22 PM EST [General]

    For the vast majority of NFL fans, the December 29th historic NFL simulcast of the Patriots-Giants season finale should have been the very last game of the season. Highly entertaining, a close game, high-level of play, and both teams played their starters until the end. The fans definitely got their money's worth, especially fans like me who paid $0 to watch it.

    The fans responded: the game was the most watched broadcast in U.S. TV history. 53.2 million households watched. That beats the final episode of M*A*S*H (the fact that that show was in the #1 slot still amazes me). For those who like numbers, 53.2 million households represents, an 83% share of the total viewing audience. Wow!!!!

    For many of us, it was also our first chance to hear Bryant Gumbel do the play-by-play. His color guy was Chris Collinsworth.

    Here are some quotes and then thoughts about them:

    Situation: pre-game and through the beginning of the first quarter

    Collinsworth: "this is a meaningless game, and I just don't understand why the Giants would play their starters."

    Analysis: I expected more from a former player. Am I the only one who thought it really strange that in a game of such importance from the perspective of NFL Network, you have one of your own announcers calling it a "meaningless game"?  Maybe the NFL Network has more liberal policies about what its announcers can and cannot say.

     

    Situation: Randy Moss scored his acrobatic TD in the first quarter

    Gumbel: "How often do you see multiple records fall on one play?" 

    Analysis: Uh Bryan, only one record (most points) was broken on that play. Most TD passes thrown and most TD receptions were tied on that play.

     

    Situation: during a stoppage in play, Vince Wilfork was caught trying to poke his finger into Brandon Jacobs's eye. A cowardly act that should be fined.

    Commentary:

    Collinsworth:       "It's unfortunate that the officials didn't see that, but the NFL will be reviewing that play and there will be some disciplinary action."

    Gumbel:            "Well, that was a little Mo, Larry, and Curley. I think he was trying to annoy him, not injure him. Don't you think so?"

    Collinsworth:    "No, I think he was just trying to put his finger in Jacobs' eye.

    Analysis:  there are just certain things that are cowardly in the NFL: spitting, poking a guy's eye out, trying to break his fingers at the bottom of the pile, and trying to piss in someone's Gatorade cup. I think Wilfork's a great player, but he needs to be fined for that. There's just no place for that ridiculous type of behavior.

     

    Final Analysis of the Annnouncing:   Gumbel wasn't great, but he wasn't terrible. Collinsworth was just being Collinsworth

     

    Here are some interesting moments from the game:

    Stupidest referee moment: giving a penalty to Moss and the Patriots for excessive celebration. That was "excessive"?

    Exciting Play I: Domenik Hixon's return after the Moss penalty pushed the ball back to the 15 yard line.

    Exciting Play II: in the 3rd Quarter Brandon Jacobs literally ran over Rodney Harrison on his way to a 16-yard run. Not many people run over Harrison

    Stupid Play I: in the 2nd quarter during a stoppage in play, Pats Vince Wilfork tried to poke Brandon Jacobs in the eye through Jacobs' facemask

    Stupid Play II: Rodney Harrison with 4:20 to go in a critical part of the game gets an unsportsmanlinke penalty

    Stupid Play III: with 1:35 left to go, the clock running, and the ball on the Pats 4-yard line, a Giant player inadvertently kicks the ball sitting on the line of scrimmage into the Pats endzone which causes precious seconds to tick off the clock. Wow, just when you think you've seen it all...

    Greatest positive surprise:   Eli Manning actually looked like a high-draft pick in the first half of the game and much of the 2nd half. That boost to his confidence alone makes the Giants starters playing the game worthwhile.

    Most Amazing Take 2: in the 4th quarter Moss drops a long throw from Brady and then on the very next play (a 3rd and 10), they connect for a 65-yard TD.

    Strangest commercial: the motorola cellphone commercial with Mangini has Belichick doing the voice over at the end. kind of bizarre. 

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Juiced II - a reason to celebrate

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 09:40 AM EST [General]

    What's that I hear? It's the sound of baseball groaning again as word spread of Jose Canseco's upcoming sequel to "Juiced".

    Although the working title is reportedly "Vindication", here are some other suggestions for the title:

     

    1.    "More Juice: First you got the liquid and now you're getting the pulp"

    2.    "Juiced part Duhhhh"  [spelling "Deux" is not as easy as some might think]

    3.    "Juiced II: how I squeezed more money out of the publishers"

     

    A lot of people are tired of Canseco. They think he's a buffoon and a rat.

