• It's a pity that the NBA and NHL couldn't have worked out some kind of deal in regards to their playoff schedules. With the Detroit Red Wings and the Detroit Pistons each battling deep into their respective post-seasons, one figures it'd be a joyous time to be a Detroit fan. However, due to issues between the leagues (that I assume involve mainly money), the Stanley Cup Finals and the Eastern Conference Finals are not only being played on the same nights, but at the same TIMES (give or take 25 minutes). This move forces fans in Detroit to essentially pick sides, or desperately try to balance the two (I saw a few fans in the Game 4 crowd in Detroit wearing Red Wings jerseys). Even me, as a Bostonian, wishes there was some other arrangement. While my Bruins are eliminated, I find nothing more exciting than playoff hockey, especially the Cup Finals. I've found myself flipping back and forth trying to watch both games, while considering getting TiVo instead. It's a shame that this has probably ended in the NHL getting lower ratings. A casual fan would probably be more inclined to watch the NBA, as the Celtics and Lakers resurgence has been well broadcast across the media spectrum. With this being the NHL's big chance to showcase some of its best young and old talent, a dispute over dollars may have the teams playing in Kevin Garnett's shadow.

• The NBA has decided to come down on "floppers", taking a page out of the NHL's book (cracking down on diving and embellishing). I'm not sure what effect this will have on the game as a whole, but I wouldn't be surprised if offensive fouls drop drastically, either because of perceived flops or because of players getting set late because of hesitation. I'd rather see the NBA promote a "Let the boys play" approach. It seems like every drive results in some ticky-tacky foul, and if no foul is called, the players look around, hands raised, mortified at what just happened. Enough with the weak fouls, and enough with the whining. These players act like children when they don't get their way, sulking down the court and glaring daggers at the referees. Grow up.

• The Celtics have a chance to set up a throwback NBA finals, as a win tonight would undoubtedly bring back Celtics-Lakers memories of old. I'm a little too young to remember any kind of fierce rivalry, but my father and uncles certainly do. Hopefully the Celtics can advance, and can give the fans a generation ahead of me a Finals to look forward to.

• A lot seems to have been made on this website about Jason Whitlock's piece on tattoos. I tend to agree with the multitudes here when I say I don't really think it's that accurate. Yes ratings are up, but does that have anything to do with tattoos? The ratings boost could just be because of the rivalries that have made up these conference finals, or, taking a Boston-centric view, because two of the league's more storied franchises in Boston and LA are seemingly on a collision course. Far be it for me to judge Jason Whitlock, as he is a great writer, but it seems like the took two unrelated statistics and fused them together here. I can honestly say that I've never looked at an NBA player and said "Wow, I'm changing the channel, this guy has too many tattoos". On a more logical note, during play it's not exactly easy to pick out tattoos anyways, but that's just nitpicking. There's my $0.02 on the latest buzz on FoxSports.com

After going 8 for 8 in the first round (though I will concede I made those picks with a late start), it's time for the predictions and thoughts for the second round of what have already been great games in the NHL Playoffs. The first round is always the easiest to pick, as the higher seed won all but 2 series (San Jose and New York Rangers). The second round match-ups should be great ones, and if the first round is any indication, hockey fans are in for as good a playoffs as we saw last season.

EASTERN CONFERENCE

1. Buffalo Sabres vs 6. New York Rangers (Season series: Buffalo, 3-1)- Buffalo took care of business in the first round, dispatching the Islanders in 5 games. As the 1 seed, this isn't much of an accomplishment, more like the fulfillment of an expectation. Either way, the Sabres looked strong in the first round, and it appears certain that their 113 point season was no fluke. The Rangers, on the other hand, are coming off an impressive sweep of the Southeast Conference champion Atlanta Thrashers, including a 7-0 beating in game 3. The series win helped the Rangers get the #### off their back of having not won a playoff series since 1997, and certainly cemented the confidence of the team. This should be a great match-up, and it's hard to pick which way it will go. It'll be interesting to see if Sean Avery makes good on his promise to "hurt" the Sabres, or if it just further motivates the talented Buffalo group. For whatever reason, I feel like the Rangers may have the edge in this series, and may be on enough of a rule to sneak past the Sabres. Rangers in 6.

