Once again an American owns the Tour De France and once again everyone is trying to take him down. It happened to the great Lance Armstrong everytime he won the Tour and he to this day is hasseled by the naysayers. Now they are after Floyd.
So what he failed his test and had incredibly high levels of testosterone? He naturally has high levels of testosterone.
So how come he never had naturally high testosterone before this? We don't know but we know for sure that when they test the backup he will be found clean and innocent.
Well how come the backup showed he had synthetic testosterone? Its all Politics. I could sit here and argue semantics forever!
Wait that is not an awnser!?! Ok fine he was tired. Don't you know when you are fatigued you produce ridiculously high levels of testosterone and then blow by all the bikers around you. I mean come on! Everybody knows that.
Floyd Landis is INNOCENT. If you don't believe me just ask him... or his lawyers or wait for the B test to come out and prove the believers right and the critics wrong.
In your post you say his B sample shows synthetic testosterone while it is his A sample. The B sample was just finished testing for the ratio, now they test for the Carbon isotope.
He will be found guilty because he doped. It is that simple. Lance was never found guilty because none of his current samples ever tested positive. It is that simple. Believe whatever you want, but his own team dropped him like a Hot Potato.
In fact, I wrote a nice post and showed the picture of Floyd receiving his testosterone. You should take a look.
YOu went back in and edited your post to take out that statement on the A sample.
You say its "semantics" and you also say its politics. The two are not the same. Semantics has to do with the use of different words to say the same thing. Politics is trying to get what you want. There is nothing semantical about a positive test.
Last edited by socalsportsfan on August 4th at 7:17 AM.
First off I never changed my post. Although you did edit your comment.
Second of all I think I know the difference between semantics and politics. Hence they are in two separate sentences.
Third I don't know how any one could write a more sarcastic blog than this blog.
I mean I literally wrote "don't you know when you are fatigued you produce ridiculously high levels of testosterone and then blow by all the bikers around you." No one blows by their competition because of fatigue. Of course Landis is INSANELY guilty that was what I was pointing out in my blog and the ridiculousness of the arguments used by Landis and his lawyers.
The newest argument is that Landis got so wasted the night before the test that alchohol produced higher levels. LOL!!!
Sportsnuttz, I edited my comment by adding more to it, not taking anything away. LOL. You are too funny. Of course he is guilty and nice use of satire.
But I still think you edited your post.
Last edited by socalsportsfan on August 5th at 9:41 AM.
i think es innocent and his latest interview pretty much proves it.....he brought up the point that only one sample out of 8 total tests for the tour came out positive, who would take testosterone only once? it wouldnt work that way.....that makes perfeect sense cuz if he was actually doping he would have used it each time
