Script: /SteveHall1979/blog/page/2
Owner:
Subdir: stevehall1979

    SteveHall1979
    Lifetime Points: 11



    Location:
    About Me: I'm an avid NBA fan with a lot of love for college basketball, college football, and the NFL. When putting together a team, all I think really matters is results on the actual field of play during real games, not in tryouts, practices, simulations, and i
    Marital Status Married
    School University of Texas
    Prospect


    Location:
    About Me: I'm an avid NBA fan with a lot of love for college basketball, college football, and the NFL. When putting together a team, all I think really matters is results on the actual field of play during real games, not in tryouts, practices, simulations, and i
    Marital Status Married
    School University of Texas

    Empathy for the Suns Fans

    Friday, January 30, 2009, 10:52 PM EST [General]

    I was watching the latest Spurs-Suns clash on TNT and found myself actually feeling a little sorry for the Suns and especially their fans.  I don't mean to come across as a condescending Spurs supporter (okay, maybe a little) but it's easy to see why it would be so frustrating to be a Suns fan.  They have been the victims of unfortunate injuries, overreative NBA rules, and some bad luck.  But longtime San Antonio followers can certainly recall our own team that tormented us for so long: the Utah Jazz.

    Like the Suns of the last half decade, the pre-Duncan Spurs seemed to be better than they actually were.  Whereas the Suns had the coaching style of D'Antoni to inflate the opinion of the team because of gaudy stats, the gaudy stats of David Robinson and some of his teammates belied the fact that they were a very soft team.  Gritty, tough basketball is what wins in the playoffs, so while the Nash Suns and Robinson Spurs were very talented and fairly well-coached, they couldn't get it done in the end.  Seemingly every year we were exposed as frauds by the Utah Jazz.  Jerry Sloan's mental toughness had permeated that team (with the exception of Karl Malone, which is why they couldn't seal the deal) and executed ruthlessly.  Like today's Spurs, you knew what they were going to do and you couldn't stop it anyway.  I prayed for injuries to befall John Stockton and Jeff Hornacek, who threw dagger after dagger into my heart.  I raged when Karl Malone would get away with superstar calls (he kneed Robinson in the chest and Robinson got called for blocking).  I developed a distate for people I knew at school and church who were from Utah. 

    In retrospect, I realize I hated the Jazz so much for not just beating up my team in a way that sometimes bordered on the shady, but for exposing my heroes and soft and not being clutch.  An honest Suns fan will take a hard look at the last few years and realize that they weren't quite as close to winning it all as it might seem - they didn't have the grit, toughness, and winning mentality to be a champion.  With that said, it doesn't mean you can't appreciate a team for what it is: your team, the team you love, with its warts and all.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Why the Shaq Trade Isn't So Dumb

    Saturday, February 16, 2008, 04:29 PM EST [Shaquille O]

         It's easy to criticize the Suns for making two potentially fatal errors: tinkering with their court chemistry and trading a star for a washed-up superstar near the end of his run.  But I submit to you that while the trade is a significant gamble for the Suns, the fiscal and chemistry components minimize the downside while the upside is potentially a championship for their franchise.  Allow me to explain.

         Obviously, in nearly every way, statistical and actual, Shawn Marion is a far superior player to Shaq at this point in their career.  Marion's faster, a better shooter, fiercer rebounder, more effective scorer, and a suffocation and versatile defender, contrasting with O'Neal's now Shawn Bradley-ish efforts.  But as anybody who watched the most recent Super Bowl knows, winning is not just about talent.  The Knicks arguably have one of the most talented teams in the league, but are more or less a $200 million VH1 reality show.  More importantly, some talents matter more than others.  Specifically, you can point to one element in every NBA champion in recent memory: dominant post play, especially defending the paint.  Why is this the case?  If football is a game of inches, basketball is a game of percentages.  Quite simply, shots in the paint are more likely to go in, so taking and preventing them greatly  significantly increases your chance of success.  Shaq is a better post scorer than Marion and the double teams he will draw will open up their shooters, a service Shawn doesn't provide in the half-court game so critical in the playoffs.  Related to that, O'Neal is a very good passer down low, both to cutters and shooters.  His post presence also makes it likely the Suns get an offensive rebound whenever he or Stoudemire are paired with one another, providing more close-up shot opportunities - most of Marion's offensive rebounds are further out on the floor.  While overall Marion is a superior defender, Shaq still takes up a lot of room on defense and must be accounted for.  Shawn Marion may be more talented at this stage of their careers, but O'Neals talents are better suited for the style of basketball played in the playoffs.

      Bob Whitsitt says he didn't major in chemistry, but Steve Kerr at least has done some brushing up.  Shawn Marion stops just short of being a cancer and takes a toll on the veteran leadership (i.e. Steve Nash) having to babysit both him and Amare.  Something is wrong with a player who'd rather be the featured player on a middling team over being in the top three of a championship contender.  On the other hand, Shaquille O'Neal is one of the most revered and well-liked players in NBA history.  Have you ever heard a complaint from teammates about Shaq that wasn't related to the Kobe feud?  Shaq is the Godfather of the whole NBA.  He provides leadership and credibility as well as likeability.  As far as ability in the playoffs, O'Neal simply buries Marion in the comparison.  He is one of the premier playoff performers in history, as evidenced by 4 rings and 3 finals MVPs.  Marion is a total playoff bust.  As a Spurs fan, I've watched him time and again dominated by Duncan's offense and taken out of the game by Bowen's defense.  In comparison of issues of character regarding chemistry and playoff performance, the Shaq is truly Marion's daddy.

         The one dimension where the Suns emerge truly victorious in this trade is in its financial aspects.  Shawn Marion presents a unique problem - he's remarkably talented but not really a star, so how do you compensate him?  With his contract expiring next year and given his desire to be traded, the Suns risked either losing him for nothing or signing him for huge money while his game declines.  This is now Miami's problem to deal with.  Speaking of new Miami problems, they now inherit the moronic Marcus Banks contract, the dumbest move of the Colangelo era.  (Seriously, they gave away the draft picks that could have been Luol Deng, Rajon Rondo,  Kyle Lowry, and Rudy Fernandez.  Three of those point guards to relieve the burden of Nash plus all of them were cheaper than Banks.)   Phoenix doesn't just shed two problem contracts, it puts itself in an excellent cap position in 2010.  That year the contracts of O'Neal, Nash, and Bell all come due, putting them 20-25 million dollars under the cap.  The free agents that year?  Oh just Lebron James, Dwyane Wade, et al.  Do you think one of them might want to play in warm weather with Amare Stoudemire (and probably a re-signed Nash) for a passionate fan base and player-friendly coach? 