_________________________________________________
______________

2. New Jersey Devils vs 4. Ottawa Senators (Season series: New Jersey, 3-1)- Ottawa disappointed the national media in dismissing the Penguins, and in doing so sending home the biggest star in the league, but Pittsburgh was simply too young and Ottawa too talented for that series to go any other way. The Devils came back strong to beat the Lightning, winning in 6 after falling behind 2-1. An area of concern for Devils fans is, surprisingly enough, goaltending, as Brodeur has at times been inconsistent this postseason. After watching game 6 however, I think it's safe to say he may be back. He turned back shot after shot in Tampa's last gasp rush at the end of the 3rd, and looked like the goaltender he really is. Also, Scott Gomez, Brian Gionta and Patrik Elias began to produce near the end of the series, which is a big bonus for the Devils. Ray Emery has played well for the Sens, and they need him to keep playing well to have the best chance to win. It'll be close, but I think the Senators will expose the Devils and take the series. Senators in 7.

__________________________________________________
_______

WESTERN CONFERENCE

1. Detroit Red Wings vs 5. San Jose Sharks (Season series: San Jose, 3-1)- This should be a fantastic series, even if the seedings make it seem a little uneven. Detroit took care of their "number 1 seed" business in the first round, holding off the Flames after a late charge by Calgary. The Sharks impressively dispatched the Predators in 5 games, and looked good doing it. Evgeni Nabokov continues to play well in the playoffs, and Dominik Hasek was a little unsteady against Calgary. I'd give the goaltending advantage to San Jose, but the offensive firepower is pretty even. Detroit is under a lot of pressure, or should be anyways, after a few disappointing playoffs in a row, especially considering last season's series defeat at the hands of Edmonton. Even with the home ice advantage, Detroit won't be able to hold off San Jose's offensive onslaught and will be sent home early again his summer. San Jose in 6.

_________________________________________________
____________

2. Anaheim Ducks vs 3. Vancouver Canucks (Season series: Anaheim, 3-1)- These two teams are coming off two completely different series. Anaheim easily sent Minnesota home, winning their series in 5 games. Vancouver, on the other hand, finally beat the Stars in a marathon of a series, especially considering the length of the first game of that series. Anaheim has been a Cup favorite since the beginning of the season, and they have done little to show that they don't deserve such recognition. They are a force to be reckoned with, and will give the Canucks more than they can handle. Even with the way Roberto Luongo has been playing, the Ducks will be able to outlast the Canucks. I think it will go 7, but the Ducks will prevail in the end. Ducks in 7.

So there you have it. These picks are a lot less confident than my first round selections, but we'll have to wait and see. Feel free to leave any comments or your picks too.

Thanks for stopping by, hockey fans.

I still think that the NHL has the best playoffs out of any major sport, with baseball probably being close behind. I'm sure I'll be ripped by fans of the NFL and NBA who claim that their playoffs are just as good, if not better. The NFL does sometimes hold my interest when the Patriots aren't involved, but I just cannot get into an NBA playoff game unless the Celtics are playing. With the NHL, I can watch every game, even without a vested interest in either side, and still be very entertained. Last year's Stanley Cup Finals was once of the best series I have ever seen in any playoffs, and most of the other series didn't disappoint either.

 I know at least a little bit about all of the teams in this year's playoffs, and know a lot about some of them too. I don't really have a favorite team this year, but there are some teams that I guess I "wouldn't mind" seeing hoist Lord Stanley in June.

 My favorite teams in this year's playoffs are:

-San Jose Sharks:  I've always liked the Sharks, for reasons that I don't really remember. It probably began when I just liked their cool logo back when they were an expansion team. Now, they have an exciting team, and also have some former Bruins with a guy named Joe and Kyle McLaren. They also have one of the better scorers in the league in Jonathan Cheechoo, an exciting young rookie in Milan Michalek, and a formidable goalie tandem in Evgeni Nabokov and Vesa Toskala. They will be strong contenders for the Cup, but they do face a strong first round opponent in the 110 point-Nashville Predators.

