In the past week, significant changes have happened in the NL Central. The Brewers struck first on Monday by acquiring CC Sabathia for Matt LaPorta, Zach Jackson, Rob Bryson, and PTBNL. The Cubs struck back on Tuesday by acquiring Rich Harden and Chad Gaudin for Sean Gallagher, Eric Patterson, Matt Murton, and Josh Donaldson. While the effect of the trades on the participating teams has been widely covered, the effect they have on the rest of the league gets little coverage. So just how has it affected the rest of the National League? I'll try to answer that today.

I will be using the Postseason Odds Report available at Baseball Prospectus as a starting point. I will also consider the Sabathia trade to add 3 wins to the Brewers and the Harden/Gaudin trade to add 2 wins to the Cubs.

NL East and West Division Championships

I have not looked closely at the Cubs and Brewers individual schedules to see how they would directly affect other teams' projected records, so the chances of each team in the other divisions winning their division championships goes unaffected.

NL Central Division Championship

With only the Cubs, Brewers, and Cardinals having better than 1% chances of winning the Central before the trades, the trades do not have a large effect on the Reds, Pirates, or Astros. As for the Cubs, the Sabathia trade decreases their chances while the Harden trade increases them. I estimate the net effect being about zero. On the other hand, the Brewers' chances of winning the division have increased about 3% to 15%. That, of course, means that the Cardinals' chances have dropped the same 3% about 5%, but there is a much larger effect in the Wild Card race.

NL Wild Card

Before the trades, the NL Wild Card had a strong probability of coming out of the NL Central with a 75% chance of that occurring. So that means that once again, the Cardinals were the bystander most affected by the trades. By my estimation, the trades have bumped up the Cubs 2% to 15% and the Brewers 13% to 47%. That increase of 15% has to come from somewhere. Since there was only 0.6% chance of the Wild Card coming out of the NL West, that 15% has to come from the East and Central. After removing 1% from the top four NL East teams and the Reds, the Cardinals' Wild Card chances are reduced by 10% to 16%. So now that we've accounted for how the Sabathia and Harden trades affect everyone's playoff odds, let's review where that leaves everyone's odds going forward.

Updated Postseason Odds

NL East
Phillies 56.70%
Marlins 9.62%
Mets 48.89%
Braves 5.19%
Nationals 0.00%

NL Central
Cubs 95.13%
Cardinals 20.67%
Brewers 62.55%
Reds 0.52%
Pirates 0.00%
Astros 0.12%

NL West
Diamondbacks 50.16%
Dodgers 42.41%
Giants 2.78%
Rockies 4.77%
Padres 0.51%

Buyer or Seller

The Buyer or Seller series may have ended prematurely, but that doesn't mean we can't revisit it here. In certain situations, it's obvious whether a team should be a buyer or seller, but there are other situations where it's not so obvious. Here's my opinion; I'd like to hear yours in the comments.

Buyers: Phillies, Mets, Brewers, Diamondbacks, and Dodgers
Holders: Cubs
Sellers: Braves, Nationals, Reds, Pirates, Astros, Giants, Rockies, and Padres
Undecided: Marlins and Cardinals

I plan on revisiting the Marlins and Cardinals in separate posts to make up my mind on where they should be. If I had to decide now, I'd place them in the Hold category.

---

Also, I plan on having one more post regarding the All-Star selection process. Hopefully, I can get that up by Monday; it's going to be especially difficult if my internet connection doesn't start working.

Now that the All-Star teams have been announced, you have probably seen and will see articles complaining about All-Star snubs and/or undeserving All-Stars. This is inevitable no matter what. While I surely don't agree with all of the selections and non-selections, it is the process I want changed. This year, it is Joe Crede's selection that demonstrates this best. Let me repeat. I'm not upset with the fact that Crede was selected; I'm upset with the process.

So how exactly was Crede selected to the All-Star team? Much like the fans vote for the All-Star team, the players also vote. If the fans' selection and the players' selection are identical, the players' second choice is selected to the All-Star team. Now, if we were to examine the players' voting results (which I don't think are released), I'd imagine that over 90% of the players voted for Alex Rodriguez at 3B. Since the fans selected Rodriguez, it goes to the players' second choice. Let's say that 95% of players chose Rodriguez. That means that the players' second choice received less than 5% of the vote. Going deeper into that and assuming that all players were voting for who they thought was the best AL 3B, we are looking at the 5% of the player population that think Alex Rodriguez is not the top AL 3B. Should we really be relying on those players to make an All-Star selection?

