It all began on June 1, 2005 when Dr. Daryl Gross, the Director of Athletics at Syracuse University, announced that the Orange were ditching the all-orange headwear they had donned for the past 21 years and adopting an Alabama-like orange helmet with blue numerals and a solid blue stripe down the middle. It was a throwback to the Jim Brown era, when the Orange were still Men, and a major upgrade over the Donovan McNabb togs. But how would the new uniforms affect the team’s play? The Orange went 1-10, their worst record since 1948, with the lone win coming against Buffalo. Not a great start to the “old is new” era at SU.
The Orange’s downfall prompted me to examine other team’s fate after a significant uniform/helmet switch. Pittsburgh trotted out new helmets for the 05 season and stumbled to 5-6 following a BCS bowl appearance in 2004. New Mexico State followed the retro-is-in-craze, reverting to white helmets for 2005 and went 0-12. Oregon, the virtual chameleon of uniform changes, while only losing one game this season, got snubbed by the BCS for the second time in four years.
There seemed to be a pattern emerging that pointed towards a relatively simple deduction, dubbed the Helmet Corollary by yours truly, which states: “If a team changes its helmet design more than once every 25 years, said team is simply not a college football powerhouse.”
Look at the teams that are in the BCS this year: USC, Texas, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Penn State, FSU, West Virginia, and Georgia. That’s a pretty traditional bunch. There will be no question as to what they’ll be wearing come January.
While nearly every team in college football has made minor changes to stripes, numerals, fabrics, etc. to keep up with modern times, this year’s BCS group seems to highlight the fact that you have to have a good head on your shoulders if you want to win titles.
USC has sported the same helmet design continually since 1993, minus the facemask change from scarlet to grey in 2001, but today’s logo dates back even longer as it is the same that Anthony Davis wore when he ran all over Notre Dame in 1972. And speaking of the Irish, they’ve been doffing the all-gold lids since 1962.
Ohio State’s been plain since 1968, Penn State since 1975. The Seminoles have worn the same spears and tomahawks headdress ever since Bobby Bowden set foot on campus in 1976. In 1964, Georgia started riding the coattail’s of Lombardi’s Packers and they continue to this day, while if West Virginia’s interlocking “WV” design looks vaguely 80’s it’s because it is. The Mountaineers have had the same helmets since the decade dawned.
But the Helmet Corollary extends far beyond just this year’s top teams. Take a look at the National Champions since 1990 (including split national titles): Colorado, Georgia Tech, Miami, Washington, Alabama, Florida St., Nebraska, Florida, Michigan, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Ohio State, LSU and USC.
All of those helmets are imminently recognizable to even a casual fan of college football, and only one of those teams has since undergone a relevant change. Washington didn’t fudge the logo, but they did switch from gold to purple helmets between 1996 and 1998, before going back to gold in 1999. Are they feeling the effects of the sartorial switcheroo? Let’s just say they’re 3-19 in the past two seasons.
But if you’re willing to forgive the Huskies for changing colors, it was a nod to tradition I believe, you have to reach even further back on the National Champions list to find a team who has made major uniform changes in the past 20 years. That team is BYU in 1984. Since then, at Nike’s behest I presume, they’ve had a revolving door of helmet and uniform designs, seemingly switching every two to three years, before finally arriving this year at, guess what, the same helmet design they wore when they won it all. After a 12-0 start in 2001, they gave up 100 points in their final two losses to finish 25th in the AP Poll. In the past three years they’ve bobbed around the .500 mark and fallen completely off the national radar.
It seems as if the Helmet Corollary is making its presence felt in AD offices throughout the country. But remember, you can’t undo what’s already been done. Syracuse, NMSU, Pitt, Indiana, and BYU, a combined 18-49 in 2005, have all made changes back towards tradition, but it takes a while to wake up the echoes of past greatness. (Ask Notre Dame, and they wouldn’t DREAM of changing their signature look.)
So what does the Helmet Corollary mean? It means that Florida and Miami can color one sleeve whatever they want, Nebraska and Florida State can experiment with different white-pant combos, and Tennessee and Miami can trot out an occasional throwback design, just don’t change the helmets.
But it also means that maybe there’s a reason Oregon and Virginia Tech (whose current helmet design dates only to 1999, according to ESPN’sCollege Football Encyclopedia) have been close in recent years to the coveted Sears Trophy, but not close enough.
There is one team with a chance to overturn the power of the HC in the coming years and they reside in Columbia, South Carolina. It seems fitting that Steve Spurrier, who has always given the impression that he’s more than willing to throw tradition to the wolves, would be the one to do it. (Quick name the most famous visor on college sidelines prior to the Air Spurrier era.)
The Gamecocks have alternated between crimson, black and white helmets for the past decade, but should Spurrier get USC-East up and flying they can make history as the first team since, irony alert, their bitter rival Clemson, whose now famous paw print design was only four years old when they won it all in 1981, to take home the trophy without a tried and true traditional topper.
Until then, tradition…and the Helmet Corollary…still reign supreme on the college gridiron.
It is always interesting to see just what the teams will be sporting each season. I know we must be open to change but there is something admirable about tradition. Give me tradition ... it's tried and true!!!!
Very well done. I would also say that Kansas and the football power they are had a time period in the early 90's where they were following everything that the New York Football Giants were doing with their helmets.
Choosing which helmet to wear basically comes down to how I used to think in high school. If I had a good game wearing the new kind of socks or different haircut, the next game, you know I'd be doing the same thing...conversely, if I played poorly, never doing that again. This juvenile superstition, however, operates not only in the AD offices of schools that are continually changing their helmets, but also those that don't. The BCS teams have found their winning helmets, and it'd be bad luck to change...teams like Syracuse and Pitt, if they were to win the national championship, guarantee they wouldn't be changing their helmets for awhile. For now, though, they're just searching for the right combination...
SharkPlates - Very good point concerning the lucky finger tape, jock strap, wristband phenomenon, but those all have their own, separate governing bodies and don't necessarily fall under the same statutes as the HC. It's interesting to note that most of the current helmets we think of traditional, didn't get their start until the 70's.
That seems surprising at first, but if you think about it the two periods in helmet haberdashery leading up to the "modern" helmet era were the leather helmet epoch, followed by the first composite versions of a hard helmet, a period where everyone took the Alabama approach. So it was until the WIDE lapel era that teams started experimenting and going for their own look.