    Here's the thing about Canseco, he's doing it for the same reason that a lot of players leave great situations on a good team to descend into the lowly ranks of the non-contenders: the money.

    However, there is another possible motivation: he's looking to stick it to the American public and MLB. Great drama.

    Here is the general flow of criticism over time about his first book: 

     

    1st        Canseco is a rat

    2nd       Canseco is a lying rat

    3rd        Canseco is a juiced lying rat.

     

    Only the first seems to be completely true, and I'm not even sure that it was deserved. So we want the truth, but we're going to call them a "rat" if they give it to us?

    Whatever the reason for his first book (and I'm not entirely sure that it was only about money), a large number of his claims were true. For fans clamoring to clean up the sport, you should be supporting Canseco. You should be telling everyone criticizing him to shut up.

    Some may be suspicious and wonder, "Why didn't he just name everyone in his first book?" You might as well ask hy J.K. Rowling why she didn't reveal everything about the Harry Potter storyline in the first book of that series. You keep the audience coming back for more.

    Canseco may be a publicity hound, but so far there is nothing to indicate that he's lied about other MLB steroid users, and that's why you can be sure that when his new book comes out, every MLB player who ever used steroids will either read the book or have someone else read the book and give them a synopsis. Hey, some people don't like reading.

    If you can separate all the other negative stuff about Canseco's personality from his claims (a Herculean task for most), you'll find that he's refreshingly honest. He's confessed to his own steroid use without having been caught first, and he's accurately named several players who used steroids. At least he's far more honest than every one of his thousands of his MLB peers who know the truth and aren't talking.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Who Gets The Ball? The Football Hall of Fame

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 08:47 AM EST [General]

    Okay, the Patriots are perfect this season. That's a big 16-0 for those of you not paying attention. All four records that could have been broken were broken. Those records include most points scored by a team, most touchdown receptions by a player (Randy Moss), most touchdowns thrown (Tom Brady), and most wins in an undefeated season (sorry '72 Fins, 16 is still more than 14).

    Of course someone is going to try and stir up the pot amongst the Patriots because there are a lot of people who are tired of seeing the Patriots win all the time.

    One potential place of divisiveness is the 2nd touchdown ball that Randy Moss caught.

    That ball could be one of the most historic game balls in the history of the NFL.

    Why?

    Two records were broken with that single ball:

     

    a)      Randy Moss set the single-season touchdown reception record

    b)      Tom Brady set the single-season passing touchdown record

     

    So, who gets the ball? Moss? Brady? Do they split it in half? Do they have joint custody of it?

    My guess is that you're going to see that ball end up in Canton at the Football Hall of Fame. It really should go there, especially as the ball was part of the record-setting 16-0 regular season. And if Canton doesn't want it, then the Patriots should ask for it to be displayed somewhere in the Gillette Stadium/Patriot Place Complex.

    Maybe before this year, I would have predicted that Randy Moss would selfishly take it for himself. But he's really bought into the Patriots "team first" attitude.

    So, for those of you who might think that Brady and Moss will fight for ownership of that ball, forget it. You forget that the Patriots prepare for just about everything, and it wouldn't surprise me if Brady and Moss had already discussed this possible scenario prior to the game and mutually decided that they would donate the ball to either the Hall of Fame or the Patriots. That's just another reason amongst many why the Patriots are special.

     

    P.S. don't let Jonathan Papelbon's bulldog near that ball!!!!!!!!!

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Time To Forgive The Anabolic Cheaters - a New Year's Thought

    Monday, December 31, 2007, 12:21 PM EST [General]

    And you wonder how people are getting anabolic steroids so easily?

     

    Just utter the word "steroids" and a thousand knives suddenly appear. Almost every single professional sportswriter (and most amateur ones as well) believes that definitive proof of steroid use should ban a player from the Hall of Fame.

    There are also others who think that players like Roger Clemens are guilty based on a preponderance of circumstantial evidence (e.g. Brian McNamee's testimony, Clemens shocking improvement as he got older) combined with long-standing suspicions that maybe the Rocket was using a different type of fuel than his peers to propel his career.

    But there are a few things people should know about steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), because far too many out there have the wrong perception of them.

     

    Myth 1: steroids or other PEDs can't make you hit a fastball.

    Anabolic steroids have been shown to increase reflex speed in both animal and human studies.

