Here are my American League predictions for the upcoming
season, just to get them up before the season starts. Since the National League
doesn’t start until Sunday, those predictions will come later. A more detailed
preview will be posted within the next week or so…
AL East
1. Boston Red
Sox: Health and youth progression are the biggest questions, but the
Beckett/Papelbon and Ortiz/Ramirez combinations are among the best in the game.
2. New York Yankees (Wild Card): The lineup is incredible
and Chamberlain/Rivera is a great combination at the end of the game, but the
starting pitching is questionable, especially with Wang’s inability to win the
big game thus far in his career.
3. Toronto Blue
Jays: The team has awesome pitching, a good lineup, and lots of young talent,
but most of their key players have shaky health histories, which doesn’t bode
well for a contending team.
4. Tampa Bay
Rays: Awesome potential, but not enough to finish in the top three in the AL
East. If the pitching develops, they could be tough, but most likely not for a
couple of years.
5. Baltimore: If
they trade Brian Roberts and then George Sherrill at the trading dead line, at
least they’ll be in full rebuilding mode. There’s no middle ground with respect
to rebuilding. The Orioles have blown it up, which is the right way to go.
AL Central
1. Cleveland
Indians: They might be the deepest team, although their closer is still shaky
and Carmona will probably regress, it’s a much more complete team than people
give them credit for. Remember, they were very dangerous in 2005, got hurt in
2006, and were a game away from the World Series in 2007.
2. Detroit
Tigers: The lineup could be historic, but Verlander is the only sure thing on
the pitching staff. Dontrelle Willis is more likely to be worse in the AL
than to improve, Bonderman has been inconsistent, but could dominate, Kenny
Rogers is old, and Nate Robertson is middle of the road. The bullpen is very
weak at the back end and the team has very little in terms of trade chips in
the minors.
3. Chicago White
Sox: Swisher is a great addition and although Orlando Cabrera is overrated,
he’ll fit well as a sparkplug under Ozzie Guillen. The pitching will be key,
especially the bullpen, which was horrible last year; it should be better this
year.
4. Minnesota
Twins: With no Santana and Liriano still recovering from Tommy John surgery,
the Twins will probably struggle. Delmon Young joins Morneau, Mauer, and
Cuddyer in a potent offensive core, but it won’t be enough. They’ll have to
rely on a very good bullpen and hope for the young pitching to develop in order
to have any chance.
5. Kansas City
Royals: Meche and Bannister offer a decent front end of the rotation, although
they’re more likely to be 2-3 or 3-4 on a championship team. Billy Butler, Alex
Gordon, and Mark Teahan should all have good seasons this year.
AL West
1. Anaheim
Angels: They’re the best of a flawed division, although if their young pitching
develops, they’ll have a lot of depth. The Angels have no real shortstop, an
injury-prone first basemen, and too many aging outfielders in Guerrero,
Anderson, and even Matthews. Hunter is going to be overpaid, but he’s a huge
upgrade in center over Matthews both offensively and defensively. Also, if Scot
Shields is injured, a new setup man must emerge.
2. Seattle
Mariners: The Mariners will not be a championship contender, unless they sign
Barry Bonds. There are serious questions at DH (Vidro), 1B (Sexson), RF
(Wilkerson), LF (Ibanez), 2B (Lopez), and SS (Betancourt). They weren’t an 88
win team based on their run differential last year and neither Bedard nor
Hernandez has stayed healthy for a full season. Even if healthy, it won’t be
enough.
3. Oakland
Athletics: Billy Beane has to hope for a monster first half from Rich Harden so
he can trade him and maybe Huston Street
and Joe Blanton and continue his rebuilding process, which has drawn rave
reviews so far. Otherwise, they could be an exciting team to watch develop, but
that’s about it.
4. Texas
Rangers: They’re strong up the middle with Young, Kinsler, and Hamilton, and
Bradley could be a nice pickup if healthy. They really overpaid for Hamilton,
giving up a good pitching prospect in Eldinson Volquez. Saltalamacchia should
get the starting job so he can develop, but it looks like he’ll split time with
Laird at best to start the season. The pitching staff won’t be pretty.
