GO SEAHAWKS! 12TH MAN!
by: seattle_seahawks_rule
Seattle Sports "What If's"
Jul 20, 2008 | 4:39PM | report this

WHAT IF: The Seahawks took Odell Thurman instead of Lofa Tatupu in the 2nd round of the 2005 NFL Draft?

 

·         If the Seahawks did that, our defense would be nowhere near it is today. Tatupu is the leader of our defense and arguably the best player on our entire team. In fact, during the 05’ Draft, Tatupu was considered a huge reach (primarily because of his size) while Thurman was considered 1st round talent, but fell into the 2nd round due to some personality issues. Thurman was taken three picks after Tatupu, and in the rookie season of each player, they both were solid, in fact, Thurman was a Defensive Rookie of the Year contender. Three years later, Thurman has been suspended for two consecutive seasons while Tatupu has made three consecutive Pro Bowls. In other words, if we did that, we ought to be punching Tim Ruskell in the nuts for the rest of his life.

 

 

WHAT IF: The Mariners never made the trade for Erik Bedard?

 

·         I was never a fan of trading Adam Jones, and I still think he will be a star in the future. Bedard on the other hand has been injured much of the season. Today, I’m a fan of trading Bedard, but I doubt he can make an appearance prior to the trade deadline. If the trade never occurred, we’d still have a solid team. In fact, if we didn’t trade for Bedard, we could put Brandon Morrow or Ryan Rowland-Smith as the 5th starter and George Sherrill as our closer keeping in mind J.J. Putz has been unhealthy all year long; and we’d still have a solid pitching rotation and bullpen.

 

 

WHAT IF: The Mariners selected Tim Lincecum instead of Brandon Morrow with the 5th pick in the 2007 MLB Draft?

 

·         The Mariners would be a much better team had we selected Lincecum. I’m not saying Morrow instead a good player. In fact, I think the kid has tons of potential. But until we’ve seen Morrow as a starter, Lincecum will forever be the much better pitcher. Of course, Lincecum wouldn’t have burst with the Mariners if we took him until this season; so look to the future, just imagine a pitching rotation with the likes of Felix Hernandez, Tim Lincecum, Ryan Rowland-Smith, Philippe Aumont, and Juan Ramirez. The latter two aren’t ready just yet, but just imagine in the future, once the five develop, a rotation like that…

 

 

WHAT IF: Tim Ruskell never hired Mike Holmgren as the Seahawks’ head coach?

 

·         I could never imagine a Seahawks team without Holmgren. But that’s reality after next season, but what if he NEVER was. Think of the impact. That probably means Matt Hasselbeck would be a nobody, just like his brother, Tim. Why? If Holmgren never came to Seattle, Matt wouldn’t have (since Matt came via trade thanks to Holmgren), which would have meant Matt would have still needed to stay with the Packers, and backup up headline-magnet Brett Favre. In fact, we probably wouldn’t even know what a Hasselbeck even is. Just imagine, guys like Trent Dilfer and Jon Kitna as your starter instead of Matt Hasselbeck. Can you say Super Bowl team???

 

 

WHAT IF: The Seahawks traded several picks higher to select Antonio Cromartie rather than Kelly Jennings with their 1st round pick in the 2006 NFL Draft?

 

·         No Seahawks fan has probably ever considered this, but I’ve thought about it many times. The Seahawks defense would be even better if this happened. Think of a Seahawks secondary in the near future with the likes of Marcus Trufant (7 interceptions last year), Antonio Cromartie (10 interceptions last year), Jordan Babineaux, and Josh Wilson. I’d definitely be pretty optimistic about our pass defense.

 

 

WHAT IF: The referees in Super Bowl XL weren’t Steelers and were actually doing their job?

 

·         The normal person who say, simple. The Seahawks would have won their first Super Bowl in franchise history. But there’s much more to that. If that happened, Mike Holmgren would be a lock for the Hall of Fame (he won’t be unless the Hawks pull off a miracle in 2008), Bill Cowher wouldn’t have retired, while Jerome Bettis would have retired as just another oversized and overrated back, and Ben Rothleisberger would be a nobody who has a messed up last name and is a cheater.

 

 

WHAT IF: What if the Seahawks never traded Darrell Jackson?

 

·         To tell you the truth, I don’t think Jackson is ever going to have any year like the ones he had here in Seattle. While with the Seahawks, Jackson averaged 63 receptions and 920 receiving yards per season. However, he had a very disappointing year with the 49ers last year. However, I do believe had Jackson stayed with Seattle, I think Jackson would still have a career and would be one of the best receivers in the league. With D.J. Hackett and Deion Branch injured for portions of last year and Marcus Pollard nowhere close to expectations; think of how much 63 catches and almost 1,000 receiving yards would have helped us. That would definitely have given Seattle one of the most solid receiving corps in the league, and would have added AT LEAST one more win onto the 10 we got. Now with Denver and emerging young guys like Brandon Marshall and Tony Scheffler more looked at by Jay Cutler, Jackson will be no more than a reserve for the rest of his career.

