On Company Time
by: AG_Blanks
Adam Morrison, Larry Bird, and Freddie Prinze, Sr.
Dec 28, 2005 | 4:47AM | report this
Last night I watched a regular season college basketball game.

Big deal, right?

Well, for me it is. You see, I used to be a pretty huge hoops fan. I was weaned on Larry Legend and Magic. Came into my own in Jordan’s heyday. Was captivated by Clyde, wowed by Worthy, and dazzled by Dumars. Scottie, The Dream, Isiah, The Mailman . . . I knew them all well.

And it wasn’t just the pro game. Some of my first college sport memories were of the March Madness variety: the epic Georgetown/Houston matchup in ’84; Bob Knight’s Indiana team in ’85; the Running Rebs’ of UNLV in ’90; Duke’s run with Hurley, Hill, Laettner, et. al. There was a time when I loved college hoops. But something happened on the way to “middle-aged.”

I lost interest in the game.

I can’t figure out exactly why this happened. I have tried to pin it on the emergent hip-hop culture that pervades the NBA. I have wondered if being a nearly thirty, middle-class white guy makes it hard to relate to the mostly young, mostly black, mostly wealthy athletes who play the game. But I’m convinced this isn’t it. When I have followed basketball sporadically over the last few years, I have been watching AI, Ben Wallace, KG, LeBron. These men definitely represent a culture to which I cannot relate very much. But when you watch them play, you don’t see culture, you see game. Besides, I never identified with Stockton's tighty-whities either.

I think maybe the changing nature of the pro-game has something to do with it . . . the departure from the fundamental team game and the prevalence of the “1-on-1 at the top of the key, clear out the lane, drive to the hole” playground mentality. But even this complaint seems flimsy. There will always be good teams playing sound basketball. And this only explains the reason for not watching the pro game. College ball is still fairly solid in terms of fundamentals.

So, I don’t know exactly why I stopped watching the game. Maybe it’s a combination of things. But I do know this. I know why I tuned in last night, why for the first time in years I made a concerted effort to be in front of the TV when a basketball game tipped off.

The reason? Simple. Adam Morrison.

I know, I know. Some of you hoops aficionados out there might scoff: “He’s not a complete player.” Yeah, I’ve heard that. And it may be true. But I’m not interested in all that right now. I’m just trying to see if this kid is for real. And you know what? I think he may be.

Like many, I tuned in to the Memphis-Gonzaga matchup hoping to see a game that lived up to the hype. But unlike many, I cared less about the game itself and more about Morrison. I had heard the comparisons to Bird, and was intrigued. Other than Morrison going stone cold in the last 9 minutes (due to Memphis lock-down D), he lived up to my expectations. But it’s funny . . . there’s something about the way Morrison carries himself that reminds me less of Bird and more of Pistol Pete. Obviously, Maravich and Morrison’s game aren’t reminiscent of one another, but there is something about Morrison’s swagger that reminds me of that air of confidence that Maravich had. Not ego, per se, but confidence in the skill, confidence in the ability to beat you, to hit the clutch shot, to go off for 40. Morrison has that.

Morrison is averaging 28 a game, and last night against Memphis, went for 34. He is so fun to watch. The way he moves away from the ball, his high release, the moppish hair, the Freddie Prinze ala “Chico and the Man” moustache . . . He draws in the casual fan and reminds me why college hoops are so enjoyable. (He also reminds me a lot of Jimmie Fallon, but that is beside the point.) But I think the comparisons to Bird are not completely accurate. Bird played relentless, tenacious defense. Morrison admits he doesn’t care to D-up. Bird wasn’t necessarily an assist machine, but was the master of the timely “dime.” Morrison could use some improvement in this area. But when it comes to shooting . . . dang. The boy’s a gunner. And I can definitely understand the Bird comparisons there.

Will Morrison lead ‘Zaga to the Dance? I don’t know. Will he be able to make the leap to the pros? Can’t say. But I do know he has helped a former fan find new interest in the game. That should count for something, right?
17 Comments | Add a comment   categories: NBA, CBK
 
« Continue reading On Company Time
total comments: 17      Page 1 of 1     
MooreSports
Dec 28, 2005
5:48 AM
I'm not a big fan of directing people to my blog, but the topic you're writing about I addressed about a week and a half ago, so you might want to read my comments about "The Never-Ending Bird Watch". I like Morrison too, but I think it's unfair to compare him to Pistol Pete (my favorite college player ever) or Bird.

