I will start by saying that I DO look forward to a NGS 2! This contest was very fun and exciting for me before the final 16 were announced and I'm sure just about anyone other than Ty would be amped to have another shot at getting in those finals. I think it could be really great ... IF some things are fixed first!
Having said that... apologies to the judges and anyone who designed this contest, and to Ty, for what I'm going to say. I know the people who created this thing probably put a lot of time into it, and it was a nice concept, and it's cool that a random person just got $5000 for nothing more than giving his 2 cents on the internet, but I have to say after seeing how the finals went that this contest was a farce. Ty, although a good writer, was not the best in the competition, and for that matter neither was Mustang. The fact that they both ended up as the final 2 is evidence that there were some critical flaws in the way this contest was set up and I hope those flaws are corrected before the next competition.
There were some VERY strong writers in the finals who got eliminated rather early on, particularly Crookdnose and yes, Doc. Whether he plagiarized or not, I can't say for certain, but regardless, he and others like crookd, norcalfella, and a couple others were quite obviously the cream of the crop of the finalists in this competition, and yet none of them got anywhere near the finals where they deserved to be. They got beaten by weaker writers who skated by on popularity and biases.
I also just found out that Ty runs a radio show in California...saw it posted up on a website where his place in this competition was being advertised...not that it was against the competition rules, but what bigger advantage is there than that? Who knows how many listeners he was able to pool votes from? That's just one more reason why public voting should not be the determinant in this competition. That's thousands (if not more) of listeners who would be voting for Ty simply because they know him from their radio, and they would give him good ratings simply because they know him, not because they thought he wrote the best stuff. Hell I'd be surprised if they would even be reading the blogs before voting.
In the future I hope for the next competition that the judges take the power of elimination AWAY from the public! The judges are the only ones who are professionals in this field and they are really the only ones who should have the ability to judge who did well enough to advance through the rounds. Leaving the decision up to a bunch of laypeople, most of which are voting moreso on bias than on actual judging of talent, will cause you to end up with the result that this competition ended up with...people lasting until the end who really ought to have been eliminated by then.
Please judges if you choose to hold another one of these competitions (and I sincerely hope you do!), correct this problem and leave the elimination decisions up to yourselves only!
First this is going to be all positive because I figure we've already had enough negativity from Foo for one week so if youre foo or anyone who likes foo's way of expressing opinions then this blog isn't for you.
Going
to try to give a quick synopsis of my opinions on each finalist up to
this point. I'm curious to see if my views matchup with the majority
or not. So as to make sure my post avoids looking like I'm trying to sway anyone's opinion about any one blogger or another I'll just list them in order of earliest to join the competition to the last.
Jdeppa (First entry for competition: Nov. 27): Deppa is
very creative and original and he got himself noticed with relatively
few blogs compared to how much time he's been registered for the
competition which I think is very difficult to do. To do that you have
to write high quality stuff every single time without fail and that's
exactly what deppa's done.
MBrady (First entry for competition: Nov. 30): Brady's
blog is probably the most unique in my mind with the most
individualistic style of writing. He's also pretty clever to be able
to figure out how to categorize all of his postings into links at the
bottom of his page like that for easy navigation. I would like to see
this bright writer advance but he's another like Domer who for some
reason or another did not input an entry for the assignment this week
so unfortunately may be on the way out before his time.
DrMidnight (First entry for competition: Dec. 6):
Obviously a very intelligent blogger with a lot of knowledge of sports
history. A lot of his blogs bring back fond memories for me of games
that I have loved throughout the years. His comments are witty and
poignant, he doesn't write a whole lot but when he does he has
substance.
Detpack (First entry for competition: Dec. 7):
A very funny guy who's come up with a couple very creative writings.
His blog with the song names for each team is a work of art. I don't
think I can even name 32 songs, much less think of 32 that apply to
each team in the league! It takes brains and a good sense of humor to
know what makes people laugh and Detpack has shown that ability. He's
also another pick of mine who could make it to the top 4 (including
Domer if she isn't voted out this week for missing deadline).
DC_Domer (First entry for competition: Dec. 8): I really
like Domer's blog because it's informative and insightful. Great, informative posting with a touch of class (something you just can't get from men!! J/k fellas ;) She writes very effectively and in a manner that keeps you interested throughout the entire piece. She's definitely one of my favs for the final 4.
