Tyler's Take
by: RaysDigest
Mariners Cleaning House, Release Overpaid Sexson
Jul 10, 2008 | 11:51AM | report this
The Seattle Mariners entered the season with high expectations. After all, Seattle added a talented young lefty, Erik Bedard, to the top of its starting rotation, in addition to one of the more promising free-agent pitchers in a thin class, control artist Carlos Silva. Several writers thought that perhaps Bedard, who came over in a blockbuster deal from the Baltimore Orioles this winter, was the missing link for the Mariners, who nearly missed winning the American League Wild Card down the stretch in 2007.

Under the leadership of recently fired general manager Bill Bavasi, however, Seattle did not see its ’07 campaign for what it was, essentially a fluke. Thus, Bavasi mortgaged the future in Seattle, sending Adam (not Pacman) Jones, George Sherrill and three other minor league prospects to Baltimore with the intention of overthrowing the Los Angeles Angels as the supreme team in the American League West.

What Bavasi failed to recognize, though, is that the Mariners’ projected lineup entering spring training was not exactly worth writing home about. In fact, it was easy to picture the Mariners struggling to score runs. Too many overpaid replacement-level veterans--Jose Vidro, anyone?--were slotted in the middle of the lineup, and have received far too many at-bats.

Then there is Bedard, who has turned into a six-inning pitcher and is now on the trade block himself.

There is now hope, however, for Seattle fans. Bavasi, who was in way over his head in today’s generation of statistical analysis and did not understand the concept of replacement-level, is gone. The Mariners' opening day manager, John McLaren, was shown the door as well, becoming one of three managerial casualties--as well as John Gibbons and Willie Randolph--in less than a week earlier this spring.

And today, Seattle made another long-awaited step towards securing its future, finally viewing aging first baseman Richie Sexson as a sunk cost by releasing the underperforming veteran. Over the past two seasons, hitting a baseball has been extremely difficult for Sexson, perhaps the ultimate example or the face of the Mariners’ willingness to overpay for aging, unproductive stars on the decline.

In fact, one could say that Sexson has been allergic to hitting since he belted 34 home runs back in 2006. He was one of the least productive offensive first baseman in the majors during the Mariners’ brief stint of relevance in ’07, batting .205/.295/.399 in an injury-plagued campaign. Things have not been any easier for him this spring, as he posted a .696 OPS in 74 games before getting released this afternoon.

Sexson’s 2008 salary: $15,500,000

Now, though, instead of wasting at-bats on Sexson, the Mariners can create more opportunities for some of their younger hitting prospects, including catcher/designated hitter Jeff Clement. Clement, who was sent down to Triple-A Tacoma a few days into a call-up earlier this season based on his performance in relatively small sample size, proved that he could handle Triple-A pitching, posting one of the highest OPS totals in the Pacific Coast League.

So, the Mariners finally came to the conclusion that Sexson is a sunk cost, an incurred cost fixed into the budget which cannot be recovered.

New manager Jim Riggleman, however, continues to place Vidro--and his embarrassing .571 OPS--in the cleanup spot. These things take time, apparently, in the land of Starbucks.

Bedard, by the way, was placed on the disabled list in a corresponding roster move. That certainly does not help improve his trade value, and odds are that Seattle will not get anywhere close to what it gave up in return for the inconsistent lefty.
5 Comments | Add a comment   categories: Seattle Mariners, Richie Sexson, Major League Baseball, Erik Bedard, Baltimore Orioles, Jose Vidro, Carlos Silva, Jim Riggleman, George Sherrill
 
« Continue reading Tyler's Take
total comments: 5      Page 1 of 1     
justanotherfan
Jul 10, 2008
12:09 PM
RaysDigest
So the Mariners'll let go of Sexson ? Well it won't be long before the parent company comes to the decision to put the team up for sale rather than seeing money being wasted as it has on a franchise seemlessly going nowhere. They haven't been a relevant force in the game in eons.

Suffice to say if they were contracted would anyone but their fans really care ?
Too many dysfunctional parts on a team that's been built without a strategy at all.



justan' aka tophatal ...........


Last edited by justanotherfan on July 10th at 12:11 PM.

RaysDigest
Jul 10, 2008
12:43 PM
The Mariners' Japanese ownership insisted that they sign Kenji Johjima to a ridiculous contract in spring training, and he is now essentially a backup catcher. The M's need to hire a young, innovative GM--do not bring back Pat Gillick--with a strong vision for helping this team remain competitive over the long term.

goutdaddy
Jul 10, 2008
1:39 PM
Ray
I hated to see Richie slide into the abysmal slump over the last two years. Though he didn't hit for average he put up some power numbers last year. This year he was truely painful to watch. You are right about Bavasi and allowing the farm system stagnate. It is like the lights went out when Hargrove bolted in mid season. The players never recovered from that travisty. Hell I haven't recovered from it. Future has got to look brighter it's all we got.

justanotherfan
Jul 10, 2008
1:52 PM
Rays Digest
Though the sport's fans in Seattle aren't ruing the day that Bennett upped and left with the Sonics. I guess that in their heart of hearts they were hoping that the Mariners' parent company would come and do the same thing ?
That way they could just implode the stadium and just build one great big damn parking lot with a slew of shops , restaurants, hotels, theaters , condo's and office space.

At least the city'd be getting their monies' worth in terms of real revenues. 'cause as of now I definitely don't know that's the case.


justan' aka tophatal ..........

rmac1973
Jul 11, 2008
5:43 PM
Not a relevant force in the game for eons?

They won 116 games in 2001. They did pretty good in '02 and '03, too, I think, winning 93 games both years. They managed 88 wins in 2007.

They haven't been great, by any means, but they've been noticeable, surely.

Just because '05, '06 and '08 are washout seasons doesn't mean they haven't been significant - they lost the AL West in 2002 and 2003, and they won 93 games both years. They were the surprise of the AL last season until an August swoon.

Ownership won't sell the team, especially with Itchy on the roster - he's a huge PR piece both in the States and in Japan, and there is not a chance in hell the ownership sells out or trades him.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
ABOUT ME


RaysDigest
I just graduated from Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida, with a business adminstration
degree. During my days down in St. Pete as a student there, I began to follow and cover the Tampa Bay Rays for Scout.com. Fittingly, the franchise begins to win as soon as I leave. I enjoy reading, watching and writing about baseball, taking BP and playing golf. For me, Buster Olney's blog is a daily must read, though Rob Neyer is up there as well.
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.