One type of article that I always find comical/worthless is
those that start with “If the season ended today…,” so…
If the season ended today, the Orioles, Rays, Angels,
Marlins, Cardinals, Brewers, and Padres would be in the playoffs with the
winner of a 1-game playoff between the White Sox and Royals joining them. Out
of those eight teams, only the Angels and Brewers were considered strong
playoff contenders just a week ago. So what’s my point? Discard most of what
you’ve seen so far this baseball season. 96% of the season has yet to be
played. Unless your favorite team is the Pirates, Astros, or Giants, don’t give
up yet. If your favorite team is the Orioles, White Sox, Royals, Twins,
Marlins, or Nationals, enjoy being near the top of the standings, but it’s
probably not going to last long. If you drafted Matt Holliday or Alfonso
Soriano, don’t worry because they’ll turn it around before long. If you drafted
Cliff Floyd or David Murphy, first, why’d you do that and second,
congratulations, everything’s downhill from here. When evaluating your team
right now, remember that the last few years tell you more than the first week
of 2008.
On to the other topic I wanted to talk about, I selected a
fantasy team this morning, and I must tell you that my team’s not very good
(Warning: not for the squeamish):
C Jason
Kendall 1B Jose
Vidro 2B Kazuo
Matsui 3B Mike Lamb SS Adam
Everett LF Emil
Brown CF Carlos
Gomez RF Darin
Erstad P Livan
Hernandez P Kyle Kendrick
With that lineup, I’m hoping to score 580 runs, which might
compete with the Giants, but my two pitchers are nothing compared to Matt Cain
and Tim Lincecum.
All kidding aside, the above team is my 2008 HACKING MASS entry. In
HACKING MASS, the goal is to select players that will be bad but will remain in
their team’s lineup/rotation. My 2007
team finished 20th out of 1322 entries, but due to 6 of those
players no longer being in everyday lineups or rotations, none of my 2008 picks
were on my 2007 team.
Looking at my team, it may look like I’m picking on the
Astros (2 current and 2 former) and Twins (4 current), but it wasn’t
intentional. Other than that, I see two picks that might be controversial:
Darin Erstad and Kyle Kendrick. For Erstad, it’s questionable whether or not he’ll
get enough plate appearances to do well in this contest, but I’ve got a feeling
that his “baseball guy” reputation will get him the necessary playing time. On
the other hand, Kendrick is coming off a 10-4 2007 season with a 3.87 ERA. What
stands out for me is the fact that he only struck out 49 batters in 121 innings,
a measly 3.64 K/9. Among pitchers with 100+ IP, only Steve Trachsel, Aaron
Cook, Mike Bacsik, and Zach Duke had lower strikeout rates. Other pitchers
below 4 K/9 are Brad Thompson, Chris Sampson, Mike Maroth, Livan Hernandez, and
Carlos Silva. Other than Cook and Hernandez, that’s a collection of
back-of-the-rotation starters, and it’s arguable that Livan should be a
back-of-the-rotation starter as well. Why did I pick Hernandez and Kendrick out
of this group? Although none are expected to be very good, Hernandez and
Kendrick are the most likely to stay in the majors all season.
I think you got a huge draft pick with Gomez. Though he doesn't have a good draft ranking I think people will be surprised. If he stays consistent at the plate with his phenomenal speed hes going to score a lot of points. I would definately hold on to that one.
Even thou the MLB sample size on David Murphy is small, don't sleep on him. He has hit very well at every level and I suspect the preference to Cattalanoto (sp?) when he comes back, is more to do with veteran bias from Ron Washington than lack of talent from Murphy.
This is baseball. Let's have some fun.
Recommended Websites:
MLB Trade Rumors, Baseball Prospectus, Cot's Baseball Contracts, Fan Graphs, Football Outsiders