         If Shaq proves to be a bust, the Suns at the very least how smoothed out team chemistry and given themselves unbelievable cap flexibility (see Bill Simmon's article on "Chemacterility").  But if Steve Kerr is right, we get to see Steve Nash weep with joy rather than frustration.      

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Thanks for the Laughs, Isaiah: My Take on Every NBA Team's Offseason Moves

    Monday, October 30, 2006, 05:38 PM EST [General]

         On a human level, I was pleased to see that the NBA draft went fairly sensibly.  On a more depraved level, I felt a longing for comically bad draft picks (Desegana Diop, anybody?) that compelled me to hi-five my invisible friends.  Thank goodness for free agency which more than satiates my desire to clown GMs with more dollars than sense.  I shall also take a few moments to give credit to where credit is due, throw in some random predictions, and express my fondest wishes for all 29 NBA teams (don't act like the Bobcats are an NBA team).

     

    Atlanta

     

         When Billy Knight is your GM, either controversy or hilarity is guaranteed in any personnel move.  Drafting Shelden Williams falls more on the controversial side, but I'm actually going to defend Knight in this selection.  Everybody was screaming for them to draft a point guard, an obvious need, but this neglects two important issues: the Hawks' pathetic interior defense/defensive rebounding and that they needed experience/leadership.  Which sounds better: Scenario A - you draft an intelligent, hardworking leader who blocks shots and is a monster on the glass, compelling you to bring in an experienced point guard via free agency/trade OR Scenario B - you draft a laptop-stealing/out-of-shape point guard, compelling you to look for an interior presence in a grossly-overpriced and thin market of big men?  Knight actually made the right call given his circumstances.  Drafting a swingman would have been beyond idiotic given their current glut of such players.  They drafted a player who will contribute immediately in areas of profound need in addition to being a leader and someone the fans will appreciate.  Memo to Shelden: thanks for making me look bad with your preseason play. 

         Getting rid of Al Harrington is fantastic.  His absence frees up playing time for potential future stars (we know what Al is going to give us) and gives cap flexibility instead of the NBA's second-most-overrated player (a category in which Steve Nash really is #1).  Signing Speedy Claxton, a vital cog in the Spurs' 2003 playoff run, as an experienced point instead of picking an unproven rookie with character issues was the right move on such a young team.  I still can't believe I just said Knight did a good job.  The Hawks are that much closer to snatching that coveted 10th spot in the East.  (I will take that last statement back if Marvin Williams plays in-season like he has in the summer leagues.)

         Actually, sucking is the best possible route for the Hawks in ridiculously deep draft.  With that in mind, we should congratulate them for their off-season.

     

    Boston

     

         You have to congratulate Danny Ainge - his team will win all of the Rucker League tournaments.  But who will play defense in the NBA?  Potential-wise Telfair may be Earvin Johnson, but achievement-wise he's more Ervin Johnson.  Leon Powe might actually be a nice pickup; hopefully he plays well enough to convince the Celtics to not give the overrated Jefferson Eddy Curry money for Eddy Curry play.  Ainge did manage to shave a year off of bloated big man pay in swapping LaFrentz for Ratliff, also acquiring guaranteed shot-blocking and leg injuries in Theo.  Rondo isn't a distributor, but he is an upgrade.  Let's hope for the Celtics that he isn't just the second coming of Flip Murray.

     

    Charlotte

     

         They drafted the 'Stache, but when Brandon Roy hoists the Rookie of the Year trophy this year and is knocking down clutch shots in the playoffs in a few years, the Bobcats will conclude they made the wrong choice.  And I like Morrison.  I might be inclined to crack on them for not doing more in free agency, but there's a principle I learned about the NBA: free agents only help you win championships if you already have a good team.    True franchise players are drafted and never leave via free agency (though they are traded).  The glaring exception to this is when Shaq joined the Lakers.  And for the most part, good free agents don't want to go to bad teams for a reasonable price, especially not in NBA-nobody towns like Charlotte.  With guys like Oden and Durant in the draft next year, the Bobcats are much better off in the long run sucking for now than tying up big money in players who won't help them win big. 

     

    Chicago

     

         John Paxson will get the award, but Isaiah Thomas deserves to win Executive of the Year for the way he guaranteed the Bulls will be strong playoff contenders for the next decade thanks to the supremely idiotic Eddy Curry deal.  Dealing overpaid and underachieving Chandler for cap space (formerly known as P.J.) was good both for Da Bulls and Tyson.  Swapping whining for leadership is always the right call.  Sure, Ben Wallace is overpaid - they gave Tim Duncan money to a guy with half of Duncan's game- but it will probably prove to be a worthy gamble leading them to win a weak East where the only opponent of consequence is Miami. 

    Cleveland

         The Cavs are Exhibit A in how much it means for your team when you replace an idiot GM with a competent one.  After moronic picks like Dajuan Wagner and Desegana Diop in the lottery, this year they selected guys who make sense at the positions they were drafted.  Shannon Brown finally adds a guy alongside James who can create his own shot and score like crazy. Daniel Gibson probably becomes Damon Jones 2.0: good shooting but in this version, with excellent rebounding and some athleticism, minus the Diddy-wannabe wardrobe.

         Let's all welcome Drew Gooden back to Earth with his signing of an appropriate extension.  After whining about not getting Nene money, Gooden and his agent Calvin Andrews are now acting like it was the best contract ever.  Credit Danny Ferry for putting together a contract that gives his team flexibility while rewarding his player and not succumbing to the whims of a delusional above-average power forward.  At least some teams are learning that you only have to offer a little bit more than the other teams in the market can pay for in order to keep your guys.  Allan Houston and Zack Randolph certainly profited by their teams not abiding by this simple principle. 

     

    Dallas

         So they trade Marquis Daniels and draft his younger, cheaper clone; good call.  Letting Keith Van Horn go is the right call being that Austin Croshere is the younger, cheaper Keith Van Horn.  Croshere is a nice pickup for them, adding even more shooting and rebounding to a team not lacking therein.  Not resigning KVH and the trade bring the Mavs a little closer to cap sanity.  Resigning Terry was a must, and they did it right at his market value, which I didn't even know Mark Cuban knew how to do.  Not getting Mike James is a minor setback, but as long as Devin Harris progresses as he should, there's no question we'll see Dallas right back on top.

