Oh sure, you all are ready to condemn my town. Frankly, I don't blame you. Los Angeles is home to the biggest bandwagon sports fans in the country. Bar none.

We have had two professional football teams- the Los Angeles Rams and the Los Angeles Raiders. One owner allegedly drowned her husband to escape to the the cozy confines of St. Louis, and the other decided Oakland had a better fan base.

USC doesn't count as a professional football team yet-let's wait and see what the NCAA decides. UCLA is a basketball school. Don't let their hot cheerleaders fool ya.

The NBA fans here are as fickle as Lindsay Lohan's pledge of life-long sobriety.

The Lakers are the hottest ticket in town- during the second and third quarters only, of course.

The fans don't make it to the first quarter and leave in the fourth to A) let Fifi take a break from her Louis Vuitton pet carrier, B) call their agent, or C) to escape traffic. Yeah, it's bad when you worry about traffic at 10 PM at night.

The Clippers are treated like a red-headed step child-unless they are winning. Two years ago, Billy Crystal looked like a freaking genius when his years of Clippers' loyalty finally paid off. The entire city was suddenly transformed into a Clipper fan base. Then they lost. Now you could hear a pin drop when the games start. Jack is King, once again.

Our model citizens are Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, every left/right-wing nut job, OJ (luckily, he moved to Florida where all good felons go to avoid property being seized from our bankrupt state), Charlie Sheen (and blackbook), Britney Spears, Heidi Fleiss, Michael Milken, Name-any-Broadcom-thug, sports agents, and lets not forget the population of San Fernando Valley, which is the porn capitol of the world. Ron Jeremy for Mayor!

We have elected two actors to office, and wonder why everyone thinks we are nuts.

We are the bank robbery capitol of the world (one every fifteen seconds), and cheer on low-speed freeway chases by taking time off work to make banners to hang over freeway overpasses.

Our police department is more corrupt than the Medellin Cartel.

We are complete weather wimps. If it drizzles, there are 500 accidents on the freeways and the news channels' opening breaking story is "Stormwatch 2008." The entire Southland is in a state of chaos because no one owns an umbrella, raincoat or operational windshield wipers (cracked/dried out due to sunny weather) on their $115,000 leased Mercedes (nothing down, and $1700 a month car payments).

We have the highest foreclosure rates, the biggest credit card debt, but dang, don't our fake boobs look perky?

We spend close to five bucks a gallon for gas, and complain to the Shell attendant while filling up our 26 gallon tank Suburbans.

We live in a sunshine-filled state, yet wear over sized sunglasses to make our cheeks look more prominent and our bodies smaller, and flock to the tanning salons to get that California glow. Our teeth have been known to blind on-coming traffic when we smile.

TomKat  and Suri make their home here. And in outer space.

We are home to the Los Angeles Kings, but ever since Gretzky left, only the gang ####ers wear Kings' jerseys. The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, well, doesn't the name really say it all? Total identity crisis. It's baseball on heroin.

The Dodgers play at Chavez Ravine, so at least its name reflects the proud (and growing ten-fold every day!) Hispanic heritage.

Yes, it's true...you must speak Spanish to live here, and frankly, it keeps us busy guessing what the meanings of street signs are while we sit in coughing smog and grid-lock.

Cost to live in Paradise? A half a mil gets you a three bedroom shack with no backyard, a garage, massive debt, mudslides, earthquakes, wildfires, locust invasions, pestilence and someday, a permanent ocean view- all 360 degrees, according to geologists.

Just ask Dr. Lucy, our local geologist from Cal Tech. She's the one person in this state with job security, and everyone knows her name.

Yep, my town rocks so hard it rolls every ten years. Jealous?

*****OK bloggers...time to have some Summer fun. How does your town rock your world? Here's a fun contest idea (I got from another website, BleacherReport.com) to see who can write the best blog about their town. It can be satire, or an honest piece. Keep it sports-related, and let's read about other bloggers' home-towns. Make it fun! No prizes will be rewarded, but everyone can vote on their fave!

We have followed them since their high school years and crossed our fingers in hopes our team would be the one these uber-quarterbacks chose to bless with their presence.

But how did they fare once they embarked on the collegiate gridiron? Were the expectations met? Exceeded? Or did they fail to meet the hype that has surrounded them since high school?

Now, a look at one of the most highly-hyped quarterbacks to come out of high school and what his future holds.

Jimmy Clausen, Notre Dame

Clausen was one of the first feathers in head coach Charlie Weis' cap. A five star recruit, Clausen was pretty much set on committing to Notre Dame, according to some media outlets, despite hailing from California.

Though the press hyped-up Clausen's much-anticipated announcement, Clausen decided to take it to the next level. He arrived at the College Football Hall of Fame in South Bend, Indiana in a rented white stretch Hummer limo to announce Notre Dame as his final choice.

Over the top? Completely.

In fact, the press derided his flamboyant entrance as a mockery of college athletics. Clausen, of course, had only to continue Notre Dame's "Return to Glory" mission of the previous two years to have all criticism of his "announcement day show" forgotten.

Clausen, unfortunately, failed miserably in his first year. Was it his fault? The coach's fault? Or was he overrated? You be the judge.

While Clausen did have a horrible 2007 season, coach Charlie Weis failed to inform the public of Clausen's secret elbow surgery (bone spur) prior to the start of the 2007 season.

To make matters worse, Georgia Tech—in Notre Dame's first game of the season—saw Demetrius Jones as the starter, even though he had complained of shoulder pain. According to Jones, the Irish ignored the injury so as to encourage competition between the Irish quarterbacks.

Jones was pulled at halftime, and eventually Jimmy Clausen played, who Jones maintained was the "chosen one" despite alleged reassurances from Weis that there would be competition for the quarterback position. Jones, as it turned out, left the team and had his shoulder surgically repaired.

Clausen, of course, began his nightmarish freshman season. Was it too early for him to start playing after having surgery? Perhaps, but Weis didn't have a lot of options after Jones left the team.

The fact that the Irish had one of the worst offensive lines in the NCAA also didn't help Clausen's campaign. In 10 games he had a -187 yards in rushing, ostensibly due to 34 sacks. He had a 56.3 passing completion percentage and a 103.85 quarterback rating.

Cue the deflating balloon sound.

The Irish were ranked 116th in scoring offense, 115th in rushing offense, 112th in third down conversions, and 110th in passing offense. How bad was the O-line? The Irish were ranked dead last in sacks allowed and tackles for loss allowed.

So how much of it was Clausen's fault?

His 6-7 (INT-TD) pass ratio doesn't help his case, but his sore elbow does. The fact that Clausen spent more time on his back than Paris Hilton furthers the argument that his horrendous stats weren't entirely his fault.

But most good quarterbacks know when to throw the ball away, how to make reads on the defense, and recognize blitz packages—Clausen failed to really make any headway in those three departments. Sure the O-line was a giant sieve, but Evan Sharpley, who played in eight games, had better stats. And less hype.

Sharpley had a 106.65 quarterback rating, completed 55 percent of his passes, and had a 3-5 pass ratio. With the same offensive line that Clausen did. So now what?

Is it Weis' fault? This writer believes some of the fault lies squarely on the shoulders of the head coach. Weis, the offensive guru, was exposed as one with too much hype, much like his young quarterback.

The reverberations of Spygate and his possible involvement only add fuel to the fire as to how qualified he was to be a head coach. It's easy to look like an offensive genius if you know the defensive play signals in advance, isn't it?

Weis, whether he participated or not, didn't have the benefit of videotapes to help him call the right offensive plays at Notre Dame.

He couldn't adjust his offense to counter the blitzes (Why weren't more rollouts and draw plays used?) and quite possibly jeopardized Clausen's future by starting him when he wasn't healed completely.

But while Clausen was young and inexperienced, so were Tim Tebow and Colt McCoy. They both had better records. The biggest problem for Clausen, however, was escaping pressure from the D.

