After sixteen straight days of football we have a two-day break before the semifinals get underway. A chance perhaps to indulge in some observations?

In terms of entertainment and quality this edition of the European Championships far exceeds what was on show four years ago. It's on par with 2000 but the latter stages of the tournament in Netherlands and Belgium had two fantastic extra time games and one that was not unlike the Spain and Italy (except this time Italy supposedly played with 11 men for the full 120 minutes) game yesterday. The last three games of Euro 2008 will decide where it will ultimately sit in the list of great tournaments.

And that partially segues to the fallout from the last quarterfinal match. Contrasting the column inches and tone of blog posts emanating from North America dedicated to Russia versus Netherlands against Italy versus Spain makes interesting reading and may give an indication of how far the game still has to go in these parts.

It seems to me that more effort has been dedicated to trashing the Italy - Spain game than celebrating and reveling in the quality of the play and the spectacle that was Russia versus the Netherlands.

There are far too many posters and writers overly concerned about the reaction from non-soccer fans and sportswriters in North America. It is if a multitude of North American soccer fans/bloggers/posters decided after yesterday's game to strap on the cilices and whip themselves bloody before the soccer-haters of North America even had a chance to mobilize.

It is a reaction of a bullied child that would opt to inflict self administered pain rather than allowing the bully the pleasure. It is also the reaction that does nothing to grow the game in North America. It was a poor game yesterday - you get them from time to time and not only in soccer. That's just the way it is and self-flagellation isn't going to change anything.

Celebrate the great, praise the beautiful, rejoice that on occasion we get to enjoy 120 minutes of footballing heaven the likes of which we were privileged to see on Saturday. No one every grew anything worthwhile by wallowing in the negative and when you respond to soccer-haters gripes all you are doing at best is reinforcing the darkside. At worst it runs the risk of becoming a self-fulfilling prophesy.


As group winners Portugal, Croatia and Netherlands fell at the first knockout stage you could hear a rising crescendo of "it's not fair." Perhaps it's not fair, but there is nothing that grants a right to go on and win a tournament just because a team starts well.

Tournament play is about pacing, peaking at the right time and taking advantage of the breaks when they come your way. You don't get bonus points for artistic impression, going unbeaten in the group stage or even qualifying after only two games.

You only have to glance at the history of major tournaments such as the World Cup and the European Championships to see how difficult it is to lead from start to finish (as it is in any competition in any sport). Now and again a country will come along and be able to pull off such a remarkable achievement.

Performances by the likes of Brazil in 1958 and 1970, and France in 1984 are extremely unusual and it is easier to find examples of teams burning intensely in the early stages but flaming out spectacularly while failing to reach their overall goal.

Hungary (1954), Netherlands (1974), Italy (1978), Denmark (1986), Spain multiple times, and the daddy of them all Brazil in 1982 played memorable football in the early going only to fail in the later stages.



Comment(s) of the Day
"Previously, Daneiele de Rossi and Alessandro Di Natale had failed for Italy, while Daniel Guiza, of Italy, also had his effort saved." -Kevin McCarra in the Guardian.

Now that I have seen that it can happen to the best I don't feel so bad about Fernando Cannavaro!

It was later corrected to read - "Previously Daniele de Rossi and Alessandro Di Natale had failed for Italy, while Daniel G