 

 

Let me know what you think.

 

9 Comments | Add a comment   categories: NFL, Seattle Seahawks, Seattle Mariners
 
« Continue reading GO SEAHAWKS! 12TH MAN!
total comments: 9      Page 1 of 1     
thesupposedbuckles
Jul 20, 2008
5:22 PM
I pose this question to you. What if the Seattle Seahawks and their fans blaming refs for loses is a #### poor excuse for team not playing well enough to win. Name me one thing Seattle did to deserve to win that game. They had oppurtunities early to take the control of the game they didn't. Say what you want about calls, the best team won that day, period.

Hanahan
Jul 20, 2008
5:32 PM
WHAT IF.....

Your Aunt had balls?

She'd be your Uncle!

patsrock07
Jul 20, 2008
6:02 PM
The Steelers won fair and square, sure the refs made some questionable calls, but most of them are interpreted different ways. If I recall correctly I think some went against the Steelers that left me scratching my head.

PF
Jul 20, 2008
6:20 PM
I supported the Bedard deal, but thought he would worth the hefty price. Obviously a lot of us were wrong. The guy is fragile and I hope they can move him at the deadline, but his value has really diminished. I think Adam Jones will be average, but the pitchers we traded will hurt in the long run.

That Super Bowl defeat still stings me. It was the only championship game, I've seen where the referees took center stage and the game appeared to be fixed. Unfortunately, it involved my favorite team not getting what they rightfully deserved. I think that was the first time, I had seen offensive PI called in a game in my life. The Steelers were a good team, but we should've had like 24 points on the board, instead of 10. We were robbed.

Lofa is by far my favorite Seahawk, so that worked out well.

My big if with the Hawks is: what if they traded several picks higher to get Jonathan Stewart from Oregon.

WestSeattle
Jul 20, 2008
6:29 PM
rule,

It's great you make these post's, but you should really do a little research before submitting them.

Tim Ruskell didn't take over as GM until 2005, after he was assist. GM for Atlanta.

And please don't give these people more ammo by bringing up SB XL. Most of us have moved on. It's a sore subject for me, but I also believe in Karma. Time will tell, just let it go for know....PLEASE!

HAWK NATION!!!!

jon_464
Jul 20, 2008
6:37 PM
Had the Hawks got Antonio Cromartie AND Jonathan Stewart, they'd be THE favorites for winning it all this year. I'd certainly would have had them in the Super Bowl. Stewart would have been the missing piece to the puzzle.

Stewart's going to be a BEAST in Carolina this year. Too bad in the first three games, he's going against two of the elite defenses in the NFL. (San Diego and Minnesota) After that, he's going to tear it up! As a Panthers fan, I'm looking forward to it! I was actually surprised the Hawks didn't trade up with Carolina to get Stewart or the Steelers to get Mendenhall.

Consequently, had the Hawks drafted Thurman, they'd be a 6-10 team year after year, at least until they drafted a MLB that can stay out of trouble and can ball.

kellyscott
Jul 20, 2008
9:50 PM
WHAT IF?? the deal went south... and the sonics are staying???????

Seahawksown9ers!
Jul 20, 2008
10:26 PM
You should have mentioned that while Thurman was a contender for rookie of the year, Tatupu came in second. Also I'm perfectly happy with Jennings, Cromartie may be a ball hawk, but most ball hawks give up big plays. Jennings does not.

P.S., please stop with the SB 40 refrences, just forget it and move on. I think Roethlisberger is a lot of things (or not a lot of things people say he is) but a cheater is not one of them, he is actually a pretty classy guy. Look no further than the Jax playoff game to prove that.

Last edited by Seahawksown9ers! on July 20th at 10:28 PM.

moseby
Jul 21, 2008
1:42 PM
(Yawn) More tears from a bitter Seahawks fan. Wah, Wah, Wah. Roethlisberger is a cheater? Dude, you are just grasping at straws. No one feels sorry for your team. They couldn't make any plays legally that day and didn't deserve to win. Oh well, yawn, another unsatisfied customer.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
ABOUT ME


seattle_seahawks_rule
viagra jesgamble I am a FOX Sports Blogger who is a fan of the Seattle Seahawks. My primary interest is the NFL, I also enjoy the Arena Football League (AFL) and I follow-up on the NBA and MLB. I live on Mercer Island, Washington; across from the city of Seattle. Send any comments or complaints to: chad.johnson.
bengals@gmail
.com (I'm an Ocho Cinco fan).
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.