Playoffs
Red Sox over Angels:
Again….
Indians over Yankees:
Again…
Red Soxover Indians: Again…
AL Champions: Boston Red Sox: Again…
Potential swaps in playoffs: Tigers as wild card instead of
Yankees
Potential surprise teams: Chicago,
Oakland
Potential disappointments: Seattle,
Toronto, Detroit
I have yet to hear of a Red Sox trade rumor that would make
them a significantly better team. Adding Mark Teixeira, Jermaine Dye, Ty
Wigginton, or Jarrod Saltalamacchia will not make the team much better
overall. Ignoring even the cost of acquiring one of these players in terms of
players and prospects, you can only consider the marginal benefit of adding the
player, not the player’s overall stats.
The marginal benefit
of player added = performance of [player added – player replaced]. This
formula applies however you want to measure performance, whether it be
traditionally (like using home runs) or sabermetrically (like VORP), as I
choose to do. For example, adding a Teixeira, who is on pace for 23 home runs,
would add 8 home runs if he replaced Kevin Youkilis (projected 15 HR), but cost
a home run if Youkilis slide over to third and Mike Lowell (projected 24 HR)
was replaced.
There really haven’t been any outstanding trade rumors
involving the Sox in the past few days, but a few new names have popped up, so
I’ll analyze those deals (more to come as the rumors hopefully start to fly).
1) Red Sox trade Michael
Bowden, Brandon Moss, and Craig Hansen to Cincinnati
for Adam Dunn
Dunn plays first base, Youkilis plays third base, and the
Sox trade Lowell
in a separate deal for prospects.
Verdict:No thanks. Dunn (projected 17.28 VORP
remaining) would add almost two wins over Mike Lowell, but the asking price for
Dunn is reportedly steep right now. If the price were to drop to something like
Bowden and Moss/David Murphy, then I’d probably think about pulling the
trigger. However, Dunn’s contract allows him to opt out after this year if he’s
traded, and he only has one more year either way, so he could be a costly
rental in terms of prospects surrendered.
Quick notes:
1) I
completely agree with Nick Caffardo’s column on Wednesday in the Boston Globe about not looking at small
sample sizes when deciding whether or not the Sox need to make a trade. Last
week at this time, the Sox had lost 8 of 11 and the sky was falling. This week,
they’ve won 6 of 7 and are unstoppable. I think Theo Esptein has to make some
kind of move to ensure there aren’t any more downward trends like losing 8 of
11.
2) I’ve
written about wanting to trade Wily Mo Pena because he isn’t a role player on a
championship-caliber team, but games like last nights (2 doubles, a laser of a
home run, 4 RBI), make me hope even more for a torn calf muscle or any
season-ending injury just so the Sox can hold on to him.
3) I’d
be really happy if they traded Kason Gabbard right now and wish he had pitched
a lot better last night so that he could have maintained a little more traded
value. I look at it this way: he’s never going to be more valuable in a trade
than he is now. He’s a soft-tossing lefty who was on a roll, but eventually
he’ll start to get hit. Yes, he’s a sinker-baller, but those types of pitchers
are usually less consistent from season due to a high dependence on defensive
help. He doesn’t project to be more than a fourth or fifth starter, so any
reasonable offer for him should be enough incentive for the Sox to trade him.
I'm a college student from Boston who has a passion for baseball. I love stats and sabermetrics and am thrilled that they are becoming more common place in the game today. The Red Sox are my favorite team and I'm lucky to live in Boston, where baseball season never ends. If you can't name the starting nine on the Red Sox and the starting rotation (and normally the closer, but not yet in 2007), you probably can't call yourself a diehard Red Sox fan; to me, those are the lowest minimum standards to qualify. If you can't meet those standards, you probably don't remember Scott Williamson, certainly don't remember Scott Hatteberg, and have never even heard of Scott Cooper. You probably just started following the Sox in October of 2004, but that's OK, just don't call yourself a diehard fan.