Script: /FrankIrizarry/blog/page/6
Owner:
Subdir: frankirizarry

    FrankIrizarry



    Location:
    About Me: My name is Frank Irizarry and I am an Assistant Professor of Communication at Suffolk University in beautiful Beantown. I teach courses in public relations. I am an avid sports fan with football being my true passion. I played two seasons of College F
    Prospect

    Rest in Peace Chico

    Tuesday, May 8, 2007, 10:56 AM EST [Boxing]

    Fox Sports and the Associated Press are reporting that Diego "Chico" Corrales, who won titles in two weight classes and was involved in one of the most memorable fights in recent times, died Monday in a motorcycle accident. He was 29 years old.

     

    Reports indicate that Corrales was driving his motorcycle at a high rate of speed when he ran into the back of a car about 10 miles west of the Las Vegas Strip on Monday night.

    Corrales, who stood 5-10 1/2 but fought the majority of his career at 130 pounds, was a crowd pleasing big puncher best known for getting up after two 10th-round knockdowns to stop Jose Luis Castillo in one of the most thrilling fights ever.

    That fight took place exactly two years to the day before his untimely death. 730 days is all it took for Corrales to go from triumph to tragedy. The fight was named by the Boxing Writers Association of America and numerous boxing publications as the fight of the year for 2005.

    He lost his last three fights, including his last fight on April 7 against Joshua Clottey in Springfield, Mo. He had moved up two weight divisions to welterweight for that fight, but dropped a decision. I watched the fight and it was apparent that he could not bring the same power up as he went up in weight. There were times in the fight that I was certain Corrales would be knocked down but he showed the heart of a champion and fought to the bitter end against a younger and stronger opponent.

    Corrales was born in Sacramento, Ca., but lived in Las Vegas in recent years. He won his first 33 fights and held a piece of the 130-pound title before he was stopped by Floyd Mayweather Jr. in a unification fight in January 2001.

    Although most of his fans will choose to remember the engaging warrior we saw in the ring, Corrales did have a fairly dark side to him. He was sent to jail on a domestic abuse and didn't fight again for two years. He came back from his exodus to fight a thrilling trilogy against Joel Casamayor, losing two of the three fights, and split a pair of fights with Castillo.

    Corrales' promoter Gary Shaw summed it up best when he said "he always cared about the fans and gave them their money's worth. He was a true warrior. He was what boxing stood for, and what boxing is all about."

    While the boxing world ruminates over the De LaHoya -Mayweather matchup from this past weekend, let's all take a moment to recognize the passing of a great boxer and a tragically flawed man, Diego "Chico" Corrales.


    0 (0 Ratings)

    Waaaarrrrrriiiorsss, come out to pla-ay!

    Monday, May 7, 2007, 09:31 AM EST [General]

     

    "Alright now, for all you boppers out there in the big city. All you street people with an ear for the action, I've been asked to relay a request from the Gramercy Riffs. It's a special for The Warriors. That's that real live bunch from Coney, and I do mean The Warriors. Here's a hit with them in mind.  Be looking good Warriors, all the way back to Coney. You hear me babies? Good. Real good. Adios."

    The 1979 cult classic The Warriors spins a tale about the impossible journey that a mythical New York City street gang must go through to make it from the Bronx back home to Coney Island after being unfairly accused by rival gang member Luther of killing Cyrus, the leader of the biggest gang in the city who was attempting to unite all New York City street gangs. To make matters worse, the truce has been called off, the Warriors have no weapons and every gang in the city is out looking for them.

     

    Fast forward 29 years and we see a similar tale involving an improbable journey of some new Warriors taking shape.  The Golden State Warriors upset of the Dallas Mavericks was one of the greatest upsets in NBA playoff history.  We all have heard by now that the Warriors were the first #8 seed to knock off a #1 seed in a best-of-seven series.  We all know about the bad blood between Don Nelson and Mark Cuban, the modern day Cyrus among NBA owners.  There's no need to look at the past.  Just like the Warriors in 1979 couldn't revel in victory after taking down the Turnbull AC's (especially with The Orphans lurking around the corner), the Golden State Warriors need to look ahead on their struggle to get to Coney Island (Detroit?).