Amazingly, Clausen's resume had some superlative qualities from scouts that somehow just didn't seem to materialize last season.

His Oaks Christian High School coach is quoted as saying, "I've seen a lot of them and I've coached a lot of them, and I've never seen a finer high school quarterback anywhere.

"He has all the throws. The long ball. The short ball. He can put the steam on. He can take it off. He can move around the pocket. He gets rid of the ball extremely fast. And he's a good leader. If there's a freshman who could ever start at a four-year school like Notre Dame, it would be Jimmy Clausen."

He can move around the pocket?

According to Scout.com, Clausen's "speed would be the only question, though he has good mobility."

The irony is there. Clausen simply didn't move well around the pocket last season and was sacked. A lot.

Did Clausen's stock get too much press?

While you can blame Notre Dame's porous O-line, it's hard to believe that Oaks Christian High School had a better O-line than one of the most elite football programs in the nation. You also can't help but put some of the blame on the quarterback when it takes him four games to score his first touchdown.

While Weis may have put Clausen in the starting position prematurely, and possibly to quell the inevitable "put in the best quarterback recruit in the nation" chants from boosters, the bottom line is that Clausen had a failure to launch.

He was a complete dud.

And despite glimmers of optimism from the Irish faithful, the O-line returns four starters.

Despite visions of 2008 BCS bowl bids dancing in leprechaun's heads, Clausen showed little sign of having made a lot of progress—except for lack of soreness on his throwing arm—during their Spring Game, according to some Irish's fans comments on Internet message boards.

His over-the-top arrival at the Hall of Fame now is the fodder for Internet photo satires, and is a solemn reminder to all those recruits who think they are the end-all to college football.

Ryan Perrilloux, Stephen Garcia, and others have all learned their lessons the hard way. High school is a world apart from college.

And Jimmy Clausen is now about to find out if the previous year was just a fluke, or a sign of things to come.

I'm betting on the latter. I'm a realist.

"Our schedule looks a bit soft this year." Les Miles, LSU coach.

"Can we tone down the colors?" Mike Bellotti, Oregon Coach.

"Stop everything, hold it- we thought ASU was Athens State University." Mark Richt, Georgia Coach.

"At least we can count on the Navy game as a win." Charlie Weis, Notre Dame coach.

"I don't read fine print." Rich Rodriguez, Michigan coach.

"Hell yeah, I'm still going to win four Heismans." Ryan Perrilloux, ex-quarterback for LSU.

"Maybe that white Hummer limo entrance at the College Football Hall of Fame on signing day was a bit premature." Jimmy Clausen, quarterback, Notre Dame.

"No comment." Mike "I'm a man" Gundy, Oklahoma State coach.

"OK, I admit it. There's some things that even I can't turnaround." Steve Spurrier, South Carolina coach.

"I've decided to be a spokesman for YahooSports and ESPN." Pete Carroll, USC coach.

"I asked Kim Kardashian to be my wife because she stimulates my mind." Reggie Bush, Saints running back.

"What's the going rate for old playbooks on eBay?" Norm Chow, UCLA Offensive Coordinator.

"No pressure, no pressure at all." Mike Stoops, Arizona coach.

"We're going bowling this year." Any Baylor fan.

"Why would I think about Joe Pa's record?" Bobby Bowden, FSU coach.

"Who's Bobby Bowden? Joe Paterno, Penn State coach.

"We are thrilled to be in the Capitol One Bowl, again." Bret Bielema, Wisconsin coach.

"Tim Tebow is overrated." Urban Meyer, Florida coach.

"USC sucks." Mark May, ESPN college football analyst.

"Notre Dame sucks." Lou Holtz, ESPN college football analyst.

"The Big Ten sucks." Kirk Herbstreit or Lee Corso, ESPN college football analysts.

"I have plenty of experience to run this program." Bill Stewart, West Virginia coach.

"I view Duke's AD position as a promotion from my previous job." Kevin White, ex-Irish AD.

"I'm never leaving (insert state here), it's my home." Nick "Can I get that to go?" Saban, Alabama coach.

"We are focusing are being the top defensive team in the nation." Mike Leach, Texas Tech coach.

"Can you make those donuts sugar-free?' Phil Fulmer, Tennessee coach.

"This is Pete Carroll's last year in college football, again." Jim Harbaugh, Stanford coach.

"We do everything by the book here." Rick Neuheisel, UCLA coach.

"Football isn't that important in Nebraska." Bo Pelini, Nebraska coach.

"Of course we don't miss Vince Young." Mack Brown, Texas coach.

"We aren't looking ahead to any particular game." Jim Tressel, Ohio State coach.

"We love the current BCS system." Gary Pinkel, Mizzou coach.

"Where can I buy a pair of flip-flops and a lei for the game?" June Jones, SMU coach.

"What amazes me is how my new office always has small scraps of papers and pens lying around." Bobby Petrino, Arkansas coach.

"Pullman, Washington is a fertile recruiting ground." Paul Wulff, Washington State coach.

"Can we request a Pac-10 officiating crew for the Red River Shootout?" Bob Stoops, Oklahoma coach.

"Oh well, there's always basketball season." Any Syracuse or Kentucky fan.

"%$#$% &^%^%^ $#@$#$" Bronco Mendenhall, BYU coach.

"We're going green." Chris Petersen, Boise State coach.

Yesterday was my wedding anniversary.  After being spoiled rotten with gorgeous jewelry over the years, I was hoping hubby would think of something more, well, me, when it came time to exchanging presents.

So imagine my surprise when I opened my gift—a gorgeous Spalding "Never Flat" football.  I had tears in my eyes.  God, I married well.  He so gets me.

As I held that ball in my hands, my leg started to quiver.  With my fingers laying across the laces and my grip getting tighter on the ball, I realized I was ready.  I need some football.  Now.

It's that dreaded time of year—post-NBA Finals and right smack dab in the middle of the death throes of baseball.

Don't get me wrong—baseball is OK, but I fervently believe that it's a kids' game that grownups ruined.  It bores me.  I need a contact sport.  I need football.

I'm already looking forward to that first football TV commercial.  My favorite one?  Where the guy bends over to look at something and this deranged woman comes up behind him, cups her hands underneath his ####, looks to the right with this psychotic look on her face and yells, "Hut-Hut!"  Hilarious.

It's that time of year where I start to actually miss Lee, Herb, and Chris.  And Lou and Mark.  Although I work for ESPN's rival, I miss them nonetheless.

I miss that opening music theme to College Game Day.  The students with their silly signs, bobbing up and down, behind Lee and Herb talking about the upcoming games.  The cheerleaders standing on the shoulders of their male teammates, leading yells to the masses.  Dang it, I need to see a mascot head and some helmet stickers.

I miss Lee tapping his Ticonderoga pencil on the desk.  God help me—I miss Lou's halftime locker room pep talks.  Spit and all.

It started with the Spring games in April.  At the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, I actually took off my cowboy boots and ran my toes through that sweet turf.  I imagined all the great players that had walked on this sweet-smelling sod.

I walked through the tunnel leading out to the field and touched my hand on those crumbling, old walls.  How many great players have touched these walls as they passed through to play in front of 90,000 fans?

I actually remember thinking, "Wow, LAPD could have probably gotten some of O.J. Simpson's DNA lifted off the concrete."  There's some history here.

I stood near Pete Carroll on the sidelines—yeah, I cheat a little on the sidelines and tend to step over that 25-yard line barrier between the press and the players.  Shhh.  Don't tell anyone.  I just like to feel the intensity of the players and coaches when I stand near them.

I can already hear the sounds of the marching bands drowning out the sounds of the visiting teams' fans.  I can smell the hot dogs and nachos, and taste those $8 beers.  It's stuck in my brain now.

I can see the fans clasping their hands behind their heads as they look at the last seconds of the clock tick down—will their team pull off the upset?