Arabchickencurry (First entry for competition: Dec. 12): When I look back at the first few posts of arab's and compare them to what he's doing now it's like night and day. You can actually SEE the growth in his writing it's remarkable. IMO his first few posts wouldn't qualify him as a finalist and now what he's writing is right there with the top writers legitimately. Very impressive.
Crookdnose (First entry for competition: Dec. 12): A rather humorous writer who offers a unique insight to pretty much all of his posts. His personality comes out in a lot of his writing. It's not stoic or without feeling, which makes it more interesting to me. He also seems to be able to write well on a variety of sports.
Jon Mano (First entry for competition: Dec. 12): The
amazing thing about Mano is that he posted just SEVEN blogs before the
judges decided on their final 16!! That's incredible. To get noticed
with that few blogs is really impressive and he got noticed for good
reason. I really like his insightful approach and his write up on the
pittsburgh game is (IMO) spot on.
Sportstraveler (First entry for competition: Dec. 12):
A very sound writer with very creative input. The piece he wrote on
Monday Night football is probably one of the best blogs I've read on
the site because of the ingenuity he used to create it. There is no
sign of writer's block with S-traveler because he has shown that he can
write about any topic fluidly and in entertaining fashion.
tyhildenbrandt (First entry for competition: Dec. 13):
Yet another very creative writer who uses parody, sarcasm, and wit to
grab his readers attention. Really like pretty much all of his blogs
even his piece on the "Rose has its thorn" bit despite the fact that he
was pretty wrong on it lol! (Just messing with you ty !!) He doesn't
miss a beat when switching from topic to topic and is one of the few
writers here who has kept me interested throughout a good portion of
his blog entries.
HiPlainsDrifter (First entry for competition: Dec. 13):
He uses a lot of very witty sel####epricating humor to help make his
points and he uses them perfectly. He's one of the few bloggers who's
actually got me literally laughing out loud when I read some of his
posts. There are a lot of blogs out there that are funny in the sense
that they make me laugh in my head but not more than that but some of
Drifter's blogs have actually caused a spontaneous chuckle from me =)
An accomplishment for sure if you knew me haha (see that was one of
those "laugh in my head" moments). Here is another that I think will
probably be going to the final 4.
Mustangj17 (First entry for competition: Dec. 13): One of
the better senses of humor in the competition. He knows how to write
entertaining pieces that will grab readers attention. He even grabbed
the attention of a judge so much that the judge actually broke protocal
just to post a comment on a blog of his with congratulations! Now
that's mighty impressive given that the judges have not done that even
once for anyone else on this site that I know of.
Jwatters (First entry for competition: Dec. 16): He is
one of the more technically sound writers in the finals and that will
be a great benefit in helping him advance. I hope he does because he's
a very unique writer with a unique voice that he makes sure comes out
in all of his blogs. His entry for this week is probably among the top
3 in my mind and also IMO is very accurate.
Norcalfella (First entry for competition: Dec 19):
Entered the competition late and made an impression in a hurry AND
without writing very much making all of his blogs really count. He has
impressed a lot of people with his writing and rightfully so because he
offers writing that really makes you go "hmm..." and makes you think.
He finds ways to discuss an issue that aren't so obvious to the average
person. He's definitely an outside-of-the-box thinker and that's what
I like most about his writing.
The_Doc (First entry for competition: Dec. 20): Like
Forgotten_Fan, Doc entered this competition very late and yet still
managed to go from complete unknown to the final 16 and seems to have
built one of the largest readership bases of any of the finalists in
just 9 days. The thing I like most about Doc is that he has written
all sorts of blogs about all sorts of different stories in all sorts of
different styles and yet writes with exceptional quality in all of them. I've written a few things professionally and I can tell you that people underestimate the enormous talent it takes to be able to do that. His technical writing skills
are extremely solid and his assignment entry this week was IMO hands
down the best of the finalists and he is another that I think is a
favorite to make it to the final 4.
Forgotten_Fan (First entry for competition: Dec. 21): This guy impresses me with the sheer volume of quality writing, note I said QUALITY with a T , I've seen people on ehre saying the finalists got in with just quantity but if they wrote a lot AND had quality to it you can't fault htem and that's what Fan has done here. Very good posts across the board and interesting topics. He also managed to work his way into the top 16 with very little time before the end of the first leg of the competition which is quite remarkable.
