Script: /blog/orange.one
Owner:
Subdir: clarkdogg

    Ripken and Gwynn Should Be Denied Entrance

    Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 07:47 AM EST [General]

    It was just announced that the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York will be enshrining two players in July.  The honorees will be Cal Ripken, Jr., who spent his entire career with the Baltimore Orioles, and lifetime Padre Tony Gwynn.  On the surface, their induction is a no brainer.  Both men achieve the 3,000 hit mark.  Ripken, for one, was credited with saving baseball after the calamity of the 1995 player's strike by breaking Lou Gehrig's record for consecutive games played.  Gwynn meanwhile won eight batting titles in his career.  In an ordinary year, it would have taken zero explanation for why they were voted in...but as it turns out, this is no ordinary year.

    Overshadowing Ripken and Gwynn is another player whose name appeared on the ballot for the first time this year.  While Ripken nearly set a record by appearing on 98.5% of the ballots and Gwynn was given the green light on 97%, Mark McGwire's name was checked on only 23%.  Like Ripken, McGwire was credited with "saving baseball" when his historic chase for the single season home run record (along with Sammy Sosa's competition) fueled a media frenzy that made the sport interesting again.  During that Summer of 1998, McGwire not only caught Roger Maris' 61 home run mark, he shattered it and achieved a mark that many believed would never be caught again when he smashed home run number 70 on the final day of the season.  This was not the first time McGwire had achieved records.  As a rookie in 1987, "Big Mac" (as he was affectionately referred to as throughout his playing days) set a rookie record of 49 home runs, missing his shot at becoming the first player to hit fifty in over a decade when he missed the final weekend for the birth of his first child.  He then became the first player to hit more than thirty in his first four seasons.  In all, had it not been for missing most of three seasons to injuries, as well as retiring early due to injuries, McGwire likely would have smashed the career record for bombs.  Teams McGwire played for were also more successful due to his presence.  Unlike Ripken and Gwynn, McGwire does have a World Series ring.  Without a doubt, McGwire was always a bigger draw than either of the players who cruised into the Hall this year.

    The odds of McGwire ever joining them is slim, though.  While his press conferences in 1998 were fawned over, the same men who deified him then have made him a pariah due to another interview that was less to their liking.  In 2005, the U.S. Senate held hearings about steroids in the game of baseball, mainly because of an investigation that had uncovered a lab that provided the illegal drugs to Barry Bonds.   There was also a "tell all" book from a disgraced former teammate of McGwire that implicated "Big Mac" as a steroid user.  During the hearings, McGwire basically pled the fifth amendment and was prosecuted in the courtroom of public opinion.  Other players called in to testify, and certainly just as guilty, adamently denied any wrongdoing.  One player, Rafael Palmerio, was later caught in the newly instituted drug testing.  However, since these players went on the record (likely perjuring themeselves), they have been given more lenience.

    At the heart of the matter is that these players played in a flawed generation.  McGwire's rookie year of 1987 saw an explosion in home runs.  In all, twenty-eight players surpassed the thirty home run mark.  Only thirteen had done so the two years prior.  Cracking the top-50 in the sport required at least 26 bombs.  To explain light hitters like Matt Nokes and Mike Pagliarulo being able to smash more than thirty home runs, the conspiracy theorists hatched up a story about Rawlings wrapping the balls tighter.  Major League Baseball laughed off the loony suggestion and ignored the actual cause (all players developing forearms like Popeye) of amazing home run production.  And why wouldn't they?  The fans loved watching the majestic blasts and the media enjoyed writing about them.  Seats were filled constantly and new stadiums popped up like Starbucks.

    No player filled those new seats better than the goliath known as Big Mac.  His arrival in a visiting town did for baseball what a Michael Jordan road trip did for basketball.  In a world of steroid popping players, where former defensive specialists were a threat to clear the bases on a hung slider, none of them held a candle to Mark McGwire.  Yet the most dominant player of the generation will be punished while those who did the same, with fewer results, will probably get their invite to Cooperstown.

    Which brings me to the current inductees:  Why do they deserve enshrinement?  If McGwire is disqualified because he is known to have taken a supplement called Andro (which was not only allowed by MLB, but legal to buy at any mall front vitamin store) and suspected of taking worse--why are Ripken and Gwynn above suspicion of cheating?  Ripken played in more than 2,600 consecutive games without ever taking a break.  It was rare for him to even come out of a game early.  Who is to say he never took a steroid cycle to improve his recovery time and help him get over the sprains and strains that kept other players from making the same achievement?  Tony Gwynn was never a big power hitter, but he was known to use an extremely tiny bat to make sure his bat speed was good enough to spray singles.  Could he have corked his bat to give him an even lighter bat?  Obviously, I have no proof of either of these things, but there should be a cloud of suspicion in this extremely cynical era we live.