I can hear the impending smack from all the bloggers as they get ready to pronounce their team/conference/cheerleaders/band the greatest in college football.

Yeah, I'm ready to see the Oregon Ducks' new uniforms.

I'm ready to see if Weis can right the Titanic he currently is captaining through treacherous waters.

I'm ready to see if Urban has found a way to fix the Gators' secondary.

I'm ready to see if the Buckeyes really are as good as everyone says they are. Again.

I'm ready to meet the new Cinderella who'll upset a Georgia, USC, Wisconsin, or Oklahoma.

I'm ready to perhaps hear Keith Jackson say, "One more year, then I retire for good."

I'm ready to hear 100 renditions of "Rocky Top" when Tennessee visits the UCLA Bruins.

I'm ready to put away my DVD collection of USC 2007 football games and watch some live games instead.

I'm ready to hear the wails of "unfair" when a team isn't ranked No. 1, and ready to hear another team get chants of "overrated" when they take the field.

I'm ready for the "D" and fence signs, and "SportsCenter is next" signs.

I'm ready to get new batteries for my digital voice recorder and fire off some questions to coaches and players.

I'm ready to ditch all the college football magazines on my bedside table and see if the prognosticators were correct in their predictions.

OMG—I miss Sun Belt football.

As I sit here spilling my guts out, I hold that football even closer to my face.  It's not pigskin, but I can smell it.  It's a faint smell that will get stronger around late July, and permeate my every sense by late August.

The football, resting comfortably in my hands, has inspired me to hang on for two more months.  We'll get through this.

Am I the only one who feels this way?  Is there an easy button I can push to get me through the next two months?

Thank God I married well.

The rich keep getting richer- that's the theme for the Pac-10's 2008 outlook.

Two teams have had major coaching changes, and injuries to some teams' key players will play an important role in determining the pecking order of these ten teams. An interesting story-line is that only one team returns fifteen or more starters this year. The Stanford Cardinal.

1. USC Trojans.

The Trojans will not be rebuilding this year, nor any other year, unless the NCAA decides to hand out some sanctions. They just keep reloading, and already have a killer recruiting class for 2009. The Trojans have some key losses on both sides of the ball, but their baptism by fire with their season-opener at Virginia should get them fairly used to what the expectations are.

Offense.

The O-line is the biggest concern of the team due to the losses of both tackles, two guards and their center. Left tackle is the biggest concern- it's QB Mark Sanchez' blind side- but the five projected starting linemen have all had starting experience. Since Sanchez is an extremely mobile quarterback, the O-line could have less pressure defending the pass rush until they jell as a unit.

The quarterback picture is crystal clear, and the Trojans have the perfect storm brewing. All three- Mark Sanchez, Mitch Mustain and Aaron Corp- could start today on any FBS team. The running back situation is also a little less muddled, now that three tailbacks are not returning. The stable is talented and deep, with Joe McKnight, Stafon Johnson and CJ Gable getting most of the touches.

The wide receiver corps, usually a reliable unit for the Trojans, underachieved last season. Too many dropped catches and incorrect route-running. This year's Spring practice saw a different unit taking hard hits and hanging on to the ball. Patrick Turner, Vidal Hazleton, David Ausberry and Damian Johnson will all split duty, while TE Chris McCoy has big shoes to replace- Mackey Award winner Fred Davis.

Defense.

This unit will be ranked in the top five in the country for good reason, despite the losses of LB Keith Rivers, DT Sedrick Ellis and DE Lawrence Jackson. The projected starters are all top notch, including sophomore Everson Griffen. The linebacking unit has been ranked #1 or #2 preseason, and the Nagurski Award could go to Rey Maualuga this year if he out-shines the other big contender- James Laurinaitis- in their game against the Buckeyes on September 13th.

The secondary suffered one big loss in CB Terrell Thomas, but the senior duos of Josh Pinkard and Cary Harris will fill the loss nicely with their experience. Safeties Taylor Mays (6-4, 225) and Kevin Ellison both had extensive playing time last year, and this secondary unit could be one of the best in the nation. Mays looks and hits like a linebacker. Remember his name.

Outlook.

The Trojans should win the conference championship due to a more favorable schedule- they host Oregon, Arizona State, Washington and Cal- three of the four other contenders in the Pac-10. The Trojans' BCS title game's hopes come down to two dates: September 13th hosting the Buckeyes, and November 29th hosting a much-improved Fighting Irish. Win them both and beat the Sun Devils and Ducks, and it's off to the BCS title game.

2. Arizona State Sun Devils

In just one year, the Sun Devils went from a six-win season in 2006 to a ten-win season under first year coach Dennis Erickson. This year, the goals are even higher. Remember, they earned a co-championship of the Pac-10 last year, but their loss against USC left them without the Rose Bowl bid.

Offense.

Rudy Carpenter comes back for one more shot at quarterback in his senior year. Last year, he played with a sprained thumb for half the season, but is now injury-free. This will be his best year yet, and as it stands now, he is third on the career passing leaders list at Arizona State.

The O-line picture is not as rosy. The Devils lose their First Team Pac-10 center Mike Pollak, as well as two right tackles, a left tackle and left guard. While the line did well last year in scoring offense, they were horrendous in sacks allowed (only Notre Dame was worse) and with only thirty-plus starts between the five of them, they had better improve quickly. This is the key to Arizona State's season.

The receiving unit also took some big hits, with five gone, including two tight ends and one of whom- Zach Miller- was a Mackey Award finalist for 2006 season. The good news is that two of three projected WRs have had good experience- both Chris McGaha and Michael Jones had 13 starts last year- with Jones averaging almost seventeen yards a catch. Their TE, Dane Guthrie, played DE last year.

The running back situation is a "let's wait and see" attitude, with the Devils losing Ryan Torain. Keegan Herring (815 yards, 5.3 ypg) is the projected starter, and is extremely fast (4.3 in the 40). The problem for the running game is how well the O-line pushes off their blocks. Last year it wasn't a problem.

Defense.

The D-line looks more solid with three starters returning. They did lose DT Michael Marquardt, but the incoming addition of true freshman Lawrence Guy, a very highly touted lineman, could alleviate some jitters.

The linebacker unit looks very strong. They lost a stud in Robert James (First Team Pac-Ten), but returning five backers with starting experience, there will be no let-down. This unit looks like a monster.

The secondary was ranked in the top third last year, and looks to be about the same this year. They had two key losses in SS Josh Barrett and CB Justin Tryon, but this unit also returns four DBs with starting experience. Look for the same kind of season as last year's-steady, reliable and competitive.

Outlook.

This year's schedule is much more formidable than last year's. For starters, they host Georgia on September 20th. They get a bye, and then have a brutal two week road trip at both Cal and USC. Their hopes for a Pac-Ten crown are dependant on whether or not they can snap that 8-game losing streak against the Trojans, and beat either Cal or Oregon for a shot at a Rose Bowl bid. If they can do that, and beat Georgia, then you may be looking at a BCS-title dark horse.

3. Oregon Ducks.

We all know what could have happened if Dennis Dixon hadn't gotten hurt- probable BCS title game. But Dixon is gone and now what? Another very good team that should contend for the Pac-10 crown. Their schedule is the only thing that could stop them from running the tables.

Offense.

It all starts at quarterback, and this is one of the two only real question marks on the team. Will the starter be Nathan Costa, a dual-threat like Dixon, Justin Roper or BYU transfer Cade Cooper? Once the position has been settled, the team should get back to some stability.

The other question mark is at running back. How do you replace Jonathan Stewart, who is now second on the school's career rushing leaders list? Head coach Bellotti went the JUCO route, and is pretty high on LeGarrette Blount, a pounding runner. They also have senior Jeremiah Johnson (who is a nightmare in spread-option formations) back, so while the excitement of Stewart will be gone, they still should have enough weaponry in their arsenal to keep the D honest.

