If the game is on the line and you’re a typical Red Sox fan, who do you
want coming to the plate? David Ortiz. (Or if you're a typical Yankees fan, who don't you want coming up?) What about this season? Do you still
feel that way? Should you?
When most Red Sox fans think of David Ortiz, they think of
home runs, a big smile, and clutch, game-winning at-bats. In the past, such a
description of Ortiz was very accurate, but 2007 has been a strange season for
Ortiz. He’#### only 19 home runs after blasting a franchise record 54 last
year, he’s seen his smile disappear at times because of a knee injury that
might require surgery after the season and a sore shoulder he hurt flopping
into second base, and he’s failed in those clutch situations that he seemed to
be thrive on in the past.
Ortiz’s total production, as measured by VORP, hasn’t fallen
too much. Since the season isn’t over yet, it’s more useful to compare his VORP
rate (VORPr) because it’s easier to compare rate of production than to look at
75% of this season versus 100% of last season and try to compare those totals.
Last season, Ortiz produced .494 runs per game, good for 7th in all
of baseball. This year, he’s dropped off only slightly to .486 runs per game,
10th in all of baseball. That’s only a difference of 2 runs over the
course of an entire season, so for all the fuss about Oritz’ production being
doing significantly, it’s really not.
The reason Ortiz’ production hasn’t plummeted is that
despite a drop in his 2006 SLG from .636 (4th overall) to 2007’s
.560 (14th overall), his 2006 OBP of .413 (15th overall)
has climbed all the way to .431 (3rd overall) in 2007. Fans are
obsessed with power, and slugging percentage is indicative of power, so fans
cringe when they see a drop in SLG. Fans should realize that OBP is more
important than SLG; studies, beginning with Michael Lewis’ Moneyball, have repeatedly proven that 1 point in OBP is worth 3
points in SLG. Because on base percentage is more important to scoring runs
than slugging percentage, Ortiz has nearly managed to balance his drop in SLG
with an increase in OBP. While home runs are sexy, Ortiz has still been helping
the team despite not hitting as many as he has in the past. This is probably
due in large part to his nagging injuries that may be causing some of the balls
he’#### to travel to the warning track instead of over the wall. Regardless,
Ortiz has been productive and fans shouldn’t worry so much about his home run
totals and slugging percentage being down.
The idea of clutch has long been dismissed in sabermetric
circles. The general argument is that numbers in the clutch are skewed either
positively or negatively because of a small sample size. When the number of at
bats is so low, generally around 30 or so for a season, a difference of three
hits in clutch situations leads to a difference of .100 in AVG. While a number
of players seem to always come through, it’s generally more perception than
reality. Baseball Prospectus did a study on clutch hitting in their Baseball Between the Numbers and found
that if anybody is clutch, it’s generally solid contact hitters who have high
averages for their careers in all situations, like Mark Grace, formerly of the
Chicago Cubs and Arizona Diamondbacks. In general, clutch stats will regress
towards overall career totals over time. Theo Epstein echoed this sentiment
recently when asked about the Sox failure to hit with runners in scoring
position; his response was something along the lines of saying that over time,
the team would hit in such situations and things would even out.
(Personally, I agree with sabermetricians that clutch stats
are overrated because of the small sample size. Mathematically, there’s really
no way around that fact. However, I do think that there is an indefinable
clutchness surrounding some players. It probably isn’t quantifiable, which is
disappointing, but perhaps the aura surrounding a player like Ortiz is enough
to shift the balance of power in his favor? Maybe fear inspired by some players
actually boosts their performance or hinders that of their opponents? I’m not
sure, but it’s a thought.)
In 2007, Ortiz is hitting a mere .154 with an OPS of .385 in
26 at bats in which the Red Sox have been trailing in a game in the 7th
inning or later with at least one man on base when Ortiz came to the plate. He
has no home runs and just 2 RBI. In his 4 and a half years with the Red Sox, he
has hit 8 home runs, driven in 51, and batted .275 with an OPS of .786 in such
situations. This year’s numbers should come as no surprise. Anyone who’s
watched the Sox this year has probably seen a situation in which Ortiz has
failed to deliver the game tying or game winning hit when everybody expected
him to do so. However, over the course of his career, the numbers dictate that
this year’s clutch performances aren’t too far from his Sox career norms. Fans
were spoiled by last season’s ridiculous 4 home run, 18 RBI, 1.000 OPS
performance in such situations. If Ortiz was matching his career averages in
clutch situations right now, fans would still be disappointed if viewed in the
context of last year’s performance. Additionally, the perception of Ortiz as
clutch has probably developed because his biggest hits have come on the biggest
stage, the playoffs.
What does all of this mean?
1) Sox
fans should stop worrying about Ortiz’ production. He’s producing, he’ll be
fine, and the offense will be fine.
2) Ortiz’
injuries are probably sapping his power, but see #1. Next season, the power
will likely be back.
3) Clutch
statistics are overrated, so take them with a grain of salt. Maybe perception
is greater than reality in this case. Don’t worry about his low production in
the clutch right now because it’ll even out.
Questions/Comments? Does anybody have a unique view on the
clutch?
I'm a college student from Boston who has a passion for baseball. I love stats and sabermetrics and am thrilled that they are becoming more common place in the game today. The Red Sox are my favorite team and I'm lucky to live in Boston, where baseball season never ends. If you can't name the starting nine on the Red Sox and the starting rotation (and normally the closer, but not yet in 2007), you probably can't call yourself a diehard Red Sox fan; to me, those are the lowest minimum standards to qualify. If you can't meet those standards, you probably don't remember Scott Williamson, certainly don't remember Scott Hatteberg, and have never even heard of Scott Cooper. You probably just started following the Sox in October of 2004, but that's OK, just don't call yourself a diehard fan.