    Then, of course, there are the other players who played during the time frame McGwire shook fear into opposing pitchers.  My favorite player, Kirby Puckett, saw his home run numbers explode in the late eighties after beginning his career as a doubles hitter.  Perhaps he had some chemical help.  Nolan Ryan somehow managed to get better as he reached his fourth decade of life.  Steroids certainly could have helped his body recover quicker between starts.  Should every player who took the field from 1987 to 2001 have their plaque removed?

    As I see it, the Baseball Hall of Fame's purpose is to honor the greatest players of every generation.  Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth were enshrined even though their behavior was certainly upsetting to the fanbase of their time, because their exploits on the field were greater than their contemporaries.  Now, the voters want the Hall to become an arbiter of moral values.  In that case, only Dale Murphy and his boy scout behavior is probably the only player who belongs.  Of course, he again was denied admittance this year--which is probably just as well, he had some suspicious home run spikes once the steroid era began.  As the current precedent shows, suspiscion is all it takes.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    OKC First Scouting Report...

    Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 01:27 PM EST [Chapel Hill Basketball]

    SCOUTING REPORT FOR OKC FIRST:

    Shooter

    They have a ton of big guys, but this is really the guy who killed us last game.  We kept leaving him alone on the three point line and he made us pay.

    Point Guard

    This guy likes to run the point for some reason, and occasionally he will drive into the paint.  I, for one, will not be taking a charge from him, so it's best to keep him out on the perimeter where it's safe.

    LaMarcus Aldridge lookalike

    This guy is taller than anyone we've got, but he fell in love with the three point shot last game and bricked enough to keep us competitive.  That's where we want him to stay.

    Shed

    Shed is good.  When he's aggressive, he can score at will.  The refs love him and call whatever he demands, which only makes him that much more dangerous.  I have noticed in the past that he tends to be late to six o'clock games, so maybe that trend will continue.  He's also out of shape, so if we run them, he can be neutralized.

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Upset Watches...

    Thursday, March 16, 2006, 03:05 PM EST [NCAA BB]

    I'm a dork. Under no circumstances do I deny this. That being said, I analyzed every first round games using statistical trends from previous tournaments and came up with the following games as the most likely to have the higher seeded team win:

     


     OAKLAND BRACKET

    2 UCLA vs 15 Belmont

    Belmont showed promise early, but apparently stopped playing with about 25 minutes of game left on the clock.


     ATLANTA BRACKET 

    None


    MINNEAPOLIS BRACKET

    4 Boston College vs. 13 Pacific

    BC won, but it took them two OT's

    5 Nevada vs. 12 Montana

    Montana pulled it off.

    7 Georgetown vs. 10 Northern Iowa

     


     

    WASHINGTON D.C. BRACKET

    2 Tennessee vs. 15 Winthrop

    Curtis Lofton's miracle shot with .4 seconds prevented this one.

    4 Illinois vs. 13 Air Force

    Air Force looked good early, but ran out of steam when Illinois' patriotism ran out.

    7 Wichita State vs. 10 Seton Hall

    Blew that one!  Wichita State owned that game from the tip off.


    MISSED UPSETS

     6 Oklahoma vs. 11 University Wisconsin - Milwaukee

    While the OU/UW-Milwaukee game didn't meet the criteria to hit my upset watch, it wasn't by much. For an eleven seed to meet the standard, they must score 75 points per game and have a point differential of greater than 6 points for the season. UMW won games by an average of 7.8 points, but only averaged 74 points per game. Apparently, it isn't a perfect system.  I actually did pick UW-M to win this game in my bracket and took them as my "Cinderella" in the side pool.

    7 Marquette vs. 10 Alabama

    A ten seed is most likely to pull off an upset if they have not gone to the tournament for more than three consecutive seasons and if their coach has been to the tournament less than five times.  Mark Gottfried is coaching in his sixth NCAA tournament and Alabama is a fixture in the tournament.  The Crimson Tide tried to stick with the trend, but Marquette could not capitalize down the stretch.

    5 Syracuse vs. 12 Texas A&M

    The indications that a 12 seed is a good candidate for an upset are that the team played in the prior year's tournament and that the team's scoring is frontcourt heavy (55-75%).  A&M is in their first tournament since 1987 and approximately 53% of their scoring comes from the frontcourt.  Oddly enough, I convinced my wife that Syracuse would be a likely first round loser because of what happened last week in the Big East tournament.  My reasoning was that Gerry McNamara's (who she calls McNamoron) head got so large due to all of the media love he received that he would confuse it with the basketball leading to turnovers.  Then, I ran the numbers and advanced the Orangemen to round 2 on my own bracket.  Now who's the McNamoron?