 -Calgary Flames: I also don't know why I'm a fan of the Flames. I'm interested in seeing how Wayne Primeau and Brad Stuart perform. Also, I loved the passion shown by the Calgary fans in the '03-'04 Stanley Cup Finals loss in seven games to the Lightning. I don't know what it is, but Calgary would be a cool winner, especially because they are an 8-seed out West, and I'm always a fan of the underdog.

-Anaheim Ducks: The Ducks are what I wish the Bruins would be, mainly because of their physical style of play that seems to almost be the norm out West. They have a very strong defensive corps, led by Francois Beauchemin, Chris Pronger and Scott Niedermayer. They also have good offensive weapons in Ryan Getzlaf, Chris Kunitz and Rob Niedermayer. Like the Sharks, they also have a strong two-pronged goalie duo with Ilya Bryzgalov and Jean-Sebastien Giguere. They are going to be very tough to beat out West.

I don't think it's any coincidence that no teams from the East are among my favorites, simply because they are all frequent opponents of the Bruins. I'd jump on the Pittsburgh bandwagon, because a Stanley Cup victory by Sidney Crosby's Penguins would be a huge marketing boost for the NHL, but I think that enough of the national sports media has climbed on the bandwagon, and it might be a little full.

Let's take a look at each series in the first round, with the predictions for each at the end in bold. Since I'm writing this after all of the series are in full swing, the current series records are in parentheses after the team names.

EASTERN CONFERENCE

 1. Buffalo Sabres vs 8. New York Islanders (Series tied 1-1)- This seems like it would be a completely one-sided series, since the Sabres have been amongst the best teams in the league all year. I wouldn't mind seeing the Sabres go down, mainly because Daniel Briere is my least favorite player in the league. The Islanders entered the playoffs in probably the coolest way possible (and eliminated the hated Leafs in the process) by winning a shootout against the New Jersey Devils. They have been riding the hot hand of Wade Dubielewicz, and got a solid performance from Rick DiPietro in his first game back in game 2. However, even with my overall distaste for the Sabres, I can't deny the amount of weapons they have as a team, and think they will prevail in the end. Sabres in 6 games.

 __________________________________
__________________________________________

2. New Jersey Devils vs 7. Tampa Bay Lightning (Series tied 1-1)- This is a great match-up, with two of the league's top five scorers in Vincent Lecavalier and Martin St. Louis of the Lightning facing off against one of the greatest goalies in history in Martin Brodeur. The Devils have been playing really well all year, and even made a run at the Sabres for best record in the East towards the end of the year. I can't pick against solid goaltending, so I think the Devils will come out on top. Devils in 6 games.

________________________________
___________________________________

3. Atlanta Thrashers vs 6. New York Rangers (Rangers up 2-0)- This seemed like it would be a really close series, with both teams playing really well down the stretch to secure a playoff berth. The Rangers were on the verge of being out of it, then went on a tear and moved all the way up to sixth place. The Thrashers seemed rejuvenated with the arrival of Keith Tkachuk and Alexei Zhitnik. However, after the first 2 games, the Rangers seem like they have the series under control. They took the first two games on the road in Atlanta, and are now firmly in control of the series, and I can't really see them losing control. Atlanta will take one, but the Rangers will take the series. Rangers in 5 games.

________________________________
___________________________________

                                                 

4. Ottawa Senators vs 5. Pittsburgh Penguins (Ottawa up 2-1)- This is the series that everyone is watching. The Senators have been perennial playoff disappointments, and the Penguins have been the league's darlings all year. Everyone wants Sidney Crosby's team to succeed. To his credit, his team has had an amazing turn around, one of the top 5 point turn-arounds season to season in NHL history. They have a great group of players in Crosby, Colby Armstrong, Sergei Gonchar, Evgeni Malkin, Jordan Staal, and a great young goalie in Marc-Andre Fleury. The Senators have a strong team as well, with Daniel Alfredsson, Jason Spezza, and the always-entertaining Ray Emery in net. This series is going to be a dogfight, but I think the Senators will be able to pull it out. Senators in 7 games.