    What is probably just as important is that they can dramatically reduce the amount of breakdown (catabolism) that normally occurs when muscles undergo the stress of exercise. Less breakdown means faster recovery. When you consider how many musculoskeletal injuries a ballerina sustains despite the graceful nature of her art, then you can better imagine the damage that occurs in baseball players while violently and repeatedly swinging a bat, especially when they miss.

    All of that damage will slow down bat speed. This is where steroids really help. If you recover faster to baseline, you'll be able to more consistently hit pitches with power.

     

    Myth 2: steroids are inherently bad for you.

    There are several studies about people with low testosterone, and the trend is clear: low testosterone levels put you at a significantly increased risk of dying younger.

    Now don't go start shooting up on steroids because of that last sentence. The point is that exogenous steroids may be beneficial for our overall health. One of the problems is that good solid prospective studies are lacking on how a person with normal testosterone levels might use steroids properly to gain benefits and minimize side effects. The reasons for this are administrators being too close-minded.

    That situation probably won't change until people stop immediately associating steroids with former East German women, NFL and MLB players, and weightlifters.

     

    Myth 3:  injecting steroids automatically makes a person stronger.

    This is completely false. The simple act of injecting steroids will not make you stronger. It's not like getting bit by a radioactive spider like Spider-man or being injected with Super Soldier Serum like Captain America.

    People look at MLB athletes like Mark McGwire, Roger Clemens, and Barry Bonds, and they completely frown on those athletes for using steroids.

    But a fact that's been forgotten in all of the finger-pointing is that each of them was an elite athlete who worked hard. Name me one hitter who worked harder than Mark McGwire or Barry Bonds off the field? Name me one pitcher who had a tougher workout regimen than Roger Clemens? Their workout routines are the stuff of legends, and that was before they took steroids.

    But time has a funny way of demonstrating diminishing returns. At first it's a few days here or there where you just can't bench as much as usual or your timed sprints are a bit slower or you can't catch up to the fastball or the radar gun objectively tells you that you're losing a few mph off your fastball. Then those few days turn into weeks and then months.

    Then suddenly, you start seeing younger guys who are not working anywhere nearly as hard as you starting to catch up to you. To maintain the edge, you try steroids. And one way that you justify it to yourself is that the steroids only work because you yourself are putting in a tremendous amount of time and energy to stay in top shape. You reason that the steroids don't and won't work for you without you adding your own sweat and commitment. And you know what? You're right.

    Heck, even Captain America needed help (from low-level radiation exposure in his case) to make the injected substance work. People using steroids are similar: energy in the form of exercise is needed to see the true athletic benefits of anabolic steroids.

    While people are crucifying Bonds, Clemens, and McGwire, just remember that these guys were already way ahead of the curve in terms of their workout routines. I remember reading a Sports Illustrated article during McGwire's magical home run season. The thing that impressed me was how much time he spent working out. Also, I remember Clemens' intense workouts even on non-pitching days while he was with the Red Sox.

    Folks, these weren't guys looking to gain an edge for free. They had been and were willing to continue paying the price in terms of sweat to stay on top.

     

    Does this excuse what they did? No.

    But is what they did understandable? Yes.

    If we were in their position and stood to make millions of dollars a year playing a game and receive adoration from hundreds of thousands of people, would we not do everything in our power to keep things going?

    The general public is sounding like a lynching mob when it comes to stringing up any MLB athlete who used illegal substances like steroids and HGH. Was it 100% illegal? Yes. But it's become a bit crazy. Trust me, I know union workers who have resorted to outright violence to prevent people ("scabs") from breaking the picket lines. That violence is also 100% illegal and far more damaging to others, but I don't hear the general public tearing down the walls to put those violent people out of commission.

    If we demand that MLB players or any other athlete open their eyes and minds to the dangers of anabolic agent use, then shouldn't we try and open our minds a bit as to the reasons why they feel compelled to use such things?

    Many of us think, "Heck, I would never inject that junk into me." But unless we've been in a similar situation, it's tough to tell what we're capable of doing.

    So, MLB players flouted the law and cheated because they thought that following the rules would endanger their continued livelihood in baseball. Funny, wasn't this country's independence created by people who flouted authority, because they believed that their livelihoods were being threatened by unfair rules? Didn't those same revolutionaries also go against the common rules of military engagement and instead "cheat" by using "cowardly" guerilla tactics?

    I'm not trying to equate MLB players with the brave revolutionaries that created an independent America. But I'm trying to show you that Americans looking to for some way to better their circumstances is an inherent part of our personalities. It's impossible to deny this.

