Eight years and just getting worse. I don't understand how the "computer polls" have Michigan ahead of Ohio State, why USC is better than both of them and why the whole system is a compilation of about 1,000 so -called experts predictions.
Basically we have all these polls with coaches, newspaper writers, and some guy named Harris, and still the system is flawed. Every talking head complains about how the system needs help yet everyone still votes and still supports this system that no longer includes strength of schedule, quality wins or margin of victory in the formula.
So really the system just keeps getting worse. I can understand why margin of victory is not in the mix anymore, but what's the point of excluding it if you don't include strength of schedule. Because really when you eliminate the strength of schedule your saying the opponents don't matter, and if the opponents don't matter then why is margin of victory not included- why are peoples opinions more important that the scores, the schedules and results?