Comments? Anyone else agree here? Disagree? (but don't be too nasty for the sake of drama in this place!!) Anyone else care to give their prediction for the final 4?
Before I give some Chicago sports-angled predictions for the upcoming
year, I'd like to tell a quick story about a recent DePaul basketball
game I attended. It was New Year's Eve and the team looked very
sluggish against a weak, injured Florida International team. We won
the game and the players who excelled were Sammy Mejia, Draelon Burns,
and Cliff Clinkscales. But what made it an inspiring game for me to
watch as a fan was the game by Marlon Brumfield, the 6'8 senior
center. Most DePaul fans know the story of Brum, he worked his butt
off after being a backup to Andre Brown and earned a starting job last
season but was ####ed up frequently. He is always considered the
hardest working player on the team by coaches. This season Brum has
been ####ed up and his minutes have been limited. In the game on
Friday, Brum had 4 points, 3 rebounds, and 2 steals. But he was so fun
to watch. He got his hand on many balls fed to the post on defense and
induced turnovers and bad shots. All of Florida International's points
came from their guards it seemed because of Brum's inside defense, not
to mention his constant battle under the basket that led to offensive
rebounds by him (2) and other Blue Demons. When Brum exited, my Dad
and I stood to congratulate his game, but few others realized his
impact. Brum is one of those players that makes sports so joyful
because he's a feel-good story that makes you feel even better when he
does well.
Now some predicitons for 2006, once again with a Chicago angle:
Bulls:
Will get the 8 seed, get swept in the first round, but make a great run
at the end of the season to make the playoffs that makes most fans
forget about their early exit.
Illini: They'll get a 2 seed and get upset in the 2nd round. Sorry orange crush, but Dee can only do so much.
DePaul:
They'll have a couple fun upsets in the Big East and just miss making
the big dance after an early Big East Tournament exit. They'll win a
game or two in the NIT.
Northwestern: Bold
prediction: The Wildcats make the NCAA tournament for the first time in
history after winning the big ten tournament with Vedran Vukusic
averaging 40 points per game.
Bears: They'll make the NFC
Championship, i obvoiusly want them to win the Super Bowl but it seems
like it's the Seahawks year, with a healthy Rex next year things may be
different.
Cubs: If they trade Prior: They'll finish 3rd in the
NL Central and Miguel Tejada will have many arguments in the already
tumultuous clubhouse.
If they keep Prior: they'll get the Wild Card and lose first round.
i will start of by saying i am a Texas Boy. born and raised in the
south. the past couple of years i have been relocated to Tennessee. all
these people are so stuck on Tennessee they deny texas anything. i had
a guy at work tell me that Tennessee's halfback would win the heisman
next year.... who cares!!!!! the team is a wreck and they keep on
cycling quarterbacks and cordinators. i believe it is time to get to
the real problem and get rid of phillip phulmer.
next
the title game. i am still hearing people tell me on the daily that
Texas does not deserve to be there. they will not compete with U.S.C. i
constantly point out the fact that they have a better all around
defense and offense that U.S.C. their only point of arguement is that
Texas has not played anybody this year.. Is Ohio State nodbody. Did
they not blowout an undefeated Texas Tech team. there only scare was a
double digit victory over a rival team. rival teams are always tough. I
think you have to look at last year. is this not the same team that
tore its way to an 11-1 record last season when the big 12 was on top?
the same team whos only lost was to rival Oklahoma who went on to play
for the national title. the same team who beat Michigan in a game that
literally went to the end? The answer is NO. this is a better team.
this team has depth at running back, a more solid defense, and more
than one wide receiver, no offense to Roy Williams, but the depth at
receiver is definetly a benefit. Lets not forget about Vince Young,
A.K.A. THE FREAKING MAN, well by me anyway. He is even more mature than
last season with only one off day on the season which again was a
double digit victory.
If anything, i think U.S.C. has had
a less impressive season. the number 1 team in the nation should be
benching its starters by the 4th quarter. U.S.C. has been behind at the
half as many times as not however. they have had multiple games come
down to late scoring drives. against a comeback player like Vince
Young, U.S.C. will have no chance of coming back in the 4th quarter.