    The point is that when people are looking at the end of the road (and for an athlete facing the grim realization of retirement, it feels like the end of the road), it's a terrible time. Are we so completely unable to understand why pro athletes like Andy Pettitte resort to using steroids or other PEDs to prolong their careers, especially when they know that most of the other guys around them are doing it?

    In the past, I've written several blogs about steroids and the people who use them. I've never ridiculed anyone for making the choice to use steroids. It violates federal law (and now MLB rules) and it's unsportsmanlike. But I can separate those facts from the other fact that we all should try placing ourselves in other people's shoes.

    Yes, they make big money, but for the majority of them, their whole life has been devoted to sports. I can understand why they would try steroids or HGH or other PEDs. I don't condone it, but I understand where they are mentally to make that choice.

    However, I have no problem ridiculing athletes who lied about their use. That's why I have some respect for a guy like Andy Pettitte and complete disdain for Paul Byrd and his ridiculous story about using HGH that was prescribed by an online dentist for his supposed brain tumor.

    As the year comes to a close, here's a thought. Maybe it's time to give the illegal drug users a break and let them come forth and confess everything without fear of retribution. Maybe we need an Amnesty Period where players are guaranteed that anything they confess about receiving steroids and other PEDs will not be used against them legally or for Hall of Fame balloting consideration.

    In a lot of ways, this steroid saga has wearied me and left me thinking the same thing I thought when my best friend was lost at sea while saving his wife after their boat was obliterated in a destructive storm: regardless of what the truth is, I just want to know the truth.

    I would rather let a player confess completely that he used steroids his entire career and then let him walk away unscathed then stay in this limbo where we are all left guessing whether he did it or not.

    Also, I don't believe that it's all about greedy players just trying to stay on the big high-salary gravy train of the MLB.

    A person's ego and feeling of self-worth is partially tied to their income, but it's more heavily connected with a feeling of contributing to something greater than himself or herself. Every one of us should try to imagine having a job that we absolutely love; a job where we receive praise and respect from our boss and coworkers. Then imagine how we'd feel if our boss came to us tomorrow and said, "We have to let you go, because there are younger faster people we want to replace you with." Imagine the sadness and panic that might immediately well up in you.

    Then suppose that I come up to you and whisper, "Hey, I have this stuff called Adderall which will allow you perk up, outperform any new person, and allow you to keep your job." The catch is that it's illegal to use this drug unless you have medically diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. What if I also told you that I could get it to you without a prescription and that there were no real side-effects? Would you try it? Of course you would. It's as much a part of our DNA as Eve biting from the forbidden apple.

    And folks, just an fyi, Adderall abuse is rampant in universities and even amongst competitive high school students. What is Adderall? It's a type of amphetamine. That's right, it's "speed".

    Now, that I've shared that true tidbit about Adderall being used illegally by a lot of American university students, are you still not going to try it to keep your job, especially when you most likely will be replaced by someone who is using it?

     

    If you say that you would still not try it, then you are an incredibly moral person, lying to yourself, or you don't need money and job happiness as much as normal people do.

    None of this is to say that we should excuse the guys who cheated. But unless we can find a way to ensure a clean and level playing field, can you really blame guys who are trying it to keep their jobs against other players who very well might also be users?

    Sen. Mitchell proposed that we should not focus on punishing those who cheated in the past, but rather focus on the present and the future. I agree, and that's why MLB steroid users need to catch a break. Let's wipe the slate clean.

    For people who have been arguing that letting such cheaters off the hook sullies the records of many of our MLB sports heroes, here is a sobering fact: Synthetic testosterone was first introduced into sports during the 1940s and 50s. There is no definitive way to know whether or not records achieved since that time are also tainted. So, let's drop the charade that all players 20 and 40 years ago were clean. Let's have an Amnesty Period where players can confess everything without fear of retribution and let them know that from that moment on they must stay clean or face being wiped out of all record books.

    Let's do this to save ourselves the time and agony of having to hear a lot of players lie to save themselves because that's the only option left to them. Let's do this to save the money we would have used on investigating athletes and devote that money to better testing in the future. Let's not allow ourselves to get stuck on the idea of punishment and miss the greater good of finally knowing the whole truth.

    Finally, let's give the MLB anabolic steroid and HGH users a break so we can all move forward, because as the saying goes, you can't advance to second base if you keep your foot on first.

    HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!

     

    P.S.  the picture at the top of this post is not Photoshopped. that's an original advertisement found 2 days ago. obviously i didn't include the phone number and web address.

    0 (0 Ratings)