The wide receiver unit is a little iffy, and really dependent on how consistent (read- minimizing dropped passes) Jaison Williams is. It's that simple. Well, that, and remaining injury-free. Last year Williams' stats were down from the previous year despite being thrown a lot of passes by Dennis Dixon. The Ducks get a possible boost from USC transfer Jamere Holland, another projected starter.

The O-line, despite losing LG Josh Tschirgi and RT Geoff Schwartz, will not suffer any let-down. Oregon has always had a strong offensive line with huge depth, and this year is no different. Center Max Unger, an All-American candidate, is back, as well as LT Fenuki Tupou and RG Mark Lewis.

Defense.

The D-line looks good to go. They have to replace two DTs, David Faaeteete and Jeremy Gibbs, but so far, it doesn't appear to be too big of a task. While the Ducks look secure on their ends, there is a depth issue on the line. Two JUCO's have been brought in to solidify the tackle positions. If the Ducks can avoid injuries, then the line should hold up.

The secondary will probably be the best in the country, hands down. They only lost two free safeties, which sounds like a big problem, but it's not, thanks to Rover Patrick Chung. He's First Team Pac-10 and the heart of the D. Throw in Walter Thurmond and Jairus Byrd, the two best corners in the Pac-10, and you have an opponent's quarterback's nightmare.

The linebacking unit has suffered numerous injuries, and this could be a problem if some others don't step up to the plate. They lost two linebackers, but that's not the problem- it's the others avoiding injury. Jerome Boyd is the only one to return with thirteen starts last year. John Bacon had nine starts last year, and the anticipation of Casey Matthews (yes, he's related to Clay and Bruce) erupting into a beast could add some spark.

Outlook.

Solve the quarterback issue (six of them have two career starts total) and everything falls into place. Sort of. There's also this little issue called a schedule. The Ducks host Washington in their opener, instead of a lower-division cream puff, and while the Huskies don't exactly look like national title contenders, this could be a rough start for the Ducks' inexperienced quarterback.

They also travel to Purdue, host Boise State, then travel to USC, Arizona State, Cal and Corvallis for their rivalry game against the Beavs. It may be too much to ask for an eight-win season, but then again, if they can split their road games and win their non-conference games, they will be right in the thick of it.

4. California Golden Bears

Just what is it with the Bears? Every year they come in as a preseason top 25 team, and every year they manage to lose a game they shouldn't at the worst possible time, usually in bundles. So close, yet so far. Last year they beat Tennessee and Oregon, but lost to Washington, Oregon State and Stanford, after being highly ranked. This year, they are not in the top 25 in some preseason magazines, and that's what makes them so dangerous- no one expects a lot from them this year.

Offense.

The quarterback issue isn't really an issue, or is it? Senior Nate Longshore, after having a terrific year before suffering a chipped bone in his foot, might not start due to sophomore Kevin Riley winning the fans' hearts. Whoever wins the starting job, the hope is that he improves even with their four WRs leaving.

The second problem for the Bears is the running back situation. They lost Marshawn #### prematurely to the NFL, and Justin Forsett, who ran over 1,500 yards, is also gone. Add Justin Montgomery transferring to Washington State and you have a depleted backfield. The Bears' best hopes rest on sophomore Jahvid Best, a 10.3 speedster in the hundred meter dash.

The receiving corps is the third issue for the Bears. DeSean Jackson bolted for the NFL, and they lost Robert Jordan, Lavelle Hawkins, TEs Craig Stevens and Julian Arthur. The best returning receivers, Nyan Boateng, has only four receptions, while LaReyelle Cunningham has ten. It's time to re-build.

The O-line is a bright spot on the offense. While they lose their LT Mike Gibson, LG Brian De La Puente is back and this unit has averaged only twelve sacks a year for the last two years. They should give excellent pass rush protection. Their All-American center Alex Mack is back as well.

Defense.

There's good news here. The linebacking unit is just stacked with talent and depth. The Bears could go to a 3-4 to compensate for the depth issues on the line. The talent is there on the line, with six of eight returning. They lost Matthew Malele, but have Rulon Davis, Derrick Hill, Tyson Alualu and Cam Jordan returning.

The linebacking unit could be one of the best in the Pac-10. All-Pac-10 Zack Follett is back, as well as Anthony Felder and Worrell Williams. This is a strong unit and should back-up the DL until things start to jell there.

The secondary also looks good, with only FS Thomas DeCoud and Rover Brandon Hampton as the notable departures. Both corners- Syd'Quan Thompson and Chris Conte have started games- and Bernard Hicks taking over the FS spot should be an easy transition for the Bears' secondary.

Outlook.

Thank goodness for small favors. The Bears schedule only calls for five road games; Washington State, Maryland, Arizona, USC and Oregon State. Their date with Maryland could be a sign of how well this team gets into Tedford's game plan. While their season won't end in Pasadena, they should have at least six or seven wins and a bowl bid. Considering all the losses on the offense, that's not a bad place to be.

5. Arizona Wildcats

Mike Stoops' job just might get saved this year. And he'll owe it all to the offense, not defense- something the Wildcats are not known for. He is in his fifth season, has never had a winning season, and if the Cats don't go bowling this year, it's probably back to Norman, Oklahoma where he would most likely be greeted with open arms.

Offense.

Quarterback Willie Tuitama returns after breaking all kinds of school records. He's got plenty of weapons to throw to, including Mike Thomas, Delashaun Dean, Terrell Turner, Terrell Reese and TE Rob Gronkowski. The only key loss in this unit is Anthony Johnson. This team will throw hard and often- think WAC-like offense here.

The running back situation isn't as favorable. Their top back, Nic Grigsby, was ranked ninth in the Pac-10, and unless he gains 20 lbs, will not be the possession back they so desperately need. They only lost one back, so while the talent is there, it's very young and inexperienced with a lot of underclassmen on the roster.

The O-line is sitting pretty with almost everybody returning except four year LT starter Peter Graniello. This unit looks to be the anchor of the team, and if they can really hold their blocks, the running game could improve drastically and take some pressure off of the passing game.

Defense.

This is normally the strongest part of the team, but this year, they must replace eight starters, including All-American CB Antoine Cason and LB Spenser Larsen.

While the line backing corps has a lot of new faces, it still looks pretty strong. JUCO Vuna Tuihalamaka is expected to start after not qualifying academically last year, while Ronnie Palmer and Xavier Kelley should fill out the box. It won't be spectacular, but it will be a solid unit.

The D-line is very inexperienced and not a unit that is expected to do well. Two new DEs and DTs will be lining up and only one has a career start- Chris Horton.

The secondary is a mixed bag. They have two replace two DBs and Antoine Cason. Since they were ranked in the top 25, you have to figure some drop-off here. FS Nate Ness returns and joins CB Devin Ross. A lot of new faces, and while probably talented, this unit will not have the same results as last year's unit.

Outlook.

The Wildcats need to go bowling this year, or else. This is the year they could do it. While always known as a defensive team, this year will surprise everyone. They will pass a lot, especially if their running game doesn't materialize.

Their schedule is do-able. They open with three easy non-conference games then travel to a most likely beat-up Bruins team. They have only four conference road games- UCLA, Stanford, Washington State and Oregon. Their probable losses against USC, Oregon and Oregon State with the rest probable wins make them cancel their fishing plans in December.

6. UCLA Bruins

This is a rebuilding year for the Bruins- make no mistake about it. Forget the 25 players gone (17 of them starters), they also have a new head coach, Rick Neuheisel, and new OC Norm Chow. If that isn't enough to make your baby blue hopes' fade, both of their starting quarterbacks are injured-one for the year, and one projected to be back in the Summer. It's going to be a scary ride, Bruin Nation.

Offense.

Only one way to go, and it's up. With only four starters returning and averaging a paltry 22.4 ppg, it's time to produce. Unfortunately, Patrick Cowan tore his ACL and is out for the year, leaving only Ben Olson, who is recovering from a broken foot, to guide the offense. This wouldn't be such an issue except the quarterbacks' injuries are a result of a suspect O-line. Very suspect.