___________________________________
__________________________________________ 

WESTERN CONFERENCE

1. Detroit Red Wings vs 8. Calgary Flames (Detroit up 2-0)- Detroit has been a quiet success, not receiving much media attention while accumulating 113 points and tying Buffalo for the most wins at 53. Calgary snuck in as the 8 seed, squeezing in ahead of the surging Colorado Avalanche. Detroit still has a ton of talent, and the steady playoff hand of Dominik Hasek in net. Calgary also has talent, with plenty of toughness as well in Dion Phaneuf and Robyn Regher. They also have one of the best goalies in the league between the pipes in Miikka Kiprusoff. After losing the first two games in Detroit, I think Calgary will be able to take at least one of the next two at home on the Red Mile. Even so, Detroit is too good to blow this series lead. They have been dominating this series so far, outshooting the Flames 97-35 in the first two games, and will be able to close it out without much of an issue. Detroit in 5 games.

___________________________________
__________________________________________

2. Anaheim Ducks vs 7. Minnesota Wild (Anaheim up 2-0)- When Minnesota came to Boston in early March, I was surprised to hear that they were in solid playoff standing, simply because I hadn't heard much about them. They are a good young team, led by Marian Gaborik and Brian Rolston, and have pretty solid goaltending with Manny Fernandez and Niklas Backstrom. Even so, I don't think there is a chance for the Wild to win this series. They may sneak one in at home in front of those rabid Minnesota hockey fans at the Excel Center, but the Ducks will win the series. Anaheim in 5 games.

___________________________________
__________________________________________

3. Vancouver Canucks vs 6. Dallas Stars (Vancouver up 2-1)- Before even getting into who has the advantage in this series, I have to say that game 1 between these two teams pretty much captured what is so great about playoff hockey. FOUR overtimes! That's nearly 140 minutes of full tilt, pedal to the metal, playoff intensity hockey. Vancouver had 3 players with more than 50 minutes of ice time (Mattias Ohlund, Willie Mitchell and Kevin Bieksa), and Dallas had 2 (Sergei Zubov and Philippe Boucher). Zubov led all players in ice time at 55:08. That's nearly 56 minutes on the ice, which is almost a full game. Roberto Luongo made 72 saves in his first career playoff game. SEVENTY-TWO!!! An amazing game, one that I wish I had been able to watch but couldn't due to Versus not being offered on my dorm's TV. Either way, I read stories and saw highlights, and this game was everything that the playoffs should be. As far as the actual series goes, it should be a good one. Vancouver has been quietly fantastic all year, as has Dallas. Both teams have solid goaltenders in Luongo and the Stars' Marty Turco, and both also have proven scorers in Dallas' Mike Modano and Vancouver's Markus Naslund. This should be a great series, though it may seem like a let-down after such a thriller in game one. I think Roberto Luongo will be the difference maker. If he can continue to play as well as he has (and I think he will), the Canucks will be able to hold of Dallas. This series does have the potential to go the distance, especially after another overtime game in game 3, but Vancouver will prevail. Vancouver in 6 games.

________________________________
___________________________________

4. Nashville Predators vs 5. San Jose Sharks (Series Tied 1-1)- This series, when I looked at the seedings, really surprised me. Nashville with 110 points at number 4, and San Jose with 107 points at number 5? Both of these teams are very talented, and are only numbers 4 and 5 respectively because of who else is in their division (Detroit for Nashville and Anaheim for San Jose). This is probably going to be the best series of the playoffs, and it's hard to decide which way to go. In the end, the duo of Toskala and Nabokov could prove too much for Paul Kariya, Peter Forsberg and the Preds. San Jose in 7 games.

So there you have it, playoff predictions just a week late...

___________________________________
__________________________________________ 

No blog post is complete without Bruins news or thoughts, and this one is no excuse. Here are some "quick hits" from the Bruins.