    Denver

         Have Gilbert Arenas and Manu Ginobili taught us nothing?  Hanging on to your second-round draft picks is a no-risk, high-reward opportunity.  Having lost their first-rounder in the future-killing Kenyon Martin trade, they gave away their second-round pick.  On a team with depth issues, why not take a guy and let him develop in Europe or the NBDL if he doesn't make the squad? 

         Extending Carmelo was obvious, but signing Nene to that huge money?  What incentive does he have to earn that now?  This deal screams bust.  The Warriors think this signing is too expensive.  Why would Denver pay Steve Nash money for Steve Blake production?  This is one of the keys to perpetual mediocrity: All-Star money for back-up players.  

    Detroit

         Note to the Sonics: do like Detroit and take your Senegalese project big men late in the second round instead of flushing away your lottery pick.  Losing Ben Wallace is a big blow, but what they're not spending on him may be their salvation.  Take into consideration that they were slipping even with him on the squad and that now they can play five-on-five on offense now, it's not as big of a blow as what we might first think.  Mohammed will fill in admirably; fans and his team will appreciate his hard work and smart play but lament that he isn't Big Ben.  In Flip Murray, the Pistons finally have somebody who can create his own shot.  He's a little playground in his style, but Flip Saunders will find a way to incorporate that.  And one question: why give away Maurice Evans, a proven solid player with nice potential when your perimeter rotation is still so weak?

    Golden State

         The way Warriors fans know they're team is doomed is that the Earth is rotating.  On a struggling team with shaky post play, the best solution is to draft a center that can't hold his position (if he finds it) and needs lots of work on his post moves.  O'Bryant was a fantastic pick!  Here's all you need to know: Chad Ford loves his upside.  ESPN's "Insider" Chad Ford loves anybody with "great length" and "freakish athleticism."  The only way Chad Ford could love this pick more is if the player was named "O'Bryantovic" and played four minutes a game for a fifth-rate Macedonian team that plays on a milking bucket attached to a barn.  Nobody talks about achievement with O'Bryant; it's always "potential."  When "potential" isn't accompanied by actual winning or at least obscene stats (e.g. high school numbers of McGrady), "potential" is nearly a lock for "bust."  Ask the Pistons about a certain Serb with loads of "potential."

         Trading Derek Fisher for spare parts from Utah is bad basketball-wise, but smart financially.  Fisher is a solid contributor on the court who affects teammates positively, but is wildly overpaid.  But wildly overpaid is Golden State's way: they're committed to more than $150,000,000 over the next three years to their starting five that can't make the playoffs.  Even Mark Cuban thinks they overpay. 

         The only laudable move for the Warriors was the purging of Coach Montgomery followed by the upgrade to Don Nelson.  Nelson's crazy schemes will make them more watchable, but 35 wins is the zenith.  Any hopes beyond that are delusional; Nelson still has a point guard who is a lousy shooter but loves to hoist it anyway, a small forward whose best asset is his ability to get paid (and that's probably his agent's best asset) and a gaggle of big men who fear their own shadow.  These guys are still doomed and will be until they fire the owner.

    Houston

         After Vince Carter's picture by "underachievement" in the dictionary, you have the Houston Rockets.  How can a team with a dominant center and a potential Hall of Fame wing player not be elite or at least good?  We won't be able to tell how well they did this summer for some time until we see how good Rudy Gay becomes in Memphis.  Shane Battier brings five things the Rockets desperately needed: shooting, tough perimeter defense, intelligent play, leadership, and a reasonable contract.  You could make the argument that they should have drafted a point guard (i.e. Marcus Williams) and create a very strong case (hopefully one not including a laptop), but since McGrady does so much of the ball-handling and new point guards are not usually reliable, it may not have been a bad decision.

         Getting rid of Swift was an obvious move.  Any big man who doesn't rebound and can't score in the post other than on dunks is a problem.  Steve Novak will have to work to be Steve Kerr or risk becoming Mike Penberthy.  As for snagging Bonzi Wells, some nights it will seem brilliant, others you'll remember why he's played for half of the league.  You have to wonder if the Rockets' conservative approach to this year's draft night will prevent them from becoming a great team rather than just a good, solid squad.   

    Indiana

         What is the source of desperation for Al Harrington?  Why does his "unparalleled" athleticism translate to blocked shot numbers like Steve Nash's? (Nash: .15, Harrington .18)  Do the Pacers really need an average rebounding, sub-par shooting, foul-prone, no-defense forward?  Why lock themselves into perpetual slightly-above-averageness with a bloated contract on a team when they're looking to get rid of such contracts?  Why take minutes away from a promising Danny Granger?  A move for Harrington is an unofficial declaration that the Pacers are not trying to win a championship.  Jermaine O'Neal deserves better.  While many applaud the acquisition of the trade exception for Peja, it just enables them to bring in the cap-killer from Atlanta.  To the Pacer's credit, they did not bring Harrington in for quite the stupid money he wanted nor did they give Atlanta the $3 mil that they wanted.  Credit Bird and Walsh for that stand.

         As far as their draft-day acquisitions, both seem to be great athletes, but Williams and White don't really seem to be great basketball players.  It doesn't make much sense to bring in raw players who won't produce for some time when you're trying to win now.

     

         Speaking of not trying to win, they dealt their only productive point guard who can play more than 60 games for Old Man Armstrong and garnish.  This was purely a short-sighted move to open up a little bit of money to bring in Harrington.  Basketball-wise, they can't possibly think it prudent to trade a productive point guard, the rarest of creatures, for a professional athlete who has membership with the AARP.  That being said, the Croshere-for-Daniels swap was win-win for both teams.  Croshere was useless to Indiana and Marquis is a major upgrade over the departed Fred Jones.  Now they are guaranteed to have an athletic guard on the court even if Stephen Jackson decides to brawl with an entire stadium.

    L.A. Clippers

         Elgin Baylor is dead and has been replaced by a clone.  After deft moves like acquiring coach Dunleavy, Brand, Magette, and Cassell all at the right price, he made moves this summer that looked like a good team smartly tweaking the roster to win bigger. One of the biggest mysteries of draft night was how would the Clippers do with their choice not in the single digits.  They scored: they drafted solid, talented guys at positions of team need (center and shooting guard) that may or may not be brought in right away.  They resign team leader Sam Cassell to an appropriate contract.  Then the Clippers let Count Chocula and his one-dimensional game go to the Clippers only to bring in multi-faceted and newly reenergized Tim Thomas for less money.  And you still don't think that Elgin Baylor is dead or at least possessed by an alien entity?