Center Micah Reed and LT Micah Kia are the only returning linemen who have ever played a game. Scary. Real scary. And they have a new O-line coach. Don't look for any real progress as far as blocking and pass rushing. Norm Chow will have to get real creative to overcome the thin O-line.

The running game also took a hit- Chris Markey, Derrick Williams and Michael Pitre are gone. Kahlil Bell and Raymond Carter are both a question mark due to injury. Fullback Chane Moline could see a lot of action in the game.

The wide receiver position at UCLA has always been a source of pride, and last year, Brandon Breazell and Joe Cowan were the unit's leaders. This year, Breazell, Cowan and TE William Snead are gone. Osaar Rasshan, who was used as a quarterback when both Olson and Cowan were hurt last year, could come back to his natural position, but with the current injury-plagued quarterback situation, that's a big if. Marcus Everett returns for his fifth year, and with the dearth of talent in this position, there shouldn't be that much of a drop-off.

Defense.

The D-line looks like it's in good shape. The Bruins lost DE Bruce Davis, DT Kevin Brown and DE Nikola Dragovic, but return stalwart DTs Brigham Harwell and Brian Price as well as DEs Korey Bosworth and Tom Blake. All in all, the D-line is solid.

The linebacking unit will be about the same as last year's unit. Kyle Bosworth returns on the strong side, but the weak side is a little iffy. Reggie Carter, the team's signal caller, will be back in his natural position and is the heart of the Bruins' D.

The secondary is a bit of a mess. Four of the eleven DBs were Spring walk-ons. The one bright spot, Alterraun Verner, is the earth's eighth natural wonder. He is extremely underrated, and a terrific pass defender. And he'll have to be, since the Bruins lost CB Trey Brown, FS Dennis Keyes, CB Matthew Slater and S Chris Horton. Yep, a lot of teams will be passing on the Bruins.

Outlook.

This is a rebuilding year, make no mistake about it. The Bruins have the talent, just not a lot of experience. The quarterback disaster doesn't help the offensive issues at all.

The good news is that the Bruins have a superb coaching staff, and there is excitement in Westwood again.

The bad news is their schedule- not a schedule a rebuilding team wants by any measure. Three of their first four games are against top 25 teams: Tennessee, BYU and Fresno State. They also take road trips to Eugene and Berkeley. The prospects for a winning season do not look good, but it's not due to the talent on the team, it's due to the brutal schedule for such a young team. Look for the Bruins to eek out a six-win season as a goal, perhaps even surprise an unsuspecting Pac-10 champion contender or play the spoiler, and then fasten your seatbelts for next year.

7. Washington Huskies.

The Huskies are the sexy pick to be the biggest surprise of the year, but they need all the planets in the universe to align at the right time. Once a fearsome opponent in the Pac-10, they have had a bad stretch since 2005- a total of six conference wins. Like Stoops, Willingham's hot seat may reach a scorching level if the Huskies don't go bowling this year. Their schedule is not that favorable, but then again, it has been one of the toughest in the nation for the second year in a row.

Offense.

It all starts with Pac-10 Freshman of the Year Jake Locker. Last year he was hurt, but this year he's back and could cause havoc in the Pac-10, much like Dennis Dixon did before he was hurt. He has a cannon of an arm and can run past the best of defenses (102 yards against Ohio State). In short, if Locker has a break-out year, the Huskies could be bowling.

The running back unit will have to replace Louis Rankin, but they do have some potential weapons in Brandon Johnson and JR Hasty. The wide receiver unit has loads of talent, but short on experience. Like USC, the Huskies suffered a lot of dropped passes last year. They have a freshman Chris Polk, who originally committed to USC, and some other highly touted players including returner TE Robert Lewis. After losing six receivers, this unit has to jell fast.

The O-line returns three starters, and should have no problem giving Locker some room to maneuver. They only lose RT Chad Macklin, but senior Juan Garcia suffered a foot injury and may miss all of 2008.

Defense.

The Huskies rolled over last year by giving up an average of 446 ypg- a school record. And it really doesn't look too much better this year. They have a new DC, former NFL'er Ed Donatell, but don't expect him to work any miracles this year. The D is just too inexperienced in the trenches.

The line is a major problem, and losing five of six starters doesn't give much hope for 2008. Key losses include three DTs and two DEs. With so much inexperience at the line and some depth at linebacker, expect the Huskies to convert to a 3-4 just like the California Golden Bears are expected to do.

The linebacker unit looks more promising, returning five with starting experience and two actual starters. While they lose OLB Dan Howell, the have EJ Savannah and Donald Butler coming back. Expect this group to be the leading tacklers on the team.

The secondary returns only two starters, but they are good ones- Mesphin Forrester started all games last year, and FS Jason Wells. They lost CB Roy Lewis, but with seven players returning with starting experience, they should be OK.

Outlook.

Let's put it this way- it will be a roller coaster ride for Huskies fans. Longing for the glory of the 2001 Rose Bowl-winning team, the Huskies have to step it up this year. The offense can do it, the D will not.

Their schedule is again brutal- last year they were ranked #1 in SOS. They open their season at Oregon. Then host BYU and Oklahoma. They could surprise the Cougs if Locker can run wild, but the Sooners will also run wild on the Huskies. The remaining games include road games at Arizona, USC, Washington State and Cal, with Notre Dame sandwiched between USC and Oregon State.

8. Oregon State Beavers

They finished last year 9-4 and beating the Terps in the Emerald Bowl. Always a team that gets overlooked in the Pac-10, and always a team that can #### victory out of an unsuspecting Pac-10 team's jaws. Mike Riley has always been on the verge, but never can get over that hump. This is another one of those years where he could go far, but the past is usually more indicative of where the Beavers will end up- better than average.

Offense.

The Beavers have an unusual situation- they have two outstanding QBs in Sean Canfield and Lyle Moevao. Who gets the start? Moevao is 4-0 after taking over Canfield's spot when he was hurt. Canfield is a NFL-prototype drop back passer, while Maevao is much more mobile. Mike Riley has a tough decision to make.

The running back situation is a bit iffy. The Beavs lost two-time 1,000 yard rusher Yvensen Bernard, as well as four other backs with limited playing time, but they should be able to find a capable back to carry the load in either Jacquizz Rodgers, a very highly recruited freshman, or Ryan McCants.

The line looks good to go. They return three starters, and barring any injury, will be rock-solid. They had some issues on the left side (LT Tavita Thompson, academics and LG Jeremy Perry, knee) but with the two of them also returning, the Beaver Nation should feel very comfortable with the line.

The receiving unit got a huge boost when Sammie Stroughter was awarded an extra year after a kidney issue. In 2006 he had almost 1,300 yards, and with the departures of Anthony Brown and Brandon Powers, his return will be a huge confidence-builder for the unit.

Defense.

The Beavers only return three starters, but almost everyone has had some starting experience, so no need to panic. They lose six of their eight linemen, but return their two DEs, Victor Butler and Slade Norris, who combined for 19.5 sacks for 188 yards in losses. While they were primarily sack specialists, they could see more extensive playing time this year.

The linebacking unit, while returning no starters, has all had plenty of experience as back-ups. The problem is that all three departing backers this year were on the All-Pac-10 Second team. That's a huge loss, and could be critical against some strong running teams.

The secondary only loses two- SS Daniel Drayton and CB Gerard Lawson. Safety Al Afalava is the unit's leader, and they return two key CB's in Keenan Lewis and Brandon Hughes.

Outlook.

Their conference schedule is not that bad- they host USC, Washington State, Cal, Arizona State and Oregon. Their non-conference schedule is a different story- they go to Penn State before returning to face a depleted Hawaii, USC and then back on the road again to play Utah. All in all, there isn't really one guaranteed win on their schedule since they travel to a much-improved Stanford in their season-opener.