     

    "Okay, let's get down to it boppers. We're gonna have to do better out there. Our friends just made it past one of the minor league teams. Remember boppers, be lookin' good."

    So the immediate question at hand is "can the Warriors get past Utah?"  While I think the series will be close, I do think the Warriors may have an edge.  First of all, the Warriors are better warmed up because they are just coming off of a series with a much tougher opponent than what the Jazz faced in round 1.  Comparing the Mavs to the Rockets is like comparing The Lizzies to the Baseball Furies.  It's no contest.  The Mavs are a much more athletic team than the Rockets so the Warriors have shown they can hang with an athletic team.  The jury is still out on the Jazz.  Second of all, while some teams suffer a "hangover" effect after a tough emotional series I don't  think a veteran squad like Golden State will have a problem with that.  The fact that their series did not go seven games benefits them down the road.  Plus, it's not like the Jazz had a cake walk in their series.  They had to go to game 7 and their close out game was a lot closer than the Mavs close out game.  Lastly, the season series is tied at two wins apiece and while both teams enjoyed 24 point routs of the other during the regular season (Utah beat Golden State 106-82 in their first matchup while Golden State beat Utah 126-102 in their last matchup), Utah got their rout on November 4th and Golden State got their rout on April 9th which tells me that the Warriors beat down of the Jazz is probably fresher in both teams minds and the Warriors were on the upswing late in the season while the Jazz started strong this past season but played with increased mediocrity as the season went on.  The Jazz will have a hard time matching up with Baron Davis, Steven Jackson and Jason Richardson.  My prediction: Warriors in 6.

    "Latest sports news off the street boppers. The Baseball Furies dropped the ball, made an error. Our friends are on second base and trying to make it all the way home. But the inside word is that the odds are against them. Stay tuned boppers. Stay tuned."

    If the Warriors manage to get past the Jazz they will face the winner of the Spurs-Suns series.  The Spurs lead that series 1-0 and I think they to will win in six.  Assuming the Spurs advance, do the Warriors have a chance against a strong defense oriented team like the Spurs?  The Warriors will have their work cut out for them.  They were 1-3 against the Spurs this season and down the stretch, the Spurs were the only team to beat the Warriors in the last 10 games of the regular season.  The best hope that the Warriors have is that the Suns take more out of the Spurs than the Jazz take out of the Warriors, which is at least plausible.  If Baron Davis is 100% when this series rolls around the Warriors at least have a fighting chance, just as the Warriors in 1979 did against the Riffs.


    I can't even begin to predict what will happen in the Eastern Conference although the Pistons have to be considered the odds on favorite.  If the Warriors get through the Jazz and Spurs I'm sure I'll revisit this blog.  But until then, I leave you with this...


    "Good news boppers, the big alert has been called off. It turns out that the early reports were wrong, all wrong. Now for that group out there that had such a hard time getting home, sorry about that. I guess the only thing we can do is play you a song."


    0 (0 Ratings)

    The NFL Draft: Another example of SEC DominanceFirst Round Picks by Conference

    Sunday, April 29, 2007, 09:08 PM EST [General]





    As a fan of SEC football, I do not hide the fact that I firmly believe that top to bottom the SEC is the strongest conference in all of college football.  The NFL draft this weekend seemed to validate that belief and it showed  that many in the NFL also believe in the strength of the SEC.  Consider the number of SEC first round picks relative to other conferences: 

    First Round Picks by Conference

    SEC                        11

    Big 10                     6

    Big East                  5

    Big 12                    4

    ACC                       3

    Pac 10                    1

    Independent           1

    Mid-American          1                 

    35% of the first round picks came from the SEC and the SEC accounted for as many first round picks as the Big 10 and Big East combined. 

