If all the sportswriters and fans and other opinion-havers of the world were not so hell-bent on holding baseball up as something holy and sacred, then we probably wouldn't be faced with such a nasty-tasting endeavor into history.
Yes, I know that baseball is America's past-time.
Yes, I know that fathers and sons have bonded for generations on diamonds and in backyards.
Yes, I know that the vestiges of childhood are often the most difficult trappings to rid oneself of.
But, dude, it's just a game.
It's played by grown men who make boatloads of money. It's run by other grown men who hold cities hostage for the right to host them. And it's a past-time whose time of innocence passed long ago.
The game has been tainted - one way or another - for almost as long as it's been played.
And fans have always complained about those things. Yet they still hold the game up as sacred, if not pure.
Barry Bonds is gonna break Babe Ruth's home run record. It won't make Babe Ruth mean any less to baseball. And it probably won't make baseball mean any less to you.
It'll always be sacred to you. Because you want it to be sacred.
And you'll continue to moan about it. Because it isn't.
Bafongu, the history of the game was spoiled as soon as it began. It's not like one day, these guys (Canseco, McGwire, Sosa, Bonds, etc.) just popped on the scene and tarred and feathered baseball history.
Sorry, buddy, but baseball history just isn't as pure as you like to think it was pre-steroids. In fact, steroids helped baseball if anything, looking at the '98 season (that is, if McGwire and Sosa did use steroids, which is unprovable at this point).
I am the greatest writer of my generation. My generation just doesn't know it yet. Probably because I haven't sawed the hands off of all the other writers in my generation. *Note to self: Buy very large saw tomorrow.*