    0 (0 Ratings)

    Good bye Kirby...

    Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 08:09 AM EST [Kirby Puckett]

    There are some events that always resonate so well in your memory that just thinking about it takes you back to that moment. Kirby hitting that homerun in game 6 of the 1991 Series is one of those for me. I remember that I was babysitting my little sisters while my parents were out for the evening and I was wearing the replica Twins jersey my aunt from Minneapolis sent me for my birthday a month earlier. When Liebrandt's circle change left the yard, I was so excited I did a lap around the block, sprinting and screaming the whole time.

    I even remember the last time Kirby played a ball game and how it ended with him leaving after being hit by a pitch in the face. Supposedly, he bled so much that the dirt in the batter's box became mud.  At the time, I was so angry at the pitcher, not because he did it on purpose (he probably didn't), but because it meant Kirby would be leaving the game too early. Little did I know it would be the last of Kirby on the field ever.

    The next Spring, Kirby announced that glaucoma had claimed his sight in one eye and that he would have to retire. I was a senior in high school, and very little could make me cry by that point. Realizing that my hero was riding off into the sunset too early was one of them.

    Now, Kirby has left this Earth too early. As someone who cherished every at bat I was able to see from him and every play he made on the field for my beloved Twins, I can take comfort knowing that his spirit will live on in our memories.
    0 (0 Ratings)

    Trade Deadline Aftermath...

    Friday, February 24, 2006, 03:08 PM EST [General]

    The trading deadline in the NBA is a day I look forward to like a child does Christmas morning.  There are only a few days like this for me.  Major League Baseball's trade deadline, the NBA draft, national signing day, the NFL draft, the first day of March Madness...ironically, Christmas is not one of those days.

    Now that the deadline has passed, it is time to analyze the outcome of the buzzer beating deals:


     

    TRADE # 1:  Seattle Supersonics/Sacramento Kings/Denver Nuggets/Portland Trail Blazers

    The first deal to go down was the days largest blockbuster.  (Blockbuster may be a little strong.)  In it, the Sonics came away with the biggest prize in Earl Watson.  (Prize may be a little strong.)

    Sonics:

    Players Received:  PG - Earl Watson, SG/SF Bryon Russell, and a future second round pick, all from Denver

    Players Given up:  C - Vitaly Potapenko to Sacramento, PF - Reggie Evans to Denver

    From a talent standpoint, the Sonics gave up more than they brought in even though they claimed the most sought after player who changed hands on the day.  Watson will be the Sonics second string point guard (something the Sonics sorely needed).  He is a huge upgrade over Rick Brunson and will give the team a better defensive presence on the perimeter when he spells Luke Ridnour.

    That being said, the Sonics filled one void and created another.  What made the Sonics so strong last season was a backcourt of Ridnour, Ray Allen, and Rashard Lewis that filled up the hoop, and a platoon of big men who gooned it up on the inside.  In the past few weeks, the Sonics have jettisoned three of those post players, leaving a skeleton crew who will now have to ration their fouls.  On the other hand, that dynamic was not working well this season, perhaps due to the constant discord of the goon squad.  Both Evans and Potapenko had requested a trade, and Danny Fortson (who is still in Seattle) also demanded to be moved.  Freeing up playing time may create more harmony.

    Bryon Russell was a salary cap throw-in with an expiring contract.

    Denver:

    Players Received:  PF - Reggie Evans from Seattle, SF - Ruben Patterson and SG - Charles Smith from Portland

    Players Given up:  PG - Earl Watson, SG/SF Bryon Russell, and a future second round pick to Seattle, and SG - Voshon Lenard to Portland.

    Denver exchanged problem children and still failed to bring in the sharpshooting two guard they have coveted for two seasons now.  They did bring in a talented rebounder in Evans who will provide depth on a front court maligned with injuries.  Ruben Patterson will bring defensive tenacity that has been missing with a banged up Eduardo Najera.  The fact that Patterson and Evans both wore out their welcome on their previous teams can only be mitigated because the Nuggets were able to schlough off two guards who had complained about playing for Denver.

    Portland:

    Players Received:  SG - Voshon Lenard from Denver, PF - Brian Skinner from Sacramento

    Players Given up:  SF - Ruben Patterson, SG - Charles Smith to Denver, SF - Sergei Monia to Sacramento

    Portland may have come out best in this deal.  They receive some salary cap relief by exiling the pouty (and perhaps rapist-y) Patterson for Lenard.  They also picked up a useful power forward who can spell Zach Randolph in Skinner.  Being able to get rid of another player who helped to create the team's bad public persona slightly make up for the team's failure to win the Penny Hardaway cap relief derby.

