In the past week, significant changes have happened in the
NL Central. The Brewers struck first on Monday by acquiring CC Sabathia for
Matt LaPorta, Zach Jackson, Rob Bryson, and PTBNL. The Cubs struck back on
Tuesday by acquiring Rich Harden and Chad Gaudin for Sean Gallagher, Eric
Patterson, Matt Murton, and Josh Donaldson. While the effect of the trades on
the participating teams has been widely covered, the effect they have on the
rest of the league gets little coverage. So just how has it affected the rest
of the National League? I’ll try to answer that today.
I will be using the Postseason Odds
Report available at Baseball
Prospectus as a starting point. I will also consider the Sabathia trade to
add 3 wins to the Brewers and the Harden/Gaudin trade to add 2 wins to the
Cubs.
NL East and West
Division Championships
I have not looked closely at the Cubs and Brewers individual
schedules to see how they would directly affect other teams’ projected records,
so the chances of each team in the other divisions winning their division
championships goes unaffected.
NL Central Division
Championship
With only the Cubs, Brewers, and Cardinals having better
than 1% chances of winning the Central before the trades, the trades do not
have a large effect on the Reds, Pirates, or Astros. As for the Cubs, the
Sabathia trade decreases their chances while the Harden trade increases them. I
estimate the net effect being about zero. On the other hand, the Brewers’
chances of winning the division have increased about 3% to 15%. That, of
course, means that the Cardinals’ chances have dropped the same 3% about 5%,
but there is a much larger effect in the Wild Card race.
NL Wild Card
Before the trades, the NL Wild Card had a strong probability
of coming out of the NL Central with a 75% chance of that occurring. So that
means that once again, the Cardinals were the bystander most affected by the
trades. By my estimation, the trades have bumped up the Cubs 2% to 15% and the
Brewers 13% to 47%. That increase of 15% has to come from somewhere. Since there
was only 0.6% chance of the Wild Card coming out of the NL West, that 15% has
to come from the East and Central. After removing 1% from the top four NL East
teams and the Reds, the Cardinals’ Wild Card chances are reduced by 10% to 16%.
So now that we’ve accounted for how the Sabathia and Harden trades affect
everyone’s playoff odds, let’s review where that leaves everyone’s odds going
forward.
The Buyer or Seller series may have ended prematurely, but that doesn’t
mean we can’t revisit it here. In certain situations, it’s obvious whether a
team should be a buyer or seller, but there are other situations where it’s not
so obvious. Here’s my opinion; I’d like to hear yours in the comments.
Buyers: Phillies, Mets, Brewers, Diamondbacks, and Dodgers Holders: Cubs Sellers: Braves, Nationals, Reds, Pirates, Astros, Giants,
Rockies, and Padres Undecided: Marlins and Cardinals
I plan on revisiting the Marlins and Cardinals in separate
posts to make up my mind on where they should be. If I had to decide now, I’d place them in the Hold category.
Also, I plan on having one more post regarding the All-Star
selection process. Hopefully, I can get that up by Monday; it’s going to be
especially difficult if my internet connection doesn’t start working.
After writing about the Cubs a couple
days ago, it’s now time to talk about the team I
picked to beat them in the World Series: the Boston Red Sox. Now let’s look
at the defending World Champs to see if they have areas to improve before the
trade deadline.
First, among position players, their only two potential
weaknesses are at SS and C. At SS, Julio Lugo is getting on base really well
this season, but his defense is once again suspect, at least according to the
advanced statistics. He’s at -2 FRAA,
83 Rate,
and .770 RZR.
That RZR ranks last among MLB shortstops. The bad news is that Lugo is still
signed for 3 more years, so he needs to play if he’s to provide value (either
on the field or in trade). If the Sox end up looking for alternatives, they
might not have to look any farther than Jed Lowrie. Lowrie has hit at both AAA
(.279/.375/.435) and in the majors (.310/.340/.476). Plus, he’s held his own on
defense, though in very limited time.
At catcher, Jason Varitek’s age might have caught up to him.
He’s striking out 26.9% of the time. While that’s not much worse than his
career 22.9%, his walk rate has also dropped to 8.6% (career 10.6%). That
amounts to a career low 0.35 BB/K (career 0.52). On top of it, his liner rate
has dropped to 11.7% (career 20.4%). However, there aren’t really any alternatives.
Even if there were options, could you see the Red Sox choosing someone over
Varitek? (On the other hand, did you expect them to trade Nomar Garciaparra?)
On the mound, the Red Sox have an embarrassment of riches.
With Josh Beckett, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Jon Lester, Justin Masterson, Tim
Wakefield, Clay Buchholz, and Bartolo Colon, the Red Sox have plenty of SP to
choose from, but that hasn’t stopped them from coming up in the C.C. Sabathia traderumors.
Moving to the later innings, the Red Sox also have a full stable of options: Jonathan
Papelbon, Hideki Okajima, and Manny Delcarmen among others. If they choose to
acquire a pitcher, more power to them.
Potential holes to fill: C, SS
Potential trade bait: Jed Lowrie, Coco Crisp (he's still here?), Ryan Kalish,
Lars Anderson, Clay Buchholz, Justin Masterson, Michael Bowden (Buchholz and
Masterson only listed for a potential Sabathia deal)
After taking a 3-1 lead, the Indians lost three straight to
the Boston Red Sox, but don’t worry Indians fans. Mark Shapiro and company have
your team setup for the long haul.