Now i know this isnt the greatest article ever, and you might not haave read the entire thing, but im working on it.
Brett
Favre is getting all the “Should he or shouldn’t he retire?” headlines.
However, very quietly, another great athlete is being faced with the
very same decision, Mario Lemieux. Mario Lemieux is the greatest
athlete in Pittsburgh sports history. He is also quite possibly the
best hockey player ever to step skate on the ice, certainly he’s in the
top 2. However as all great athletes must do, he must now make the big
retirement decision. Of course, the irony (or whatever the irony police
want to call it) is that it would mark the second time he’s had to make
such a decision, and it was probably easier the last time.
The
Favre/Lemieux comparison this season is very strong. They both come
into their seasons with very high expectations for their teams. And due
to circumstances they could not foresee their teams are having the
worst seasons of their careers. The Packer’s poor season is due to
injuries to pretty much everyone but Johnny the towel boy. The other
towel boy Jimmy is out for the season due to a severe towel snapping.
The Penguin’s poor season is due to very bad free agent signings and a
general lackadaisical attitude throughout the whole organization, which
is partly Lemieux’s fault. They are both having sub-par seasons.
Lemieux’s season is very poor by his standards, and let’s be honest,
Favre’s season would be a bad one for Scott Mitchell. As for their
careers the big similarity is that they are guys who have won
championships, but should have certainly won more.
Of
course as overall careers go they really couldn’t be more different.
Lemieux was the next big superstar, even before he was drafted teams
were offering half their rosters to trade to get him. He’s one of the
few who’ve been labeled the next big superstar that have actually lived
up to the hype, a French speaking LeBron James so to speak (in French).
Brett Favre on the other hand was a second round pick who was traded
for a first round pick by the Atlanta. While that seems like a trade
up, it obviously wasn’t, no one would have traded Favre for anything
had they known what they were giving up. Favre is known as probably the
most competitive guy in all of football. Lemieux, and even as a huge
fan of his I know, was never that big on effort all the time. Certainly
when it came to crunch time in the Stanley Cup years there were very
few who were as clutch. And he was so talented he could glide through
games and still average over 2 points a game in his prime. But let’s
put it this way, the term “country-club atmosphere” would not have
existed in the locker rooms of ultra-competitive guys like Favre or
Michael Jordan. Heck, the guy had Scotty Bowman and Kevin Constantine
fired because they ran systems he didn’t like and ran tough practices.
Probably the biggest difference in their careers is durability. Favre
has not missed a game since 1993. Lemieux has never made it through an
entire season without some kind of injury. Had he had even half of
Favre’s durability there’d be no doubt he’s the best player in history,
but as it is he didn’t play enough games even before he retired too
early.
The
answer to both questions of retirement is how healthy they both feel.
If they both feel healthy enough they should each give it one more go,
because both teams will be playoff worthy next season. Lemieux has
developed an irregular heartbeat, so there’s reason to worry about his
health there. Of course Tedy Bruschi had a stroke and was back playing
football, what, 3 weeks later? So an irregular heartbeat shouldn’t be
that big a deal over the long haul, but he may want to check with a
doctor on that, not just take my word for it. However should he come
back it should be in a specialized role, perhaps only play on the
power-play if such a thing can be worked out. I had heard teams were
considering dressing guys only for shootouts, so that isn’t too much of
a stretch. As for the Packers, they will have high draft picks and a
ton of guys returning from injury. Plus they’re in the NFC so it won’t
take that much more improvement to make the playoffs, or even the Super
Bowl. Favre, if he can get out of pre-1995 mode, can be a big help in
that effort.
The
thing we should remember about both guys is that it is their decision
whether or not to retire, and that as sure hall-of-famers they get
“stick around too long without repercussions” privileges. Hell, Lemieux
is already in the Hockey Hall of Fame, one of the few for who they just
said “No need to wait, just come on in” after he retired the first
time. So to the professional sportswriters and amateur bloggers trying
to make the decision for them can go back to vilifying Ron Artest,
kissing the Patriots ####, and whatever else it is you like to write
about. That goes for me as well, so shut up me. Gee, time for my Prozac
already? Till next time
When
I was a junior in high school, I received the best compliment for which
I could have ever wished. It was one of those lazy sixth periods near
the end of the school year. The part of the final semester where even
the teachers are getting antsy for summer vacation and to insure they
do not have a lot of work to grade, they give assignments that do not
have to be graded. That day, me and a few of the other "good kids" in
my typing class were sent across the hall to the computer lab to work
on our word processing skills while the rest of the class honed their
craft on the typewriters. Those of us who were in the lab were likely
playing Tetris until Mr. Prandy came to check on us.