    L.A. Lakers

         In case you're under any illusions, the Lakers are a bad team made above-average by the brilliance of Kobe Bryant and Phil Jackson.  In the Jackson-less season, had Kobe broken his leg in training camp, this team would have aspired to be the Bobcats.  This team embodies the idea of lacking depth; other than Bryant and Odom, there isn't a player on last year's roster that would be so much as the 7th man on any Western playoff roster on the other teams.  In that context we analyze the Lakers' off-season moves.

         More than anything they needed a point guard and got one.  Jordan Farmar was the best available and he's got to be better than a dude who chooses to be called "Smush."  Kudos on the Maurice Evans acquisition, an athlete who knows how to play basketball.  Being a cap-strapped team, the Lakers weren't looking to be major players in free agency, so they threw their mid-level at Vladimir "Count Chocula" Radmanovic.  The Count brings excellent long-range shooting where the Lakers ranked 19th last year.  Despite his Euro defense (which is sighted along with the Easter Bunny and unicorns) and guard-like rebounding, he's a basketball asset for the sum they acquired him.  But this signing is a double-edged sword: for all of his basketball merits, his signing prevents the Lakers from being major players in free agency after next season when the hideous contract of Brian Grant is over as well as those of Mihm, McKie, and Walton.  But if you really think he's better than the whole free agent crop of 2007, then this is your signing.

         I do have to apologize for a comment I made in a previous blog indicating that the Lakers' bench would be a middle-of-the-pack WNBA squad.  I apologize to the WNBA, their players, coaches, and fans: your brand of basketball should not be degraded by saying that the Lakers' bench could make it in your league.  I am very sorry.

    Memphis

         If you forgot that Jerry West is a genius, let this off-season be your reminder.  West knows how to gamble: he turned a chain-smoking Serb into a cocky high-schooler who became perennial MVP candidate Kobe Bryant.  So this year he rolls the dice and again trades proven commodity Shane Battier for potential superstar Rudy Gay.  Memo to mediocre teams in a rut: this is the type of move you need to make The Leap.  Grizzlies had poor athleticism, so he drafts Gay and reacquires Stromile Swift who can both fly.  West helps remedy toughness in the frontcourt issues by snatching Alexander Johnson in the second round.  At the one, he lets china doll Bobby Jackson go and kills two birds (scoring and the 1 position) with one stone by grabbing Kyle Lowry.  In addition to having a young team with a bright future, they'll have a ton of money after the season once Eddie Jones' obscene contract comes off the books even with the absurd Brian Cardinal contract.  In just two years, we could be talking about the freaking Grizzlies as perennial championship contenders, assuming that can be done with a point guard who once tried to conceal marijuana at an airport metal detector by wrapping it in foil.

    Miami

         They had no draft picks and even less cap space, so their changes were to scrape up some undrafted guys that I've never heard of.  Being the returning champs is a very nice thing, but to depend on increasingly creaky players like O'Neal, Mourning and Payton while assuming Posey, Walker, and Williams will stay under control/motivated is a fairly substantial gamble with very little upside. 

    Milwaukee

         Most people say that Milwaukee fleeced the Raptors in giving them a beat up Ford for Villanueva.  I disagree.  What team doesn't need a guy who can't shoot above 40%, is pushed around on the defensive end, and is a major injury liability?  Why would you want a big man who played well out of position at small forward, improved on an already solid shot, and has star potential?  Yes, yes, the Bucks really bit it this time.  (Note: sarcasm may be present in the previous paragraph and probably the following.)

         Mad props go to the Bucks for trading a big chunk of potential cap space for three average players with overly-long contracts; ALWAYS trade potential big cap space for perpetual mediocrity.  With no first round picks thanks to the brilliant trade to get Magloire in the first place (sarcasm now ending), the Bucks snatched the kind of guys the second round was made for.  Chad Ford reports that David Noel tested as the best athlete in the Orlando pre-draft camp which I guess is a good thing, but at least he comes from a winning program with great coaching.  Regarding Damir Markota the Euro big man, obtained from San Antonio via trade, may I echo Charles Barkley from draft coverage a few years ago and say the Spurs picked him - I guess he can't be that bad.

    Minnesota

         They got Foye but should have kept Roy.  Given the way Foye tore apart the summer competition, he looks like he'll give the Wolves just the scoring option they need to keep Garnett a top fantasy choice...I mean to win.  Minnesota also reminded us they're not that smart and fell for the classic "I've never done anything before this year, but on this bad team I was a ball hog and scored in bunches" routine perpetrated by Mike James.  Why is Stephen Jackson coming to mind?  Mike James is proof that given enough shots, virtually any NBA player can be a 20 point scorer.  Remember that Dominique Wilkins as an old man was the leading scorer on the Spurs in the David Robinson-less '96-'97 season.  Don't forget that not long ago Jerry Stackhouse was the #2 scorer in the league on a terrible Pistons squad.  But since the Wolves don't care about winning, the point is moot.

    New Jersey

         See, karma is real.  Banishing the evil spirit Kenyon Martin compelled the basketball gods to reward them with Marcus Williams, a lottery talent who through idiocy of his own and that of NBA GMs freefell into the lap of Rod Thorn.  Williams will be an excellent heir apparent to the still-awesome Jason Kidd and an obvious upgrade over the Bosnian dude and the ancient Vaughn.  Here's a free tip to all NBA personnel employees: there are exactly two foreign point guards who are successful in the NBA, namely Steve Nash and Tony Parker.  And when you think about it, Canadians don't really play all that differently from us and Parker's dad is American.  When it comes to point guards, buy American.  Go Euro on your swingmen.

         We've been hearing for three years about Josh Boone is going to blow up, but where are the results?  Ditto for Hassan Adams, but at least the Nets drafted him in round two.  I'm actually a big fan of the Mikki Moore trade. He's a good energy guy in the post and he'll give the fans someone to cheer for while Vince Carter is moping on the sideline being consoled by his mother.

    New York

         Were I to give the Knicks a grade for the off-season moves, I'd give them an H, because not only is it lower than F, it stands for "hilarious."  Clearly the worst move was hiring Isaiah Thomas as coach.  This guarantees that any of their young players will learn absolutely nothing about how to win or play basketball correctly.  They'll play like the Phoenix Suns alright, but after the Suns had all participated in a shot-drinking contest after they intentionally sprained their ankles. 