Strengths
Most of the team’s core is locked up through 2010 with C.C.
Sabathia being the only exception. Sabathia will become a free agent following
the 2008 season if he isn’t signed to an extension before then. Victor Martinez
is the key component that will be a free agent following the 2010 season. Other
key guys like Grady Sizemore and Travis Hafner are signed through 2012, and
2008 sensation Fausto Carmona also won’t be eligible for free agency until the
end of the 2012 season. Is Rafael Betancourt (and his 80/9 K/BB) a key to this
team? He’s a reliever, so I’d say no. If you think he is, he’ll be a free agent
following the 2009 season.
Outside of the core of this team, their other major strength
is that there are no glaring holes on the team. Martinez shored up his defense
last offseason so that teams are no longer running at will when he’s behind the
plate. After a miserable 2006 saw 100 of 122 would-be base stealers reach
successfully (an 18.0% CS rate), he threw out 33 of 103 runners this year (a
32.0% CS rate). Their fifth infielder is Josh Barfield, who was considered one
of their major additions last offseason, but after hitting .250/.278/.326
through July, he was benched in favor of Asdrubal Cabrera. If Barfield can fix
his problems at the plate, the Indians could then swing a midseason trade to
fix any early-season holes that crop up due to injury or poor performance. Flanking
Sizemore in the outfield are Franklin Gutierrez and a platoon of Jason Michaels
and David Dellucci. The two players have career lines of .287/.359/.441 against
LHP and .269/.355/.464 against RHP, respectively.
The pitching staff will have Sabathia and Carmona headlining
a rotation with Jake Westbrook, Paul Byrd, and Aaron Laffey filling out the 3,
4, and 5 spots. That assumes that the Indians pick up Byrd’s option of $8M, which
also depends on the outcome of his hGH admission (it wasn’t against the rules
at the time and he had a prescription, so he should be safe). Without Byrd,
their in-house options are Cliff Lee, Jeremy Sowers, and Adam Miller. After
missing the month of April due to injury, Lee pitched 91.2 major league innings
before being demoted because of a 6.38 ERA and clubhouse
problems. In 48 minor league innings, Lee had a 3.00 ERA. Coming off a 2.76
ERA over 153.2 AA innings in 2006, Miller was expected to be a late season
addition to the Indians 2007 staff, but he only managed 65.1 innings at AAA
with a 4.82 ERA due to right
elbow inflammation in July. Minor league injury information is tough to
come by, so I’m unaware of the extent of the injury. However, he is pitching in
the Arizona Fall League, so that’s a good sign. These backup options for the
rotation could also find a spot in the bullpen, but they’ll be hard to come by
as Betancourt, Rafael Perez, and Jensen Lewis will all be back. In addition,
Joe Borowski and Aaron Fultz have $4M and $1.5M club options for 2008. Fultz’s
option will most definitely be picked up, and Borowski’s option isn’t bad for a
league average relief pitcher. That’s five bullpen spots already taken, which
doesn’t leave a lot of room for the other guys.
Concerns
After a healthy 2007, a couple of Indians’ pitchers could
struggle to stay healthy in 2008. Tom
Verducci of Sports Illustrated has written about the Year-After Effect, and
Will Carroll of Baseball Prospectus has written about a “rule of 30” based on
ASMI research. Both tell the same story. If a pitcher sees a 30-inning increase
in IP, the risk of injury elevates. Both Sabathia and Carmona exceeded last
year’s IP by at least 50. There are exceptions, but with two players on the
same team, it’s likely that at least one of them will suffer from the
Year-After Effect.
The Indians have no holes on their roster. I know I
mentioned this as a strength, but it can also be a weakness. The easiest way to
add wins to a roster is by replacing a poor player with an average one (or even
better, a great one). Without any holes, the Indians will be strong contenders
in 2008 and beyond, but it has to be tempting to go out and get one improvement
in an attempt to distance themselves from the Tigers. The easiest improvement
would be to get a big bat to play one of the corners, since they don’t
currently have one at any of the four corner positions. However, it’s hard to bring
in somebody to start over Ryan Garko, Casey Blake, Gutierrez, or
Michaels/Dellucci and still get your money’s worth. The only big bats available
on the corners are Alex Rodriguez (most likely), Mike Lowell, Barry Bonds, and Adam
Dunn (possibly). I only see Lowell and Dunn as plausible choices, but imagine
if Bonds played for the Indians, who would get booed more on the road: the perceived
PED user (Bonds) or the guy with the positive PED test (Betancourt)?
Overall
The Indians’ main goal this offseason has to be signing
Sabathia to an extension, but given the workload on his arm this year, do they
wait until next offseason in case he gets hurt? Given that Verducci pointed out
that Sabathia was an exception before, Shapiro should try
to get something done before other teams can get involved next year. The
Indians don’t have any needs to fill heading into the offseason, but if they
want to get involved, they have some options. They could sign another big bat.
They could trade one of their infielders (depending on how they or other teams
feel about Barfield). No matter what they do, they’ll be contenders in the AL
Central again next season and should be for years to come.
This is baseball. Let's have some fun.
Recommended Websites:
MLB Trade Rumors, Baseball Prospectus, Cot's Baseball Contracts, Fan Graphs, Football Outsiders