While we
were unsupervised, my friends Sharhonda and Kara walked by the lab and
spotting me near the door, stopped by to say hi. Those two were in
student council, with Sharhonda being my junior class' President. The
main benefit was that they spent the final hour of the day with
unfettered hall privileges and basically a free pass to skip home early
if they desired. On that day, they were on their way home and were in
a giddy mood. About five minutes after they left, Tony Newson, the guy
sitting next to me started laughing randomly. When I asked him what
was funny, he told me, "That black girl, the way she cuts up."
I
scanned the classroom and spotted about six people in the room, all
dudes, and all were too engrossed in their video games to be making any
spectacles of themselves. After, I realized he referred to Sharhonda I
felt kind of embarrassed that I had already forgotten there were women
nearby only moments earlier. With redface (it takes little to make me
blush), I explained, "Oh, you meant Sharhonda. I never think of her as
a black...she's just, Sharhonda." Tony kind of did a double take, and
turned from his screen with an expression of serious consideration. He
was (probably is, whereever he might be) a large African-American man
who was the starting tight end on the football team and eventually went
to Southern Methodist as a wide receiver. I will never forget the
solemn tone of his voice as he said, "That's the way it should be,"
before returning to his game of stacking pixelated blocks.
We
may never live in a truly color blind society. I like to think we are
progressing toward that goal, however. From the expressions of a
couple of athletes whose abilities I admire, though, it may be further
off than I hoped.
It is an old story now. A little more than
a year ago, former Boston Celtic legend and current Indiana Pacer
President, Larry Bird sat down for an interview with Jim Gray. Perhaps
Gray ambushed Bird with race related questions, but Bird, the greatest
white basketball players of the past several generations, did not
respond well. Rather than blowing off such questions, he referred to
the NBA as "a black man's game," said the league needs more white
stars, and voiced disdain toward being guarded by white men.
<indent>"The
one thing that always bothered me when I played in the NBA was I really
got irritated when they put a white guy on me," Bird said. "I still
don't understand why. A white guy would come out (and) I would always
ask him: 'What, do you have a problem with your coach? Did your coach
do this to you?' And he'd go, 'No,' and I'd say, 'Come on, you got a
white guy coming out here to guard me; you got no chance.' ... For some
reason, that always bothered me when I was playing against a white guy.
"As
far as playing, I didn't care who guarded me -- red, yellow, black,"
Bird added. "I just didn't want a white guy guarding me. Because it's
disrespect to my game."</indent>
For my part, I have
always admired Larry Bird. As a kid, for the same reason Bird thinks
the NBA needs more white stars, I was always compared to him on the
playground. I think most tall, gangly, fair complected kids of my
generation were called Larry Bird at some point. It was a compliment
as far as I was concerned, and to this day I still wear # 33 when I
play for my church team as an homage to him. On that day, though, I
was embarrassed by him. It is not that what he said was wrong, but
that it was such an antiquated notion which disgusted me. Of all
people, he should have been the first to recognize that racial make-up
is only an outward image, that talent is the only real indicator of a
basketball player, or a person in general.
It was that last rant that echoed in my head when I read a recent article in ESPN: The Magazine
about current Gonzaga star Adam Morrison. Morrison has been getting a
lot of Bird comparisons recently, and while most good white players get
this treatment, Morrison actually deserves such treatment. For one, he
consciously patterned his game after Larry Legend. However it looks
like that pattern may have gone beyond the mechanics of the game. In
the article mentioned earlier, the author recants a story during the
All College Tournament where Morrison's Bulldogs faced Eddie Sutton's
Oklahoma State Cowboys where Morrison complained during a timeout that
he was being guarded by Daniel Bobik rather than future NBA first round
pick Joey Graham. He felt that not going mano y mano with Graham was a
(does this sound familiar?) "disrespect to his game."