Putting that aside, just how many votes did Joe Crede receive? If we're using the above example, 5% would mean that there were only 38 votes for non-A-Rod third basemen. Let's say they were nearly split between Mike Lowell and Crede. That means that Crede would have only needed 20 votes to make the All-Star team. Now, if we consider other percentages of A-Rod votes (as shown below), you'll see that a second selection at a position with a clear #1 still doesn't require a whole lot of votes. Basically, with Alex Rodriguez being the clear #1 AL 3B, it's very easy for an undeserving player to be selected to the All-Star game. Consider this: AL 3B Frank Cheater could slip his teammates a few bucks to have them vote for him. That's 25 votes going his way. If most votes are for Rodriguez, Mr. Cheater could slip his way onto the All-Star team. I certainly don't think anyone has ever done this, but it's certainly possible for a player to do this when there's a clear #1 at his position.

95% => 2.5%, or 20 votes, required for selection
90% => 5%, or 38 votes, required for selection
85% => 7.5%, or 57 votes, required for selection
80% => 10%, or 75 votes, required for selection

If the idea is to include both the fans' and the players' opinions, there are a couple different ways to tweak the current system to make it better. [1] Only include the players' first selection. If it's the same as the fans', then that leaves one more roster spot for the manager to select a player. OR [2] Have the players vote for twice as many guys as the fans. In this way, no one will get selected while receiving less than 100 votes as I suspect Crede has.

---

Official Birk's Blog Announcement: The Buyer or Seller series has been canceled. Birk's Blog HQ simply doesn't have the resources to continue its production. We thank you for your support.

Back to being serious, I find that people are more interested in what teams are going to do and not what I think they should do. My hope was to generate discussion about the teams and what they should do. While that was successful for the Mariners and Cubs, the other 5 posts have had very little response.

I'm trying out a new format today. Let me know if you think it's better than the old one.

Window of Opportunity: 2008-2009 with a good possibility of extending it

C: Chris Coste deserves more playing time (.317/.376/.549 vs. Carlos Ruiz's .213/.308/.287)

1B, 2B, SS, LF, CF: Set with Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins, Pat Burrell, and Shane Victorino

3B: Greg Dobbs deserves more playing time against RHP (.330/.368/.453)

RF: Jayson Werth has done his part by hitting lefties .299/.365/.649, but Geoff Jenkins hasn't hit righties so far (only .254/.304/.406). However, Jenkins' BABIP (batting average on balls in play) sits 40 points lower than expected (based on line drive rate and career average), so things can turn around quickly.

SP: Cole Hamels and Jamie Moyer are doing their part, but Adam Eaton, Kyle Kendrick, and Brett Myers have question marks. Kendrick's and Eaton's K/9 rates of 4.00 and 4.70 mean they're walking a fine line, while Myers' BB/9 of 3.90 and HR/9 of 2.12 are the reason why he's back in the minors. Acquiring a starter, as rumored, would help them considerably in 2008.

Before I talk about the Phillies' bullpen, I want to mention how I view bullpens in general. First, they shouldn't be a concern until the rest of the team is ready to compete. In other words, a top closer on a losing team is a waste of money (see Jose Valverde and Francisco Cordero). Second, while you don't want to ignore the back of the bullpen, only the top two or three are really important to your success. To make my point, consider who pitches the 8th and 9th innings in tight games, they're usually the same guys for every team. When it comes to the playoffs, it is the same guys every night. Third, relief pitchers are the most variable players from year-to-year, so investing a lot of money in your bullpen means nothing when it comes to the performance you'll get. Consider the Indians' bullpen over the last four years: 12.506 WXRL in 2005, -1.532 in 2006, 13.514 in 2007, and -2.908 in 2008.

So when it comes to building a bullpen as the trade deadline approaches, I generally don't worry about it unless it's in shambles or lacking a top-of-the-line closer. With that in mind, let's get back to the Phillies.

RP: With Brad Lidge, Chad Durbin, and Ryan Madson pitching well with good peripherals, I don't consider this an area in need of help, but that hasn't stopped the Phillies from being mentioned in the Brian Fuentes rumors.