    SEC 1st Round Selections (11)
    #1 Oakland JaMarcus Russell, QB, LSU
    #6 Washington LaRon Landry, S, LSU
    #8 Atlanta Jamaal Anderson, DE, Arkansas
    #11 San Francisco Patrick Willis, LB, Ole Miss
    #16 Green Bay Justin Harrell, DT, Tennessee
    #17 Denver Jarvis Moss, DE, Florida
    #21 Jacksonville Reggie Nelson, S, Florida
    #23 Kansas City Dwayne Bowe, WR, LSU
    #27 New Orleans Robert Meachem, WR, Tennessee
    #29 Baltimore Ben Grubbs, OG, Auburn
    #30 San Diego Craig Davis, WR, LSU

    The dominance seemed to extend beyond the first round.  Consider the following:

    - The SEC had the No. 1 pick in the draft for the fourth time in the last 10 years

    - Three of the first five defensive players taken were from the SEC

    - Three of the first eight players taken were from the SEC

    - The SEC had 11 first round selections, which was the most of any conference.

    - The 11 first round draft picks were the most ever by the SEC. In 1998 and 2005, the SEC had 10 first round draft selections.

    - The SEC, Big Ten and Pac-10 were tied with the most selections in the second round with six each. The Big 12, WAC and Mountain West each had three selections.

    - After two rounds, the SEC led with 17 selections, followed by the Big Ten with 13, Big 12 and the ACC with seven each.

    - During the first day (three rounds of the NFL Draft), the SEC led with 21 selections, followed by the Big Ten with 18, ACC with 14, Big 12 with nine and the WAC with seven selections.

    - The SEC finished the draft with a total of 41 players selected

     
    This folks, is yet another example of Southeastern Conference football Dominance! 

     

    SEC Players in the 2007 NFL Draft

    PK (OVR) NFL TEAM PLAYER POS. SCHOOL FIRST ROUND #1 Oakland JaMarcus Russell QB LSU #6 Washington LaRon Landry S LSU #8 Atlanta Jamaal Anderson DE Arkansas #11 San Francisco Patrick Willis LB Ole Miss #16 Green Bay Justin Harrell DT Tennessee #17 Denver Jarvis Moss DE Florida #21 Jacksonville Reggie Nelson S Florida #23 Kansas City Dwayne Bowe WR LSU #27 New Orleans Robert Meachem WR Tennessee #29 Baltimore Ben Grubbs OG Auburn #30 San Diego Craig Davis WR LSU SECOND ROUND #3 (35) Tampa Bay Arron Sears OG Tennessee #9 (41) Atlanta Chris Houston CB Arkansas #10 (42) Indianapolis Tony Ugoh OT Arkansas #12 (44) Minnesota Sidney Rice WR South Carolina #17 (49) Cincinnati Kenny Irons RB Auburn #22 (54) Kansas City Turk McBride DT Tennessee THIRD ROUND #1 (65) Oakland Quentin Moses DE Georgia #20 (83) Carolina Charles Johnson DE Georgia #21 (84) St. Louis Jonathan Wade CB Tennessee #34 (97) San Francisco Ray McDonald DT Florida FOURTH ROUND #22 (121) Denver Marcus Thomas DT Florida #24 (123) Houston Fred Bennett CB South Carolina #34 (133) Atlanta Martrez Milner TE Georgia #36 (135) San Francisco Joe Cohen DE Florida #38 (137) Baltimore Le'Ron McClain FB Alabama FIFTH ROUND #15 (152) Tennessee Antonio Johnson DT Mississippi State #24 (161) Seattle Will Herring OLB Auburn SIXTH ROUND #16 (190) St. Louis Kendrick Shackleford OT Georgia #20 (194) Atlanta David Irons CB Auburn #23 (197) Seattle Courtney Taylor WR Auburn #32 (206) Tennessee Ryan Smith CB Florida SEVENTH ROUND #3 (213) Cleveland Chase Pittman DE LSU #10 (220) New Orleans Marvin Mitchell ILB Tennessee #11 (221) Chicago Trumaine McBride CB Ole Miss #17 (227) Pittsburgh Dallas Baker WR Florida #18 (228) Green Bay Deshawn Wynn RB Florida #30 (240) San Diego Brandon Siler ILB Florida #36 (246) Tampa Bay Ken Darby RB Alabama #38 (248) St. Louis Keith Jackson DT Arkansas #45 (255) Detroit Ramzee Robinson CB Alabama

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    "And with the first pick in the 2007 NFL draft, the Oakland Raiders select..."

    Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 11:25 AM EST [General]

     

    "......., Joe Thomas, Offensive Tackle, University of Wisconsin."  Now I know I said the same thing last year about the Texans selecting D'Brickashaw Ferguson with the first pick and in reality I'm not expecting to hear these words uttered by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on April 28 at approximately 12:18 pm when he introduces the first pick in the draft.  Most likely, we will hear the name "Russell" or "Quinn," or "Johnson" along with the first pick (although I think JaMarcus Russell is almost a lock.)  Much of the debate in cyberspace as well as on the radio and television revolves around Russell, I'm here to tell you that even though the analysts and commentators are paid to give their opinions (while your humble scribe works for free) that doesn't mean they are making the right call.  Most analysts believe Russell will go to the Raiders thus creating a modern day "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" (Al Davis, Lane Kiffin, Randy Moss, and JaMarcus Russell).  Now I agree that this is how things will probably turn out but I'm here to tell you why I think things should turn out differently.  The following are the top five reasons that the Oakland Raiders should select Joe Thomas with the first pick in the draft:

     

    #5 - You must solidify the protection for the quarterback before you find the quarterback.  In 2005, David Carr suffered through 68 sacks, 424 yards lost, 17 fumbles, six fumbles lost.  It was a rough season for the former number one pick in 2002 NFL Draft.  He received an $8 million roster bonus which seemed to lock him up as the franchise quarterback through the 2008 season but he never got there because the Texans did not overhaul their offensive line.  Mario Williams couldn't protect Carr and now Carr is gone.  Four years of quarterback development and an $8 million dollar roster bonus last season down the tubes.  Maybe a pick like D'Brickashaw Ferguson could have helped salvage Carr's career by providing better pass protection for Carr.  Now it's 2007 and the same scenario seems to be building.  The Raiders are set to grab Russell, a big armed and slow footed quarterback that seems to be more in the Byron Leftwich mold than the Donovan McNabb mold.  Now I'm not saying that to be an NFL Quarterback you have to be a running quarterback (although you will probably need to run for your life as a Raiders quarterback). What I am saying is that when you play behind the worst Offensive Line in football, you have to be able to move in and out of the pocket. To be able to use the arm that can chuck a football 50 yards down the field, you need pass protection that will hold up while your receiver gets 50 yards down the filed. The Raiders O-Line is the worst in football. Statistically speaking they were the worst rated offense in the NFL in 2006. They gave up a league leading 72 sacks. The Lions gave up the second most at 63 sacks. That's nine sacks worse over 16 games. They were the only team in the NFL to lose over 400 yards from sacks. Do you really think it matters whether Russell can throw the ball 15 yards or 50 yards? Do you really think a rookie QB with a questionable work ethic, an inability to read defenses and is slow of foot can win in a situation like this? No way. Just check out the following image. This is what will happen to Russell about 80 times next year.


     

     

     

    A pick like Joe Thomas would solidify the offensive line at the crucial left tackle spot.  The left tackle spot has emerged as one of the most crucial positions for a football team.  Michael Lewis, author of the critically acclaimed Moneyball, also penned The Blind Side: Evolution of a Game, in which he contends that in the evolution of football "first came the modern, meticulously choreographed passing offense, then the ferocious defensive pass rusher whose bone-crunching quarterback sacks demolished the best-laid passing game, and finally the rise of the left tackle-the offensive lineman tasked with protecting the quarterback from the pass rusher-whose presence is felt only through the game-deciding absence of said sacks. A rare creature combining 300 pounds of bulk with 'the body control of a ballerina,' the anonymous left tackle who is now often a team's highest-paid player."  The importance of the left tackle position can not be over stated so if you have an opportunity to land a franchise offensive tackle, as many scouts believe Thomas will be, then you land him.