         Watching the NBA draft was awesome.  You remember that feeling when Michael Jordan was alone on a breakaway something awesome was going to happen?  Same as when the Knicks were on the clock.  Lottery talent Marcus Williams was still squirming in the green room.  All sorts of athletic wingmen around plus a few solid big man prospects were waiting to be picked.  Then they snag Renaldo Balkman, whoever the hell he is.  It was so gratifying.  Just before the pick ESPN was interviewing some of those "knowledgeable" New York fans who were spouting wisdom such as "yo, uh, uh, Isaiah gonna turn things around this year.  We gonna get Marcus Williams and come back, baby!"  After the pick was announced and the boos exploded, I laughed my ass off.  Spike Lee's eyes nearly popped out of his head, followed by his "we are screwed!" laughter and clapping.  I feel incredibly sorry for Balkman.  He might be the first 20th pick in the draft to be scrutinized as much as the 1st.  The one element that makes this pick truly horrific is how the hell do you pass up Williams and then draft another point guard later?

     

         The Knicks follow up this brilliance by drafting their 10th guard Mardy Collins.  Then they lose promising young big man Jackie Butler to the Spurs because they suddenly cheap out when it's a position of need.  Following this they plunked down a wad of cash to Jared Jeffries who brings wonderful things to the table such as abysmal shooting (32% 3PT, 59% FT) and a high foul ratio, both already glaring Knicks issues.  The only thing this team is missing is Darius Miles.  Please pull the trigger on Richardson-for-Miles, Isaiah.  Maybe some of those "knowledgeable" New York fans could lend Dolan and Thomas a hand in running their team.

    Oklahoma City

       You can easily make the argument that the Hornets got better, but how much better remains to be seen.  Personally, I think they've bitten off more than they can chew.  Individually, I like all of their moves to a degree, but it probably would have been smarter to try to change a little bit more gradually.  The first glaring issue is that they dramatically overpaid to get Peja.  His health and numbers have declined over the past few years.  If he can stay healthy, the counterargument from Byron Scott is that playing with Chris Paul and in an open offense will reverse the trend of playing with constantly injured and declining teammates in his latter days in Sacramento and in Indiana.  It's a huge gamble on a guy with a record of disappearing in crunch time and who couldn't stop Montgomery Burns from going to the hole.

         Apparently there is a premium on athletic big men who can't score, explaining the acquisition of three of them (Tyson Chandler, Hilton Armstrong, and Cedric Simmons.)  However, this may prove to be a worthy gamble in the middle for two reasons: all of these guys are young and can learn plus blocked shots and rebounds are what ignite fast breaks, and Byron Scott's teams know what to do in the open court.

    Orlando

         I have no idea how to evaluate Orlando's draft.  I really want to like the Redick pick.  Redick is such an excellent player and his candor and character are impressive, but the question is how his game will translate to the pros.  Will he be Reggie Miller-lite?  Will he become Steve Kerr?  Or bust?  Dick Vitale was hilarious with his honesty during the draft, hitting up J.J. for free tickets after all the "free publicity."  Way to make you and ESPN seem unbiased, Dick.

          Having just looked at the list of salaries for the Magic, I was surprised to note that with the exception of Grant Hill, this is the most cost-effective team in the NBA.  Bogans, Ariza, and Outlaw are all nice contributors being paid what rather minor role players should be paid.  Orlando is going to have a lot of money come the next summer; if Darko does anything and Dwight Howard continues in his path, don't act like your team's free agents aren't going to want to play with them.

     

    Philadelphia

         Allen Iverson's Lonely Hearts Club Band just got a little more miserable.  Drafting Iguodala's prot

    0 (0 Ratings)

    2007 NBA Title Predictions

    Thursday, July 13, 2006, 10:08 PM EST [General]

    You're thinking this is premature, and you're right, but I've got a lot of time on my hands and an Internet connection at home combined with NBA season withdrawals; this blog is a result.  I'm calling a Bulls-Spurs final with the Spurs narrowly edging the youngsters due to more big-game experience.

    Here is why the Bulls will win the East:

    Detroit is taking a big step back.  The issue isn't just the play of Big Ben replaced by the play of Mohammed; it's what Wallace's departure will get the other players thinking.  Billups is in the last year of his contract, so he'll want to play in such a way that gets him paid in his last opportunity to get a big deal - this may lead him to play something other than team basketball.  Without the primary enforcer and motivator around, who keeps an eye on Rasheed?  Saunders is a smart coach, but not the culture-creating iconoclast that wins championships.  Other than Rudy T and maybe Chuck Daly, can you name an NBA coach who's won a championship that doesn't have an overwhelming presence in the locker room?  Larry Brown is a diva, but he gave the team the edge they needed to win it all despite not having a star who could consistently take over games.  Add to that Dumars gave away potential future building-blocks in trading Darko and Maurice Evans.  The Pistons are still very skilled and very experienced, but they now lack the toughness and togetherness that gave them the razor's edge advantage over all of their opponents.

    The Heat are a one-hit wonder

    I'll start with the counter-argument on behalf of Wade & Co.  Dwyane Wade is just going to get better.  Lest we forget, His Airness began his career as a pathetic outside shooter previous to his becoming the record-holder for threes made in the playoffs, and there's no reason for us to believe someone as driven and gifted as Wade won't adopt new skills.  Miami can count on a weakened Detroit and other than the Bulls, a conference bereft of worthy opponents.  Like this year, whoever comes out of the East can anticipate an opponent that has expended tremendous energy just to escape the West playoffs.

    So much is stacked against the South Floridians.  Repeating a title run is difficult in any sport, but especially in the unique era of NBA parity.  Miami won the title in large part because Dallas had been bloodied by the Spurs and Suns, evidenced by Jason Terry's legs not being in his shots (do you really think he couldn't score on that perimeter D?) and Dirk too tired to go to the hole.  Pat Riley should send gift baskets to Poppovich and D'Antoni.  After such a cathartic victory, how hungry will Riley and his 15 Strong be?  Shaq will be a year creakier as will Payton and Mourning.  Williams, Haslem and Posey are playing at their peak.  While Wade has established himself as one of the game's premier crunch-time performers, what happens if he rolls his ankle, not for the first time?  And Mourning isn't even a lock to come back.  Remember that this "warrior" back-stabbed both the Nets and Raptors, so apparently losing a kidney hasn't diminished his love of the dollar.  Now that they've proven themselves, it remains to be seen if this group with several players with character issues will hold it together for a title run.  Ask the 2004 Lakers: a team with three stars years past their prime with a top-notch two-guard will still be dangerous, but not quite fit for the title.

    The East is Still Least

    Cleveland will be marginally better, as will New Jersey, but unless LeBron becomes MJ and Krstic becomes Duncan, we can comfortably ignore the Nets and Cavs come conference finals time. 