• The Bruins took a lot of grief all year from Toronto and Montreal fans, so one can imagine my happiness as both teams were eliminated from the playoffs in the last two games of the season. So what did these two teams gain by being "this close" to the playoffs? Nothing. They are still taking an extended summer vacation, and are actually worse off than the Bruins are, since they are now picking further down in the draft. Taking joy in others' misfortunes isn't usually an admirable thing do to, but rules are out the window when dealing the Toronto and Montreal.
• In looking at the above playoff predictions, one thing stands out. A lot of the elite teams have 2 dependable goalies, and their success isn't just a coincidence. The Bruins have a wealth of goaltenders in their system, and just need to figure out what their plan is for the future. In talking with my brother the other night about this team, the tough position that this team is in came to light. They showed flashes of excellence this season when Tim Thomas was on his game, and he can be a solid goalie. However, the team is in a bind as to what to do next. Should they bail on Toivonen and bring in a Toskala, Nabokov or Giguere? The sticky situation gets worse when thinking about how young Hannu is, and a team never wants to give up on a young player who has shown so much talent at times. He just needs a little more experience and more development. Also, bringing in a high-caliber goalie would probably delay the NHL arrival of the "Chosen One", Tuukka Rask. Even this has a catch though, as Rask is going to need some time. He is likely going to spend all of next season in Providence, then see where he is headed after that. Should the team really base the next 2 years (at least) on the possibility that Rask will be the goalie of the future? By all accounts, Rask will be great. He is already near the top (if not the number one) goalie prospect in the world, but it's never good to put that much pressure on such a young kid. My opinion? Do nothing. Keep Thomas and Toivonen, let them play 1-2 next year, and let Dave Lewis ride the hot hand in 2007-2008. This team's problem last year was both inconsistence and defense. If the defense can be shored up with a small trade or free-agent signing, that would be the best solution. Toivonen and Thomas can do the job, and if Toivonen steadies his game, Bruins could be looking a Finnish-tandem of Toivonen and Rask a few years down the road.
• In watching "The Bricks", Andy Brickley's end of season awards show for the Bruins that highlighted the best plays of the year, it became apparent that this team's offense really fell apart with the loss of Glen Murray. The flak that this guy gets is puzzling. Sure, he's not that young, but he's also no Chris Chelios. He had 28 goals in 59 games, missing a bulk of the end of the year due to injury. As the show showed highlights of the great goals of the season, the Bruins' power play worked like clockwork at times. Pass from Bergeron to Chara, Chara to Savard, Savard back across to Bergeron, Bergeron across to Murray in the slot, Murray into the back of the net. Bing, ####, boom. This is why the "TRADE MURRAY!" complaints are so puzzling. He is one of the key cogs to this offense, probably second only to Marc Savard's amazing playmaking ability. Sure he may be getting up there, and he does have a pretty large contract, but he's still a pure scorer and a great player.
• Dave Lewis' job has been all but secured for at least the START of next season, and I'm really not disappointed. I think he deserves another shot, considering he was as new with his players as they were with him. If he doesn't start off well next year though, Chiarelli won't hesitate to let him go. If next October is as sluggish as October '06, Dave Lewis will be looking for a new job.
• Please, please, please, please, PLEASE don't trade Patrice Bergeron. This came up in an article by Kevin Paul Dupont in the Boston Globe a few weeks ago. Dupont said that if a trade was to be proposed to San Jose for Nabokov, a Murray/Toivonen package would no longer cut it due to Murray's injury, and Dupont then elaborated, saying that Sharks GM Doug Wilson would probably ask for Patrice Bergeron instead. If this trade happened, it would push me away from the Bruins probably for good. I don't think Chiarelli is this rash or, to put it bluntly, this stupid, but I felt like it needed to be said.

Any Bruins fan can vouch for the fact that this season has been far from quiet, far from easy and far from predictable. This team has looked like they could take on the World All-Stars and shut them out, them come out on the following night and looked like they were a Pee-Wee team that took a wrong turn on the way to the rink. The inconsistency has been, in my opinion, the most frustrating part of the season. Last year, the B's were out of it early. Now it's March 13, and they are still remotely in contention for a playoff berth, as unlikely as it may be. With all of the problems, this team is still only 5 points out of 8th place in the conference with 13 games to play. Their "games in hand" secret weapon is really no longer a factor. They squandered each of those games completely, failing to make up any ground at all. The 5 points seems like nothing, but they also need to leap over 4 teams to claim the 8th spot. Impossible? Of course not, but definitely unlikely.

Since my last post, there have been 7 games played, and, surprisingly enough, this stretch has been a microcosm of their season. Here's a game by game mini-breakdown, mainly with how big of a win or loss each was:

 3/1: OT Loss to Philly- I was at this game, and it was pretty frustrating. Tim Thomas made more than 50 saves, and the Bruins had a 2-0 lead after less than 5 minutes. If it's any consolation, Scottie Upshall made a great play to end the game, and they did take at least 1 point out of it. Ugly Loss.