Honestly,
having Bobik assigned to him was the biggest compliment a defensive
stalwart like Sutton could give Morrison. Bobik was the latest in a
long line of defensive stoppers trained specifically to clamp down on
the opposing team's best player. Preceding Bobik there was Tony Allen
(Boston Celtics), Melvin Sanders (San Antonio Spurs) who shut down
Carmelo Anthony in the NCAA tournament, Adrian Peterson, Randy
Rutherford, Terry Collins, Brooks Thompson (Orlando Magic-retired), and
even Cornell Hatcher from the early Oklahoma State days. In the Final
Four run the year prior to this Morrison/Bobik match-up, Bobik had been
assigned Sean Banks (NO/OKC Hornets) of Memphis, Julius Page of
Pittsburg, Jameer Nelson (Orlando Magic) of St. Joe's whose last
second shot to tie was blocked by Bobik, and Jarett Jack (Portland
Trail Blazers) of Georgia Tech. Graham, on the other hand, was an
Eddie Sutton anomaly. Despite the unparalleled athletecism he
possessed, he would not focus on defense. His assignment constantly
torched the Cowboys and was a major factor in the team's
underacheivement his senior year. Bobik, though, thrived on defense,
desired to play defense, and started specifically because he made it
his calling to be a pest to the opposition's best player.
So
why would Morrison take it as a slight? Well, Bobik was a pale faced
Mormon from Orange County. Despite his California upbringing, he did
not even have a tan. Just like Bird, he could not see past his
defender's skin color.
Hearing outdated, slightly racist
commentary coming from a middle-aged man like Larry Bird was not too
much of a shock. This was a man who was often referred to as the "hick
from French Lick" in reference to his upbringing in rural Indiana.
Morrison, on the other hand, is thought of as the modern day Bill
Walton for his outspoken liberalness. While most liberals dream of a
day when people see wide receivers like Eddie McCaffery recognized for
his speed or a day when fans do not automatically assume Byron Leftwich
is a great scrambler just because Randall Cunningham and Michael Vick
are, Morrison's comments suggest that this day is far, far away.
INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana. Emboldened by the NCAA's decision to bar
teams with Native American nicknames from post-season tournaments,
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals today demonstrated at the
athletic group's headquarters in an effort to ban mascots based on
non-human animals as well.
"There is nothing so demeaning to
a tiger or a lion as to sit in a cage while a zookeeper watches Penn
State or LSU on TV," said Heather Ulrich, PETA spokesperson.
"Wild beasts have feelings too."
The ban would extend to
insects such as the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets, Ulrich added, even
though she admitted to swatting mosquitoes herself. "Sometimes the
personal isn't political."
Under PETA's proposal, the only
teams allowed to compete in the NCAA's March Madness, BCS and College
World Series tournaments would be those named after colors, vegetation,
forces of nature, minerals and regional human sub-groups such as the
"Sooners" of Oklahoma and the "Hoosiers" of Indiana. "We couldn't care
less about people," Ulrich explained.
The Stanford
Cardinal, a color-based name that is symbolized by a undergraduate
dressed as a tree, could thus pass muster on either of two grounds, she
noted, "although how that guy ever gets a date is beyond me."
Asked
to provide member schools with an easy-to-remember yardstick to
determine whether their mascot would be permitted under the PETA
proposal, Ulrich's colleague Michelle Shaloob said, "Miami
Hurricanes--fine, UCLA Bruins--nein."
If the NCAA
agrees to PETA's demand the Iowa State Cyclones would be unaffected
by the new policy, but assistant football coach Ogden Fry was not
mollified by this fact. "I don't like to be on the same side of any
issue with your wing-nut liberals," he explained. "The guys at the
coffee shop will give me grief for the rest of my natural born days."
The tension is beginning to build now. After this posting, only eight
competitors in the “Best Gimmick Ever” contest will be left. We have
some fantastic matches set up the rest of the way, so let’s get right
to it.
In Bracket A, the final will be top seeded Hulk Hogan facing third seeded Mr. Perfect for the right to go to the final four.