    Regarding New Jersey, Jason Kidd is still awesome even a bit slower, and he'll be better rested now that Marcus Williams is on board.  Hopefully Williams will have more thefts on the court than off.  Vince Carter is the David Robinson of guards: Hall of Fame numbers, but not the guy who wins playoff games for you.  East coast whiners complain of a lack of respect for Jefferson, but they should complain of his lack of jump shot and lack of delivering in big games.  Krstic, like all Euros, plays no defense, so considering the last champion that won without excellent post play was nobody, cancel the parade through town.

    Many NBA followers, especially the media, would love for LeBron to be the next Jordan, leading his previously destitute team to glory.  But the bad news for James fans is that his opponents score like Paris Hilton at a frat house; MJ took it as a personal offense when his opposition succeeded.  Sadly, ferocity generally isn't a characteristic you go out and get.  Big Z has nowhere to go but down.  Damon Jones now has to endure the cruel world known to slow-footed perimeter chuckers who don't have the benefit of double-teams on Duncan/O'Neals/Stoudemire or draw and kick guys like Nash.  The Cavs need three things: a savvy point guard, a shooter who can create his own shot, and a sadistic coach.  Eric Snow was the right guy for the PG job six years ago, but now they need a newer model.  Why not make a play for Brevin Knight?  Shannon Brown may actually the shooter/scorer they need.  As talented as Mike Brown is, he hasn't convinced the team to play the kind of defense he was schooled in under Carlisle and Poppovich.  It doesn't take that long for the right coach to get his team at least on the right path - Exhibit A is Avery Johnson and the previously defensively-defunct Mavs.  Defense is mostly an issue of effort, which effort is shaped by the coach rewarding and punishing play.  LBJ could be the league's premier defender, given his physical skills and instincts, but he has to be shown the way.

    Everybody else is completely doomed.  Paul Pierce excluded, the Celtics are a playground team.  Artest flushed a beautiful thing in Indy down the toilet and they won't recover.  The Bobcats and Knicks might make the Elite Eight in March Madness.  Milwaukee is three players and a coaching staff away from contending.  Basically, it's the Heat and Bulls with the rest in the dust.

    The Bulls are Actually That Good

    In 2005-06 Chicago led the league in field goal percentage defense and was fourth in defensive rebounding.  Whereas they were weak in shot-blocking, they bring in four-time Defensive POY and swat king Ben Wallace as well as defensive dynamo Tyrus Thomas.  If TT has half the offensive game he claims to have not used due to the system at LSU, he'll win Rookie of the Year handily.  With those two and P.J. Brown down low they'll have more possessions, which they'll need not being the most offensively-efficient team quite yet.  Hinrich and Gordon already provide reliable scoring, but if Deng, Smith, and Thomas progress as hoped, their scoring woes will disappear.  Skiles will keep this team prepared for opponents and has already progressed as an in-game decision maker.  He'll find a way to channel the energy of the guys who are coming up for contract extensions into feisty team play.  These guys are actually a lot like the '99 Spurs but without the same amount of veteran leadership.  If this isn't their year to come out of the East, then wait one more; it will come.

    How the West Will Be Won by the Spurs

    The Suns Still Don't Have a Bench

    Phoenix ended the season with many questions, many of which were answered negatively in the off-season.  The biggest is how well does Amare come back; is he Penny Hardaway or Antonio McDyess?  Both were fantastic players who were never the same, not even when healthy.  Jason Kidd has come back nicely, but his injury wasn't as severe and he still dropped a notch in his game.  Even at the top of his game, Amare couldn't guard his own shadow and didn't rebound that well for someone of his size and athleticism.  Healthy or not, Stoudemire is still only one player and will not compensate for the Suns' biggest problem, that being the lack of depth.  No offense to Barbosa, but every time Steve Nash was lying down on the sidelines, everybody watching cringed just a little.  Though he shouldn't have won either MVP award, so much of what the Suns do relies on Nash's awesome decision-making, and when he leaves the floor most of the team's basketball IQ goes with him.  Nash winning the MVP is a lot like a DH or closer winning the MVP in baseball: obviously he's excellent in one dimension of the game, but doesn't every part of the game matter? 

    The sad thing is they had opportunities to address depth problems with two first-rounders, but they gave the picks away.  And what have they done in free-agency?  They bring in another shooter, already their greatest strength, rather than bring in somebody who could defend, rebound, block shots, or pass.  In addition, their value was artificially inflated by the play of Tim Thomas, who was playing hard for the first time in a decade so he could get a new contract.  Having Kurt Thomas and Amare back will help, but Diaw's effectiveness will be lessened.  Speaking of Amare, has anyone of that size, skill, and athleticism been a poorer rebounder?  Who will hit big shots when Nash inevitably wears out?  The answer, as it has been for three years, is nobody.  That along with an open contempt for defense will doom the Suns in second or third play out west yet another year.

    Mavericks will take a few steps forward, a few steps back

    No sane basketball observer will say that Dallas won't be right in the mix to win the West and even the whole thing.  But lest we forget, Cuban and Co were one brain-dead foul by Manu Ginobili from watching the rest of the playoffs from home.  As far as advantages of next year over this one, they'll have another year of tutelage from Avery Johnson as well as experience for the coach, which will help especially in late-game and playoff situations, a significant reason Pat Riley's squad won.  Cuban has seen the wisdom of keeping a core group together, so they'll be even tighter as a unit.

    However, a few questions linger regarding to how well Dallas can do this year compared to the last.  This last year, Jason Terry was playing for a contract; will he be Ray Allen and submit an even better year after his monster deal or will he be Eddy Curry and phone it in now that he's gotten all the dollars he needs?  If you don't think that's a legitimate question, ask the teams that have/had Tim Thomas, Curry, Ike Austin, Stephen Jackson, Steve Francis, etc.  Perhaps the more significant concern is that nearly all of the Mavericks' players are playing at their peak or just beyond.  Other than Devin Harris and maybe Josh Howard and Diop, these guys have hit their ceiling.  Stackhouse is probably going to be worse as more injuries and physical restraints come with his age.  How much better can Dirk get?  Will the defensively-challenged Croshere actually get minutes on Avery's squad?  Dirk and the gang will be right back in it, but the track record of teams that lose in the Finals over the last few decades is less than an encouraging sign for their title hopes.

    Yes, You Can Count Out Everybody but the Mavs, Spurs, and Suns

    Who you got, the Warriors?  They'll most probably be even worse than last year.  Memphis can't win a playoff game, which will change if Gay becomes a star, but who will play point?  The Clippers are up-and-coming, but lack the seasoning.  Same with Utah.  With all of the long-term contracts on the Kings, they've pretty much cemented their slightly-above-mediocre status for years.  I'm better than the Nuggets' guards and other than Carmelo, their frontcourt is a reliable as election results in the Soviet Union.    