3/3: Win versus Montreal- Great game, full house, action packed. Coming off the Philly game, this was an important one. Big Win.

3/4: Win versus New Jersey- With Joey MacDonald in net, this was probably the best effort of the season. The Devils are challenging the Sabres for 1st in the East, and the Bruins essentially shut them down. Coming off the big Montreal win, this game should have done wonders for this team's confidence. Should have. Another Big Win.

3/6: Loss against Colorado- I was at this game, and boy, was it ugly. No offense, no rhythm, no tempo, nothing remotely threatening against the Avalanche. Bad game following a great effort against the Devils. Bad Loss.

3/8: Loss versus the Wild- I was at this game too, and saw my second straight home stinker. This game showed a little more offense from the Bruins, and they made it interesting at the end, but it was still a terrible game. Even worse loss.

3/10: Loss at Philadelphia- Awful is the one word that can sum up this game. Sure, Philly has been playing better since the Forsberg and Biron trades, but come on boys. Have some pride. Terrible, Terrible, Terrible Loss.

3/11: Win versus the Red Wings- Again, similar to the Devils game, the Bruins seemed to play up to their opponents, beating the second best team in the NHL 6-3 at home in front of the entire nation on NBC. Great Win.

So there you have it. Up and down this team continues to go. Where it stops? Hopefully the playoffs, but who knows? With 2 more games against the Rangers, whom they haven't played well against all year, and 3 against Montreal, anything is possible. A consistent and strong effort versus the Caps on Thursday would be a good place to start. I'm not ready to shift my focus to just Daisuke, Beckett, Manny and the bullpen just yet.

Before I get to the trades, a couple of things that were especially painful about last night's home loss to the Atlanta Thrashers:

• 1. Atlanta is a team who is ahead of them in the standings, another quality opponent where a win could have built confidence for this team. Not only that, they were reeling themselves, having gone 2-5-2 in their last 9 before last night's game. They were 8 points in front of the Bruins last night, and this could have been a great win for the team.

• 2. This was one of the Bruins hidden tools down the stretch: a game in hand. One of the reasons I've yet to concede defeat this season is that the Bruins have at least 2 games in hand on nearly every team in front of them. This was one of them, and it was wasted in a losing effort.

• 3. I couldn't watch the game, since my dorm's satellite TV doesn't carry Versus (Sorry, this is more of a personal complaint).

This upcoming game vs. Philadelphia is a must win (aren't they all down the stretch, though?), since this team can barely afford another loss, let alone another one of their infamous mini-skids. The game vs. Florida Saturday night was a lost cause, and fans probably could have sensed this one coming going into the game. It came on the tail end of a long, difficult road trip, and was against a team that the Bruins have struggled mightily against all season. Sure, 7-2 is a bit much of a loss, but a loss is a loss, no matter by how many or how few. I think some of the internet message boards bashing of Hannu Toivonen is unjustified. Yes, he let up 4 goals in 2 periods, but he also faced 33 shots, an amount that most goalies will face in an entire game. Blame should be put on Toivonen for the goals, but he shouldn't bear the brunt of it, as a sieve-like defense in front of him did little to prevent Florida's offensive onslaught.

Chiarelli has finally done the right thing with Toivonen in sending him down to Providence. Joey MacDonald can serve as an emergency backup down the stretch, and Toivonen can continue to develop and play regularly down in Providence. A point was made the other day that Toivonen, had he been an American born player, could be (just as an example) be a starting senior goalie at Boston University this year. He's just a kid at this point, and hasn't gotten the time or chances that he both deserves and needs to develop into the player that he should be.

Now, on to a wild day of trades, and not just by the Bruins. However, since they affect me the most, I'll start there.