Holes to Fill: SP

Trade Bait (Speculation): Carlos Carrasco, Antonio Bastardo, Josh Outman, Jason Donald

On the surface, the Chicago White Sox appear to be a team with no easily-upgraded positions. That would seem to be a good thing, but going into the trade deadline only up 2.5 games, it isn't. A team without easily-upgraded spots can't make moves to counter moves made by the teams chasing them. In essence, the competition can get better, but you can't. Although Kenny Williams doesn't seem likely to make a move, I see one spot that needs fixing.

Alexei Ramirez appears to be doing all right. He's hitting .294/.318/.439 on the season. The .318 OBP is definitely not impressive, but it also shows me something worse. With only six walks on the year, his plate discipline is terrible and might be a sign that he needs some time in the minors. By swinging at 43% of pitches out of the strike zone, he swings at more pitches out of the zone than everyone except Vladimir Guerrero. While pitchers know that Vladimir will swing out of the zone and compensate by throwing only 40% of their pitches in the strike zone, they haven't figured that out about Ramirez...yet. A full 54% of pitches Ramirez sees are in the strike zone. Let me re-phrase. Although Ramirez swings at more balls than all but 1 player, he sees more strikes than all but 17 players. Eventually, the opposition will catch on and throw fewer strikes. If Ramirez doesn't show more discipline, his average is going to plummet quickly. When that happens, the White Sox will find that they need a better 2B. They probably don't have what it takes to get Brian Roberts, but Mark Grudzielanek and Ray Durham would be good targets.

On the flip side, Paul Konerko was simply not performing before he went on the DL with a strained left oblique. Konerko has hit .215/.322/.368 on the season mostly due to a measly .232 BABIP. Based on his 20.3% line drive rate, his BABIP should be closer to .323. That gives reason to believe that he should be better when he returns. If he isn't, then the White Sox will have something of an albatross on hand as Konerko's due $12M in both 2009 and 2010.

Holes to Fill: 2B

Trade Bait: prospects although most of their offseason top prospects now play in the Oakland system

---

If you have any interest in the Giants, Tim Lincecum, pitching mechanics, pitching injuries, or great baseball articles, be sure to check out Tom Verducci's How Tiny Tim Became a Pitching Giant. It's a great article and certainly qualifies as a must-read.

If you asked someone to name the surprise team of 2008, you'd most likely be told the Tampa Bay Rays. PECOTA would disagree. What can the Rays do to enhance their chances in 2008 without hurting their chances down the road?

Holes to Fill

I would argue that their number one hole is at shortstop, where Jason Bartlett has not lived up to expectations since coming over from Minnesota. After hitting a modest .265/.339/.361 in 2007, Bartlett has hit an even worse .248/.294/.279 in 2008. While he has helped the Rays vastly improve their defense, it's mostly because of how bad Brendan Harris was last year. Harris had an RZR of .760, 86 Rate, and -12 FRAA in 2007. Bartlett is only at an RZR of .822, 96 Rate, and -3 FRAA this year. So while he's improved their SS defense over last year, it's only because he's been average to Harris's not-quite-average defense. With both Reid Brignac and Tim Beckham in their farm system, they don't need a long-term fix at short, but a short-term fix could help them. Unfortunately, that guy isn't available by trade.

Other places they could try to upgrade include the rotation, the bullpen, and a right-handed outfielder. On the pitching side of things, it's mostly to counteract risks in their current staff, whether that's due to inexperience or health. As for the right-handed outfielder, that's because Eric Hinske has only managed lines of .176/.317/.294 in 2008 and .228/.297/.372 in his career against left-handed pitchers. While Jonny Gomes can hit lefties (.230/.324/.508 in 2008 and .282/.384/.532 career), he's already doing that for Cliff Floyd at DH. Who are possible targets for these positions? Marc Topkin of the St. Petersburg Times mentions C.C. Sabathia, Brian Fuentes, Matt Holliday, Jason Bay, and Xavier Nady. In my opinion, those three outfielders are overkill for what they need, but they could always flip Hinske for something else if they acquired one of them.

Trade Bait

With 5 of the top 40 prospects still in the minor leagues, the Rays could do whatever they want in the trade market. Those five prospects are David Price, Wade Davis, Desmond Jennings, Reid Brignac, and Jacob McGee. Even if they don't make a big move, their system is more than just those 5 guys. The Rays have a ton of good prospects that they could use to make minor upgrades throughout the roster to bolster their chances in 2008.

Holes: SS, RH RF, SP, RP

Trade Bait: too many names to list