    Delusional Lakers fans: you aren't getting Garnett unless you give up Kobe.  People who talk about Lamar Odom's potential: thank you for the comedy.  What does he have to do to convince you he's never going to get it?  Show up year after year without spending a minute in the weight room over the summer?  Not develop reliable post moves?  Display incompetent defense?  Get called obscene names by his own coach?  The Lakers' bench would be a middle-of-the-pack WNBA team.  Good luck, Farmar.

    That the Rockets are not championship material is a sure sign of bad GM work.  They have two pieces most teams would kill to have: an increasingly dominant center and a top-five player on the perimeter.  McGrady is even a premier playoff performer.  It is a crime that Houston is not on par with the other Texas teams, but with a supporting cast worse than a Vin Diesel movie, these guys are doomed.

    Everybody else is too doomed to mention.

    The Spurs Will Bounce Back

    It's just their way.  They can't win two rings in a row.  They weren't too far off this year - as I mentioned earlier, they were one play from advancing to the conference finals where they would have dispatched the Suns (who nearly lost to the Lakers.  The Lakers!)  San Antonio matches up better with Miami than Dallas: Josh Howard isn't exactly Bruce Bowen guarding Wade (who serves up a brickfest every time in that matchup) and Duncan is one of the game's premier low-post scorers, something Dallas has in minimal supply.

    These guys are flat-out winners.  They play suffocating and clutch defense, have three reliable big-time scoring options, and clutch shooting and playmaking.  Does anyone think Parker won't get even better after doing so his whole career?  He just turned 24.  Ginobili and Duncan were both slowed by injuries, but both figure to be healthy.  We should also take into account this will be the first summer in a long time that no Spur will be obligated to play for a national team, a problem in years past as far as contributing to fatigue.  Since they lost in the second round, the Spurs had even more time to rest this year. 

    Don't forget that the Spurs have one of the league's best coaching staffs and the best player personnel department.  San Antonio's leadership will make the correct adjustments to diminish previous weaknesses and mistakes, which aren't that numerous to begin with.  Already a top-notch team just a razor's edge worse than the Mavs this year, Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili all are due better seasons than the last.  With more mobility in the game plan and another year for Finley to adjust to his role, you can expect the Spurs to be even stronger, smarter, and better-rested.

     

    Why San Antonio Will Beat Chicago

    My proposed finals would be a bloody battle, but one won by the more experienced and savvy team.  The big-game experience of Duncan and crew would dwarf the upstart Bulls.  I envision these finals a lot like the '95 finals, the Bulls playing the role of the Orlando Magic as the young/athletic team with all the potential in the world being outclassed by the smarter/experienced team led by a world-class big man in the Spurs playing the Houston Rockets part.  I honestly believe that this Bulls team will win a championship or a few in the near future, but not before one last hurrah from Team Duncan.

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Reviving Your NBA Team: Portland Trail Blazers

    Monday, June 19, 2006, 12:44 PM EST [General]

    In these columns, I have taken over as the owner/GM of your NBA franchise.  Herein I suggest personnel (player, coach, and management) and coaching changes that will take your franchise to the next level, moving from losing to winning and winning to winning big.  I have taken all salary and free agency information from HoopsHype.com, draft information from foxsports.com, and basketball statistics from ESPN.com.  Where applicable, I used the trade checker on RealGM.com.

    I'll be as generous as possible in describing this team: they are a pathetic abomination.  Record-wise, they were worst in the NBA this season.  Statistically speaking, they were even worse - dead last in points, point differential, 3point defense, free throw percentage, rebounding percentage, opponent's offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, and total rebounds.  In every other statistical category, they were average or usually much worse. 

    Zack Randolph and Darius Miles both expressed desires to play elsewhere.  Owner Paul Allen is finally realizing what a colossal waste of money his expenditures have been heavily investing in unworthy players (isn't Shawn Kemp still on their payroll?) and has relinquished ownership of the arena so he doesn't have to pay the penalties for the losses (that's money he needs to buy the rest of the Pacific Northwest.   Ask me some time about his damn streetcar he wants Seattle to build for him.)  They fired a sub-par GM with no apparent successor.  Nate McMillan coaching this team bereft of talent is like Francis Ford Coppola directing the Jackass sequel.  Portland fans, once the most loyal and loudest in the NBA for many years, have left, alienated by the bumbling management of their once-beloved team.  How do you fix a team with no GM and the owner and players looking to hit the eject button?

    Solutions

    Follow the Nuggets' pattern.  This pattern can be boiled down to a few parts: trade everybody who makes more than the coach and get draft picks, followed by signing reasonably-priced free agents.  In the Blazers' case, trade everybody who makes more than the assistant coaches (Nate is well-paid) except Randolph - I'll make the case for my exception later.  The Blazers have no money this summer for free agents - you have no idea what a good thing this is.  They shouldn't use the mid-level exception either, especially since it probably puts them into luxury-tax territory.  But in summer 2007 they become players in free agency as far as the cap is concerned, so they must not only make moves to not stifle that, but to enhance that.  The Blazers would be wise to read on.

    Do like the Raptors and shove a pile of money in front of a proven GM.  Stealing Bryan Colangelo was a fantastic move for the Canadians.  The only GMs I'd open the vault for are R.C. Buford, Joe Dumars, Rod Thorn, Jerry West, and Geoff Petrie.  Dumars is a Piston for life or until the owner decides he hates winning and his fans and fires him.  Buford is leading a relatively pressure-free life out of the spotlight with a perennial championship contender with arguably the best player and coach in the league.  Jerry West is about to sail off into the sunset with his gazillion trophies and there's ample evidence he's lost it a little bit.  That leaves the Blazers with Petrie and Thorn.  Both have limited resources to work with but both took terrible teams to conference finals.  Neither GM has historical or familial ties to their respective teams.  And who the hell wants to work out of Sacramento or New Jersey?  See if either one is attainable.  If not, hire a disciple of one of the guys listed above.  If Kevin Pritchard was the guy, why haven't they hired him?  Is his handling of the draft a final exam? 