AG_Blanks
Dec 28, 2005
6:57 AM
Moore,
I will check your piece out when I get a chance today. Thanks for the heads up.

In regards to comparing Morrison to Bird, read my post closely, I say he doesn't live up. The only way I see their games comparing is in the way they shoot; they both make huge shots, hit shots in traffic, have a knack for getting open, and move well away from the ball. Other than that, no way the comparison sticks. 33 had too many intangibles.

The Pistol Pete thing is the same way. Has there ever been anyone with the combination of skills Pete had? To this day I don't think anyone, other than maybe Magic, has seen the floor the way Pete did. I wasn't fortunate enough to be alive when he was playing college ball, but if I were, I know I would have wanted to watch every game . . . seems like he was always capable of a HUGE night. As I said in the blog, nothing about Morrison's game reminds me of the Pistol. But there is something about his on court persona that is reminiscent of Maravich. Anywho . . . just the ramblings of a hack, that's all.

Thanks for the discussion! Good luck tomorrow!

flimflamunlimited
Dec 28, 2005
7:38 AM
You can compare Bird to Morrison because of the "Puberty Mustache". Thats about it. Bird could #### with the best of them. And its one thing to score a bunch of points and get the victory. But Bird was a clear leader. He willed his team to greatness.

On your comments about the NBA. I can see your point. I was just listening to Magic Johnson talk in a radio interview and he made a valid point about the way the NBA markets the NBA right now. They feature the stars of the team but not the whole team. I think the NBA was in its prime when teams were featured more. It was never just Magic and the Lakers...the Lakers were a great team (featuring three hall of famers). The same went for the Celtics, Pistons (badboys), and ofcourse the Bulls. But I think MJ had a hand in the NBA marketing just the star. It wasn't MJ's fault, he was just that big. The NBA geared away from featuring the team and teams were being built in that MJ mold....one great player, and a team built around them.

There are only two real complete teams in the NBA right now, the Spurs and the Pistons. The rest just feature a star(s) and the supporting players. There are teams coming up that are close to that mold now, because I think teams and the NBA are realizing, that it takes a great TEAM to win it all.

AG_Blanks
Dec 28, 2005
7:55 AM
fliflam,
Ha! "Puberty Stache" is pretty good. I called it a "porn stache" the other day and one of my buddies corrected me. He said it isn't quite a porn stache in the mold of say, Jeff Kent, or pre-season Jake Plummer. But you are correct, it is a puberty stache. The only thing Morrison has going for him is that Larry's eventually filled out a bit. There is always hope.

You are dead on about NBA marketing--I hadn't thought of it that way but it is true.

Liked your piece on Kobe last week. Keep it up.

The_Sports_Intellectual
Dec 28, 2005
9:33 AM
You evoked some memories for me there at the beginning. Morrison has been a machine this year, but I agree with the others. Bird was so unique, you can't really compare anyone to him. Plus, as a fan, I try to keep his image from being tarnished- not that Morrison's a bad player, but my jury's out until he makes it big as a pro.

AG_Blanks
Dec 28, 2005
9:55 AM
Intellectual,
I completely agree. Watching Bird in college was watching a man among boys. Morrison is no where close, but he is fun to watch. Especially as a shooter.

You do indeed have a tough act to follow . . . the epic poem was one of the most popular blogs I have seen yet. But the Madden Screenplay was quite clever. Keep it up.

detpack
Dec 28, 2005
11:04 AM
Blanks, I don't know who Adam Morrison is so I can't leave you a meaningful comment. Sorry. Just wanted to stop by and thank you for your support, man. I only brought my leg up one time before and that was like 10 days ago in a comment as a respose to another person's comment. I didn't want to turn this into a "feel sorry for me" type of thing as opposed to letting my stuff stand on its own and seeing how people responded. But when somebody takes a shot like me like they did on the judges blog, I feel like I have a right to offer up a defense. Thanks again.

AG_Blanks
Dec 28, 2005
11:10 AM
DP,
You kill me. All you need to know about Morrison in that he looks like Jimmie Fallon and shoots the hell out of the rock. He wears cool socks, too.

