Personally, I would NOT.

What scares me, though, is the fact that there are about 29 other General Managers that are going to try to SELL him several of the aforementioned commodity before the MLB Winter Meetings end on Thursday of this week.

Why my trepidation, you might well ask?  Let me see, there is last year's perfectly awful Horacio Ramirez for Rafael Soriano deal.  The Braves get one of the better setup men in the League, and the M's get--you guessed it--an oft injured pitcher who can never win on the road, and only occasionally at home, with a 7+ ERA.  Then there was the mostly failed Jeff Weaver experiment--who is going to benefit from that this year, now that he is no longer in Seattle blue?  (Of course, I would be more than happy if someone just kind of sent his brother up here, but we all know that ain't gonna happen either).

Then there is the fact that he/the M's front office did absolutely NOTHING at the trade deadline--a time at which the M's were actually in contention for the AL West, and after which they slid back down to second, never to recover. (Yes, I know that they won more games last year than they have since 2003 but that is really beside the point, now, isn't it?)

Rumors/leaks went out over the past week or so that the Mariners had discussed a Johan Santana trade with the Twins.  And they probably did, but they had to have known what everyone else seems to know--Santana has a full no trade clause, and he wants to go to the AL East, not West.  Besides, who were they going to give up to the Twins for Santana?  Felix Hernandez?  I think NOT. So that was a pretty useless conversation, especially if it lasted more than two minutes. (And don't get me wrong here, I can salivate over the prospect of a Santana/Hernandez one two in the rotation as much as the next person, but I'm also sane enough to know that it wasn't going to happen).

Kuroda, anyone?  Those who are in the know say that the soon to be 32 year old Japanese pitcher projects to be no better than a middle of the rotation starter, and would probably be better of in the NL than the AL (see Matsuzaka, Daisuke under the subheading "not quite as good as advertised for the monies paid out").  So the M's offer him 4 years/$45MM.  I say they would be better off giving (and I do mean GIVING) Richie Sexson to the Giants, along with maybe Wladimir Balientien and Rob Johnson, and bringing Tim Lincecum home to pitch.  Less salary, younger, hometown boy, and the probability of being able to fix those funky mechanics under the stern tutelage of new pitching coach Mel Stottlemyre.

Eric Bedard is not going to come cheap, and I'm not sure Andy McPhail wants much, if anything, that good ole Bill could/would offer him in return.  Same for the former Seattle Pilots and Ben Sheets.

The Cubs are said to be interested in left fielder Raul Ibanez, but only to convert him to a right fielder (see Soriano, Alfonso under the subheading large contract and "heck, no, I ain't moving out of left field").  What would the M's get in return?  I'm hearing Mark Prior.  Doesn't he have a glass arm?  Raul may be losing a step or two with his bad back and bad hammy from last season and he doesn't have the strongest arm from left field, but he is a left handed batter who can still more or less hit, particularly with the short right field porch at the Safe.

Despite my early thoughts to the contrary, both Jose Guillen and Jose Vidro were good pickups for the M's last season, but Guillen is now gone, so that takes 20+ HR's and 100+ RBI off of the game for this year.  Vidro is not exactly comfortable in the DH role, and his knees won't let him play the field consistently.  So, I guess that I have to give Herr Bavasi credit for those.

In short, Bill, wise up this winter.  DON'T come home with a bunch of broken down vets who probably can't get it done at Safeco Field.  If you can't come home with at least one good, young top of the rotation pitcher, then don't come home with anyone.  Start using those good young arms that are waiting in the wings.  Brandon Morrow, Ryan Rowland-Smith, Sean Green and the other 20 somethings will be ready in another year.  Don't mortgage or trade away the future for someone(s) that are not going to put a winning product on the field come spring.

I don't like the team not winning, but there are young players in the system who will get better if allowed to develop here and not be traded away for player or players who really aren't going to help.

Restrain yourself this year, OK?  (Fukudome, though, you could come home with and we would be at least a little happy about that).

Sitting here in my semi-weekly despair after the Mariners' 12-7 rout at the hands of the also sub-.500 Los Angeles Angels of Anheim, Azusa, Cucamonga and all points east, I have come up with an idea to (perhaps) restore some of the fun and excitement to the otherwise dreary season being had by fans of those teams who look to be in the doldrums for the balance of the season, and headed to 90-100 losses.

To whit, that MLB split out a third league and populate it only with teams carrying a less than .500 win percentage. The current denizens of this league (name....Losers League sounds so bad, any better ideas out there?) would be:  Orioles, D-Rays,  Indians, Twins, Royals,  A's, Angels, Mariners,  Braves, Nationals, Marlins,  Brewers, Cubs, Pirates, and the Giants.

Since baseball doesn't ever play to a tie (well, unless it's spring training or one All Star game, at least) SOMEONE would have to win the games played in this league, thus raising some of their win percentages above .500.  This would help (hopefully) to restore confidence to some of the downtrodden players who are mired in hopelessness right now, thus (again hopefully) improving their overall performance.  It would help to restore some of the hope that there is life in baseball to fans of these teams who can't stand just sitting at home (or in the ballpark) watching their teams lose all of the time. It would even make life tougher for the "elite" teams left in the traditional leagues, because we all know that some of them get their winning records by playing losing teams.

Once a team regained a winning percentage over .500 and maintained it for at least a month, they could return to their normal division, and the teams previously there who had fallen below .500 due to the extra-competitive nature of their current play would go down to the new league.  This constant rotation of teams into and out of the sub-.500 league would make for increased competition, more excitement for the fans, and maybe even increased attendance.

My 25 year old daughter made a suggestion the other day (with tongue firmly in cheek but, hey, it sounded good at the time) for adjusting player compensation, as well. She thinks that ALL players should be paid the league minimum and then given incentivized contracts calling for bonus monies for each productive hit and/or run for position players, and for each strikeout for pitchers. Drug tests would be held monthly for everyone to ensure that all bonus monies were paid out for legitimate hits/strikeouts. Imagine the fierce spirit of competition if baseball players actually had to earn their large salaries (merit based pay? what a novel idea....why didn't I think of that?)

I, for one, would pay to see a game played under such conditions. What about you?  (Perhaps we could start a petition and send it to the Commish? Oh, wait, the Commish is Bud Selig, what was I thinking????)