9. Washington State Cougars

After four years of not being a contender in the Pac-10, Bill Doba was canned and Paul Wulff (Eastern Washington) was given the nod. He is installing a no-huddle spread offense, so while the team's offensive production will be exciting to watch, it will be a first year experiment. The Cougs haven't been strong on the defensive front for a long time, and this year will be no different.

Offense.

Quarterback Gary Rogers returns (5th year) and while he has a nice arm, his ability to stay in the spread offense is a concern- he's not very mobile. Alex Brink had a lot of experience and with his departure, the Cougs will have to be patient.

RB Dwight Tardy returns, but is coming off an ACL injury. Chris Ivory is a more breakaway threat, and if Tardy isn't 100%, Ivory will see more carries.

The receivers unit lost a big name in Michael Bumpus, as well as TE Jed Collins and Charles Dillon, but All-American Brandon Gibson, after flirting with the NFL, has decided to return. The unit looks very inexperienced, and could be a major concern.

The line looks a lot more promising, with nine of the top ten back. They lost LG Bobby Byrd, a 4-year starter, but that's it. Their experience could give Rogers some more time to work his magic in the pocket.

Defense.

The D has always been the Cougs' biggest problem, and this year is no different. The line has been consistently man-handled and the secondary was marginal at best last year.

The line has two starters returning, A'i Ahmu, a RT who specializes against the run, and DE Andy Mattingly. They lost four linemen, and Wulff raided some JUCOs to give the line some more depth.

The linebacking unit has more experience, with Greg Trent, Corey Evans and Kendrick Dunn all returning. The problem is depth- if one of them goes down with injury, the alternatives do not look good.

The secondary can only be described as this: the top tackler on the entire team was FS Husain Abdullah, and he's gone. They return a CB (Alfonso Jackson) and a SS (Chima Nwachukwu), and that's it. Look for this unit to get a lot of action, as everyone will be throwing on the Cougs.

Outlook.

A new coach, new offense and lingering defensive issues will not give the Cougs' opponents any reason to fear them. It's rebuilding time. They open against Oklahoma State, a guaranteed loss, then host Cal before traveling to Texas and playing Baylor, a possible win.

After a Portland State win, the Cougs host Oregon, then play at UCLA, at Oregon State, host USC, then go to Palo Alto to play Stanford, a possible win, Arizona, at Arizona State then host Washington for the Apple Cup and close out their season at Hawaii. A three-win season is not unrealistic, and a five-win season would be a huge confidence-builder going into 2009.

10. Stanford

Last year the Cardinal went 4-8, including that historic upset against USC. This year, they will not be surprising anyone. While the Cardinal return the most players in the Pac-10, most of these players aren't the same caliber as their counterparts in the Pac-10. The question is, can second-year coach Jim Harbaugh get them to over-achieve again?

Offense.

Tavita Pritchard will be in a battle for the starting spot against Michigan transfer Jason Forcier and sophomore Alex Loukas. This is the real bright spot for the Cardinal-depth at the quarterback position.

The wide receiver corp suffered a major loss with both Mark Bradford and Evan Moore gone. Richard Sherman and Doug Baldwin look to be the projected starters, but Bradford was fourth on the Cardinal's all time reception yards, so there could be a huge drop-off this year.

The running backs all have experience. Senior Anthony Kimble returns after a injury-plagued 2007, and Toby Gerhart could actually steal the starting spot away from Kimble. This unit has a lot of potential, especially due to the deep O-line returning.

The O-line is the strength of the team, with only center Tim Mattran and LG Mikal Brewer as the most notable losses. They have four linemen with nine or more starts returning, and they get a huge boost with Oklahoma State transfer Chase Beeler filling in as RG.

Defense.

Nine players return with starting experience. The question is, can they handle the high-octane offensive juggernauts in the Pac-10? Probably not. Remember, this is the team that beat USC, but lost to Notre Dame.

The D-line has some experience with DE Pannel Egboh (six sacks, 13.5 tackles for a loss) and NT Ekom Udofia returning from an injury-riddled season last year, but lose Chris Horn, a DT with eleven starts and 24 tackles. If they can limit the injuries, this could be another positive for the Cardinal.

The Cardinal return their top two linebackers, but when you consider Clint Snyder was their #2 tackler and Pat Maynor was their #3 tackler, all that means is that the opposing teams have a tendency to break though the O-line a lot. Still, the top tacklers return, so this is a confidence-booster.

The secondary is a concern, although FS Bo McNally was second in the Pac-10 with tackles (114). Still, when your FS is a leading tackler, there are issues. Huge issues. Their SS has not played on any defensive unit since middle school, and is a converted WR. The Cardinal secondary was ranked #74 last year, so there's definite room for improvement. The loss of CB Nick Sanchez could be a big concern, but how much worse can it get?

Outlook.

The Cardinal have seven road games, and that will probably be too much for them to handle. Their conference road games are at Arizona State, Washington, UCLA, Oregon and Cal. Not very encouraging for a team in transition. Throw in a road game at Notre Dame and TCU, and you have a team that will be lucky to equal last year's 4-8 season.

The Cardinal's last three games are the key to another losing season: at Oregon, USC, at Cal. That's about as brutal as it gets when you consider both Cal and USC were upset by the Stanford Cardinal last season. Can you say P-A-Y-B-A-C-K? I knew you could.

There are some stories that defy description. There are some that are just so unbelievable, you have to pinch yourself and wonder if it was just a dream. Welcome to the world of Fresno State.

This year, their football program will be ranked in the pre-season top twenty-five rankings- stifle your laughs, folks. Will UCLA and Wisconsin still be laughing after facing Pat Hill's ferocious Bulldogs? Probably not. In fact, they'll probably be licking their wounds asking, "who are those guys?"

But for now, let's concentrate on baseball in the San Joaquin Valley. You know...where the California raisin and almond growers are. Home of the Fresno State Bulldogs- a team that lost twelve of their first twenty games of the season. And where Cinderella just bought herself a new castle. Tonight.

The baseball World Series ended, and this time, there was a shocker.

Cinderella, meet Georgia. Georgia, meet Cinderella. Cinderella, by the way, had beaten the #2 ranked North Carolina Tar Heels before finally advancing to the Finals of the College World Series. Her next dance partner? Number 6 Georgia.

The Georgia Bulldogs were a high seed going into the series, and after beating Florida State, thought they probably could just mail in the next two of three games. In fact, in the first game, they beat Fresno State 7-6. Win one more, and the SEC has yet another National Championship to crow about.



But a funny thing happened on the way to Omaha. Fresno State decided that their ranking of #89 was just a tad too disrespectful. In game two, Fresno State rocked Georgia back to their midnight train 19-10 and all of a sudden, what looked like a rout was now becoming a potential Hollywood script for Kevin Costner to produce.

In game three, it was all Fresno State. Pitching (Justin Wilson) a shut-out until the eighth inning, Fresno State let Georgia make one last stab, parking a pitch for one run. Then the clock struck twelve. For Georgia.


Fresno State responded by pulling their pitcher, Justin Wilson and putting in closer Brandon Burke, to seal the deal. He forced their pinch hitter to ground out on a double play and then pitched to Olson who flied out near the warning track for the final out.

Georgia lost, 6-1, to a WAC conference team and Cinderella rewrote history.

No team in any sport in NCAA history has been seeded as low as the Fresno State Bulldogs were and won a championship. Let's rephrase that- they are the lowest seeded team in any sport to ever win an NCAA National Championship.

The Bulldogs' reaction to being Cinderella? "Cinderella, I don't know about Cinderella. We're the Bulldogs", said Justin Wilson. Another teammate said, "we're just a bunch a goofballs."

Goofballs or not, congratulations to the Fresno State Bulldogs for proving that Heaven isn't in Iowa.

Nope, it's right here in Omaha, Nebraska, baby. The nation's breadbasket.