    Now some will say that the Raiders already wasted a pick on a "franchise" left tackle by drafting Robert Gallery in 2004.  First of all, Thomas is a much better left tackle than Robert Gallery.  While there are some similarities, there are also crucial differences.  Like Gallery, Thomas is huge. He checked in at the combine at 6-6

    0 (0 Ratings)

    USC Trojans: The Rich Get Richer (Or Do They?)

    Friday, April 20, 2007, 07:55 AM EST [General]

    The Associated Press and ESPN are reporting that former Arkansas quarterback Mitch Mustain is transferring to USC. Mustain, the Parade magazine prep player of the year in 2005, sought a transfer release in January and it was granted by The University of Arkansas. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, citing an unnamed source, said Mustain would enroll at USC during the summer semester. He has remained enrolled at Arkansas for the spring semester, but did not participate in the Razorbacks' spring workouts which concluded earlier this month.

    As a transfer, Mustain would have to sit out a year at Southern California which is irrelevant since he is still a work in progress. Mustain completed 69 of 132 passes last season, for 894 yards and 10 touchdowns, with 9 interceptions. He was benched after throwing an interception in a November win over South Carolina, and hardly played again. Also, the Trojans are set at quarterback next year with John David Booty, a Heisman contender coming off a season in which he threw for 3,347 yards with 29 touchdowns. All the more remarkable was that he was a first-year starter. Damian Williams, a teammate of Mustain's at Springdale High School who was a Razorback receiver last season, has also enrolled at USC.

    The rich get richer.

    USC will be a consensus #1 team when the season begins. They return 18 starters from a team that went 11-2 and crushed Michigan in the Rose Bowl. The spring media guide notes that "a case can be made that almost each returning starter is an All-American candidate." That's probably not too far off base. Just on the defensive side of the ball alone you have nose tackle Sedrick Ellis, defensive end Lawrence Jackson (20 career sacks), three stud linebackers -- Keith Rivers, Rey Maualuga and Brian Cushing -- and an athletic, experienced secondary, fronted by sophomore free safety Taylor Mays who may be the next great USC safety. That's six potential All-American's and we haven't even got to the fact that they have a solid offensive line, Booty, and an almost obscene seven first or second year running backs that were Parade prep All -American in High School, three of those seven signed this year. Which brings me to the recruits. Scout.com rated USC the #2 recruiting class in 2007 and the #1 class in 2006. In 2007 they landed 12 of the nations top 100 recruits and in 2006 they hauled in 13 of the top 100. That's 25 top 100 recruits in two years. That means one out of every eight of the top recruits in the country enroll at USC. Landing Mustain and Damian Williams is like adding to that five star recruit count. USC will certainly benefit from bringing in Mustain and Williams.

    Or do they?

    There are three reasons I believe this move will backfire for Pete Carroll and the Men of Troy. Do I think it will have a significant impact on the USC freight train rolling on to a National Championship next season? Heck no. USC is a lock to be playing in New Orleans (and I don't mean for the Sugar Bowl) for the BCS Championship next January. Do I think this could effect the team the following season when Booty bolts to the NFL and Mustain believes it is his time to take the reins of the team? Now that's a more plausible scenario.

    Reason #1: Mustain has a bad attitude. Guys like Palmer, Leinart and Booty are leaders. Good attitude guys that set the standard for their squads. Mitch Mustain is no Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart or John David Booty. Kurt Voigt, prep sports editor at The Morning News in Springdale, wrote a book about Springdale's 2005 season. In the book he says that while being recruited, Mustain was concerned about the Hogs' offense. After Houston Nutt took credit for a play call following an Arkansas win, Mustain said the Razorbacks "would have a better chance of getting me if Nutt were fired." Are you kidding me? A high school player going on record saying the college 10 minutes down the road from his house would have a better chance at landing him if the coach was fired? That takes a big ego and an even bigger set of stones. Houston Nutt went to school at Arkansas and he brought that program back to life. I wonder what happens the first time Mustain runs his mouth about Pete Carroll and the Trojans play calling. Don't forget, the Trojans lose Lane Kiffin this year so it will be interesting to see how Sarkisian and Carroll handle Mustain.