Hogan defeated his best friend, Brutus “the barber” Beefcake
in an interesting match. The two clearly had a mutual respect for each
other at the start, but that quickly changed. Jimmy Hart was in the
corner of Brutus and despite being fond of Hogan, knocked him over the
head with his megaphone.
Hogan managed to just keep his arm up
when he was in barber’s sleeper hold and began to hulk up. Before
long, Hogan hit Brutus with a big drop kick and pinned him to advance.
Sting became the third number two seed to be eliminated in the tournament after Perfect handled him with relative ease.
The Green Monster has stood stoically on watch over the outfielders of Fenway Park since the early 20th century. With the departure of its wild child Johnny Damon and the inevitable exit of the querulous Manny Ramirez, it is a reminder once more of the fragility of modern baseball as we observe the nervous winter dance taking place among players and teams. While the excitement of landing a star player (really a cruel illusion for all but the big market teams anyway) always keeps the winter titillating, in the past there was something of intrinsic value in having a calmer, less frantic off-season. When players were rooted to their teams with something stronger than just casual familiarity, and players and fans were more than just two ships passing in the night. This was a period in the game which served a useful purpose; it gave the fans continuity and allowed them to build a relationship with their team and its members, which like anything of worth, takes time.
The left fielder position for the Boston Red Sox was at one time a paragon of this consistency. From 1939 to 1996- close to sixty years- there were just four regular left-fielders for the team: Ted Williams, Carl Yastrzemski, Jim Rice, and Mike Greenwell. This included two Hall of Famers (Williams and Yastrzemski), one soon to be inducted into the Hall (Rice), and the fourth (Greenwell), a solid regular. While the Red Sox had other players patrol left field intermittently (most noticeably during Williams’ extended absences for military service, an astounding concept now- can anyone imagine Manny taking a season off to fly jets in Iraq?), these four, during their respective reigns, were the men fans identified as the guardians of the Green Monster.
Through the presidencies of FDR and Bill Clinton, from Pearl Harbor to White Water, big band music to grunge, one of these men could invariably be found in the shadow of the Monster. All were signed by the Red Sox. All retired Red Sox. None played for any other major league team.
Fenway Park is, by American sporting standards, ancient. Its longevity is as cherished by the fans arguably as much as its eccentric design. The Green Monster plays into an enormous part of this attraction; it is essentially an ambassador for the park. However, the superb talent that played beneath the massive wall for close to sixty years is what truly made watching so entertaining. And reassuring. We could look out season after season and the face beneath the Sox cap, except for perhaps a few more weathered lines around the eyes and mouth, would remain unchanged. We observed the four in the brightness of their youth, and watched as they slowed in the Monster’s shadow. The full cycle of the player’s talent would eventually display itself if we had the patience to watch. The Green Monster will remain looking onto left field for the foreseeable future. It is, and will remain, an indelible part of the Red Sox. Unfortunately, the restless nature of the game being what it is today, the names of the Red Sox left fielders patrolling beneath it most certainly will not.
Not the game that I wanted to see. It's very disappointing to see them lose such an important game. Memphis did well but Gonzaga definitely let it slip through their fingers.
I much preferred to listen to Dickie V and whoever was with him call the game. I'm not the biggest Dickie V fan with his undeniable love for Duke but they did a great job of talking about Gonzaga and Memphis. Although, I am very much a believer that it is way too early to talk about player of the year.
This is how one of the announcers described Adam Morrison. He sounded as though he is very proud of himself for thinking of it. I present it as another example of why we need new announcers.
The Zags once again got off to a slow start but I am starting to believe it's part of the game plan. With the exception of their two losses this year, the Zags have been able to put teams away in the game's last few minutes. I never doubt that Gonzaga will win but they keep me anxious.
This is my very first blog! I'm not sure what I will include in it but for now I will start by saying that I am very excited that ESPN the Mag featured Shaun Alexander on the cover! In addition to Alexander, there was also an article on Adam Morrison! I am first a foremost a Zag....on old Zag, but a Zag nonetheless.
SI will have both Alexander and Morrison on the cover of this week's issue....here's wishing that the SI jinx does not follow them.
Just another sports buff trying to catch his big break through this thing. I'm 29 years old and an aspiring journalist, so if I could win this thing, hopefully it could turn into a career for me. Here's to hoping and good luck to all!