Your situation stinks, for sure. But you seem to be handling it well. I wish you the best in this competition. You're one of my favorites. Hope we both make it.

But do you get the feeling that this thing is way bigger than the NGS judges imagined? I wonder how closely they are able to read this stuff? But, I know they will choose the right ones.

Good luck.

detpack
Dec 28, 2005
11:33 AM
Jimmy Falon. I know him. That clears things up a little bit. I completely agree with you about the judges. The funniest part is that for all we know, they've read like 3 articles a day and they made their decision a week into this thing so they wouldn't have to bother with it. I hope that's not the case and I don't think it is. But I'm sure it's definitely not the "justice will surely prevail in this democratic blogging competition" to the extent that a bunch of people think it is. And I don't mean that as a slam against the judges. There's just no way they could have enough time.

socalsportsfan
Dec 28, 2005
12:56 PM
Love this post. Good writing once again. You have my vote as a finalist.

AG_Blanks
Dec 28, 2005
1:09 PM
socal,
Means a lot coming from you. You are one of the ones I read regularly. Good luck and thanks for all the great posts.

Eastern
Dec 29, 2005
8:22 PM
Blanks,
Hey thanks for the feedback on my stuff. Glad to see you stayed out of the blogg slinging. I wrote on Morrison/Bird the other day. We think to much alike. Must be the 30 something day dreamer thing. I like the comment on fundamentals in hoops. We got slammed in the last olympics because we can't shoot anymore.
Good luck to you.

Kia99
Dec 29, 2005
9:03 PM
This is the first time I've had a chance to sit back and read your stuff and I'm disappointed that it took this long to do so. Great job.

I also was a huge fan of the college game some years back and started gravitating toward the NBA. Now, I watch the NBA more than every other sport and much more than college hoops. For me, I think that once the NBA started getting the best high school players is when the shift occurred.....or it could have something to do with the fact that my favorite college team was penalized by the NCAA in grand fashion for things they apparently shouldn't have been doing.

Last edited by Kia99 on December 29th at 9:04 PM.

noahpinto
Dec 29, 2005
9:42 PM
As for how this thing will be judged...I remember when applying for colleges hearing that schools wanted more than just well rounded students, they wanted well rounded classes. I fear that might be the case with the FoxSports judges, and might try to balance the types of bloggers, which may hurt Red Sox fans like you and I who are overrepresented. Regardless, if you were picked over me for that reason I wouldn't mind, you've got good stuff. Good luck getting to the next round.

AG_Blanks
Dec 30, 2005
6:28 AM
kia, Eastern, Noah,
Good points, all.

So when the heck are they going to announce?

I'm waiting, trying to act like I don't care, knowing the odds are against me . . . But dang . . . enough suspense, already.

Good luck to all three of you. I think each of you would be a fine choice.

Eastern
Dec 30, 2005
8:39 AM
Yea, when are they going to annouce? This is worse than waiting for the pregnacy test. If you find out anything let me know. Would they do it over the weekend? Don't these guys take breaks?

Kia99
Dec 30, 2005
2:39 PM
A quick response to Eastern's comment. I just wanted to say that if I would have been sipping a drink or something; the liquid would have probably come out of my nose. I wasn't expecting that at all. Hilarious.

Page 1 of 1     
Add a comment  
ABOUT ME


AG_Blanks
I live in Birmingham, AL with my wife and two daughters. I work in the sales department of a medium sized, family owned distribution company. I have been here too long . . . Currently, I am the Assistant Division Sales Coordinator for my region. My "office" is one of about 12 cubicles. The company policy regarding decorations is as strict as the policies regarding "Personal Internet Use." However, I managed to "decorate" my cube with a couple wallet size pictures of my wife and kids and my favorite team's mini-helmet. This is only a mild infraction compared to my blatant Internet usage. Hopefully, I can entertain folks with my thoughts on sports as well as the goings-on in this God-forsaken wasteland called "my career."
MY FAVORITE BLOGS
The Official FOXSports Blog
Eastern's Blog
The NFL Chick!
The View From My Cube
The Truth (Possibly)
SoCalSportsFan'
s Blog
josettedupres's
Blog
The_Sports_Inte
llectual's Blog
NGS judges' blog
Luke's Untitled Blog
sleeplessinseat
tle's blog
Time stamping is done in Pacific Time.