    Reason #2: Mustain and Williams' parents are meddlesome. By now the story about Mustain, Williams and Ben Cleveland's parents going to see Arkansas AD Frank Broyles last December to complain about Nutt and his play calling is legendary. There comments showed that they were clearly more concerned with their kids stats than for the good of the Arkansas football team. Ben Cleveland's dad wanted to "know what is the direction of Arkansas ' football program?" He asked "are we eventually going to get to Gus ' offense or are we going to stay with the way we are at present ?" Concerns with the present? At the time, Arkansas was 10-2, had won 10 straight games, were leading the SEC West Division and had wins over Vanderbilt, Alabama, Auburn and Tennessee. To have any complaints about a 10-2 team in the SEC, considering the up and down nature of the Arkansas football program over the past few seasons, is laughable. I coach a Junior Pee-Wee Pop Warner football team and I wouldn't put up with parents complaining to my football commissioner about my coaching style, playing time or position decisions whether we were winning or not. Of course my team was 6-0 in our division last year and we won our bowl game 20-0 so there were no complaints but Arkansas was also winning and the parents still went to Broyles with their gripes. Rick Cleveland said " we never would have committed here knowing that this was the offense, because we knew our boys wouldn't be happy." I find his use of the term "we" when discussing the parents quite interesting. What this tells me is that winning (which is what they do at USC) is not enough for these kids. If they are not featured, they won't be happy. here's two more quotes from the meddlesome parent triumvirate.

    "Our boys are used to catching 60 passes a year. They want to go to a college where they get the same opportunity."

    " They are team players... but they're saying, 'Hey, I don't know if I'll be happy being in this offense, catching 10 balls a year or 15 and blocking 90 percent of the time.'"

    They want to catch 60 balls a year? They don't want to block? What would have ever lead them to believe that these things would have been possible at Arkansas? J. J. Meadors, with 62 catches in 1995, is the only Razorback with 60 or more catches in a season in the program's history! And do they think things are going to change much at USC? Dwayne Jarrett, an all american and a sure 1st round pick in the upcoming 2007 NFL draft caught 55 passes in his first year as a starter at USC (2004). Steve Smith only caught 44 passes in his first year as a starter and he's also going to be a first rounder next week. What the heck would lead Damian Williams to believe that he could transfer to USC and catch 60? If these parents were up in arms at Arkansas where there boys would truly have been studs in a year or two, how are they going to handle being at USC where they are barely middle of the pack players? I sure hope USC Athletic Director Mike Garrett is ready for a visit from Mustain's and William's parents. Of course, LA is a lot further away from Sprigdale than Fayetville (by almost 2000 miles) so maybe the angry parents will just call or contact Garrett via e-mail. In case Mrs. Mustain or Mr. Williams are reading this, here's a link to the contact information for USC AD Mike Garrett.

    Reason #3: Mustain is not that good AND USC has some great running backs. So let's put this in perspective. Mustain couldn't keep his starting job at Arkansas where Houston Nutt decided he would rather play Casey Dick (who's about as good a quarterback as Andy Dick) at quarterback OR he would play with no quarterback at all! That's functionally what Arkansas did when they lined up in their "Wildcat" package, an old Single Wing, direct snap offense where you snap the ball to your tailback, let him make a quick read, and then you're off to the races. Now Mustain goes to a team where he is clearly the backup to John David Booty and he may even drop to third string behind Mark Sanchez. He also couldn't share the ball with running backs Darren McFadden and Felix Jones. Now he's on a team with six or seven top flight running backs looking for their touches. I just can't imagine how a couple of "me first" players like Mustain and Williams will fit into Carroll's commune style approach to ball distribution. I'm just not sold on Mustain. Sure he was highly recruited coming out of high school but so were Ron Powlus and Brock Berlin. His stats at Arkansas were meager and he seemed completely out of sync on the field. His first two choices for schools to transfer to, Oklahoma and Louisville, wanted no part of him. If this isn't enough to raise up a red flag, I don't know what is.


    Sometimes, too much of a good thing is not beneficial to your cause. Bringing in Mustain and Williams may turn out to be football's version of one of the seven deadly sins.

    Gluttony.



    0 (0 Ratings)