Football Outsiders FOX Blog
by: footballoutsiders
Matt Leinart in Denver
Sep 27, 2006 | 12:11PM | report this

The continuing saga of the Arizona quarterback position reminds me of something that I meant to put in Pro Football Prospectus 2006, but forgot as we were finishing up the book. The KUBIAK fantasy football projection system that we use is very tentative when it comes to predicting the stats of rookies, because there's so little information to go on. As a result, the rookie projections end up being significantly tied to the overall offensive projection for each player's new team.

We tried to project the top two quarterbacks on each team for 16 games, so people could see how they would do in case they had playing time. These were the projections for Jay Cutler and Matt Leinart:

Jay Cutler, DEN:

  • 260-for-464 (55.9%) 
  • 2,590 yards
  • 20 TD / 16 INT

Matt Leinart, ARI:

  • 302-for-543 (55.6%)
  • 3,299 yards
  • 15 TD / 22 INT

But here's what happens if you simply switch the teams for these two players.

Jay Cutler if he was on ARI:

  • 299-for-543 (55.1%)
  • 2,637 yards
  • 16 TD / 20 INT

Matt Leinart if he was on DEN:

  • 266-for-464 (57.3%)
  • 3,130 yards
  • 19 TD / 16 INT

A lesson both in how hard it is to project the performance of rookies, and how dependent that performance is on how good the team is around each player.

Post by Aaron Schatz

7 Comments | Add a comment   categories: Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler, NFL, Football Outsiders
 
« Continue reading Football Outsiders FOX Blog
total comments: 7      Page 1 of 1     
ksperfection
Sep 27, 2006
2:45 PM
What are the projections for Gredkoski, however you spell the 6th round rookie starter for TB?

brownsnake
Sep 27, 2006
4:11 PM
Isn't that fairly obvious about the quality of the team. Heck if I was out there with the best offensive line providing me with protection then I would be more likely to complete more passes with less picks. Granted these two teams don't have the best offensive lines, but right now, imagine these two playing for Oakland and these numbers could well be no TDs and plenty of picks. Agreed that it is near impossible to predict rookies...but you can't predict injuries either.

colin
Sep 27, 2006
5:54 PM
BONEHEAD!

FlyingPig
Sep 28, 2006
4:43 AM
This is kind of pointless. Is there a point?

fuzzboss
Sep 28, 2006
8:50 AM
I kinda understand this. But I have a question off the point: How can this garner BOTD when it only had 3 comments (now 5) and I can't even have my blog listed in those that in the "roster" of blogs. I had been in the "interesting discussions" but then it disappears. Even those with no comments are still in the list!

evilquacks101
Sep 28, 2006
11:03 PM
So what does that prove? For those who like fantasy football it may be useful information, but in the real world of football it is pointless.

You can get a pretty good look at a T-bone by sticking your head up a bull's ####, but wouldn't you rather take the butcher's word for it?

richardbrianwade
Sep 30, 2006
1:22 AM
evilquacks101, I'm pretty sure that this was just a short commentary on the difficulty of projecting the performance of rookie quarterbacks. I'd imagine that's why it was a blog post instead of an article on the front page of the NFL section.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
ABOUT ME


footballoutsiders
Football Outsiders is the Internet's #1 home for intelligent NFL analysis. Our NFL articles for FOX include Quick Reads, DVOA ratings, Too Deep Zone, the Wednesday rundown, and many others.
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.