During the campaign of 2004 -- which this morning seems about as long ago as the campaign of 1832 -- Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., went to the White House for a congressional meeting with President George W. Bush, wearing a new campaign button.
The president gave the button a perplexed look, and asked, "Osama?"
No, said Schakowsky, it was Illinois' Democratic Senate candidate, Barack Obama. Bush shrugged and said he'd never heard of him.
"Mr. President," said Schakowsky, "you will."
This morning -- sooner than either of them, or anybody else, might have expected -- everyone has heard of Barack Obama, and the United States has elected its first African American president. The voting marks the end of a long campaign, but surely the beginning of something even bigger.
During her campaign for the Democratic nomination, back in the winter and spring, Hillary Clinton liked to find women in their nineties, born into a country where they couldn't vote, eager to vote for a woman for president. It was intended to be moving, and it was.
But Barack Obama has now been elected to lead a country where, at the time of his birth, millions of Americans who looked like him were kept from voting by violence and intimidation. Obama campaigned and contended in states where, during his preschool years, his parents' very marriage would have been illegal.
This, like the lines of people waiting three hours in the Georgia sun to vote, is something more than moving. The demonstration that there is now literally no position closed to an African American brings a partial closing to the nation's longest and most agonizing division.
Obama's triumph, over the 21 months of his campaign, was not simply to show that an African American could be a serious candidate for president, and to electrify that community. It was to create a sense of possibility in a wider audience, especially a younger audience, to make them believe that a different kind of politics was possible. From the beginning of his campaign, Obama has had a particular appeal to voters too young for their cynicism to have hardened.
His victory was no narrow squeeze; Obama ran better among white voters than any Democratic presidential candidate in decades.
For two decades, it has seemed that American politics has been locked into a punishing, unproductive trench warfare between the two parties, an endless refighting of battles about culture and country dating from the 1960s. Watching one recent national convention, David Broder of The Washington Post commented to a younger colleague that when the Baby Boomers reached nursing homes, they would be pounding on each others' walkers and yelling about Vietnam. The Bill Clinton and George W. Bush years tended to underline his point.
Obama, from a later time and free of that tie-dyed burden, offered an opportunity to finally change the subject, an opportunity the country has now embraced.
Colin Powell, in his important endorsement of Obama, said he thought Obama could be a "transformational" president. It's a big word, and a judgment finally left to historians from future decades, if not future centuries.
But Powell's point was that Obama, as not only the first African American president but a product of a post-civil rights world, a figure of extraordinary eloquence, analysis and ability to connect, carries the chance of transforming our politics, and both the way the United States sees itself in the world and the way the world sees the United States.
In 2008, these are all desperately needed changes.
Every president takes office promising to make the United States a different country than it was. Few succeed, and Obama's White House plans, like those of any other president, deserve to be viewed through that prism of improbability.
But through his historic campaign, and his impressive, once implausible triumph, Obama has already done something that few presidents manage during their entire term in office.
He has shown us that we are a different country than we thought we were.
And from that realization, we can now go forward.
This piece is courtesy of The Oregonian Editorial Board, 11/05/2008.
rmac'
I'm a Brit who's now residing and working here in the US. I'm in awe of what he's achieved and at the same time delighted by it all. That being said it'll place this country internationally in a new light.
As for a playoff system in college football. Let's see what'll happen come the end of the season. That's when Joe Pa might be on the rampage should his Nittany Lions not make it to the championship game.
I've a piece up within my site on the firing of Willingham by the Huskies as well as the Gators' beatdown of Georgia.
Should you be interested I've provided a link to the pieces below. Just click on the text to view. As and when you're ready I'll look forward to reading your comments.
Congratulations must be given to all of those who came before Obama, however.
Every person who broke a race or gender barrier throughout this nation's history must today be heralded as the pace-setters they were and for helping to establish the mere possibility of what is now a truth.
I honestly hope Obama comes through on his pledge to utilize John McCain to his benefit, possibly as a member of his Cabinet?
As a sports fan, I was pleased to hear Obama give some credit to Jackie Robinson for being one of the leaders in breaking the color barrior that made it possible for him to be elected today.
I agree on the Congratulations to Obama, but to imply that those that didn't vote for him are racist is racist in itself.
It speaks volumes about the greatness of this country that an American of African descent can hold the highest office in the land, however, I would feel much better about it if he held more of my values close to heart.
Race had nothing to do with my vote.
History was made and now the racial divide can start to heal, but statements like that only serve to contribute to divisivness.
I'm not certain that the comment made was racist, but when taken in the context you suggest, it's not a far cry. I'll consider it simply a poor choice of words on the part of nba_is_the_worst unless he/she decides to elaborate on the intent and meaning.
Thank you for voting, regardless of your beliefs, values and idealogy.
nbaistheworst
To suggest that is to denigrate those who choose a right that is solely theirs. You go in with a choice and make it. That doesn't suggest that the reason behind it is necessarily racist.
...................
slshusker
I like my sports and I also like my women. Though the latter I can stand in even larger doses than the other .
Hell I even like the fact that Palin didn't mind poking fun at herself.
...................
rmac'
Kudos to you. As a Brit residing here I've long felt that this was something that I might or mightn't have seen in my lifetime. In the UK we've political leader rise to the upper echelons of government. But they've yet to attain the highest political office in the land.
So ther may well be hope yet at some point in the future.
my question is??? if a conservative had said it the libs would thought they had lost their minds!!!!!! funny watching letterman last night talking about obama you would have thought the second coming of christ had returned??? just wait gang.. oops i for got hes a liberal cant make a mistake can he??? now lets talk politics on CNN you know political news?????
Last edited by kellyscott on November 6th at 6:22 AM.
slshusker
Nov 5, 2008
5:23 PM Read the Fox TERMS of blogging.
Fox will yank you if you delete comments that aren't profane.
Interesting that you don't believe in polite, free speech.
Delete
-----------------------------
slshusker,
Nothing in the foxsports.com or msn.com terms of use restrict my ability to remove any comments from my blog that I deem fit, regardless of the nature of the topic or posted response in question.
Furthermore, you are not polite and your comments are not constructive to the conversation taking place in this blog topic. Please keep the nature of your replies to my blog topics in line with the topic in question - a baseball topic should have baseball-related replies; a football topic should have football-related replies; a political topic, such as this very one, should have politically-geared replies.
If you cannot manage to muster enough politeness to do that, then please see your way out. Again, if you don't like my blog then stop reading it and commenting on it.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Last edited by rmac1973 on November 6th at 8:27 AM.
I'm just your average sports nut, I suppose. Of course I'm a bit of a homer - the Mariners, Seahawks, and Huskies are my teams - but I stick with my boys down the stretch, through thick and thin.
What can the Mariners do to rebound from their worst season in twent years? Will Erik Bedard recover in time for the 2009 season? Ryan Rowland-Smith and Brandon Morrow look to make the transition from the bullpen to the starting rotation, so can they combine with Felix to create a young and effective 1-2-3 tandem? How will the M's new front office guru fare - will Chuckie and Howie be able to stay "hands off" long enough for the new VP/GM to accomplish anything positive? Can the Seahawks recover from their early-season woes and rebound for a fifth straight NFC West title? How will the team handle the transition from Mike Holmgren's regime to the ways of Jim Mora Jr? Can the Hawks' defense stop anyone? Can the offense put up more than 200 yards?
Any of you folks out there interested in healthy and creative debate about anything, feel free to speak up!