Where dreams come to live and die.

Wisconsin and UCLA have about two months to face their own date with Cinderella's better half- the Fresno State football team.
Pat Hill will have his squad fired up to prove to the world that, indeed, California has more than just fruits and nuts.

California is home to the first university to reach 100 National Championships (UCLA). California is also home to the conference with the most National Championships (Pac-10).

And now, California is home to Cinderella. Paradise awaits, your highness.

" I really expected to be here, even with all of the questions at the beginning of the season." Derek Fisher, May 29th, after the Lakers beat the Spurs to go to the Finals.

"We were surprised we were here." Phil Jackson, June17th, after losing in the Finals.





"Dr. Buss is an ####." Kobe Bryant, in parking lot video, May, 2007.

"I have to tip my hat off to Buss and Mitch for going for it. .......We have a great bench. We have a lot of length, a lot of versatility. Now it's time to walk the walk." Kobe Bryant, February, 2008, after the Pau Gasol trade is announced.





"Andrew Bynum? What the (expletive)? Are you kidding me? Andrew Bynum? (Expletive) ship his (expletive) out. We're talking Jason Kidd here. They didn't want to do that. That's why we're in this (expletive) situation." Kobe Bryant, May, 2007, (Kobevideoguys.com) on his frustration with not getting Jason Kidd in a trade.

"Rebounding and a shot-blocker in the middle. He (Bynum) solves a couple of those." Kobe Bryant, June 17th, 2008, on how Bynum's return can help this team's problem's.




And finally, after the 2008 Finals ended......


"We have to get some players- if we're going to come and repeat- to have that kind of aggressiveness." Phil Jackson, June 17th, 2008, after losing to the Celtics in the Finals.


Is anyone paying attention to the Lakers and their mood swings? Coach Phil Jackson excuses his Lakers from the Finals by saying, "we were surprised we were here." If that isn't an insult to every Lakers fan, I don't know what is, especially when other players have gone on record to say they did expect to be there, especially after breezing through the "tough West."

The Lakers, like their fans, are in denial. They can point fingers and start whispering trades, but the bottom line is this: the Lakers have one great player, and that's it. The offensive juggernaut was a myth. The assault was a b**** slapped. Jackson's Zen was overshadowed by Ubuntu. Kobe can be stopped. The Truth hurts.

Kobe, for the record, can't win a ring without Shaq. Somewhere in Florida, a very large sheriff is laughing.

The off-season decisions made by management could stop the laughing. But what should they do?

Luke Walton? Trade him. He's just taking up space on the floor. If his last name was Brown, he would have been gone a long time ago.

Vlad Rad? Trade him. Except for his occasional 3-pointer streaks on offense, he's worthless on D.

Turriaf? Are you kidding me? He makes Rick Fox look good.

Fish? He is one of the most consistent players on the team, and should be more active directing the offense.

Sasha? Yeah, the chicks dig him and he plays tenacious D on the perimeter, but he folds like a lawn chair defending the middle. Either teach him better defensive skills, or trade him.

Farmar and Ariza? Keep mentoring them. They are your future.

Gasol? Teach him to finish a shot consistently strong and start plugging the middle. He's not a natural Center, but at 7 feet, should be a more effective shot-blocker. While he might go back to his natural position when Bynum takes over as Center, didn't the Lakers' fans complain about Bynum a year ago?

Lamar? It's hard to get down on him when he has suffered so much tragedy in his family. Give him another year to play next to Bynum.

Kobe? Kobe looks like he wants to be traded. Again.

The fans? Time to take off the purple-hued glasses. And take a deep look at the state of LakerNation. It's good to be behind your team. It's also good to recognize its limitations.




WrZlt
Jun 2, 2008
4:42 PM You got interesting stats Lisa.... care to explain why the Cavs held Boston to such horrible score tallies in the 2nd round I think 1 game Boston had like 69 points in a loss? Has Boston even went up against a team with the length that LA has? Or the talent / athleticism? Do you honestly think the Cavaliers are a better team than the Jazz... and if so by how much?

All these pretty stats(which mean nothing once the game starts- explain the first 2 rounds for the Celtics), are they for the regular or post season?
If they are for the post season, well it is simple... Boston faced the Hawks- are they known for anything? Then the Cavs... are they known for their offense.. or for their rebounding? Then the Pistons... another offensive powerhouse? Get real... Celtics havent went up against an offensive juggernaut like the Lakers... and despite what people say we've been playing pretty good defense in the post season too.

Why do Celtics go on 5 minute non scoring stretches? If that #### happens against the Lakers, yuo better play the best defense of your little celtic life... cause the purple and gold doesnt lull you into a victory. Lakers know what happens when you give a team breathing room... maybe thats why they played with the energy to dispense the Spurs in 5... because if you let it go 7 with the Spurs they might take it away from you.... and I don't think LA forgot what happened in the first round when we had the series lead against PHX but they came back.

Bottom line.... Lakers are more tested than the Celtics. You think the Hawks or Cavs would have gone 7 again?

tcbdog
Jun 3, 2008
1:54 AM Lakers in 4.

Dont think the Celtics will even get off.

The Lakers defense is twice as good as it was a month ago.

Doc Rivers is not half the coach Phil Jackson is.

The Lakers bench is too good.

The Lakers have the best player of this generation.

The Lakers have more experience on this stage than the Celtics.

The Lakers beat a better team than the Celtics 4-1.

I think the Lakers will win the first two in Boston and close it at home.
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
While you love the passion of the Lakers fans, you can't help but notice one thing- they consistently were in denial about their team's defense, conference strength, and bench mob while disrespecting their opponent.

Newsflash- unless the Lakers learn better D and become more aggressive, they will be the same as this year's team. In the Finals, but unable to beat a tougher foe from the East. Whoever that may be in 2009.

And unfortunately, the results will be the same. With or without Kobe.

This is a bit late, my apologies. Article deadlines take precedence over blogging.

So....after some much thought, here is the theme of this blog: spill the champagne on your home court, not theirs. Celtics win tonight.

To be honest with you, I'm a bit disappointed the C's didn't take game 5. Here was their chance to close it out, and they didn't do the job. Never, ever let your opponent think they have a chance in beating you; the Lakers see a crack in the proverbial closed door. It's ajar, and they are trying to wedge their foot in deep to prevent it from slamming shut.

One serious injury on the Celtics' team (besides Rondo, Kendrick or Paul's) and the series could take a different twist. As it is, Perkins is iffy, Rajon is iffy, and Ray Allen? Who knows, and our prayers are with his little boy Walker who spent at least two days in a hospital for tests after falling ill.

Bottom line? The Lakers have no chance of winning tonight. As much as they have that one-game-at-a-time philosophy which worked Sunday, it won't work tonight. The C's know they can't lose two in a row. They can't let the Lakers get any confidence.

What will happen? The Lakers will try to jump out to an early lead, but this time, the C's will be ready to stifle them. Kobe will be double-teamed every time he turns around. Paul Pierce will be unstoppable, Allen will carve up the middle, KG will make his 12-footers all night and someone from the Celtics' bench (I'm betting Leon Powe) will be the difference in the game.

I, for one, would like to see one foul called on Kobe where he doesn't complain about it. It's getting real old, but does have possibilities for a new drinking game. We all could be hammered by half-time if we have to take a shot every time Kobe howls about a foul that wasn't called, or complains about getting a foul called on him.

The hand dismissal he does towards the refs is cause for a T, but he doesn't get called for it. The howling every time he gets in the paint is annoying, especially when instant replay shows he wasn't touched.

Kobe, you are a great player, but your verbal flops are pathetic. Shut up, and play the game. You got away with one in the last game, and the C's had enough class to not make a stink out of it-they're no fools. Why get on the refs' bad side? But you smacked Pierce and never touched the ball and it was a swing play. Please.

