After listening to Red Sox fans over the past two weeks,
you’d think that the Yankees had clinched the AL East. Predictions of doomsday
and disaster have been pervasive since August 10, when Eric Gagne blew his
first save in a Sox uniform and the Yankees finally closed the gap to a mere 5
games. None of it matters. Unlike the British, the Yankees aren’t coming. It
may appear that they are, but in this case objects in the mirror are further
away, not closer, than they appear.
Yes, the Yankees are a league best 27-12 (.692 winning
percentage) since the All-Star break, but the Sox haven’t exactly been slouches
themselves at 22-16 (.578 winning percentage). Right now, the Red Sox hold a 5
game lead with 37 games to play. Even if the Yankees play at the same .692
winning percentage over the rest of the season and the Red Sox play at the same
.578 winning percentage, the Red Sox will finish with 96.38 wins and the
Yankees with 95.6. Round those numbers and you get a virtual tie. If you factor
Seattle’s .567 winning percentage post All-Star break into the equation,
they’re on pace to win 92.7 games, so both the Red Sox and Yankees would make
the playoffs via finishing in a tie and winning the division and Wild Card, a
la 2005.
But there is certainly reason to believe that the Yankees
won’t hold up their end of the bargain. Since the All-Star Break, the Yankees,
until recently, have played a crème-puff schedule. Even including their recent
series against Cleveland, Detroit,
and Los Angeles of Anaheim, the Yankees opponents’ combined winning percentage
is a mere .490. If you weight the winning percentages to account for more games
played against certain teams (for example, they’ve played Tampa and Kansas City
8 and 7 time respectively and Cleveland only 3, so weighting them adjusts for
actual times playing a team, not just summing wins and losses and dividing),
that same opponents’ winning percentage drops to .468. During the same time
period, the Red Sox have played many of the same opponents, but the numbers of
times they’ve played those opponents have differed. The Yankees played Kansas
City seven times and Los Angeles of Anaheim once,
while the Red Sox played Kansas City
three times and Los Angeles of Anaheim seven. The Red Sox’ opponents’ winning
percentage was .494 and .490 weighted. Over the course of a season, the
difference in the number of wins between the Red Sox’ opponents and Yankees’
opponents is three wins, so in essence the Yankees have played only 1.5 games
better than the Red Sox since the break, not the 4.5 games that the standings
would indicate.
Additionally, the Yankees’ schedule moving forward is going
to be harder than the Red Sox’ schedule. Both teams have 37 games left to play,
including six head-to-head battles. The Yankees’ opponents’ normal winning
percentage is .513 and .503 weighted. The Red Sox’ opponents’ normal winning
percentage is .479 and .472 weighted. Over the course of a season, Yankee
opponents would win 5 games more than Red Sox opponents. Think about that: the
Yankees’ schedule is 5 games more difficult than the Sox’, as wide as the
current gap between the Red Sox and Yankees. This means that in order to tie
the Red Sox, the Yankees will have to play the equivalent of ten games better
over the remaining 37 due to their schedule. Do you STILL think they Yankees
are coming?
Taking the idea even further, the Yankees have scored an
absurd 271 runs since the All Star Break for an average of 7.13 runs per game;
wow! Looking at their schedule, it might not be a stretch to say that the Yankees,
although they have a terrific offense, might be benefiting from poor pitching.
Also, their pitching staff has given up 4.84 runs per game in the same time,
against the same bad teams. Granted, bad teams are more often characterized by
bad pitching than bad hitting (see Tampa
Bay), but in general they are poor
in all areas, not just pitching. This would mean that the 4.84 runs per game
the Yankees have been allowing might be even higher against better teams while
their runs scored might be lower. Coincidently, the Sox have been averaging
5.31 runs scored per game and 4.05 runs allowed per game since the break.
If it’s not already apparent that the Yankees will regress
over the final 37 games, here’s another piece of information that Red Sox fans
can use to silence those Yankee fans in their lives. This information will
likely satisfy even those fans or writers who despise statistics and who would
prefer to rely on history. Since 1996, as Yankees fans will surely boast, the
Red Sox have not finished ahead of the Yankees. In that eleven year span, the
Yankees have averaged a 98-64 record compared to the Red Sox’ 89-73. On August
21, the Yankees have averaged a six game lead over the Sox. By the time the
season has ended, the Yankees have averaged a nine game lead over the Sox,
meaning they expand their lead by an average of three games from August 21
until the end of the season. Three games hardly seems like the late-August and
September swoon that the Red Sox are famous for. Even if history repeats itself,
the Yankees will finish two games back.
Yankees fans tend to like to rely on history. When my
friends and I were at Yankee Stadium in late May watching the Yankees beat the
Sox to narrow the Sox’ lead to nine games Yankee fans didn’t want to hear about
2004 or the nine game hole they were in. They only wanted to fall back on the
26 rings their team had won up through 2001 and how the Red Sox hadn’t won a
division title since 1995.
Sox fans, get ready to tell your Yankee-loving friends where
to stick those rings, ‘cause unlike the British, the Yankees aren’t coming.
I'm a college student from Boston who has a passion for baseball. I love stats and sabermetrics and am thrilled that they are becoming more common place in the game today. The Red Sox are my favorite team and I'm lucky to live in Boston, where baseball season never ends. If you can't name the starting nine on the Red Sox and the starting rotation (and normally the closer, but not yet in 2007), you probably can't call yourself a diehard Red Sox fan; to me, those are the lowest minimum standards to qualify. If you can't meet those standards, you probably don't remember Scott Williamson, certainly don't remember Scott Hatteberg, and have never even heard of Scott Cooper. You probably just started following the Sox in October of 2004, but that's OK, just don't call yourself a diehard fan.