Bread and Circuses
by: Dudski
China and the Olympics-The Funadamental Things Apply..
Apr 11, 2008 | 7:07PM | report this
I'm shocked, shocked to find there is repression in China.  Hold on a minute while I count my winnings.

Or so the International Olympic Committee seems to be saying in the wake of Chinese back stepping on human rights promises, and international protests over Tibet.  Gerhard Heiburg, Norway’s IOC member, went so far as to say working with China was proving “more difficult than we originally thought”.

Do tell.

Back home, an American softball player came out against boycotting the Olympics saying it would be wrong to deny athletes their dreams.  No word on what she thought about the dream of free speech, practice of religion, or the right to have more than one child.  Not her table, please move to another section.

Bud Selig, the great moral authority trying to save baseball from a steroid problem executives purposefully ignored for over a decade, is recently back from China.  His keen powers of observation still greatly evident after going to a Dodgers exhibition game where he somehow didn't notice the police roaming the stands questioning people about what the banners they held up meant.

Out on the political left in this country there is outrage that China is exerting it's control over Tibet.  Tibet and the Dalai Lama represent exotic spiritual mystery to people who have dedicated themselves to the great moral crusade of stamping out prayer before US high school football games.  Buddhists count, but not Christians secretly meeting in homes across China trembling in fear of the government knocking on their door.

"Step out of line the man come and take you away."

Shakespeare has become a good friend of mine over the years.  What was it the old boy said, "A plague on both your houses".  Or in this case, all our houses.

Just who did the Olympic Committee think they were dealing with when they awarded the Olympics to China in the first place?  Give the Chinese government it's due as perhaps the only honest entity in this sorry story.  They believe what they believe and make no secret of their attitudes.

Where were all the media types and self-appointed guardians of international virtue when the announcement of the games was made?  What did they not know then about China or Tibet that they know now?

Who are the athletes kidding when they say how much the Olympics can change the world, and then refuse to take a stand against the injustice of holding the games in a totalitarian state?

What do the IOC, Selig, and the American business community all have in common?  They see fortunes to be made and want to go along for the ride.  Then again, it's a ride we're all on, buying an endless range of Chinese made goods. 

So now we're excited about the Olympics?  Tibet?

Now we feel the need for some moral outrage?

Give me a break.

Have the Olympics in China.  Don't have the Olympics in China.  It won't change things in Tibet.  It won't change things in China.  If anything, it provides a reason to round up the usual suspects for the duration of the games.

You want to protest holding the Olympics in China?

Forget about doing it through the athletes.  They've trained for years to get to Beijing.  It isn't realistic to think they will turn back now.

Start by turning your TV to another channel during the Olympics.  It's a two for one.  You send a message to the Chinese by not watching theirs.  You might also wake up the networks and their sponsors.  If you are planning a trip to the Olympics, don't go.  If you're thinking about buying Olympic merchandise, don't.

Whatever you do, don't expect any obvious change in China.  It is still essentially a closed society carefully feeling its way forward from at least 100 years behind the Western World.  Change happens incrementally in China, and only when the Chinese have concluded it is in their best interest.

History will record China went astray by following the wrong Marx (Karl instead of Groucho).  Groucho's philosophy was much more realistic and the man knew the value o####ood cigar.  So here we are, a few million dead here and there from the odd purge along the way and one long march toward an unknown future.

Should we care about the Chinese Olympics, or their reaction to our reactions?  To paraphrase Rick Blaine in 'Casblanca', "Let me know when they get to Brooklyn."


9 Comments | Add a comment   categories: MLB, NBA
 
« Continue reading Bread and Circuses
total comments: 9      Page 1 of 1     
BEISBOL
Apr 12, 2008
7:21 AM
I don't think China has any idea of how bad is going to be, so many free press personel at one time. Surely they can't bug or contain all of them. can they?

Dudski
Apr 12, 2008
8:13 AM
Beisbol-That's the wonderful thing about being a modern police stat with technology. I believe China CAN contain the press and allow them to see only what they want them to see.

I don't think a boycott does any good. Firing the IOC staff who awarded the games to China would.

fuzzboss
Apr 12, 2008
8:13 AM
Same ole, same ole. As long as some business entity can make a buck off something, they don't give a damn.
OUR businesses here in the good ole USA are supporting one of the most repressive governments in the world except for N Korea/China is reeling in billions of dollars from manufacturing goods WE used to produce, who benefits?
We should have done something in '49 when Mao just marched in and took over a sovereign nation, but we sat on our hands until the Korean "Police Action". Way too late now, isn't it?

Dudski
Apr 12, 2008
9:53 AM
Fuzz-That is the belief that Patton had about Russia and MacArthur about China. The problem is I don't believe we could have sustained the casualties and a nuclear exchange was a real possibility.

I share your concern with so-called "free" trade. Many of the people we trade with are not free nor do they respect freedom. And we're setting ourselves up for some long term problems dealing with totalitarian governments.

Last edited by Dudski on April 12th at 9:55 AM.

edclinch
Apr 12, 2008
11:10 AM
I share a lot of your antipathy and I also have a large portion of ambivalence about this subject.

Tibet was taken authoritarianly (is that a new adverb?) in the late 50s sandwiched between our Cold War endeavors of Korea and Vietnam, two awful conflicts opposed to the Chinese Communists, more directly than otherwise.

We need China as a world partner, we need human rights and freedom, and we need development in the third world. We can't afford to throw these guys "under the bus" (overused cliche).

And sports should be sports. Is endorsing the Olympics endorsing their governing policies?

Cater was wrong for the Moscow boycott in my opinion.

We can work politically outside of sports. Use or leverage in venues other than the Olympics.

But that is me.

What if Jesse Owens had never gone to Berlin because of FDR? Would that have helped anyone?

Last edited by edclinch on April 12th at 11:24 AM.

slshusker
Apr 12, 2008
1:36 PM
Blame the IOC.
Human rights should have been a huge factor in the selection process.
China should never have been awarded the games.
This empowers China to keep doing what they've been doing.

Spurcse
Apr 12, 2008
4:56 PM
The thing about trade though is that it is the best method of turning China away from its present system. As strange as it may seem, the more "stuff" they get from the rest of the world, the more contact they will have with the rest of the world and the more things will change.

It may seem a strange thing to say, but materialism is what will change China. Communism just does not stand a chance against good oldfashioned materialism. Make it more important to the Chinese government to continue trade than to continue suppression.

And before you start railing against exporting American materialism to other countries, remember people who decry materialism are usually people who have plenty of material.

Our protests will have little impact on the Chinese, our "stuff" will have a lot.

Canceling the Olympics in China will have just about the same amount of influence as canceling the Olympics against the Russians did. None. It will just call hard feelings.

I agree that it was a big mistake to award the games to China, but what is done is done. We knew what China was like then, to pretend otherwise at this late date is the height of hypocrisy. To expect athletes to give up their dreams because someone goofed is unfair.

No, all we can do is live with the decision an hope something good comes from it.

Last edited by Spurcse on April 12th at 5:03 PM.

sexylips
Apr 12, 2008
5:38 PM
Just read this news on the HOT FREE celeb and milionaire dating site 'Rich Matc hMaking.c o m'. I think China will do well. Some of us know China little

BleedPRPL&GLD
Apr 13, 2008
12:00 PM
What husker said.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.