Paul Mara (D) to the New York Rangers for Aaron Ward (D): In my opinion, this trade is a wash. I liked what Mara brought to this team. He was a local guy who seemingly wanted to play here. He also brought a little edge to the team, and his fight against Leafs' punk Darcy Tucker remains one of the highlights of the season. Ward is older (34 vs. 27), but brings a lot of experience with his age. He was a member of Carolina's Stanley Cup winning team last year before signing with the Rangers this summer as an Unrestricted Free Agent. He was a member of 2 other Cup teams as well, both times with the Detroit Red Wings (1996-1997 and 1997-1998). The only area where this trade benefits the Bruins is monetarily, as Ward's salary is slightly lower than Mara's ($3 mil. vs. $2.75 mil.).

Brad Boyes (C/RW) to the St. Louis Blues for Dennis Wideman (D): This was a head scratcher for me. I love Boyes, and as a player, he was one of my favorites on the team. There is no denying that he wasn't producing this year, but I think Chiarelli may have given up on him too early. Boyes is a second year player, only 24 years old. Everyone in sports knows of the famed "sophomore slump". Yes, Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin aren't suffering from the same slump, but no one would ever suggest that Boyes is of the same talent level as those 2. Wideman is a young guy who has been in the league for a year. I don't really get this trade because of the seeming wealth of young defenseman that the Bruins have in Providence (Matt Lashoff, Mark Stuart, Jonathan Sigalet, etc.). He is listed on TSN as a "career potential" power play specialist. Hopefully he can blossom into a great offensive defenseman, and hopefully Boyes can go on to have a great career for St. Louis. He's a great kid, and deserves the best.

The title of my post comes from the question that I have in my head right now, which is did Chiarelli make these moves just for the sake of making a trade? In most cases, teams are either buyers or sellers at the deadline. The Bruins made a wash of a trade and a questionable one, neither one greatly benefiting the team or giving an indication of giving up. I hope Chiarelli did his research, and these don't end up being mistakes.

This was a HUGE trade deadline around the NHL, with a ton of big name players changing hands. Some that stuck out, just because of the Bruins connection, were made by Pittsburgh. What's the connection? Ray Shero, the Penguins GM, turned down the Bruins job, and in the opinions of some message boards posters, did a great job of ripping off teams to make great deals for the Penguins. They acquired an enforcer to protect Sid the Kid in tough guy Georges Laraque from Phoenix, and added power forward Gary Robers in a trade with Florida. Pittsburgh was on a tear before the deadline, and they seem to be ready to make a playoff push.

Here are some other trades that stand out:

• Keith Tkachuk to the Atlanta Thrashers-- Glen Metropolit, 2007 1st and 3rd round picks and 2008 2nd round pick to the St. Louis Blues: The Thrashers are making a desperate playoff push at this point, seriously mortgaging their future for here and now. Tkachuk gives them another big scoring threat, giving them more firepower to add to Ilya Kovalchuk and Marian Hossa. Also, St. Louis got a pretty good return for the aging forward, and seems to be arming itself for the future.
• Bill Guerin to the San Jose Sharks-- Ville Nieminen, Jay Barriball and 2007 1st round pick to the St. Louis Blues: "Dollar Bill" Guerin reunites with Jumbo Joe in San Jose, again bolstering an already potent offense. The main interest I have in this trade is again on the St. Louis end, as they got 2 young players and a first round pick in exchange for another aging veteran. Again, arming themselves for the future.
• Todd Bertuzzi to the Detroit Red Wings-- Shawn Matthias, 2007 conditional draft pick, 2008 conditional 2nd round draft pick to the Florida Panthers: Detroit picks up a guy who has the potential to add a lot to their team. The key word in that last sentence, however, is POTENTIAL, and I haven't read into it, but I'm guessing the conditions of the draft picks depend on how many games Bertuzzi actually plays as a Red Wing. The Red Wings already currently have the 3rd most points in the NHL, and a healthy Bertuzzi would make them that much more formidable down the stretch.
• Ryan Smyth to the New York Islanders-- Robert Nilson, Ryan O'Marra, 2007 1st round pick to the Edmonton Oilers: This is a really big trade. Edmonton GM Kevin Lowe actually said "It was probably the most difficult phone call I've ever had to make" when talking about informing Smyth that he had been traded. Smyth was an assistant captain, and one of the most (if not the most) popular player on the team. Apparently, Lowe felt he couldn't resign Smyth, and had to move him. This is also bad news for the Bruins, as the Islanders are ahead of them in the standings and acquired a great player to help them down the stretch.