Script: /Redline_76/blog/page/2
Owner:
Subdir: redline_76

    Redline_76


    Location:
    About Me: Create a bio? What for? Ok, I'll make it short for you. 31 years old, married, used to be in the US Navy, NASCAR freak, very opinionated, never voted for George W. Bush.... happy now?
    Marital Status Married
    Prospect


    Location:
    About Me: Create a bio? What for? Ok, I'll make it short for you. 31 years old, married, used to be in the US Navy, NASCAR freak, very opinionated, never voted for George W. Bush.... happy now?
    Marital Status Married

    Sponsorship Woes and the Chase

    Saturday, March 17, 2007, 06:31 PM EST [General]

    Sponsorship in NASCAR is getting out of control. Look at the trend:

    1. The machines look more like a 190mph billboard than a stock car or truck
    2. Owners of tracks are forgoing tradition by accepting company specific names (i.e. Lowe's Motor Speedway)
    3. Chaplains from various ministries giving thanks to God for the sponsorship of a race (see Watkins Glen in 2006).
    4. Sunoco raising a fit over Kevin Harvick's new sponsorship with Shell
    5. Jeff Burton having to gray-out the NEXTEL Cup Series patch on his uniform
    6. Robby Gordon having to remove his newfound Motorola decals off his car before being allowed to qualify
    7. The percentage of commercial breaks during a race as compared to 5 years ago.
    ... the list could go on and on.

    The biggest sign that sponsorship is out of control is the sign that everyone seemed to miss.  In my opinion, when Brian France decided to add two more drivers to the Chase for the NEXTEL Cup he did it to stop a growning trend.  Jeff Gordon and Dale Earnhardt Jr missed the Chase in 2005, then Tony Stewart in 2006.  Those are a couple of NASCAR's marquis drivers with very large sponsorship funding power.  The loss of those three drivers in the Chase not only hurt sponsorship exposure, but it hurt the Nelson ratings of NASCAR itself.  Since those two seasons had top drivers miss the playoffs back-to-back, NASCAR thought it was a trend and changed how a champion is named yet again.

    Now we have rival sponsors are bickering back and forth over who's allowed to provide company exposure of their products to potential customers . But I bet 99.9% of us don't give a damn because all we want to see is a stock car race, not a advertising convention that moves in fast circles.


    Then again, we all have to look at it at another way.  Without sponsorship to all of the race teams, each team would have to fund millions of dollars each season out of their own pocket.  That, my friends, is just infeasible.  Sponsorship is a necessary evil that we all must endure in order to enjoy the sport that we love.  Somewhere there has to be a happy medium, and a clear line so that the sport may continute to thrive and expand.

    So these are my questions for you.   Which do you think caused the change in the Chase?  Was it the top drivers missing the Chase?  Did it stem from sponsorship pressure?  Or are you like me and thought it was due to both issues in combination?  And do you think that the sport getting choked with sponsorship wars?


    Express your take on the issue with a comment or two.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    NASCAR's Consistent Inconsistency

    Thursday, March 15, 2007, 11:34 PM EST [NASCAR]

    It happened once again. March 11th, 2007 at the newly paved and configured Las Vegas Motor Speedway, and pit road was the exact location. Driver for the #48 Lowe's Chevy Monte Carlo SS, Jimmy Johnson, was making his usual charge up to the front of the pack when a caution was called due to a car that spun out. On pit road, Crew Chief Chad Kanus and the 2006 NEXTEL Cup Champion #48 team was servicing the car with four fresh tires and fuel, when all of the sudden the old tire rolled unescorted into the adjacent pit box behind the car. NASCAR quickly penalized the team to the rear of the longest pacing line when they went back onto the racing surface after their stop was complete.

    This was no problem for Jimmy Johnson. Within 100 laps, he was back near the front of the pack and eventually took the lead. After another caution period, the #48 team was back on pit road, servicing the car again when another tire decided to roll by itself, just like how it's predecessor did. This time it was in the adjacent pit box in front of the #48, and a NASCAR Official stopped it's progress from rolling any further on pit road. Not only was that scenario was a little different with the fact that a NASCAR Official stopped the tire's progress, but NASCAR did not penalize the #48 for the same infraction. Huh?

    I didn't mind the NASCAR official stopping the tire.  In fact, I'm all for it.  A loose tire on pit road is essensially a 50+ pound missile hazard.  Although I'm not arguing the safety call, I am however arguing the call to not penalize the #48 for the same infraction the second time around.  As I've stated in the FOX Sports Message Boards, NASCAR needs to fix their inconsistent rules enforcement. It doesn't matter if a NASCAR Official stops (or doesn't stop) a runaway tire. A team that let's a tire roll out their assigned pit box should start at the tail end of the longest pacing line under the yellow flag, or black-flagged back to pit road if the infraction happened while under green flag conditions. Neither questions, nor appeals can and will apply because this is a safety concern for all exposed personnel who works in the trenches of pit road.

    If NASCAR wants to play in the same yard as the NFL, MLB or any other sport, then they need to move out of the yard that the WWE is playing in by improving their rules enforcement.

    That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 1 2 Next Last