    Sacramento:

    Players Received:  SF - Sergei Monia from Portland, C - Vitaly Potapenko from Seattle

    Players Given up:  PF - Brian Skinner to Portland

    In return for one reserve, the Kings brought in two reserves.  Considering Sacramento's lack of depth, this trade provided them with a decent value.


     

    TRADE # 2:  Oklahoma City Hornets/New Jersey Nets

    Oklahoma City:

    Players Received:  PF/C - Marc Jackson, PF - Linton Johnson

    Players Given up:  SF - Bostjan Nachbar

    Fans of the Hornets appear to be disgruntled by this move.  Odds are it is because their expectations were too high in anticipation of something involving J.R. Smith.  (There was a wild--and collective bargaining agreement illegal--rumor of Smith being packaged with David West and two first round picks for Kevin Garnett.)  Considering what the Hornets had to achieve before the deadline, this was a fantastic acquisition, though.  Considering that "Birdman" Andersen is out of the league and that Jackson Vroman is out for the season after breaking his wrist, two power forwards for the little used Nachbar was a coup.  While getting a superstar post man is always an objective, it is typically little more than a dream...particularly considering what assets the Hornets had to trade.  So, a solid but unspectacular body with six fouls and the capability to rebound should have tickled the fanbase (particularly when they were pumped at the prospect of bringing in Steven Hunter only a couple of weeks ago).

    Losing Nachbar means the Hornets have no outside sniper unless Arvydas Macijauskas starts showing life.  Considering how often Nachbar actually came through as an outside sniper, though, they are basically in the same boat now.

    Supposedly, another deal was turned in by the Hornets.  The Hornets would have sent J.R. Smith to San Antonio and the Spurs would have shipped Brent Barry to a mystery third team.  That third team would have sent a player (rumored to be a big man) to Oklahoma City and Byron Scott was reportedly excited about the deal.  Unfortunately, the paperwork was faxed in about five minutes past the deadline and was nixed by the league.  Now, Smith and Scott are fueding through the media after Smith threw a tantrum and Scott accused him of lying.  Look for Smith the be traded before the draft.

    New Jersey:

    Players Received:  SF - Bostjan Nachbar

    Players given up:  PF/C - Marc Jackson, PF - Linton Johnson

    "Bokie" may become the outside shooter he threatens to bein pregame warm-ups when the clock is running at some point, but that was not New Jersey's goal in making this deal.  If they could have traded Jackson for nothing more than a Charlotte second rounder, they would have pulled the trigger there first.  What motivated the Nets was shaving a couple million dollars from their payroll in hopes of skating under the luxury tax threshold at season's end.


     

    TRADE # 3:  Cleveland Cavaliers/Seattle Supersonics

    Cleveland Cavaliers

    Players Received:  SG - Ronald "Flip" Murray

    Players given up:  SG - Mike Wilks

    This is the coup of the day, and it has not received nearly enough coverage.  The Cavs were in need of a shooting guard since they may be without Larry Hughes until the playoffs, and they basically stole Murray from Seattle.  For those who do not remember, or never knew, Murray was fantastic two seasons ago for the Sonics when Ray Allen was hurt.  Then, when Allen came back, minutes were scarce for Flip, who has been in a sort of pergatory ever since.

    Murray could have vetoed this trade, and forfeited his "Bird Rights" which could have been used to get a bigger contract next Summer when he will likely be a hot commodity.  He is taking a calculated risk that he will be able to show the same form of two seasons ago as an audition for a team with cap space.

    Seattle Supersonics:

    Players received:  SG - Mike Wilks

    Players given up:  SG - Ronald "Flip" Murray

    They got nothing.  This was done specifically to grant Murray a chance he deserves.


     

    TRADE # 4:  Cleveland Cavaliers/Philadelphia 76ers

    Clevaland Cavaliers:

    Players Received:  SF - Lee Nailon, and a 2006  second round pick

    Players given up:  A conditional 2006 second round pick

    Again, the Cavs got something (that may be overstating) for nothing.  Nailon was another player who showed promise multiple seasons ago before being buried in depth charts.  He has the ability to score and may be used as a sparkplug off the bench for the Cavs.

    Philadelphia 76ers:

    Players Received:  A conditional 2006 second round pick

    Players given up:  SF - Lee Nailon, and a 2006  second round pick

    They gave up a second round pick and a little used player for a possible pick.  I have no clue why they made this deal.


     

    In all, it was a pretty lame trade deadline.  No big stars changed hands, and most playoff contenders took the day off.

     

    0 (0 Ratings)

    First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last