Week 2 assignment for the finalists
May 30, 2006 | 8:50AM | report this

Here's the second assignment/topic for our finalists:

The best of ...
or
The worst of ...

Again, this is intentionally vague and open-ended. But you can take your pick of wanting to write about something that you deem "the best" of something or "the worst" of something. What's "something?" Totally up to the authors: game, play, team, event ... you name it.

Topic choice is often as important as the writing itself, so giving authors the freedom to choose their own path and seeing where they take it, is one of the ways we will be, and have been, evaluating entries.

Pieces must be posted on finalists' own blog no later than noon ET/9 a.m. PT this Friday.

Good luck to our 12 remaining finalists.

-Tom

13 Comments | Add a comment   category: Next Great Sportswriter
 
« Continue reading NGS judges' blog
total comments: 13      Page 1 of 1     
tjw118
May 30, 2006
9:11 AM
Ah! I love it! Thanks guys.

edclinchsaint
May 30, 2006
1:27 PM
The best of the finalists, and
the worst of the finalists.

The best of times, the worst of times.

The best of the rest,

the worst of the first.

The best of....

I am out!

Blogeachofusasmuchaswecannus.co
m

Paging Dickens!

Norcalfella
May 30, 2006
3:30 PM
Oh the irony! Anyone else think about how fitting it would've been for absolutebest to have a shot at this one?

absolutebest
May 30, 2006
3:40 PM
Personally. I'm glad that I don't have to... I have a huge headache right now, and this assignment seems way too vague. Good luck to the final 12. It will be fun to see how each of you interprets this assignment.

MeanDovine
May 30, 2006
4:14 PM
It is very simple what the judges are looking for. And, the fact that they are being so open-ended about this assignment is the best of all worlds for the contestants, as well as the worst for those who are beginning to doubt they belong in this elite class.

Comfort with one's voice and with oneself will win this competition.

Thus said, if I were a select member of this group, I would have one focus and one focus only at this time, displaying to the judges and the voting public, via my writing, a unique perspective and voice.

For example, love them or hate them, here are a few unique voices in sports who sell tickets, if you know what I mean: Vin Scully, Jay Mariotti, the late Howard Cosell, Michael Smith, Chris Berman, and of course, the late Chick Hearn.

No matter what the topic, you always hear(d) the same person behind the perspective. It's their unique way of looking at things (life..sports) that makes each one stand out from the average sports guy or gal. And, make no mistake about it, you too are vying to become a recognized sports personality.

So, what's unique about your voice and perspective?

Last edited by MeanDovine on May 30th at 4:45 PM.

patmoran2006
May 30, 2006
4:20 PM
Damn dude, pretty deep (and true)

I'm starting to think the judges were either intimidated by you; or never even bothered to look at your blog.

MeanDovine
May 30, 2006
4:48 PM
Thanks Pat. I hope they looked at my blog.

edclinchsaint
May 30, 2006
8:42 PM
They may have looked, but they didn't see.
And I am a religious guy, a man who thinks faith is the ultimate power, and I know they did not see MeanD.'s blog.

We all must truly see...everything except that which will blind us...

Blog away my brethren,

Peace

PS I have funny and thought provoking post about crickett (baseball) now on newsstands!

Blogit.usa

demonicume
May 30, 2006
8:54 PM
leaving the topic vague does the judges' work for them. as usual, i'm su####ious... this topic gives these writers just enough rope to hang themselves with. your choice of topic will say mountains about you. then how you handle said topic will speak even more. there'll be people frozen with anxiety by the amount freedom this challenge hints at. with no guidlines, there's no way to hold the judges accountable for the results... what if your topic is great, but they judges dont like it? mainstream or groundbreaking? are we flexing intellect or timely regurgitation of cliche? i'm tempted to take this challenege upon myself just to see how far i push the coin before it tumbles from the night stand and hits the worn carpet.

oh to have such freedom.

tcarr1275
May 31, 2006
7:42 AM
What will gain my attention, and I do mean my attention, are the 'wiseguys' who wouldn't know icing from the ice in their highballs, that hockey is a (in their boozed-up words) "loser sport." Don't understand this and never will. It is fine to prefer to watch one sports or another. However, for my money, or pleasure, a hockey game (Stanley Cup Playoffs at the top of the list) beats sleeping through any golf match on any network, at anytime.

socalsportsfan
May 31, 2006
9:35 AM
This topic should be fun. The only trouble I see is that this would be a great topic for someone like Crabman or TSI. Where is TSI? I miss his limericks and ballads.

Dudski
May 31, 2006
8:15 PM
Does anyone know if he was a professional writer or entertainer? That is one awesome writer and an amazing mind.

antonlash
May 31, 2006
8:50 PM
The best of anything is Steve Nash's personal video blog sponsored by NBA.COM:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
d7mgUsZQ1eE

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
 
Peter Schrager
Peter Schrager is a regular contributor to FOXSports.com and author of the popular "Wednesday Buffet" in the FOX Funhouse. He was also one of the judges in the first Next Great Sportswriter competition.
Tom Seeley
Tom Seeley is the managing editor of FOXSports.com and was also a judge in the first Next Great Sportswriter competition.
Dime Magazine
Dime Magazine is a complete celebration of the game of basketball and its culture, from the playground asphalt to the NBA hardwood to life off the court.
 
The Official FOXSports Blog
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.