    Get rid of Darius Miles and Travis Outlaw.  "Addition by subtraction" comes to mind.  Assuming these guys aren't in jail, trade them as soon as possible.  Are you still waiting for Miles to blossom?  How about his six years in the league with his rebounding average declining every year of his career?  Perhaps you're impressed by his career shooting percentages from three-point line (16.8%) or the free throw line (58.6%)?  Maybe you dig his high turnover rate and low assist and rebounding numbers.  What do you call the #3 overall pick in the draft who can't shoot, can't pass, can't defend, can't rebound, and is a black hole of good feelings on his team?  Hint: it starts with "B" and ends with "ust".  I don't even want to list Outlaw's stats lest he find out where I live.

    To solve this problem, Portland must capitalize on the stupidity of other teams; in this case, I'll use the Knicks, the dumbest team in the NBA.  It's almost too easy, especially given Isaiah's alleged coveting of Miles.  Given that Isaiah loves big men and loves Miles, I've concocted a megatrade that will give him what he wants and for the Blazers clears cap space and brings in players the fans will love.  Portland sends Theo Ratliff, Darius Miles, Travis Outlaw, and Brian Skinner for Jalen Rose, Malik Rose, and Nate Robinson.  Here's why Portland makes this trade:

    Ratliff: He's finished.  As a former owner of Theo in fantasyland, I can attest his game is blocking shots and some rebounds with pretty much nothing else.  His shot-blocking attempts often come at the expense of proper rebounding position, thus reducing his defensive impact.  Miles and Outlaw: Bad seeds and in the case of Miles, vastly overrated potential.  If references to leaping ability were MVP votes, Miles would have matched Jordan by now.  But he plays basketball, which unfortunately for him includes elements other than trying to dunk.  Skinner: Completely replaceable game and he'll want bigger dollars when his contract is up.   Jalen Rose: He might as well change his name to "Cap Space."  Jalen gives you some versatility position-wise and he wears great suits.  Malik Rose: Malik is a very good defender who can guard several positions.  He's a little overpaid, but his work ethic, energy, and professionalism will have a positive impact on teammates and endear him to fans.  Nate Robinson:  You bring him in to change the pace of the game and keep defenses guessing.  However, the real reason you bring him in: he will put butts in seats.  He won the dunk contest and he already has a following in the Pacific Northwest, so he will bring in desperately needed dollars.  Factor in that he's on his rookie contract, he's not making much money on a short deal, Robinson is a small risk to take.

    If the megatrade doesn't work out, just offer Miles for Malik Rose and Nate Robinson.  Malik brings championship experience and would instantly become one of the team's better free throw shooters while Robinson brings flair and excitement to an otherwise dead Rose Garden.

    Let Voshon Lenard go.  Resign Przybilla, but don't go nuts.  Lenard has apparently employs the trainer hired by Marcus Camby, Ken Griffey Jr., and Fred Taylor.  At this point all he brings is his waning three-point shot and a guarantee he'll miss a good chunk of the season.  Przybilla is a good defender with excellent per 40 minute numbers in rebounding and shotblocking, but he's not one you open the vault for.  He's a terrible free-throw shooter but at least has good shot selection on the floor at 54.8%.  But he seems to have hired Lenard's trainer too: six years into the league and he has yet to play more than 76 games, appearing in 58% of a possible 492 games.  Big men tend to get overpaid (Kwame Brown, Rasho Nesterovic, Jerome James - hell, even Macej Lampe) so the Blazers must be careful not to jeopardize the future for a guy they can't build a team around.

    Bring in John Lucas.  This is one addition to the coaching staff I would open the wallet big-time for.  Not only does half the league train with him in Houston in the offseason, he has revolutionized rehabilitation in the NBA.  He helps players overcome physical ailments, but Lucas has a gift in helping people heal emotionally and psychologically.  Steve Francis was an All-Star starter under John's tutelage whereas now he is an overpaid pariah.  The main reason I bring Lucas in is to mentor Zach Randolph, not just because he's pretty much untradeable, but because I seriously believe Randolph can be a star in this league.  He's nearly a 20-10 guy and he has flashes of dominance, first evidenced by the way he destroyed the competition during summer league as a rookie and sophomore.  Zach is a troubled man and with the guidance of Lucas in things basketball and life, he would be an all-star.  Lucas would be a nice counter to McMillan's hard-driving personality, giving the players someone on the coaching staff who could act as a sounding board.  Hiring a big-man specialist like Patrick Ewing or Hakeem Olajuwon would be beneficial, but John Lucas would have a therapeutic effect on that fractured team.

    Regarding Martell Webster: get him lifting weights, play him in the summer leagues as the #1 option on offense, and tell him to go to the hole.  I am a big fan of Webster.  Still young, he needs meat on those bones, probably fifteen pounds or so.  While admittedly is was in less than 20 minutes per game, he only took 71 free throws last year, a waste for a guy so athletic and who shoots at 86% from the charity stripe.  Go to the hole, Martell.  With some experience in the summer leagues being The Guy, that confidence can translate to the regular season.  Webster starting getting pretty good over the course of the season - check his pre- and post- All-Star numbers and his per 48 minute numbers.  Within a few years, he'll more than justify his high draft pick.

    If you can, draft Lamarcus Aldridge or Brandon Roy.  If you can't, settle for Adam Morrison.  More than anything, Portland should draft somebody the alpha player from a program that wins big.  All three of my recommendations come from schools that have had some success in the NCAAs and have won their conferences.  Experienced players from winning environments do all they can to win.  I'll use the Chicago Bulls as a template: drafting the two high-schoolers Chandler and Curry, the Bulls floundered and now Chandler comes off the bench and Curry is a Knick; they bring in Hinrich (Kansas), Deng (Duke), Gordon (UConn), Duhon (Duke), and Nocioni (gold-medal winning Argentina national team).  With tons of cap room and loads of young, talented, and winning-oriented players, the Bulls are already a playoff team with a very bright future.  In the meantime, the Blazers have drafted three high-schoolers and brought in/resigned grossly overpriced players with no leadership skills (Ratliff, Miles).  Start stocking up on winners.  Roy is probably the most complete player in the draft and is a McMillan-type of player.  He would bring size to that small backcourt and could even play some point.  Morrison will bring some much-needed offense and would put butts in seats; both Morrison and Roy already have a following in the region.  Aldridge would bring low-post and mid-range offense and plenty of rebounding with solid defense.

    Conclusion

    There isn't one move or even a couple moves that will make the Blazers a playoff team in the next couple years, so they have to accomplish three things: get rid of the losers, bring in players who play to win, and bring back the fans by putting on the court hardworking guys who are respectful and fun.  To do this, they must shed albatross contracts and personalities (Ratliff, Miles, Outlaw) and make every move with an eye toward winning and flexibility.

     

    0 (0 Ratings)