You get more benefits than anyone on the court. You fouled Pierce and got away with it. It was a game-changing play. Am I upset? No. The C's played sloppy and shouldn't have allowed that to happen in the first place. But I'm sick of Kobe whining about non-calls when he got away with a HUGE foul.

Kobe will try to win the game, but come up short due to outstanding D. By the way, what is with Kobe? He's deferring to his teammates instead of taking over. I don't want to start a conspiracy theory here, but WTF?????


Is this the new installment of Kobe's antics- proof to the world that he can't carry the team by himself? Didn't he pull this stunt before? (Yes, he did) Far be it for me to raise a sensitive issue to the Lakers fans, but, you have to be a bit unsettled by game 5. Kobe did not take over. He deferred. Do you smell a tirade coming? Take out the "i" in tirade, and you have trade.

Don't be shocked if it happens.

Prediction: C's win. Start pouring the champagne. The party is over for the Lakers. They won't win in Boston. Kobe vents his frustrations.

CLICK HERE TO READ J-DIZZLE'S BLOG

Becky Hammon grew up in the Midwest, where American values and patriotism run high. She plays guard for the WNBA's San Antonio Silver Stars, and at the ripe old age of thirty one years old, is still chasing her dream.

In her off season, she plays for a professional basketball team in Moscow, Russia. So far, no big deal. Because she has worked over in Russia for an extended amount of time, she was given citizenship status. And here is where it starts to get a little murky.

Becky's dream has always been to play in the Olympics. At her age, she knows Beijing is her last shot at that dream. So when Russia asked her to be a member of their National Basketball team and represent them in the Olympics, she said yes.

She was asked to try out for the US team after she said yes to the Russians and their seven figure contract, but has made the decision to play point guard for the Russians.

Keep in mind, she speaks little Russian and has no Russian in her bloodlines. She is 100% American, a native of Rapid City, South Dakota and a Colorado State graduate. her basketball jersey is the #2 selling jersey, right behind Lisa Leslie's jersey.

Anne Donovan, the coach of the women's basketball team, has called her a "traitor."


Sue Bird added, ""When you walk into that stadium, it really, really hits you. There is something to be said for representing your country and going over there and competing against other countries' best."

Hammon will be marching into Beijing donning a Russian uniform and marching behind a Russian flag, all of which doesn't sit well with many Americans. Keep in mind, J.R. Holden, an American, will be playing on the Russian's basketball team in Beijing-he plays for a professional basketball team in Russia.

What do you think? Sound off.


sources: Yahoo.com, and Seattle Times

It could happen. And I'm being purely logical here.

There are at least three non- BCS conference teams ranked in the top twenty-five: BYU, Utah and Fresno State. Now, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure one of these teams will end up being in the top ten. Eventually.

Fresno State has to beat UCLA (probable) and Wisconsin, and if the weather patterns hold up in Fresno like they usually do in September, the Badgers will wilt like five-day old lettuce in that 100+ degree weather. The Bulldogs will be ready to play. I am projecting a win for the 'Dawgs. I'm a believer in Pat Hill.

BYU is hosting UCLA and plays Washington in Seattle, and both these teams are reeling from heavy losses on their rosters. They will probably beat both, and the Cougs end their season against Utah. The Cougs could be undefeated at this point, and I have to think they will be in the top eight.

Utah could be the spoiler to BYU's quest, but I don't see it happening. They travel to Ann Arbor for their first game, and although I have that as a probable loss, Appalachian State kind of puts a stink on that projection. They also play Oregon State, and I give the Beavs the win. Their final game is hosting BYU, and the Cougs should win it.

Okay, with me so far? Fresno State and BYU are now the big guys. Let's take a look at Clemson's schedule, since they are the consensus favorite to win the ACC this year.

Their first game is at a neutral site, the Georgia Dome, against Alabama. This could be their make and break game. Let's, for the sake of argument, say they beat the Tide. They then play The Citadel, N.C. State and South Carolina State. Two of the three are FCS schools. Remember that.

The Tigers then play the bulk of their conference schedule: Maryland (win), Wake Forest (?), Georgia Tech (win), Boston College (win), Florida State (?), Duke (win), Virginia (win) and then South Carolina (win).

Except for Wake Forest and Florida State, who both have a legit chance of beating them, Clemson plays a watered down BC (no Ryan), Virginia (no Long) and no Virginia Tech or Miami.

The Tigers are in somewhat of an impossible position. They have to beat everyone to get the pollsters' respect. Why? Because of those two cupcakes on their schedules.

The eligibility requirements of the BCS are that only one FCS win may count as a win. So what does that mean?

Basically, the Tigers will only have eleven wins, even if they go undefeated, and that will play havoc with the BCS computer rankings. Florida State is in a similar predicament- they too, have two FCS schools on their schedule- Western Carolina and Chattanooga. Scheduling cupcakes has its consequences.

Clemson will most likely face Va Tech for the championship, and if they beat them, that could help their case. But I still say those computers are going to mess them up. The human pollsters may put them in the top 12, but the BCS droids might dump them.

BCS bowl eligibility requirements are very simple. If a non-BCS conference team is ranked #12 or higher, it's an automatic BCS bowl berth. If a non-BCS conference team is ranked #16 and they are ranked higher than a conference champion, then the non-BCS conference team gets an automatic berth. Fresno State and BYU are both non-BCS conference teams.

Sure, Clemson could get an at-large bid, but let's get real here. If the ACC's champion (presumably Clemson) has one or two losses and a two-loss Big 12 team has the same record (think Mizzou here), who do you think will get picked on BCS Selection Day ? A champion of a watered-down conference, or a two-loss Big 12, SEC, Pac-10 or Big Ten team?

Prediction: ACC Conference Champion does not get a BCS Bowl bid.

When asked how he would put this game four loss behind him, Kobe answered, "wine, beer and twenty shots." That sounds about right, Kobe. And we don't blame you one bit. I'll even doing the honor of pouring.

While Lakers fans start blaming the refs and Phil Jackson (hard to believe, but it's true), the obvious reason for why the Lakers lost couldn't be more obvious- lack of team work. Lack of team concept. Lack of community. Whatever you want to call it, the team lacked that certain something. Heart? Commitment? Drive? Yep, yep..... and yep.

For all the 4th quarter weight Kobe has carried on his shoulders, you would think by now that another teammate would step up to the plate. But it hasn't happened. And it probably never will, as long as Kobe is on the Lakers' team. He knows it. Gasol was supposed to be the number two guy, and so far, it hasn't worked out. Odom? Brief, shining moments of brilliance followed by mostly lackluster presence on the court. Bynum will be back next season, but will Kobe?

As long as the mentality of "Kobe will take over for us in the fourth quarter" festers on this team, they won't win a championship again. Teams win championships, not one single great player. That is fact. It takes at least two very good players to get that ring. Shaq was not a fluke. Neither was Pippen.

How is a magnificent player supposed to step-up his game in the fourth when he has three or four guys defending him? He can't. And it's not his fault.

The Lakers bench didn't do their jobs. Odom and Gasol, except for some brilliant single quarter playing, didn't play a complete game. Vujicic, with his Michael Cooper-like tenacious guarding, escorted Ray Allen through the paint for an uncontested lay-up and left an embarrassed Pau Gasol to only stare at the ball going in.

Radmonovic also left Posey wide open for a trey while trying to help Vujicic with Ray Allen. When team-help defense was waved off on the next play, that's when Ray Allen sealed the deal with that lay-up. While the Celtics took advantage of a teammate being double-teamed, the Lakers, on the hand, did not. Kobe was constantly double or triple-teamed when he was ready to shoot, but there were no Lakers in sight to help him out. A scenario that has played out repeatedly throughout these Finals.

The Celtics' alleged weak spots- their bench and their coach- were suddenly, not so weak. While the Zen Master was preaching to the Lakers about x's and o's on a white board, Doc Rivers was re-enforcing his players' mental psyches b